Andhra Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Bheemaiah, S/O Sri Buggaiah, Mahaboob Vs. Prohibition and Excise Su ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.NO.4397 OF201420-02-2014 G. Bheemaiah, S/o Sr.Buggaiah, Mahaboobnagar District.....Petitioner. Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Mahaboobnagar District......RESPONDENT For the Petitioner : Dr.K.Lakshmi Narasimha. For the Respondent : G.P.for Prohibition & Excise. : ?. CITATIONS: 1. 2002 (1) ALT108(D.B.) 2. 2003(2) ALT549(D.B.) 3. 2003(2) ALT7474. (1986) 1 Andh W R387THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.4397 of 2014 ORDER: On 10.10.2013, at about 09.30 a.m., the Prohibition & Excise Inspector of Enforcement, Ranga Reddy along with the staff and panchas appears to have inspected the Toddy Cooperative Society shop run by the writ petitioner herein. From the suspension order passed by the Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Mahaboobnagar, dated 03.02.2014, I gather that the inspecting party found one person conducting toddy sales in the shop and their enquiries disclosed that the name of that person...
Aravapalli Sreenivasa Vs. Perumalla Bala Venkata Suresh B
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY A.S.No.79 of 2014 20-2-2014 Aravapalli Sreenivasa Rao.Appellant Perumalla Bala Venkata Suresh Babu.Respondent Counsel for appellant : Sr.I. Kotireddy Counsel for respondent : Sr.Nimmagadda Satyanarayana : ?.CASES REFERRED : Nil HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY A.S.No.79 of 2014 Date : 20-2-2014 The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: With the consent of the learned Counsel for both the parties, the appeal is heard and being disposed of at the interlocutory The respondent filed O.S.No.21/2010 for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,75,000/- with interest @ 24% per annum from the appellant. The appellant/defendant filed a written statement wherein he has denied the allegation of the plaintiff that he has borrowed On the basis of the pleadings, the lower Court has framed the following issues : 1. Whether the suit hand letter dt. 18-5-2007 for Rs.2,75,000/- is true, valid, supported by consideration and executed by th 2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled...
Govind Kumar Loyya Vs. the Sub-post Master, Hsg âandeuro;andldquo; Ii ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
Oral Order: (Justice Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order of the District Consumer Forum, Karimnagar, dated 05.03.2013 in C.C.No.36/2012 , whereby the opposite parties are directed to pay to the complainant jointly and severally a sum of Rs.10,000/- on each certificate with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 05.03.2012 and Rs.5,000/- towards compensation and Rs.1,000/- towards costs. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as shown in the complaint before the District Forum. The brief facts as per the pleadings are as under: The complainant obtained two National Saving Certificates VIII for a period of six years bearing Nos.6NS/68EE571168 and 6NS/68EE571169 for a value of Rs.10,000/- each and the maturity value of each certificate is Rs.16,010/-. The said certificates were obtained by the complainant in the name of Hindu Undivided Family. After maturity date i.e. 14.11.2011,...
The A.P.Paper Mills Limited, Rajahmundr Vs. thecommossioner of Central ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA C.E.A.NO.51 OF200419-02-2014 THE A.P. PAPER MILLS LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY,REP. BY ITS COMPANY SECRETARY....APPELLANT THE COMMOSSIONER Of CENTRAL EXCISE,VISAKHAPATNAM....RESPONDENT Counsel for the appellant: Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for the respondent:Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, Standing Counsel for Central Excise. . ?.Cases Referred:1. 1997(93)ELT4292. 2001 (129) E.L.T. 44 (Mad.) 3. 1997(91)ELT532(SC) 4. 1994(71)E.L.T. 989 5. 2003(153) E.L.T. 694 (Tri. - LB) 6. 2003(153) E.L.T. 217 (Tri. - LB) 7. 2012(286) E.L.T. 258 8. 2013 (294) E.L.T. 421 (Tri. - Bang.) 9. 2011(271) E.L.T. 164 (S.C.) 10. 2001(129) E.L.T. 11(S.C.) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM C.E.A. NOS. 51 OF2004AND9 10 AND21OF2005COMMON JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) The appellant in all these Central Excise Appeals is the A.P. Paper Mills Limited, Rajahmundry, represented by ...
Yatagarisrenivasulu Son of.Chenchaiah a Vs. State of A.P.,rep. by Publ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1452 OF200919-02-2014 Yatagari Srenivasulu Son of.Chenchaiah and other ... Appellants State of A.P., rep. By Public Prosecutor,High Court, Hyderabad... Respondent Counsel for the Appellants: Mr. D. Raghava Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases referred: NIL. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1452 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) As many as 8 accused were tried for the offence punishable under Sections 395, 396, 397, 376 (2) (g) and 450 IPC, by the Court of the III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nellore, in S.C. No.380 of 2008. By their very nature, the offences alleged against them, are very serious. A detailed charge sheet was filed by the prosecution, alleging the offences under those provisions. At the time of framing charges, the trial Court frame...
M/S Fiitjee Limited and Others Vs. Miss Dupaguntla Vaishnavi
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. The respondent has joined in course Pinnacle-II-Jee of XI class programme for the academic years 2010-2012 conducted by the appellants and the appellants collected a sum of Rs.1,98,154/- in six instalments commencing from 24.2.2010. The classes were commenced on 10.06.2010 and the respondent attended the classes regularly. The respondent was not satisfied with the standard of faculty and the facilities provided by the appellants. Subsequently the respondent was transferred to Dilsukhnagar branch on payment of fees Rs.8,273/- and there also the faculty and facilities were substandard. After attending few classes, the respondent was forced to leave the institution and joined elsewhere. The respondent scored 10CGPA in 10th CBSE and the appellants failed to pay the scholarship. The respondent requested the appellants to refund the fees paid by her. The appellants rejected her request taking shelter un...
M/S.United India Insurance Company Limit Vs. Varthia Hari and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.168 of 2009 19-02-2014 M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited Rep. by its Branch Manager,Patancheru, Medak District.Appellant Varthia Hari and another. Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.K. Dhanunjaya Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.K. Lakshman : ?. Cases referred: 1)2003 (5) ALD162HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.168 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Challenging the award dated 22.09.2008 in O.P.No.101 of 2006 passed by the MACT-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ranga Reddy District (for short the Tribunal).the appellant-United India Insurance Company Limited preferred the instant appeal on the ground that the compensation is excessive and exorbitant. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The claimant is a resident of Budlapur village, Doma Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and working as a mason. His case is that on 20.12.2004 at about 1:30pm, he boarded into a Jeep bearing No.AP23...
Governmentof Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by It Vs. B. Prabhakar Andothers;
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY And HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION Nos.9719 of 2012 and batch 18-02-2014 Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department & others......Petitioners B. Prabhakar & others......Respondents. For Appellants :The Addl. Advocate General. For Respondents:Sr.G. Vidyasagar & Sr.V.Maheshwar Reddy, Advocates. : ?. CITATIONS: 1. AIR2007SC31272. (1995) 5 SCC1733. (2010) 12 SCC204HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY And HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION Nos.9719, 17054, 17062, 17063, 17085 and 17090 of 2012, 5196 & 7074 of 2013 COMMON ORDER : (Per Justice R.Subhash Reddy) This batch of writ petitions are filed by the official respondents in the original petitions filed before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, questioning the orders passed by the Tribunal, directing them to appoint the respondents herein under Police Executive quota/Children of Police Personnel and NCC quo...
Commissioner of Income-t Vs. M/S.Amarchand Sharma and Udani, Secundera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-2014
HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.169 of 2000 18-02-2014 Commissioner of Income-tax....Applicant M/s.Amarchand Sharma & Udani, Secunderabad...Respondent !Counsel for the Applicant: Sr.S.R.AshoK Counsel for Respondent: None appeared : : ?.Cases referred: 1. [1997].104 STC497(A.P.) HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH & HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.169 of 2000 ORDER:- (per Hon'ble Sr.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) At the instance of the Revenue, two questions of law as set out below arising out of the order dated 14.09.1994 of the Tribunal in I.T.A.No.1992/Hyd/88 for the assessment year 1977-78, are referred for opinion of this Court: i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the I.T.A.T.was correct in approving the reasoning of the Appellate Commissioner that the assessment order for the year 1977-78 passed under Section 144 read with Section 251 of the Act on 30.03.1987 was time-barred?. ii) Wheth...
United India Ins. Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Divisional Manager and Another ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) This appeal is filed against the order dt.06.07.2013 of the District Consumer Forum, Kadapa Y.S.R.Dist. in C.C.No.9/2013 whereunder, the District Forum directed the appellants to pay to the respondent a sum of Rs.18,89,999/- towards the repairs and replacement of the parts of the machine etc., Rs.50,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.5000/- towards the costs of the complaint. The appellants are the opposite parties and the respondent is the complainant in C.C.No.9/2013. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. The brief case of the complainant as set out in the complaint is that the complainant is the owner of the vehicle i.e. L and T Komastu PC 200-6 Hydraulic Excavator equipment. The complainant insured the said vehicle with the opp.parties company for a period from 09.02.2011 to 08.02.2012, vide policy bearing no.050904/31/10/01/00007010 by paying net premium amount of Rs.38,827/-. On 28.06.2011, the sai...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »