Andhra Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nakka Trimurthul Vs. State of A.P., Through P.P., High Court
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRL.A No.1191 of 2009 06-02-2014 Nakka Trimurthulu ... Appellant State of A.P., through P.P., High Court of A.P., Hyderabad....Respondent Counsel for petitioner: Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao. Counsel for respondents: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : ... THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Dt. 06.02.2014 Crl. Appeal No.1191 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The appellant was alleged to have killed one M. Dhanraj at 2120 hours on 15.04.2006 at Chikkadapally area of Hyderabad. He was put to trial in S.C.No.179 of 2008 in the Court of III- Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad as the sole accused. Through judgment dated 11.08.2009, the trial Court convicted him and imposed the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/-. Hence the appeal.2. The case of the prosecution was that on 15.04...
Afroz Khan and Three OThe Vs. State of A.P., Through P.P., High Court
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY andTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRL.A No.1184 of 2009 06-02-2014 Afroz Khan & three others... Appellants State of A.P., through P.P., High Court of A.P., Hyderabad....Respondent Counsel for petitioner: Ms. Naseeb Afshan. Counsel for respondents: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED :... THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Dt. 06.02.2014 Crl. Appeal No.1184 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) In S.C.No.199 of 2008 on the file of I-Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad, A-1 to A6 were tried for the offence of committing murder of Sk Wahid Kureshi on 26.03.2007 near Nataraj Talkies, Adilabad at 1230 noon. Through its judgment dated 23.09.2009, the trial Court acquitted A5 and A6, but convicted A1 to A4 for the offence, punishable under Sec.302 IPC, and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life. Fine of Rs.2500/- on each was imposed, a...
Dr. Shaik Mohammed Khasim Anwar and Another Vs. Khaja Moinuddin
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) Complainants are the appellants herein and this appeal is directed against the order of the Dist. Forum-II, Hyderabad dt. 8.5.2013 whereby the Dist. Forum dismissed the complaint on the ground that it is barred by limitation. 2) The brief facts that led to filing of said complaint are as under: The complainants purchased flat Nos. 202 and 203 from the respondent/Opposite Party on the assurances made by the opposite party that they would provide all amenities such as lift, electrical transformer, overhead tank, drinking water, parking space for two and four wheeler vehicles in accordance with developmental agreement. Believing the version of the respondent/opposite party they got the flats registered in their favour on 18.11.2006 and took possession of the flats but the opposite party failed to provide the amenities as agreed upon. The complainants submit that despite payment of development charges and Rs. 1 lakh towards car parking in the year 2007 t...
B. Jayasree Vs. the Branch Manager, India Bulls Securities Ltd. and An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order in C.C.No.179/2011 dated 02-7-2010 on the file of District Forum, Kurnool. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant averred that she deposited an amount of Rs.2,60,000/- with opposite party No.1 for earning her livelihood. In the month of June, 2006 the employee of opposite party No.1, Mr.Jammer contacted her and lured her to enter in share transactions and she opened Demat account ID.No.KL-158 with opposite party No.1 with an initial deposit of Rs.1000/-. Thereafter the complainant deposited on various dates from 20-7-2006 to 14-9-2006 a total sum of Rs.2,60,000/- and she had withdrawn Rs.33,000/- on 27-9-2006. Mr.Jameer, employee of opposite party conducted the transactions properly on her behalf by written contact notes and acknowledgements and after resignation of Mr.Jameer, another employee ...
Dr. Akella Satya Vijay Sarma Vs. M/S. Modi Developers and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) This is a Consumer Complaint filed by the complainant u/s.17(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. The brief case of the complainant as set out in the complaint is that the opposite party no.1 is a partnership firm engaged in housing construction activity and the opposite party no.2 is the Managing Partner of opposite party no.1. During April/May 2006, the opp.parties gave wide publicity and issued colourful brochure representing the general public that they were constructing the ultra luxury residential complex under the name and style of œ PALM SPRINGS over an extent of Ac.1.67 at Sy.Nos.143,144, 145 part in Kompally Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, R.R.Dist. In brochure, the opp.parties represented that they will provide landscaped gardens, children play ground, swimming pool with Jacuzzi, cement concrete roads and lighting, etc. The complainant being induced by the rep...
Machunuri Shank Vs. the State of Andhra Prad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1182 of 2009 06-02-2014 Machunuri Shanker ...appellant. The State of Andhra Pradesh...Respondent Counsel for appellant: Smt. C.Vasundhara Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1182 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The sole appellant - accused in S.C.No.47 of 2007 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court).Medak, filed this appeal feeling aggrieved by the conviction and sentence handed out to him by the trial Court. The trial Court convicted the appellant for the offence of committing murder under Section 302 I.P.C.and imposed the punishment of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/-. The appellant married Lavanya @ Madhavi, the daughter of PWs.1 and 2, on 11.05.2006. At the tim...
A.Hanumanthu Vs. the Depot Manager, Apsrtc,miryalaguda De
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.14439 of 2008 06-02-2014 A.Hanumanthu....PETITIONER The Depot Manager, APSRTC,Miryalaguda Depot, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District and others.....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.M.Amanulla Khan Counsel for respondents: Sr.H.Venugopal, SC for APSRTC : ?.Cases referred: 1. 1988(1) L.L.N.760 2. 1996(1) ALD516(D.B.) 3. 1997(2) An.W.R.126 4. 1997(1) ALD758(D.B.) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION No.14439 of 2008 ORDER: The petitioner, a Conductor in the respondent Corporation (Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation).was removed from service, based on certain cash and ticket irregularities, said to have been committed by the petitioner. The petitioner, having raised an industrial dispute and having been unsuccessful, filed the present writ petition questioning the award, dated 23.10.2007 in I.D.No.18 of 2006 passed by the Labour Court III, Hyderabad, A.P.The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner initia...
theTadpatri Lorry Owner'sAssociation,A Vs. M. Raju and other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.171 OF201405-02-2014 The Tadpatri Lorry Owner's Association,Anantapur District..Appellant M. Raju & others.....Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.R.N.Hemendranath Reddy Counsel for the respondent No.1: Sr.Ch. Ravinder Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3: Government Pleader for Transport HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WAMP.No.271 of 2014 And WRIT APPEAL No.171 OF2014DATE: 05.02.2014 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) WAMP.No.271 of 2014 is filed to grant leave to the petitioner to file writ appeal against the order dated 31.12.2012 of the learned Trial Judge in W.P.No.40356 of 2012. Leave granted to prefer appeal to the petitioner, who is the Lorry Owner's Association, as we are...
M.Ramakrishna S/Ovenkattappai Vs. the Sub-divisional Magistrate and Rd ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO W.P.No.15623 OF201005-02-2014 M.Ramakrishna S/o Venkattappaiah....petitioner The Sub-Divisional Magistrate and RDO, Vijayawada and another.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Gangarami Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: G.P for Home & Revenue : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO W.P.NO.15623 OF2010ORDER:- The writ petitioner is a Managing Partner of a lodge situated at Kodad Road, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District. The 2nd respondent-Inspector of Police, Jaggaiahpet Circle along with mediators raided the said lodge on 03-05- 2010 at 13.00 Hours and registered Cr.No.50 of 2010 for an offence under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 ( for short ".the Act".) against the petitioner and five others. Based on the information furnished by the 2nd respondent, 1st respondent issued a notice dated 02-06-2010 under Section 18(1) of the Act calling for explanation ...
Thagarakunta Nagi Reddy and Other Vs. State of a
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1046 of 2009 05-02-2014 Thagarakunta Nagi Reddy and others...appellants. State of A.P....Respondent Counsel for appellants:Sr.K.Suresh Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1046 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) As many as five accused were tried for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 149 I.P.C.in S.C.No.618 of 2005 by the Court of Sessions Judge, Ananthapur. It was alleged that all the accused killed one Balamma, with common objective. The trial Court held that the charges framed against the accused are proved, and accordingly, convicted and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302 read with 149 I.P.C., and fine of Rs.200/- each was also imposed. The sentence of...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »