Andhra Pradesh Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bheemari Srini Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.1772 of 2009 13-03-2014 Bheemari Srinivas Appellant State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri P.Sajan Kumar Counsel for respondent : Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : . HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1772 of 2009 Dated:13. 03.2014 Criminal Appeal No.1772 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. is filed by the sole accused in S.C.No.490 of 2008 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Karimnagar. He was alleged to have committed the murder of his wife Yellavva on 22-08-2007. The trial Court convicted him for the offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C and imposed punishment of imprisonment for life, and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for two months.2. The fac...
Vaddi Nagaiah S/O. Ram Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1769 OF201013-03-2014 Vaddi Nagaiah S/o. Ramulu Appellant State of A.P., rep. By Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri K. Chaitnya Counsel for the Respondent :Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases referred : AIR2004SC1714HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1769 of 2009 JUDGMENT:(Per Honble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The appellant herein was tried by the Court of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet, in S.C. No.423 of 2008 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 304-B IPC.2. The case pleaded by the prosecution against the accused was as under: The accused married Vijaya, the daughter of PW-1, five years prior to the incident. On 14.11.2007, PW-1 received information about 12.00 noon that his daughter died by hanging to a log in the hut of the accused. Soon a...
Killo Kameswara R Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEM.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.1779 of 2009 13-03-2014 Killo Kameswara Rao... Appellant State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Smt. Shanthi Neelam Counsel for respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : .... HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARSIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.A.No.1779 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S.K.Jaiswal) The appellant/accused was convicted by the learned VII-Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam in S.C.No.2 of 2009 on 23.09.2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 324 IPC, and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default simple imprisonment for six months; and fine of Rs.500/- in default simple imprisonment for one month respectively.2. Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution is as under: The accused Killo Kameswara Rao ...
Devendar Gupta and Ano Vs. National Investigation Agency, Rep. by M
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.795 of 2013 12-03-2014 Devendar Gupta and another..appellants National Investigation Agency, rep. by Mr.Mahesh Chandra Ladha, Superintendent of Police, Hyderabad..Respondent Counsel for the appellants: Sr.N. Ramachander Rao, Sr.Counsel Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, Special P.P. GIST: HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1) AIR1958SC792) 2011(3) GLT6153) 2001 SCC (Crl.) 472 THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.795 of 2013 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) On 18-05-2007, which is a Friday, prayers were being offered as usual, in Mecca Masjid, near Charminar, at Hyderabad. A blast took place around 1:25 p.m.Five persons died and many received injuries. Initially, the Station House Officer, Hussaini Alam Police Station registered Crime No.100/2007, alleging offences punishable under Sec...
Shaik Imam Saheb Vs. M/S. K. F. Biotech (P) Ltd, Bangalore, Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
GopalaKrishna Tamada, President 1. Complainant is the appellant and he approached this Commission with the present Appeal questioning the order dated 01.04.2011 in CC 117/2010 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Kadapa Y.S. R. District, whereby, the District Forum has awarded only an amount of Rs.45,500/- as against the claim amount of Rs.17,88,570/-. 2. The case, in brief, as per the complaint filed by the appellant herein is that he owns an extent of Ac.3.00 cents of land in Survey No. 569 and his son by name Shaik Hidayathula owns an extent of Ac.3.40 cents in Survey No. 890 in Vemula Village, Kadapa District. On the advice of the Marketing Executive of OP.1, he ordered for 6000 Grand Naine ( G.9) tissue Banana plants @ Rs.7.50 ps per plant and paid an advance amount of Rs.12,000/-. Subsequently, after receipt of entire plants, he paid the balance sale consideration also. Thereafter, he incurred huge expenditure for plantation of Banana with the said seeds, but, however, it ...
Kesari Haumanth Rao Vs. the Unit Trust of India-trustee Company Pvt. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member 1. This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order in C.C.No.947/2011 dated 28-3-2013 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant joined the scheme proposed by the opposite parties on 21-5-1999 for medical coverage of `2,50,000/- by purchasing 3000 units at `10/- per unit and was also entitled for cumulative bonus from 1999-2009 and he is eligible for Rs.7,42,247/- towards medical cover. As per the instructions in the logbook, it is mentioned in Cl.No.4 that maximum limit is Rs.1,50,000/- per illness per spouse and any recurrence of any illness within 45 days from the date of discharge from the hospital will be treated as the same illness. On 24-10-2010, the complainant was admitted in Care Hospital for cardiac ailment for 23 days and the doctors advised for implanting stent in the heart and after 2 ...
G. Radha Vs. Dr.Janaki Md. Dgo., (Assistant Professor and Consultant) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The unsuccessful complainant in C.C.No.197/2010 before the District Forum, Ranga Reddy District is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the order dated 02-4-2013 wherein the District Forum dismissed the complaint and refused to order any amount towards compensation. The brief facts that led to filing of the complaint are as under: The complainant, a white ration card holder, was constantly suffering from terrible stomach ache. On 05-3-2009 when the pain became severe, she was taken to Niloufer hospital for treatment. Opposite party no.1, who attended the complainant advised the complainant to visit her at her private clinic for better treatment. After conducting necessary tests, opposite party No.1 informed the complainant that her uterus was damaged and advised to undergo an operation at Chaitanya Clinic where she is a consultant. On 30-6-2009 at about 9.20 a.m. without obtaining the written consent from the husband of the com...
Girelli Laxmaiah Vs. the State of A.P.,m Rep.by Public Prosec
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRL.A.no.1754 of 2009 12-03-2014 Girelli Laxmaiah .....APPELLANT/ACCUSED The State of A.P.,M rEP.BY pUBLIC pROSECUTOR, hIGH cOURT OF a.p., Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the petitioner:Sri.T.S.Rayalu Counsel Counsel for the respondent: Public Prosecutor : ?.Citations: CRL.A.No.1754 of 2009 JUDGMENT : (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The accused/appellant herein, was alleged to have committed the murder of his daughter, by name, Mounika, on 06.05.2009 at 4.30 p.m.The complaint in this behalf was submitted by PW.1, the wife of the accused, alleging that the accused used to harass her for providing money to consume toddy, and if his demand is not acceded to, he used to beat her. She further stated that the accused used to harass their two daughteRs.by name, G.Lakshmi (PW.2).and Mounik, the deceased. One day prior to the incident, the accused is said to have threatened PW.1 wit...
Land Acquisition Office Vs. Bantu Chinna Veeramma and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL LAAS No.126 of 2007 and batch 12-03-2014 Land Acquisition Officer...APPELLANT Bantu Chinna Veeramma and others....RESPONDENTS COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT:-Advocate General COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS:-Sr.Raghuveer Reddy : ?.Cases Referred: HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL LAAS No.126 of 2007 AND CROSS-OBJECTIONS (Sr.No.10996 of 2008 COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The Andhra Pradesh Housing Board (for short the Board) intended to bring about a Colony in Nizamabad Town. An extent of Acs.67.00 of land, owned by the respondents, in various survey numbers of Kanteshwar Revenue Village abutting Nizamabad city was identified for that purpose. On the requisition made by the Board, the Government published notification, dated 24.10.1989, under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the Act) proposing to acquire the land, declara...
Anumula Lachi Reddy S/O.Mallaiah, Aged a Vs. the District Collector, K ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-11-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.6860 of 2011 11-03-2014 Anumula Lachi Reddy s/o.Mallaiah, Aged about 54 yrs Agriculturist, r/o.Vardhavelli (V), Boinipalli Mandal, Karimnagar district and two others...Petitioners The District Collector, Karimnagar District, Karimnagar and others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri V.V.Ramana Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Government Pleader for Land Acquisition for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : : ?.Cases referred:1. 2011 (5) ALD4472. APLJ (2) 1981 Page 93 3. AIR1990Karnataka 2 4. (1995) 1 Supreme Court Cases 133 5. (2006) 2 Supreme Court Cases 416 6. (1989) 1 Supreme Court Cases 113 7. 1994 (2) ALT1178. 1991 (1) ALT289. AIR1980Andhra Pradesh 205 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.6860 of 2011 Dated:11. 03.2014 The Court made the following: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.6860 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioners are challenging notification dated 13.09.2008 issued under Section 4(1) of the Land ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »