Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court March 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 04 2014

M/S.Kuldeep Wines, Hyderaba Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-04-2014

HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH & HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.52 of 2001 04-03-2014 M/s.Kuldeep Wines, Hyderabad...Applicant Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)...Respondent !Counsel for the Applicant: Sr.Ch.Pushyam Kiran Counsel for Respondent: Sr.S.R.Ashok : ?.Cases referred: 1.[1959].35 ITR519(SC) 2.[1997].3 Supreme Court Cases 530 HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH & HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.52 of 2001 JUDGMENT:- ( per Hon'ble Sr.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) At instance of the Revenue, below mentioned question of law, which arises from the order dated 07.08.1995 of the Tribunal in I.T.A.No.376/Hyd/90 for the assessment year 1982-83, has been referred for opinion of this Court. ".Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in upholding the levy of maximum penalty of Rs.10.50 lakhs and whether the Tribunal's findings are vitiated by non- consideration of the relevant fa...


Mar 03 2014

Suguna and Others Vs. T. Jayaraman and Anothe

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-03-2014

THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.406 of 2009 03-03-2014 Suguna and others....Appellants T. Jayaraman and another...Respondents Counsel for Appellants: Sr.S.V.Muni Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.V. Sambasiva Rao : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2002 (8) Supreme 594 2) AIR2004SC1340= 2004 (2) SCC13) 2011 (4) ALD778(DB) 4) 2009 ACJ1298= AIR2009SC31045) 2013 ACJ14036) 2001 (1) ALT495(DB) 7) AIR2000Supreme Court 235 (1) 8) 2003 ACJ468= AIR2003SC10099) 2005 (12) SCC24310) 2008 ACJ1149= (2008) 5 SCC403HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.406 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the award dated 31.03.2004 in M.V.O.P.No.299 of 1999 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-District Judge, Chittoor (for short 'the Tribunal').the claimants preferred the instant appeal. 2) The appellants 1 to 3 herein are the claimants 1 to 3 in the O.P and respondents 1 and 2 herein are respondents 1 and 2 in the O.P.3) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The 1st claimant is the wife...


Mar 03 2014

Syndicate B Vs. Vasuda Pharma Chem Ltd., and Anothe

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-03-2014

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Comp.A.Nos.366 of 2012 and bathch 03-03-2014 Syndicate Bank...Applicant Vasuda Pharma Chem Ltd., and another ..Respondents ^Counsel for the applicant:Sr.A.Krishnam Raju !Counsel for respondent No.2: Sr.M.Anil Kumar Head note: ?.Cases referred: 1.(2005) 8 SCC1902.Co.App.No.58 of 2012, dated 17.09.2012 3.(2010) ILR2P&H2844.AIR2008Mad 108 5.1 (2013) BC700THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Company Application Nos.366 & 367 of 2012 in Company Petition No.197 of 2010 Common Order: Company Application No.366 of 2012 is filed to permit the authorised officer of the applicant-Bank to continue in possession of respondent No.2's movable and immovable properties till they are sold. Company Application No.367 of 2012 is filed by the same applicant for permitting its authorised officer to conduct sale of respondent No.2's movable and immovable properties by following the procedure under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Asse...


Mar 03 2014

P.Lakshmi and Others Vs. Dr. A.V. Subba Rao

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Mar-03-2014

T. Ashok Kumar, Member 1. This complaint is filed U/s.17 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 claiming compensation of Rs.40,00,000/- and costs of Rs.10,000/-. 2. The facts of the complaint are that the complainant No.1 is the wife and complainants 2 to 4 are the children of late P.Seshagiri Rao. The complainants averred that Mr.P.Seshagiri Rao used to visit the opposite party for his general check up and treatment and accordingly on 02-10-2010 visited the opposite party hospital for medical check up and again on 27-10-2010 he Mr.P.Seshagiri Rao along with his son-in-law visited the opposite party hospital and Dr.A.V.Subba Rao examined him and recommended certain tests. The said Mr.P.Seshagiri Rao underwent the tests at Swetha Dianostics, Rajahmundry and approached the opposite party with reports. The opposite party after examination of the reports though commented Abnormal ECG and though it was reported by Mr.P.Seshagiri Rao that there was burning pain in chest during exercise did not adm...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial