Andhra Pradesh Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Videocon Appliances Ltd. Vs. D. Seshagiri Rao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-21-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The opposite party No.1 before the District Forum, Nalgonda is the appellant and he preferred this appeal against the order dated 17-4-2012 in C.C.No.03/2012 whereby the District Forum directed it to pay a sum of Rs.26,050/- to the complainant with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of complaint till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.5,000/-. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant, D.Seshagiri Rao, purchased a Videocon Refrigerator from Chitra Electronics and T.V. Service Centre i.e. opposite party No.2 on 30-8-2006 by paying a sum of Rs.6,800/-. Opposite party No.2 gave a warranty card for the said refrigerator, for a period of six years, from the date of purchase. When the said refrigerator gave trouble and was not functioning properly, the complainant approached the opposite party No.2. The representatives of opposite party No.2 visited the complainant on 14-4-2011 and informed the complainant that the co...
P.G.Shiva Sha Vs. the Apsrtc and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-21-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.NO.12022 OF200821-03-2014. P.G.Shiva Shanker..PETITIONER The APSRTC and another ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner:Sri.V.Narasimha Goud. Counsel for the respondents:Sr.A. Venugopal. Standing Counsel for APSRTC : ?. CITATIONS: 1.2006 SCC ( L&S) 644 2.2001 SCC ( L&S) 105 3.2002 (1) ALD64(DB) 4.AIR1984SC286HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION NO.12022 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner, a conductor in A.P.State Road Transport Corporation (the Corporation for brevity) filed the present Writ Petition assailing the Award dt. 21.07.2004 in I.D.No.66 of 2002 on the ground that once the Labour Court has found, on appreciation of the material on record, that the petitioner is not guilty of any major misconduct, it ought to have restored every benefit, attendant and consequential to the petitioner in addition to his reinstatement. The facts in brief are that the petitioner was appointed a conductor in the respondent Corporation...
Mandava Murali Krishna Vs. Muthavarapu Nalini
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The opposite party is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the order dated 22-6-2012 made in C.C.No.299/2011 on the file of District Forum, West Godavari District at Eluru whereby the District Forum while allowing the complaint filed by the respondent herein directed the appellant to provide car parking to the flat of the respondent herein together with costs of Rs.1,000/-. The brief facts of the complaint are that the respondent/complainant purchased flat No.12 in 3rd floor of Sai Sowdha Apartment with built up area of 1100 sft. along with undivided share of land to an extent of 38.57 sq. yds. out of 540 sq. yds. in Sy.Nos.90 and 92 in Satrampadu Gram Panchayat, Eluru for a valuable consideration of Rs.10,00,000/- and the said flat was registered under a sale deed dated 17-6-2009 and the possession of the flat was also delivered on the same day. As no car parking was provided and there are some deficiencies in construction, th...
The Chief Post Master General A.P. Circle, Dak Sadan Abids, Hyderabad ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) The wife of C. Shiva Shankar (hereinafter called as deceased) filed a complaint before the Dist. Forum-I, Hyderabad i.e., CC No. 34/2012 against the Opposite Party i.e., The Chief Post Master General claiming an amount ofRs. 1,21,820/- pertaining to Policy No. AP-221540-US with interest from the date of claim petition till the date of realization and to pay compensation of Rs. 1 lakh for mental agony and costs. 2) The brief facts that led to filing of the complaint are: The complainants husband Sri C. Shiv Shankar obtained two Postal Life Insurance Policies bearing Nos. AP-261055-US and AP-221540-US for Rs. 1 lakh each. While so, on 25.6.2009 during the currency of said policies her husband died. When she laid claim, the opposite party settled her claim in respect of Policy No. AP-261055-US only but offered to pay Rs. 21,820/- excluding the sum assured under policy No. AP-221540-US. Despite correspondence and legal notice got issued by the complainan...
M/S. Emaar Mgf Land Limited Manikonda Village and Another Vs. Jagadesh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant applied to the opposite parties for purchase of a three bed room apartment No.49, Tower C, with an approximate built up area of 2723.13 sft for a total sale consideration of Rs.1,92,53,441/-. The complainant paid the registration fee of Rs.9,62,672/- through cheque dated 18.0-7.2008 to the opposite parties. 2. The complainant submits that in spite of several representations and requests the opposite parties failed to furnish the standard templates of construction agreement along with a detailed sale price payment schedule. Even though no construction agreement was provided the opposite parties have presented the second cheque without intimation to the complainant and the said cheque got dishonoured. The complainant due to personal inconvenience requested for cancella...
M. Sasikala and Others Vs. Department of Posts Rep. by Its Sub-post Ma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) This petition is filed by the petitioner/complainant seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited before the Dist. Forum, Nellore. 2) The complainant filed CC No. 39/2011 before the Dist. Forum, Nellore claiming certain amounts, compensation and costs. 3) After notice to the Opposite Parties and after following the due procedure provided under the Consumer Protection Act, the Dist. Forum directed the Opposite Parties to refund an amount of Rs. 1,05,000/-. 4) Dis-satisfied with the said amount, the complainant approached this Commission and filed FA No. 61/2013 and the said appeal is pending before us. 5) Be that as it may, it appears that the respondents/Opposite Parties have deposited the said amount of Rs. 1, 05,000/- as per the orders passed by the Dist. Forum. In those circumstances, the petitioner/complainant was constrained to file cheque application before the Dist. Forum seeking permission to withdraw the said amount. However, the...
Yelamanchili Vijaya Kum Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2189 of 2006 20-03-2014 Yelamanchili Vijaya Kumar .Petitioner. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. . Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M/s. B. Adinarayana Rao Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : ?.Cases referred:1. 2010 (1) ALD (Crl.) 468 (A.P.) The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2189 of 2006 ORDER: This revision is preferred against judgment dated 16-10-2006 in Crl.A.No.358/2005 whereunder judgment dated 12-09-2005 in C.C.No.440/2004 on the file of V Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Guntur was confirmed.2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- On 23-09-2004, when P.W.1 went to the hospital of P.W.2 for treatment, accused entered into the consultation room of P.W.2 following P.W.1 with a chappal in his hand abused her in filthy language and threatened her and that P.Ws.2 & 3...
Yelamanchili Vijaya Ku Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2189 of 2006 20-03-2014 Yelamanchili Vijaya Kumar .Petitioner. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. .... Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M/s. B. Adinarayana Rao Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : ?.Cases referred:1. 2010 (1) ALD (Crl.) 468 (A.P.) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2189 of 2006 Date:20.03.2014 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2189 of 2006 ORDER: This revision is preferred against judgment dated 16-10-2006 in Crl.A.No.358/2005 whereunder judgment dated 12-09-2005 in C.C.No.440/2004 on the file of V Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Guntur was confirmed.2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- On 23-09-2004, when P.W.1 went to the hospital of P.W.2 for treatment, accused entered into the consultation room of P.W.2 following P.W.1 wit...
K.Narasimh Vs. the State,rep.by Cbi/Spe/Hyderabad,rep.B
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.210 of 2014 20-03-2014 K.Narasimha.... Petitioner/Accused The State,rep.by CBI/SPE/Hyderabad,rep.by its Spl. Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad...respondent/Complainant Counsel for the petitioner:Sri D.V. Seetharama Murthy, Senior counsel Counsel for the Respondent: Sri P. Kesava Rao, Standing Counsel for CBI : ?.Cases referred: Nil HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl. R.C.No.210 of 2014 Date:20. 03.2014 ORDER: Crl.M.P.No.301 of 2012 in C.C.No.2 of 2011 filed by the petitioner before the learned III Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad under Section 239 Cr.P.C. to discharge him, was dismissed through orders dated 29.04.2013. Assailing the same, the present revision is laid.2. The petitioner is said to be 1991 batch IAS officer belonging to the cadre of Mizoram-Arunachal Pradesh-Goa. A case of disproportionate assets to the known source of income was instituted against the petitioner under the provisions of Prevention o...
Kakarla Rosenna and Other Vs. Thammineni Narasappa and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.267 of 1995 and batch 20-03-2014 Kakarla Rosenna and others ....Appellants Thammineni Narasappa and others.... Respondents #Kakarla Rosenna....Petitioner $T.Narasappa and others.... Respondents Counsel for the Appellants : Sri V.Ravinder Rao & Sri O.Manoher Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri R.Subba Rao : : ?. Cases referred:1. AIR2003SC19892. AIR1963SC15163. AIR-2001-SC-965 4. (2003(5)-SCC-89) 5. 1975(1)SCC2126. AIR-1976-SC-634 7. AIR-1969-SC-1144 8. 2011(8) SCALE2409. AIR1989SC19310. AIR1987SC124211. AIR1966SC735 12. AIR1954SC45813. AIR1953SC23514. AIR1995SC16715. AIR1988SC719B) 16. 1991 (3) SCC33117. 1998(5)-ALD-349 18. 2003(8)-Supreme Today-194 at 196 19. (2009) 3 SCC28720. AIR1984SC66421. (1994) 5 SCC16722. 1911 ( 35) Bombay-169 23. 1915(39) Bombay 441 24. AIR1951PC725. AIR1963SC185at 193 26. 1870 (7) Bombay HCAC15327. 1869 (12) MIA35028. 1909 (36) Cal 824 29. AIR1961SC130230. 1906 (28) All. 377 31. AIR1926PC192732. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »