Andhra Pradesh Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sontari Laxmana Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-27-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.195 of 2010 27-03-2014 Sontari Laxmana Rao Appellant-Accused State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant:Sri K. Satyanarayana Rao Counsel for respondent : Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases Referred : . HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.195 of 2010 Dated:27. 03.2014 Criminal Appeal No.195 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice M.S.K.Jaiswal) The accused in S.C.No.96 of 2009 on the file of the VIII-Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Visakhapatnam, is the appellant. Through its Judgment, dated 07-10-2009, the trial Court found him guilty of committing an offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C., and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.100/-, in default, simple imprisonment for one month. The same is challenged in this appeal.2. The facts...
Niraj Kumar Mittal Vs. State Bank of India Rep. by Its Manager Hal Cam ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
Oral Order: (Thota Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. The opposite party no.1 is the appellant. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. 2. The complainant is an account holder with the Opposite Party having Savings Bank Account No.30165121208 with Internet banking, mobile banking and ATM Card facilities. On 06.05.2011 at about 06-21 pm, the complainant received two messages on his mobile phone in respect of debit of his above said account by Rs.40,000/- in two different transactions of Rs.20,000/- each. The complainant accessed his bank account on internet and came to know that there were withdrawals. To prevent any further such incident on 7.5.2011 at 12.31 a.m. the complainant immediately rushed to the nearest ATM at Balanagar near BBR Hospital and withdrew the balance amount of Rs.24,760/- from his account i.e. about 70 minutes after the unauthorized withdrawal at 11-21 p.m. on 06.05.2011 at Bangalore. Similarly another withdrawal of Rs.9,300/- w...
M/S. Vvr Housing India Pvt. Ltd., by Its Chairman and Managing Directo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) The un-successful Opposite Parties viz., M/s. VVR Housing India Pvt. Ltd., are the appellants and they challenged the order dt. 25.2.2013 made in CC 75/2012 on the file of Dist. Forum, Tirupathi whereby the Dist. Forum while allowing the complaint filed by the respondents herein directed the appellants/Opposite Parties topay a sum of Rs.12,46,884/- to 1st complainant and Rs.4,10,183/- to 2nd complainant (including proportionate costs). Complainants one and two are also entitled for interest at 9% per annum from the date of complaint that is 20.11.2012, till the date of realization, on Rs.7,01,000/- and Rs.2,01,000/- respectively and also awarded Rs. 25,000/- towards compensation and Rs. 2,000/- towards costs. 2) The factual matrix of the case in brief is that the complainants being attracted by the House Property Development Scheme floated by the appellants/Opposite Parties booked four plots by paying Rs. 2,000/- towards membership fee. They remitted...
M/S. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep. by Its Branch Manager V ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) These two appeals are disposed of by a common order, since the parties are same and also that the appeals deal with similar facts, they are being disposed of by this common order. The Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Branch office, Chittoor is the appellant herein and these appeals are directed against the orders dated 12-6-2013 made in C.C. Nos.54/2012 and 55/2012 on the file of District Forum-I, Chittoor whereby the District Forum accepted the contentions of the complainant/respondent and allowed the complaint, C.C.54/2012 directing the appellant herein to pay a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- covered under Jeevan Saral policy bearing No.844317963 with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of repudiation i.e. 06-6-2012 till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.1000/- and in C.C.55/2012 directed the appellant herein to pay a sum of Rs.6,00,000/- covered under Jeevan Chaya policy bearing No.844323766 with interest at 9% p....
The Manager Icici Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd., Adimurthy Na ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) This appeal is directed against the order dt. 31.5.2013 made in CC 91/2011 on the file Dist. Forum, Ananthapur whereby the appellants herein are directed to pay Rs. Rs. 93,794/- towards balance of first operation charges and Rs. 9,24,479/- spent by the complainant towards second operation and treatment expenses from 19.2.2010 till the death of policyholder. 2) The facts in a narrow compass are that the complainants wife Smt. P. Pushpalatha had obtained Hospital Care Plan-A policy No. 08552528 on 11.4.2008 for a period of 10 years from the Opposite Parties by paying necessary premium. While so on 21.11.2008 she was diagnosed that she was suffering from breast cancer for which she was advised to take necessary treatment and surgeries. Accordingly, as advised by the doctors, she took treatment from Yashoda Hospital and also undergone surgeries. She laid claims enclosing all the documents required along with bills out of which an amount of Rs. 83,000/- w...
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. M. Vandana and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) This appeal arose out of order dt.13.08.2012 of the District Forum, Adilabad made in C.C.No.59/2010 filed by the respondent no.1/complainant claiming Rs.1,50,000/- towards the insured amount and compensation. The appellant is the opp.party no.3 and the respondent no.1 is the complainant and the respondents 2 and 3 herein are the opp.parties 1 and 2 respectively in the compliant. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. The brief case of the complainant is that the complainants husband Mencha Ravi was the owner of Hero Honda CD Deluxe Drum Kick Start bearing registration no.AP I.G. 5607 (in short: the motor cycle). He was holding valid driving license, which was valid from 22.11.2005 to 21.11.2025 and the said motor cycle was insured with the opposite parties 1 and 2 under Group Personal Accident Policy bearing no.350700/42/03/02/00062 which is valid for three years i.e. upto 12.08.2010. While so, on 09.04....
Manju M Agarwa Vs. the State of A.P. Rep.by Public Prosecut
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.13161 OF201326-03-2014 Manju M Agarwal.....PETITIONER/ACCUSED The State of A.P. rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT Counsel for Petitioner/Accused : M/s. Sharad Sanghi & Associates Counsel for Respondents.:Ashok Reddy Kanathala GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?. Cases referred : AIR2011SC (CRIMINAL) 2472 2010 CRL.L.J.730 2011(2) CRIMES711THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Crl.P.No.13161/2013 ORDER: This criminal petition is directed against an order dt 15-10-2013 passed in Crl.M.P. No.52/2013 in CC No.58/2013 on the file of XIII Special Magistrate, Hyderabad.2. The facts in issue are as under: The second respondent herein filed a private complaint for an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ".the NI Act".). The said case was initially taken on file as CC No.337/2013 and, later on, transferred and was renumbered as ...
K.Rajani and O Vs. M.Satyanarayana Goud and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.2128 of 2005 26-03-2014 K.Rajani and othersAppellants M.Satyanarayana Goud and another....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners:V.Krishna Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Devanand : : ?. Cases Referred: 1.2011 ACJ16132.(2009) 13 SCC530THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.2128 of 2005 JUDGMENT:- Challenging the order dated 03.05.2005 passed in O.P.No.2133 of 2001 by the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal cum III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (the Tribunal, for brevity).the claimants filed this appeal. The appellants herein are the claimants and the respondents herein are the respondents before the Tribunal and for the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as per their array before the Tribunal. The fiRs.claimant is the wife, second claimant is the minor daughter, third claimant is the minor son and the fourth claimant is the mother of the deceased original claimant....
M. Madhavi and Others Vs. Ch. Ananthaiah and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-25-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.229 of 2009 25-03-2014 M. Madhavi and others....Appellants Ch. Ananthaiah and others....Respondents Counsel for Appellants: Sr.P. Rama Krishna Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sr.Somanchi Venkateswarlu : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2004 ACJ11482) 2009 ACJ1383) 2002 (1) ALT44(DB) 4) 2009 (6) ALD7795) 2010 ACJ24866) 2008 ACJ3937) 2008 ACJ18348) 2009 ACJ12989) 2013 ACJ140310) (2009) 13 SCC65411) (2002) 7 SCC455THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.229 of 2009 Judgment: Aggrieved by the Award dated 19-09-2008 in M.V.O.P No.790 of 2007 passed by the M.A.C.T-cum-VIII Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad (for short ".the Tribunal".).the claimants preferred the instant MACMA on the ground of inadequacy of compensation. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The claimants are wife, minor daughters and parents of the deceased-Manaka Prasad. The case of the claimants is that on 13-02-2007 when the deceased along...
Ram Lal Agarwal S/O. Late Moti Lal, Aged Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Li ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-25-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.30227 of 2013 25-03-2014 Ram Lal Agarwal s/o. Late Moti Lal, Aged 59 years, Prop. Deccan Service Station, Opp.Fateh Maidan Club, Public Garden Road, Hyderabad.... Petitioner Indian Oil Corporation Limited, rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, 3079/3, Sadiq Nagar, J.B.Titomarg, New Delhi and others. .... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.Ravinder Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee for respondents. : : ?.Cases referred:1. (2004) 3 Supreme Court Cases 553 2. AIR2009Supreme Court 684 3. AIR2009Supreme Court 218 4. (2010) 11 Supreme Court Cases 186 5. (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 697 6. (1991) 1 Supreme Court Cases 533 7. (2005) 8 Supreme Court Cases 242 8. 2007 (3) ALD2439. (2010) 2 Supreme Court Cases 114 10. 2011 (3) ALT221HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.30227 of 2013 Date:25. .03.2014 The Court made the following: ORDER: With the consent of learned counsels for the petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »