Andhra Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Trust for Social Justice Rep. by Its Pre Vs. State of Andhra Pradeshre ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.23 OF201424-02-2014 Trust for Social Justice rep. by its President B. Sree Latha... Petitioner State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Govt., Ministry of Environment, Forests, Science and Technology and others... Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri Jampana Kanaka Raju Counsel for respondents: Assistant Solicitor General for R.8 and R.9 Sri V.V. Prabhakara Rao for R.11 G.P. for Home for R.6 G.P. for Forests for R.2 G.P. for Municipal Administration & Urban Development for R.3 G.P. for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development for R.4 Sri Sudhakar Reddy & Ms. Neeraja Reddy for R. Sri Nagesh Bheemapaka for R.23 Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy for R.7 Dr. I. Sujatha for R.22 Sri Avinash Desai for R.10 G.P. for Information & Public Relations for R.5. : ?. CASES REFERRED: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE SRI...
Regional Director, Southern Region, Mini Vs. Minoo R.Shroff,chairman, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.1305 OF2005AND BATCH242-2014 Regional Director, Southern Region, Ministry of Company Affairs, Chennai, being rep.,by Registrar of Companies, A.P., having office at II Floor, Kendriyia Sadan Hyderabad....Petitioner. Minoo R.Shroff, Chairman, Raymond Ltd., Mahindra Towers, Mumbai and others...Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner:Sri G.KRISHNA MURTHY. Counsel for respondents:Sri S.RAVI AND OTHERS. HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. (1987) 3 SCC272. (2009) 14 SCC1153. (1979) 2 SCC179HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.1305 OF2005& 1778 OF2005Common Order: These two revisions are against the order dated 2-5-2005 in Crl.M.P.No.995 of 2005 to 1013 of 2005 in C.C.No.14 of 2005 on the file of Special Judge for Economic Offences, Hyderabad.2. Brief facts of the case leading to this revision are as follows: Registrar of Companies, Andhra Pradesh filed complaint against 35 accused persons for offences unde...
Fayaz Ahmed @ Hasan and Others Vs. State of A.P., Throughp.P., High Co ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.12866 of 2010 AND BATCH2402-2014 Fayaz Ahmed @ Hasan and others. ... Petitioners State of A.P., through P.P., High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Sharad Sanghi Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Public Prosecutor Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri M.A. Hameed : ?.Cases referred: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.12866 and 12867 of 2010 COMMON ORDER : These two criminal petitions are filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.Nos.61 and 984 of 2010 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 454, 427 and 506 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C.2. Criminal Petition No.12866 of 2010 is filed by Accused Nos.7 to 10, whereas Criminal Petition No.12867 of 2010 is filed by Accused Nos.1 to 6 in Crime No.31 of 2007 of Falaknuma Police Station, Hyderabad. C.C.No.61 of 2010 is a case which wa...
V. Bhaskar Rao Vs. Hdfc Standard Life Insurance, Rep. by Its Manager a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) The unsuccessful complainant filed appeal against the order dt.25.06 .2013 of the District Forum-III, Hyderabad, in C.C.No.489/2011 whereunder, the Consumer Complaint filed by the appellant/complainant alleging deficiency in service against the respondents/opp.parties, was dismissed. The brief case of the complainant as set out in the complaint is that the complainant has opted for one time premium policy by paying Rs.5 lakhs through opposite party no.2 a corporate agent of opposite party no.1 HDFC Standard Life Insurance. Originally the complainant was holding deposit of Rs.8 lakhs in S.B.Account in opposite party no.2, Union Bank of India. The said amounts were kept and maintained by the complainant solely for the purpose of his daughters marriage. The complainant, with an intention to get more interest, he thought of converting the S.B. Account (part balance) to FDR and proposed the same to opposite party no.2. While so, the Manager of opposite ...
Dr. C. Sai Prasad M.S. (Ortho) Viswa Chakra Orthopaedic Hospital Vs. C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
Oral Order: (Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada, President) 1) This revision is directed against the orderdt. 12.11.2013 made by the Dist. Forum at Vijayawada in IA No. 220/2013 in CC 29/2013 whereby a petition alleged to have been filed u/s 151 of C.P.C. read with section 13(4) of the Consumer Protection Act was allowed. 2) The brief facts are that the complainant/respondent herein filed the said CC alleging medical negligence on the part of the petitioner herein. After filing of written version and accepting affidavit evidence on behalf of both parties and examining the complainant/respondent herein as PW1 and the appellant and some more witnesses on his behalf as RWs 1 to 4, the Dist. Forum posted the matter for arguments. At that stage, it appears that the Andhra Pradesh Medical Council addressed a letter dt. 25.9.2013 to the respondent herein stating that the Ethics Committee had come to the conclusion that there is no negligence so far as the petitioner is concerned. In those circumst...
A. Sri Hari Kumar Raju Vs. the Managing Director, Anshu Automotives Pv ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) This appeal arose out of the order dt.02.11.2012 of the Dist. Consumer Forum at Tirupati made in C.C.No.76/2011 filed by the appellant alleging deficiency in service on the part of the respondents/opp.parties for selling defective vehicle to the complainant and also failed to do service in time. The appellant is the complainant and the respondents are the opp.parties in C.C.No.76/2011. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. The brief case of the complainant as set out in the complaint is that on 07.09.2009, the complainant approached the opp.party no.1, who is the dealer of opposite party no.2, to purchase a four wheeler. The opposite party issued brochure containing salient features of the vehicle GAMA Classic DT and quotation, to the complainant. The complainants bankers State Bank of Hyderabad, Hyderabad branch sanctioned loan to the complainant, for purchase of the vehicle and the payments were made...
Cholamandalam Mg General Insurance Compa Vs. Bathini Elendra and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.1390 of 2007 24-02-2014 Cholamandalam MG General Insurance Company Limited ...Appellant Bathini Elendra and others ....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant:Sri Kota Subbarao Counsel for respondents 1 to 4 : Sri T.Damodar Counsel for respondent No.5 : none appeared HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. 2005(12)SCC2432.2003 JT(7) SC-520 3. 2003 ACJ page 1 4. 2003(1) Supreme 732 5. 2003 ACJ15506. 2007 ACJ10437. 2008 ACJ268SC8 2007(7) Scale 753 9. 2013 ACJ page 1 10.2013(11) SCC554HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1390 OF2007JUDGMENT: The Cholamandalam MG General Insurance Company Limited (2nd respondent in the claim petition) filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- District Judge, Warangal (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.8 of 2005 dated 05.03.2007, awarding compensation of Rs.3,50,000/-(Rupees three lakh fifty thousand only ) ...
Setti China Venkata R Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1869 of 2006 21-02-2014 Setti China Venkata Rao....Petitioner. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. .... Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Kamalakar Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : ?.Cases referred:1. (2000) 1 Supreme Court Cases 278 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1869 of 2006 Date:21.02.2014 JUDGMENT: This revision is preferred against Judgement dated 08-11-2006 in Crl.A.No.96/2004 on the file of I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam whereunder judgment dated 02-08-2004 in C.C.No.520/2002 on the file of II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam (formerly V Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam) was confirmed.2. Brief facts leading to filing of this revision are as follows:- Sub-Inspector of Police, Gajuwaka Law & Order Police Station filed charge sheet against the revision...
The New India Assurance Co. Lt Vs. Smt.Nagidi Sugunamma and 3 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.2386 of 2012 AND BATCH2102-2014 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.....Appellant Smt.Nagidi Sugunamma and 3 others .... Respondents #The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.....Appellant $Sri Nalla Nagamani and 4 others... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Ravishankar Jandhyala Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K.Govind : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR2009SC208(2008)12SCC7012. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 3. (2006) 4 SCC2504. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 5. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 6. 2008(1)LS-SC-177 7. (1997)7 SCC-558 8. (2007)13 SCC2469. 2008(1) Scale 531 10. 2008(1) Scale 727 11. 2008 ACJ65412. JT-2003(2)SC-595=2003-ACJ-611=2003-ACT-611(SC) 13. 2008-ACJ-1498 14. AIR2007SC197115. Appeal (Civil) C.C.No.10993 of 2009 16. 2010 (5) ALT10517. 2005 (4) ACJ72118. AIR2011SC1234= 2011 (2) SCJ63919. (2013)7 SCC6220. 1965(1) A11. E.R-563 21. 1963(2) All.E.R-432 22. 1969(1)A11.E.R -555 23. 1995 ACJ366SC) 24. 2013 ACJ1403(4)ALT-35(SC)....
Godavarthy Venkateswa Vs. Yellanki Ravi Shankar and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5766 of 2012 21-02-2014 Godavarthy Venkateswarlu.Petitioner Yellanki Ravi Shankar and another.Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sr.K. Indra Reddy Counsel for 2nd respondent : Sr.C.V.Bhaskara Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : 1) 2010 (1) ALD5452) (2007) 13 SCC576THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5766 of 2012 ORDER: The Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, flouted all the norms that are stipulated the context of execution of a decree. The petitioner, who is the judgment debtor, had to approach this Court on number of occasions to protect his rights. The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.139 of 2007 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, against the petitioner, for recovery of Rs.2,15,683/- on the strength of promissory notes. The suit has been decreed ex parte on 28.12.2007 for a sum of Rs.2,17,087/-. About two years after the decree was passed, the 1st responden...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »