Andhra Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Raghuramaiah and Other Vs. State of Andhra Prade
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMIAL APPEAL No.1445 of 2009 21-02-2014 M.Raghuramaiah and others...APPELLANTS State of Andhra Pradesh....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS :- Sr.D.Kodanda Rami Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:- Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases Referred: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1445 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) A1 to A11 were tried by the Court of V Additional Sessions Judge, Rayachoty in S.C.No.238 of 2006. As many as 16 charges were framed by citing various provisions of law. The entire case pertains to the attack upon one Sr.Chinthala Gangisetty and the consequential murder of that gentleman on 03.04.2005, at Pedaballivandlapalli H/o. Hasanapuram Village, Ramapuram Mandal, Kadapa District. Through its judgment, dated 13.10.2009, the trial Court convicted A1 and A2 of the offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C....
Pasupuleti Rang Vs. Pasupuleti Ranganayak
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY SECOND APPEAL No.1399 of 2012 21-02-2014 Pasupuleti Rangamma..Appellant Pasupuleti Ranganayakulu.Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Mr.Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for the respondent:Mr.V.Mallik HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY SECOND APPEAL No.1399 of 2012 Dated: 21.02.2014 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: This second appeal arises out of judgment and decree dated 02.03.2012 in A.S.No.78 of 2010 on the file of the learned VI Additional District Judge, Markapur, whereby he has confirmed the judgment and decree dated 23.11.2009 in O.S.No.69 of 2006 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Markapur. I have heard Mr.Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the appellant, and Mr.V.Mallik, learned counsel for the respondent. The appellant is the defendant and respondent is the plaintiff in O.S.No.69 of 2006. For convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit. The...
The East Coast Railways, Rep. by Its General Manager, Chandrasekharpur ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
Oral Order : (Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada, President) 1) The East Coast Railway represented by its General Manager and another are the appellants herein and they assailed the order dt.11.10.2012 made in CC 228/2011 on the file of Dist. Forum-II, Visakapatnam whereby the complaint filed by the respondents herein u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act was allowed and an amount of Rs. 5,03,500/- towards loss of gold ornaments etc., Rs. 25,000/- towards compensation and Rs. 5,000/- towards costs were awarded. 2) The brief facts are that the respondents in this appeal are husband and wife, and on 8.2.2011 while they were travelling from Viskapatnam to Bhuvaneswar by Visaka Express two unauthorized women entered into the reserved compartment at Khurda Road Railway Station and took away the second respondents hand bag containing cash of Rs. 3,500/-, gold ornaments worth Rs. 3,50,000/- and also the credit card belonging to the first respondent. On account of said theft, the matter was report...
Shriram General Insurance Co., Ltd., Rep., by Its Manager, Rajam, Srik ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
Oral Order: (Justice Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) The opposite parties in C.C.No.63/2012 on the file of District Forum at Srikakulam, are the appellants and this appeal is preferred against the order dated 03.10.2012, whereby the said Forum awarded an amount of Rs.50,000/-, Rs.2,000/-towards costs and Rs.1,000/-towards advocates fee to the complainant. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as mentioned in the complaint before the District Forum. The brief facts as per the pleadings are as under: The complainants sister by name Smt.N.Koteswari W/o.N.Vital is the original owner of Maruthi Wagon “ R car bearing No.AP 31 AB 2527 and the said vehicle was insured with the 2nd opposite party for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and an amount of Rs.5,307/- was paid towards premium and the risk is covered for the period commencing from 14.10.2009 to 13.10.2010. It appears that the complainant purchased the said vehicle for a valid consideration of Rs.1,50,000/- from his sister...
Thummathuka Venkatara Vs. K.Madhusudhana Reddy and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.3358 OF200821-02-2014. Thummathuka Venkataramana..APPELLANT K.Madhusudhana Reddy and another...RESPONDENTs Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri Counsel for the respondent No.1 : None Counsel for the respondent No.2 : Sri Sriman : ?. CITATIONS: HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.3358 OF2008JUDGMENT: The claimant-injured of the motor accident that occurred on 28.05.2005 while he was waiting for bus, dashed by the crime tractor and trailer AP04V1261and 1262 of 1st respondent insured with 2nd respondent for the claim of Rs.1,50,000/-, since awarded Rs.4,000/- only by the Tribunal, preferred the appeal impugning the quantum as utterly low and in ignorance of the material on record including the wound certificate, disability certificate and the bills and hence sought for allowing the appeal as prayed for before the Tribunal.2. The 1st respondent-owner of the vehicle served failed to appear and it is the co...
Mahathi HighSchool,Warangal District Vs. the Institute of Hon'bleLokay ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.2748 OF201420-02-2014 Mahathi High School,Warangal District..Petitioner The Institute of Hon'ble Lokayukta of A.P.,Hyderabad..Respondent Counsel for Petitioner: Sr.P. Nagendra Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sr.Y. Ravindra Counsel for respondent No.7: Sr.V. Hemasundar Reddy (Party in-person) HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.2748 of 2014 This Court made the following: ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) In terms of our earlier order dated 04.02.2014, report of the Regional Joint Director dated 06.12.2013 has been produced. We thought on that day that report would be relevant and appropriate to decide the matter, but when we received the copy of the complaint made by the unoffic...
Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari @ Abdul Sa Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1062 of 2013 20-02-2014 Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari @ Abdul Salem....Appellant/Accused No.1 State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Special P.P.for CBI,High Court of A.P, Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sr.Pradeep Kumar. S and Sr.S. Pasbola. Counsel for Respondent: Sr.P. Kesava Rao, Special Standing Counsel for CBI : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2005 SCC (Crl) 1715 2) 1995 SCC (Crl) 215 3) 1999 SCC (Crl) 127 4) 2001 SCC (Crl) 160 5) (2009) 3 SCC (Crl) 66 6) 1997 SCC (Cri) 1004 7) (2001) 4 SCC5168) (1988) 3 SCC6099) (2011) 1 SCC28410) AIR1961SC176211) (1996) 4 SCC65912) (1987) 2 SCC17= AIR1987SC77313) 2013 (3) ALT (Cri) 385 14) (2011) 11 SC214=(2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 125 THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1062 of 2013 Judgment: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by accused No.1-Abu Salem Qayoom Ansari @ Abu Salem against the judgment dated 18-11-2013 in C.C.No.3 of 2006 passed by III Additional Spec...
ivrclassets and Holdings Limited, M-22/3r Vs. A.P.Stateconsumer Disput ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE WRIT PETITION No.29434 OF201320-02-2014 IVRCL Assets & Holdings Limited, M-22/3RT, Vijaynagar Colony, Hyderabad-500057, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, Managing Director......PETITIONER. A.P.State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Eruvaku Building, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, & another......RESPONDENTS. Counsel for Petitioner :Sri M.Ravindra Babu. Counsel for Respondents.:Sri T.A.Kumar & Ms. G.Sudha. GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred :1. (2011) 14 SCC662. AIR2008AP313. (2009) 16 SCC2624. AIR2003SC45485. AIR1978SC13936. AIR2010SC26087. 2012 (8) SCC5248. AIR2004Madras 494 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY W.P.No.29434 OF2013ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.Satyanarayana Murthy) I.V.R.C.L. Assets & Holdings Limited filed this Writ Petition questioning the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent-A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Comm...
Peddapalem Toddy Cooperative Society Lim Vs. the Government of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.4915 of 2014 20-02-2014 Peddapalem Toddy Cooperative Society Limited, Rep. by its President Sr.M. Narasimha Rao....Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Prohibition & Excise Department, & others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Venkateswara Rao Gudapati Counsel for the Respondent 1 to 3 : GP for Prohibition & Excise HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.4915 of 2014 ORDER: This Writ Petition can be disposed of at this stage, since I have had the benefit of hearing the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Excise, who accepted notice on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner herein is a Toddy Cooperative Society Limited, Peddapalem. It sought for a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not renewing its licence bearing No.NRT/20/1/2007-08/TCS, on the ground that the original licence is not p...
Mahathi HighSchool,Warangal District Vs. the Institute of Hon'bleLokay ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.WRIT PETITION No.2748 OF201420-02-2014 Mahathi High School,Warangal District..Petitioner The Institute of Hon'ble Lokayukta of A.P.,Hyderabad..Respondent Counsel for Petitioner : Sr.P. Nagendra Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Sr.Y. Ravindra Counsel for respondent No.7 : Sr.V. Hemasundar Reddy (Party in-person) HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.2748 of 2014 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) In terms of our earlier order dated 04.02.2014, report of the Regional Joint Director dated 06.12.2013 has been produced. We thought on that day that report would be relevant and appropriate to decide the matter, but when we received the copy of the complaint made by the unofficial respondent, who happens to be a learned lawyer of the District Court and app...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »