Andhra Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager and Another ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-13-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. The brief averments of the complaint are that the son of the respondent obtained from the appellants Pravasa Bharatiya Bhima Yojana Policy bearing No.021001/48/04/00264/175231 dated 17.06.2005 which was valid for two years. On 12.04.2007 the son of the respondent died in road accident at Dubai. The respondent being the nominee lodged claim along with required document issued by the competent authority at Dubai with the appellants. The appellants through their letter dated 19.12.2006 requested the respondent to furnish documents viz., report of postmortem examination and police report which are available at Dubai. The respondent could not get them as she is resident of India. The respondent filed the complaint before the District Forum claiming the policy amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. 2. The appellants resisted the case contending that the complaint is not maintainable and the Forum has no jurisdiction ...
Smt.K.Leelavathi and Anoth Vs. Debtsrecovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION No.3428 OF201412-02-2014 Smt.K.Leelavathi and another..PETITIONER Debts Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam, rep., by its Recovery Officer, 31-31- 21, Narayana Bhavanam, Sai Baba Street, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam and two others..RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioner:Sr.Challa Ajay Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.B.S.Prasad Sr.Hari Prasad Podina HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1) (MANU/TN/3572/2010) 2) MANU/SC/0802/2013 3) AIR2008SC13394) MANU/SC/1229/2009 HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION No.3428 OF2014ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy) The writ petitioners K. Leevalathi and Mohd. Rafi filed this writ petition challenging the proceedings initiated by the 2nd respondent - Bank under the provisions of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (for short 'the DRT Act') ...
Yakasiri Chinnai Vs. the State of A.P.,and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.36097 of 2013 12-02-2014 Yakasiri Chinnaiah..Petitioner The State of A.P.,And others....Respondents Counsel for petitioner: Sr.Syed Khader Mastan Counsel for the Respondents: Government Pleader for Home : ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.36097 of 2013 ORDER: The action of the fourth respondent in not filing a charge sheet, in FIR No.136 of 2013 dated 27.09.2013 on the file of the fifth respondent Police Station, is questioned in this Writ Petition as being arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Rule 7 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 (for short, the 1995 Rules).A consequential direction is sought to the fourth respondent to file a charge sheet. The petitioner, a member of the Scheduled Castes, lodged a complaint with the fifth respondent on 26.09.2013 stating that, at 7.00 PM, the sixth respondent, (a person belonging to the Backward Class...
K. Nagaraja Rao, S/O.Padmanabha Rao, R/O Vs. the Authorised Officer, L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.5671 of 2008 and BATCH1202-2014 K. Nagaraja Rao, S/o.Padmanabha Rao, R/o.Penukonda, Ananthapur District...Petitioner/Appellant The Authorised Officer, Land Reforms,Collectorate, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District and another...Respondents/Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner/ Appellant :Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for the Respondents/ Respondents:G.P for Arbitration HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. 1978 (2) ALT13(NRC) 2. 1978 (1) ALT4723. 1978 (1) ALT33(NRC) 4. (2004) 7 SCC2615. (1995) 3 ALT203(DB) The Court made the following : [order follows]. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.5671 of 2008 and CRP.No.1139 of 2010 Common Order: These Revisions arise under Section 21 of the A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Land Holdings) Act, 1973 (for short 'the Act').2. As both these Revisions relate to the holding of the same declarant by name K.Padmanabha Rao, S/o.K.Krishna Rao, r/o Penukonda, Ananthapur District, ...
Sri M/S. Ajit Exports,a Partnership Firm Vs. M/S.Mbs Impex Privatelimi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY COMPANY PETITION No.180 of 2011 12-02-2014 Sr.M/S.Ajit Exports,A partnership firm having its office at 93, Mangolpur Khurd, New Delhi-100083,Rep., by its Partner Sh. Ajit Singh ..Petitioner M/s.MBS Impex Private Limited,Having its Registered office at 1st Floor, M.G.Road, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500003,Rep. by its Director Mr.SukeshGupta..Respondent Counsel for Petitioner: Mr.V.S.Raju Counsel for Respondent: Mr.S.Ravi, Senior Counsel for Mr.J.Prabhakar. HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY COMPANY PETITION No.180 of 2011 Dated: 12.02.2014 The Court made the following: ORDER: This company petition is filed under Sections 433(e) and 439(1)(b) read with Section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act').for ordering winding up of the respondent company for non-payment of debt due to the petitioner. The petitioner has pleaded that it is a partnership firm and that the respondent is a private li...
Kathi Venkanna and Oth Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Its Public Pr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.A.Nos.1244 of 2009 and batch 12-02-2014 Kathi Venkanna and others.Appellants The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for appellants : Sr.A. Prabhakar Rao Smt.A.Gayatri Reddy Counsel for respondent : The Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : ---- THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.1244 & 1847 of 2009 and 641 of 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.These three appeals arise out of the judgment, dated 05.10.2009, in S.C.No.38 of 2008 on the file of Special Judge for the Trial of Offences under SCs & STs (POA) Act - cum - VI Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad. Accused Nos.1 to 10 were tried in that case for the offences punishable under Sections 364-A, 342, 387 r/w Section 511, 395, 506 Part II r/w Section 120-B and 34 of IPC and Section 27 of Indian ...
Konda Ashok and Other Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1373 of 2010 12-02-2014 Konda Ashok & others...Appellants State of A.P.rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad...Respondent Counsel for Appellants: Sr.J.C.Francis Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1373 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) A-2 is the sister and A-3 is the mother of A-1. A-1 was married to one Nomi, daughter of PWs.5 & 6. It is said to be a love marriage. On 30-08-2009, Nomi suffered serious burn injuries and she was admitted in the Government Hospital at Sanga Reddy. On finding that the patient needs better treatment, she was shifted to Sai Durga Hospital at Ramchandrapuram. Later on, her condition was found to be serious. Therefore, she was shifted to Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad. On 04...
Kathivenkanna and Oth Vs. the State of A.P.,rep. by Itspublicpro
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.1295 of 2006 and batch 12-02-2014 Kathi Venkanna and others...APPELLANTS The State of A.P.,rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ..Respondent Counsel for appellants:Sr.A.Prabhakara Rao Smt.A.Gayatri Reddy' Counsel for respondent:The Public Prosecutor : : ?.cases Referred: COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) A1, his mother, A2, and brother, A3, were tried for the offence of committing murder of Puli Subbaratnam, wife of A1, on 17.11.2003 at Boddikurapadu Village of Prakasam District by the Court of IV Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court).Markapur in S.C.No.189 of 2005. The case of the prosecution was that A1 was married to the deceased about ten years prior to the incident, two sons, P.Ws.7 and 13, were born out of the wedlock, but the couple used to quarrel now and then. The parents of the deceased are from the sa...
M/S. United India Insurance Company Limi Vs. Mittameedi Ramalakshmi An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.Nos.3779 of 2011 and BATCH1202-2014 M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited, represented by its Divisional Manager, Office at Room Nos.7 & 8, 1st Floor, Sreedevi Complex, Tilak Road,Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P...... APPELLANT Mittameedi Ramalakshmi and others......RESPONDENTS Counsel for the appellant: Sri E.Venugopal Reddy Counsel for the respondents: Sri V R Reddy Kovvuri : ?.Cases referred:1. 2004 (SCC) 517 2. 1996 ACJ11783. 2007 7 SCC4454. 1965(1) A11. E.R-563 5. 1963(2) All.E.R-432 6. 1969(1)A11.E.R -555 7. 1995 ACJ366SC) 8. (2001)8 SCC197AIR2001(SC) 3218 9. 2011(8) Scale 240 10. 2005(6) SCC23611. 2004(2)SCC-297 HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.Nos.3779,3839,3856,3869,3876,3918,3877,3898,3914, M.A.C.M.A.(SR)No.36149 of 2011 and 1813,1798,1806 and 24 of 2012 COMMON JUDGMENT: M/s United India Insurance Company Limited, Tirupati, represented by its Divisional Manager, who was 2nd respondent to the cla...
The Branch Manager, Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties against the order in C.C.No.38/2009 dated 05-11-2012 on the file of District Forum, Karimnagar. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainants husband during his life time obtained Reliance Endowment Plan (Regular) Policy bearing No.10372934 by paying first premium of Rs.5,774/- for an assured sum of Rs.1,00,000/- commencing from 08-11-2006 for a period of 21 years. The life assured died on 21-1-2008 and after his death the complainant informed opposite party No.1 about his death and submitted the requisite documents and requested to settle the claim. The opposite parties by letter dated 19-2-2008 repudiated the claim of the complainant stating that the life assured suppressed material facts with regard to his health. The complainant averred that the allegations made by the opposite parties are wrong and to avoid ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »