Andhra Pradesh Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Chit Vs. 1.Kesari Ravi and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.419 of 2009 11-03-2014 National Insurance Co.LTD.Chittoor..Appellant 1.Kesari Ravi and another..Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.Ramachandra Reddy Gai Counsel for Respondent No.1:Sr.T.Damodar Counsel for Respondent No.3:Sr.Md.Saleem : ?.Cases referred: 1986 (2) ALT606THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.419 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the award dated 29-03-2004 in O.P.No.123 of 2000 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle (for short ".the Tribunal".) the National Insurance Company Limited/3rd respondent in the O.P preferred the instant appeal. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) Kesari Ravi - injured is the claimant. His case is that he works as a cleaner in the jeep bearing No.AP04T2341owned by the 2nd respondent, insured with 3rd respondent. While so, on 17-03-2000 at about 8 am when the claimant was proceeding in his jeep as a cleaner, the jee...
Boddu Penchalaiah ...Rev Vs. Boddu Penchala Narsaiah and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CRP No.696 of 2014 11-03-2014 Boddu Penchalaiah ...Revision Petitioner Boddu Penchala Narsaiah and others ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.T.C.Krishnan Counsel for the Respondents: ---- : : ?.Cases Referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No.696 of 2014 Order: This revision is filed seeking to direct the lower Court to dispose of the petition in IA No.550 of 2013 in IA No.533 of 2013 in OS No.220 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudur, which is filed for grant of police aid in implementing the ad-interim injunction granted in IA No.533 of 2013, dated 18.11.2013. The revision petitioner herein is the plaintiff. He filed the suit for permanent injunction against the respondents. He also filed I.A.No.533 of 2013 for grant of interim injunction. The lower Court granted interim injunction on 18.11.2013. According to the petitioner, the said orders were served on the respondents. It...
Mujeebunissa Begum W/O.Mohd. Irfa Vs. Government of A.P., Rep.by Itspr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NOs.4222 of 2011 AND BATCH1103-2014 Mujeebunissa Begum W/o.Mohd. Irfan...Petitioner Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.Pushpinder Kaur. Counsel for respondents: Learned Government Pleader for Home HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1 (2006) 8 SCC1612 (2000) 5 SCC1703 (1981) 1 SCC1074 (1999) 7 SCC3555 (2003) 10 SCC786 (2004) 1 SCC6167 (1976) 1 SCC1578 AIR1975Punjab & Haryana 148 (FB) 9 (1989) 1 SCC20410 (1998) 4 SCC7511 AIR2000S.C.937 12 AIR1966AP35(FB) 13 AIR1984SC68414 (1969) 1 SCC14215 1982 Crl. L.J.961 16 AIR1986SC31217 1991 Crl.L.J.2068 18 (1990) 4 SCC40619 (1995) 2 SCC76820 AIR1967SC131821 12 Bom FCR122 Judgment in WP No.22823 of 2009, dated 28.01.2010 23 Judgment in W.P.No.24583 of 2009 dated 21.01.2010 THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.Nos.4222, 9733, 16800 of 2011, 20680 of 2012 & 36235 of 2013 Com...
Dodakula Dr. Vijaya Kumar Vs. C. Chandramma and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
Oral Order : (Gopala Krishna Tamada, President) 1) This appeal is directed against the orderdt.21.1.2013 in CC 104 of 2012 on the file of Dist. Forum, Mahabubnagar whereby the complaint filed by the respondent herein was allowed and the appellant and Op1 were jointly and severally directed to pay Rs. 5 lakhs towards compensation and costs of Rs. 1,000/-. 2) Brief facts are as under: The complainant i.e., the respondent No. 1 who is the mother of the deceased C. Renuka filed the said complaint stating that her daughter developed ear pain and in that context, she was taken to the hospital run by Op1 where her daughter was advised to undergo minor surgery. Immediately, her daughter was taken into the Operation Theatre where she was administered anaesthesia by Op2 and thereafter she was operated on the nose instead of ear. Immediately, she developed complications, hence the complainant was advised to take the patient to Hyderabad for better treatment. In the process, the patient i.e., the ...
Budi Mathsya LIn Vs. the State of A.P., Rep.by Public Prosecu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, CRL.A.No.1735 of 2009 11-03-2014 Budi Mathsya Lingam...APPELLANT/ACCUSED THE STATE OF A.P., REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD....RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.K.Suresh Reddy Counsel Counsel for the respondent:Public Prosecutor : ?.Citations: JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C., by the sole accused in S.C.No.162 of 2008 on the file of the VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC).Visakhapatnam. Through its judgment, dated 30.10.2009, the trial Court convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, for causing the death of another person, with the same name, as the accused, on 23.12.2007 at 5.00 p.m.Sentence of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.200/-, in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one month, was imposed. The case, as presented by the pros...
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp Vs. Smt.Palepu Mamatha,smt. M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.197 of 2009 and batch 10-03-2014 Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, rep. by its Managing Director,Mushirabad, Hyderabad....Appellant Smt.Palepu Mamatha,Smt. Manne Gangubai...Respondents Counsel for Appellant:Smt. B.G.Uma Devi Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.M. Rajamalla Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.N. Sreedhar Reddy : ?. Cases referred: 1. 2013 ACJ14032. 2009 ACJ1298= (2009) 6 SCC1213. 2004 (1) ALD1174. 1987 ACJ7725. 2011 ACJ6626. (2013) 1 ACC5037. AIR1976SC2595THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A Nos.197 and 1675 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 01.11.2007 in O.P No.1002 of 2001 passed by the Chairman, I Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nizamabad (for short ".the Tribunal".) the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation/1st respondent in the O.P preferred M.A.C.M.A No.197 of 2009 questioning the quantum of compensation and the claimant preferr...
N.Srinivas and Anot Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. B
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.12214 OF200810-03-2014 N.Srinivas and another...Petitioners The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary H.M.A & U.D.A Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others.. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu Counsel for the Respondents: G.P.for Municipal Admn. & Urban Area Development : : ?.Cases referred 1 AIR1956SC1102 1981 (1) ALT463 1994 (3) ALT73(F.B.) 4 AIR1991SC14535 1921 (2) K.B. 716 6 (1995) 5 SCC762HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.12214 and 17943 of 2008 In spite of Dr.Thomas Fuller's warning in 1733 saying 'be ye never so high, the law is above you' and reiterated later by Lord Denning, still some feel that they can violate law with impunity.2. These two writ petitions are disposed of by a common order in view of the common issue involved in them. FACTS OF THE CASE:3. The parties are described, for the sake of convenience, as they are array...
J.K.Cold Tyre Retraders,kathipudi, Rep. Vs. United Indiainsurancecompa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.806 OF200910-03-2014 J.K. Cold Tyre Retraders,Kathipudi, Rep. by Proprietor Kotha Jagadeesh, S/o.Atchuta Ramaraju, Aged about 33 years, JK Cold Tyre Retraders, Kathipudi, E.G.District.-----Appellant. United India Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by Sr. Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Kakinada and another......Respondents. Counsel for Appellant : Sri J.Prabhakar. Counsel for Respondents.: Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala. GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred :1. 2010 (3) ALD290(DB) 2. AIR2003SC26293. 2007 (1) ALT515(DB) 4. 1999 (9) SCC2835. AIR1963SC216. 13 CLJ3997. AIR1952Punj. 364 8. 1951 ALJ6749. AIR1989Delhi 175 10. AIR1992Orissa 23 11. 1924 Bombay 149 12. AIR1988Guj. 23 13. AIR1988SC179114. AIR1989SC126315. (2003) 12 SCC47416. (2009) 5 SCC67817. (2012) 5 SCC30618. (2006) 11 SCC181This Court made the following : HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SAT...
M/S. Suchir India Developers Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Y. Lakshmi
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The opposite parties are the appellants and this appeal is directed against the orders in C.CNo.835/2010 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad dated 06-3-2013 whereby the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent herein was allowed and the opposite parties/appellants were directed to return the entire sale consideration that has been paid by the respondent with interest at 18% p.a. etc., The brief facts that led to the filing of the complaint are as under: The appellants are developers and builders and on the basis of their attractive colourful brochures etc., the complainant/respondent being attracted purchased a plot admeasuring 200 sq. yds. by paying an initial amount of Rs.10,500/- towards admission fee. Thereafter she became a member of the scheme introduced by the opposite parties and thus parted a total sum of Rs.40,000/- towards plot allotment charges, Rs.5,30,000/- towards the cost of the plot and a further sum of Rs.10,0...
Bajaj Life Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Suru Rohini
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
Oral Order : (Gopala Krishna Tamada, President) 1) M/s. Bajaj Life Insurance Company Ltd., is the appellant and this appeal is filed challenging the order dt. 28.1.2013 in CC 51 of 2012 on the file of Dist. Forum, Vizianagaram whereby the complaint filed by the respondent herein was allowed and the appellant was directed to pay Rs. 3 lakhs with interest @ 12% p.a., from the date of death of the deceased till the date of payment together with compensation of Rs. 10,000/- and costs of Rs. 2,000/-. 2) It is mainly contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that for obvious reasons they could not contest the matter, and in those circumstances, subsequent to pronouncement of orders, it came to light that the husband of the respondent herein had undergone treatment at Nizams Instituteof Medical Sciences(NIMS) prior to obtaining of the policy, and in those circumstances, the respondents husband is not entitled to any amount under the said policy. 3) From a perusal of the order, it is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »