Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kosaraju Nageswara Rao Vs. M/S. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
(Circuit Bench at Vijayawada) Oral Order : (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The Complainant is the appellant. The appeal is filed challenging the order of the District Forum on the aspect of quantum of compensation awarded as inadequate. 2. The appellant insured with the respondent his Lorry bearing Registration No. AP 20X 3447 for a sum of Rs.9 lakhs. The respondent issued insurance policy bearing No. 462-100/31/20.12/634 for the period commencing from 28.04.2011 till 27.04.2012. 3. The vehicle met with an accident on 20.08.2011 at Kolkata and the appellant had given intimation about the accident to the respondent which deputed surveyor Chenchal Biswas to visit the place of accident and conduct spot survey. The surveyor conducted spot survey and undertook photographs of the damaged vehicle on 22.08.2011 and he submitted report on 09.09.2011. The surveyor had not mentioned in his report any amount assessed as damage. 4. The appellant shifted the vehicle from the place where the acc...
Agnivesh Gupta Vs. Hdfc Bank Ltd., Regional Head (Ap and Chennai) and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The petitioner who is complainant in C.C.No.590/2010 as party in person filed the present transfer application seeking transfer of the said C.C. from District Forum-III, Hyderabad to any Forum in city or Ranga Reddy District Forum. Heard the petitioner in person and counsel for the respondents. It may not be necessary for us to go into the various aspects raised in the complaint or in the transfer application for the reason that the counsel for the respondents stated that he has no objection if the matter is transferred to any Forum. In those circumstances, the said C.C.No.590/2010 is hereby withdrawn and transferred to District Forum-II, Hyderabad. Accordingly this transfer application is allowed transferring the matter i.e. C.C.No.590/2010 to District Forum-II, Hyderabad. There shall be no order as to costs....
D. Arjunudu and Others Vs. Akshya Gold Farms and Villas India Limited ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The complainants, 100 in number, approached this Commission U/s.17 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and filed the present complaint seeking directions to the opposite parties to pay Rs.18,98,150/- towards refund of the amount as agreed by the opposite parties and to pay Rs.9,49,575/- towards compensation as mentioned in the consolidated table totalling to Rs.28,48,725/- together with interest thereon @ 24% p.a. from the date of the complaint till realization together with costs. The case in brief is that the opposite parties which are in the business of real estate collected amounts from the complainants under a scheme, which is called œAkshya Gold?. In terms of the scheme, the first complainant paid Rs.5000/- on 30-6-2010 to opposite party No.1 on a condition that the first complainant would be paid Rs.7500/- on 29-6-2013 in case he does not require the site of 5 plots/units and the first complainant is also said to have insurance co...
1.Abdul Aziz, Vs. State of A.P., Through Intelligence Offi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.4145 of 2014 29-04-2014 1.Abdul Aziz, 2. Mohd. Ismail Shaik Petitioners/A.2 & A.3 State of A.P., through Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Sub- Zone, Hyderabad. Respondent/ Complainant Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P. Amarender Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri V. Gopala Krishna Gokhale, Spl. Public Prosecutor for NCB : ?. Cases referred:1. 1996 Crl.L.J.900 (Orissa) 2.2013 (13) Scale 295 3.1992 CRI.L.J.2929 4.1993 CRI.L.J.1785 5.2001 CRI.L.J.3183 6.2013 (12) Scale 552 HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.4145 of 2014 Date:29. 04-2014 ORDER: The petitioners are A.2 & A.3 in NCB.F.No.48/1/2/2013/NCB/HYD of Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB, for short) South Zone, Hyderabad. They allegedly committed offences under Sections 8(c) read with Sections 22, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act, for short). Out of 7 accused, 6 accused moved for grant of bail. I granted b...
Malladi Krishnayya S/O. Satyanarayana an Vs. Tadikonda Siva Suryapraka ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.1313 OF199829-04-2014 Malladi Krishnayya S/o. Satyanarayana and another . Appellants Tadikonda Siva Suryaprakasa Rao (died) S/o. Krishnayya and two others .. Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Smt. Bhaskara Lakshmi Counsel for the Respondents: Sri O. Manohar Reddy : : ?. Cases referred:1. 2002 (1) SCC3672. 2002 (4) ALT5253. (1964) 7 SCR6684. (1992) 1 SCC5085. 2004(2) SCC297HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.1313 of 1998 JUDGMENT: The plaintiffs who filed the suit for Rs.3,15,853.50 Ps. with subsequent interest against the sole defendant which is for recovery of Ex.A1-suit pro-note dated 09.01.1988 principal sum of Rs.1,74,000/- with interest thereon @ 27% per annum simple from the date of pro-note till date of suit (the suit filed on 16.01.1991 in view of the intervening Pongal vacation to the Courts from 01.01.1991 to 15.01.1991 both days inclusive) which interest comes to Rs.1,41,853.50, thus the suit claim i...
Kum. Karri Ramya Lathasri D/O.Satyanaray Vs. the State of A.P Through ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO Criminal Petition No.4766 of 2014 29-04-2014 Kum. Karri Ramya Lathasri D/o.Satyanarayana Reddy, Aged 19 years, Occ: Student, R/o.Pandalapaka Village,Biccavole Mandal,E.G.Dist.. Petitoner The State of A.P through P.S Undrajavaram,West Godavari District,Rep. by Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad and two others...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri K. Gani Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 &3: .. : : ?. Cases referred:1. (2012) 4 Supreme Court Cases 684 2. 2013 (2) ALD (Crl.) 535 (AP) 3. 2014(3) SCC4714. 2012(8) SCC795THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.4766 of 2014 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C by the petitioner/A.2 in Crime No.23 of 2014, on the file of the Station House Officer, Undrajavam Police Station, West Godavari District registered for the offence punishable under 3(i)(x) and (xi) of Scheduled Castes an...
K.Narasimha C Vs. the General Manager( Personnel) and Two
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.24732 OF201329-04-2014. K.NARASIMHA CHARY..PETITIONER The General Manager( Personnel) and Two others RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.V. SREE RANGA RAO Counsel for the respondents :Sr.Nandigam Krishna Rao. : ?.CITATIONS: (1)2013 (5) ALT691(2)(1995) 4 SCC172HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION No.24732 of 2013 ORDER: The petitioner is a workman without much of educational background; respondent, a Colliery Company. In this litigious combination, the leitmotif is: the dispute of date of birth. This problem is a proverbial phoenix that always rises from the adjudicatory residuae ashes, notwithstanding numerous judicial pronouncements on this aspect. The petitioner, a Sub-Station Attendant, initially secured his employment on 24.04.1977 as a Badili Filler in the respondent company. Having secured promotions as Coal Filler in 1979 and as General Mazdhoor in 1985, later eventually as Sub-Station Attendant, the petition...
A.Suseelamma and Others Vs. the District Educational Officer, Nellor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.33314 of 2013 29-04-2014 A.Suseelamma and others....PETITIONERS The District Educational Officer, Nellore,SPSR Nellore District and others.....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.M.V.Narasimham Counsel for respondents: Government Pleader for Education : ?. Cases referred: Nil HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION No.33314 of 2013 ORDER: It is yet another instance to illustrate the attitude of the officials who seem to strongly believe that the orders or judgments of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are non-implementable or non- executable unless there is an execution petition filed in the style of a contempt case by taking recouRs.to Article 215 of the Constitution of India as well as Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Sad state of affairs to witness. The callous and impervious, if not imperious, attitude of the officials to the solemn judicial directives of unquestionable effica...
M/S. Just Dial Limited Vs. M/S. Comwen Information Technologies Pvt. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) This revision petition is directed against the order passed by the District Forum in I.A.No.113/2014 in C.C.No.237/2014 dated 10-4-2014 whereby the District Forum-III, Hyderabad by its order directed the opposite party not to stop the services of the petitioner i.e. complainant pursuant to the contract dated 28-3-2014. It appears that there was a contract between the respondent/complainant and the petitioner/opposite party for a period of one year but however as the opposite party is not adhering to the terms of the said contract and providing services as agreed upon, the complainant approached the District Forum and filed the complaint and the same is numbered as C.C.No.237/2014. In the said C.C. it also filed I.A.No.113/2014 seeking an interim injunction not to stop the services pursuant to the contract dated 28-3-2014. The District Forum having considered the said petition and also the submissions granted interim direction as prayed for....
V. Ashok and Ot Vs. District Collector, Hyderabad District a
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.28738 of 2011 28-04-2014 V. Ashok and others.PETITIONERS District Collector, Hyderabad District and others.RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioners:MR. H. VENU GOPAL Counsel for Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE R1 & R2 MR. MAHMOOD ALI R3 GIST : HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. 2011 (2) ALD424(DB) 2. (1994) 1 SCC13. AIR1970SC1THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.28738 of 2011 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition questions the impugned show cause notice dated 11.10.2011 wherein the first respondent purported to review his earlier order in File No.B2/12954/2008 dated 09.04.2009. The review proposed to be made by virtue of the show cause notice, referred to above, is by purported exercise of power under Section 166 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act 1317 Fasli (for short the Act).2. Petitioners state that they are owners and possessors of an extent of Ac.10.00 guntas of lan...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »