Andhra Pradesh Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. A.Rukmini Priya Darshi Vs. the Crime Investigation Department, Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.4425 of 2014 05-03-2014 Smt. A.Rukmini Priya Darshini....Petitioner The Crime Investigation Department, Rep. by its Additional Director General of Police,Hyderabad & others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.S. Chalapathi Rao Counsel for Respondent 1 & 3: GP for Home Counsel for Respondent No.2 : GP for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.4425 of 2014 ORDER: This Petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of the 1st respondent Crime Investigation Department, represented by its Additional Director General of Police, in directing the 2nd respondent, namely the Village Revenue Officer, Nallagandla Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, to visit the house of the petitioner to ascertain the caste of herself and her family members without there being any cognizable offence committed by her or her family members and witho...
B.Venkateswarlu and Two Other Vs. Government of A.P.Revenue (Excise) D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NOs.35116 OF201305-03-2014 B. Venkateswarlu and two others.....Petitioners Government of A.P.Revenue (Excise) Department, rep., by its Prl. Secretary to Govt. Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Learned Senior Counsel, Sr.N. Subba Rao, Sr.S. Lakshma Reddy, Sr.S. Rahul Reddy, Sr.I. Chandrasekhar, Sr.P. Nagendra Reddy, Sr.P.V.Ramana, Sr.C. Damodar Reddy, Sr.B. Vijaysen Reddy and Sr.S. Rajasekhar Rao, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioneRs.Counsel for respondents: Learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) AIR1980SC1502 1980 Supp SCC812) (2004) 11 SCC263) 2005(6) ALD5144) (2007 (3) ALT678= (2007) 2 ALD8305) AIR1961SC1170: (1961) 3 SCR1856) AIR1997SC22397) AIR1990SC17478) AIR1966SC16789) (1984 (2) SCC50010) (2001).SCC6111) (2003).SCC13412) (2005)10 SCC43713) (2004)11 SCC62514) (2001) 8 SCC54015) (1995) 1 SCC35...
Bethalam Subbara Vs. the Superintendent of Police (Urban),gun
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.39478 of 2013 05-03-2014 Bethalam Subbarao...Petitioner The Superintendent of Police (Urban),Guntur District,And others....Respondents Counsel for petitioner: Ms.Vasudha Nagaraj Counsel for the Respondents : Government Pleader for Home The Public Prosecutor : ?. CITATIONS: 1.2000 Crl.L.J.2453 (1)(SC) 2.1997 (3) ALD784(DB) 3.1997 (3) ALD395(DB) THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.39478 of 2013 ORDER: The relief sought for in this Writ Petition is to declare the action of the respondents in not expeditiously investigating Crime No.108 of 2013 of Chebrolu Police Station, pertaining to the hurt, intimidation and abuse of the petitioner in the name of his caste, even after six months as arbitrary and illegal. The petitioner belongs to the Scheduled Castes. He filed the complaint, in Crime No.108 of 2013 dated 07.06.2013, alleging that he was assaulted and abused in the name of his caste by the accused on 14.04...
Neelakanti Gunaker Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Spec
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.A.M.P.No.110 of 2014 and batch 05-03-2014 Neelakanti Gunaker....Appellant/Accused No.2 State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Special P.P.for CBI,High Court of A.P, Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sr.T.M.K.Chaitanya Counsel for Respondent : Sr.P. Kesava Rao, Standing Counsel for CBI : ?.Cases referred: 1) (1995) 2 SCC5132) (2007) 1 SCC6733) (2007) 2 SCC5744) AIR2001SC3320(1) = (2001) 6 SCC584HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.A.M.P.No.110 of 2014 in Crl.A.No.407 of 2013 Order: The instant petition is filed by the appellant/A2 under Section 389 Cr.P.C.seeking stay of conviction passed by the II Additional Special Judge for CBI cases, Visakhapatnam in his judgment dated 30-04-2013 in C.C.No.6 of 2007 convicting him and A1 for the offences under Sections 120B, 384 IPC and Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ".PC Act".).2) A1 is the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Cent...
Nekkala Bangaram Vs. the State of A.P., Rep.by Public Prosecu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRL.A.NO.1616 OF200905-03-2014 Nekkala Bangaramma ...APPELLANT/ACCUSED The State of A.P., Rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.B.Parameswara Rao Counsel for the Respondent :Public Prosecutor : ?.Citations: CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1616 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The appellant herein was tried as the sole accused in S.C.No.60 of 2007 on the file of the Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam. She was working as a maid servant in the house of P.W.1, a retired railway driver. He was leading retired life with his wife, and his daughter at Visakhapatnam. On 18.11.2006, PW.1 is said to have gone to the Ayyappa Swamy Temple, for Pooja. At about 11.00 a.m., PW.2, his tenant and a resident near by, is said to have come to the temple, and informed him that the accused knocked the door, when he was asleep, and informed him that the wife of PW.1...
D.Suryanarayana and Other Vs. Government of India Rep. by Itscabinet
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.33388 of 2013 05-3-2014 D.Suryanarayana and others... Petitioners Government of India rep. by its Cabinet Secretary Rastrapati Bhavan, New Delhi and others... Respondents COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS : Sri B. Kanta Rao COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1 to 3: Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, Assistant Solicitor General COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.4 : Government Pleader for General Administration Department HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATION:1. AIR1993SC12672. AIR1987SC14543. AIR2014AP134. AIR1960SC51THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.33388 OF2013ORDER: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief: "....to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Prohibition restraining the cabinet decision d...
Cheedipalli Kalyanam @gow Vs. the State of A.P.,rep.by Public Prosecu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1634 of 2009 05-03-2014 CHEEDIPALLI KALYANAM @GOWTHU...APPELLANT THE STATE OF A.P., REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYD COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER:Sr.D.RAGHAVA REDDYD COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT:PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The appellant was tried by the Court of the IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam in S.C.No.44 of 2008 for causing the death of his wife, by name, Lakshmi @ Demudamma. After conducting the full-fledged trial, the trial Court convicted the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 302 IPC. It imposed the punishment of imprisonment for life, and fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo simple Imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. Fine of Rs.500/- was imposed, in default, to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one mo...
Ghouse Pasha and Another Vs. Branch Manager Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainants are the appellants. The brief averments of the complaint are that the appellants borrowed a loan of Rs.4 lakhs from the respondent bank for construction of a house on their open plot bearing No.30 in Sy.Nos.267 and 268 situated at Narsapur (V) and (M) by mortgaging the house plot as security. The respondent sanctioned a sum of Rs.3,90,000/- to the appellants and they commenced the construction and could not complete the same due to escalation of construction material charges. The appellants requested for sanctioning of additional loan of Rs.2,50,000/- and the respondent bank instead of sanctioning the loan issued demand notices and initiated recovery proceedings under SARFESI Act. 2. The respondent resisted the case contending that the appellants failed to repay the loan amount as per agreed terms and conditions and as such the respondent issued demand notice. The appellants instead of repaying the loan requ...
C. Premraj Vs. M/S. Indu Eastern Province Projects Private Ltd., (Spv ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The complainant is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the order of the District Forum, Ranga Reddy District made in C.C.No.82/2010 dated 30-3-2012 whereby the District Forum has come to the conclusion that the complaint is mis-conceived for the reason that there is no deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties and accordingly dismissed the complaint. For the sake of brevity, the parties will be referred to as they were referred to in the District Forum. The opposite party No.1 is a registered company engaged in real estate business and opposite party No.2 is a bank which finances for purchase of houses/house development. The complainant entered into an agreement of sale on 25-7-2008 to purchase villa No.211 admeasuring 200 sq. yds. in a total built up area of 1840 sq.ft. situated at INDU ARANYA in Sy.No.117, Bandlaguda, Tattiannaram (V), Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and paid an amount of Rs.11,87,00...
Yarlagadda Krishna Murthy Vs. Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co (P) Ltd ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-05-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. All the revision petitions are directed against the order dated 08.07.2013 passed by the District Forum in petitions seeking direction to the Registrar of Chits, Chennai Central, Tamilandu for furnishing of details of chit group No.G2J/104/12 dated 20.03.2004 and for production of account copy ticket No.12 in the proceedings. As such all the revision petitions are disposed of by a common order. R.P.No.64 of 2013 is taken as a lead case. 2. The revision petitioned filed complaint and sought for reliefs for payment of compensation from the opposite parties on the premise of deficiency in service and also sought direction to the Registrar of Chits, Chennai Central to furnish accurate information regarding the amounts paid by the complainant and dividend allowed to him in the chit transaction. The petitioner had filed petition I.A.No.34 of 2013 seeking direction to the Registrar of Chits, Chennai Central, Tamilandu to furnish details of chit...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »