Andhra Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mir Osman a Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.1215 of 2009 11-02-2014 Mir Osman Ali... Appellant-Accused State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant:Smt. Ammaji Nettem Counsel for respondent :Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : .... HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARSIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1215 of 2009 11th February, 2014 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S.K. Jaiswal) This is a case of infanticide wherein it is alleged that the appellant- accused has killed his one year old daughter - Muskan Fatima and has thrown the dead body in a well. Crime No.192 of 2008 was registered by P.S. Kanchanbagh in relation thereto. Charge-sheet was filed after investigation and on committal to the Metropolitan Sessions Division, the case was numbered as S.C.No.36 of 2009 on the file of IV-Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. Thro...
M.Swarupa, and Three Others Vs. Musapet Narsimhulu, and Anothe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.389 OF200711-02-2014 M.Swarupa, and three others .... Appellants Musapet Narsimhulu, and another.... Respondents Counsel for the appellants:Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : -- Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri N.Mohan Krishna : : ?.Cases referred:1. 2006 (1) Decisions Today SC4792. 2013 (4) ALD753. 2012 (1) ALT812DB4 AIR2009SC2085. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 6. (2006) 4 SCC2507. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 8. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 9. 2008 ACJ265410. 2008(1)LS-SC-177 11. (1997)7 SCC-558 12. (2007) 13 SCC24613. 2008(1) Scale 531 14. 2008 ACJ65415. 2007 ACJ72116. 2001 ACJ84317. 2008(1) Scale 727 18. JT-2003(2) SC595= 2003 ACJ61119. 2010 ACJ16520. 2012 ACJ128421. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 22. 2008 ACJ288523. 2000 ACJ31924. 1996 ACJ1046(SC) 25. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 26. 2008-ACJ-1498 27. AIR2007SC197128. (2004)2 SCC-1 29. Appeal (Civil) C.C.No.10993 of 2009 30. 2010 (5) ALT10531. 2005 (4) ACJ72132. AI...
Karri Prakash Vs. T. N. Rajyalakshmi and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
Oral Order: (Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada, President) 1) These Revisions are directed against the order dt. 17.7.2013 in IA Nos. 10/2013 to 12/2013 in CC No. 12/2009 on the file of Dist. Forum, Machilipatnam whereby the said petitions filed by the Opposite Party/Petitioner herein were rejected holding that the matter cannot be re-opened for the purpose of receipt of a document marked as Ex. B2 and also to examine Sri Kallepalli Venkata Nageswara Rao as a witness. 2) Having heard the submissions on behalf of the parties and also the order, in our considered view, the order impugned in these revisions cannot sustain. It is true that it is an old case of the year 2009, and the matter is posted for arguments, and that can never be a ground to reject a petition of this nature to re-open the matter. Normally, sufficient opportunity shall be given to the parties to adduce both oral and documentary evidence in disposing of the cases. As stated supra, no doubt, it is an old matter but on that ...
Penki Krishnam Naidu Vs. M/S National Horticulture Board, Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the order in C.C.No.131/2011 dated 23-8-2012 on the file of District Forum, Vizianagaram. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant, an agriculturist and cultivation is the source of his livelihood. He owned lands in Sy. numbers 229, 230 and 231 at Sathivada Village, Amiti Revenue village, Therlam Mandal in an extent of A.c.13.50 and also owns other lands. In pursuance of the opposite partys offer, he made an application for development of cultivation of exportable high value mango crop through production and post harvest management under letter of intent and paid necessary fee, submitted project report issued by the Global Horty services, Hyderabad in respect of the aforesaid complainants land, bank consent letter for loan from State Bank of Hyderabad, Rajam branch along with pre-sanction report and submit...
Smt.T.Subhadra and TwooThe Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
HE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO W.P.No.23079 OF200510-02-2014 Smt.T.Subhadra and two others....petitioners Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, rep.by its Commissioner and another.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana Counsel for the Respondents: Smt.A.Deepthi, Standing Counsel for GHMC. : : ?. Cases referred:1. AIR2001A.P. 345 2. AIR1995A.P.208 3. 2004(5) ALD6604. (2005) 2 SCC1265. AIR1995A.P. 230 6. 2001(3) ALT2007. 2011(6) ALD2838. 2001 (2) ALD182(DB) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO W.P.NO.23079 OF2005ORDER:- Around 2000 B.C., King of Heracleopolis wrote to his son, ".Do justice, that you may live long upon earth. Calm the weeper, do not oppress the widow, do not oust the man from his father's property, do not degrade magnates from their seats. Beware of punishing wrongly; do not kill, for it will not profit you.". These wise words apart, we have a written law which was breached in this case. 02. A widow, aged abo...
Vemula Jaga Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Public Pro
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1203 of 2009 10-02-2014 Vemula Jagadish..appellant The State of A.P.Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P...Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Smt.A.Gayatri Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Addl. P.P. HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1203 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The sole accused in S.C.No.148 of 2008 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar filed this appeal, feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 28-08-2009, rendered therein. The accused was tried for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C.for committing the murder of one Sr.Cheerala Keshavulu, on 13-09-2007. Sentence of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.100/- was imposed. He was also tried for the offence under Section 324 I.P.C.for causing injuries to the wife o...
Gurumeetsingh S/O. Sri Mahender SIn Vs. State of A.P., Rep. Bypublicse ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1205 OF200910-02-2014 Gurumeet Singh S/o. Sri Mahender Singh... Appellant State of A.P., rep. By Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad... Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Y. Ravindra Kumar Counsel for the Respondent :Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases referred: NIL HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1205 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The appellant was tried for the offence of causing death of a Sub-Inspector of Police, Malakpet, by name, E. Madhava Reddy, on the intervening night of 2/3.09.2007.2. The case of the prosecution was that vehicle the Police, Malakpet at Gaddiannaram, commenced checking of vehicles from 11.30 p.m. on 02.09.2007, and two Sub-Inspectors, by names, Ch. Chandra Sekhar - PW-1 and E. Madhava Reddy - the deceased, were discharging the duties at that time. The A...
State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou Vs. Rayudu Ramana and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.540 of 2009 10-02-2014 State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad... Appellant Rayudu Ramana & another...Respondent HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED :.... THE HON'BLE SRI JUSITCE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Dt. 10.02.2014 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.540 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S.K.Jaiswal) Aggrieved by the Judgment of the learned VII-Additional Sessions Judge, Kakinada, dated 28-1-2008, in S.C.No.529 of 2006, acquitting the accused of the charge under Section 302 read with 34 of I.P.C., the State preferred the appeal.2. The allegations in brief are as follows:- One Vittanala Venkata Ramana @ Ramana (deceased) is the elder son of Vittanala Narayana @ Narayaudu who is a resident of Ramanayyapet, Kakinada Rural. Vittanala Narayana @ Narayaudu has four sons and a daughter. His 3rd son by name Krishna (P.W.3) was given adoption....
The Andhra Pradesh Rajiv Swagruha Corporation Limited Rep. by Its Mana ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) All these appeals are filed by the Andhra Pradesh RajivSwagruhaCorporation Ltd., represented by its Managing Director assailing the orders of the Dist. Forum, Srikakulam in the above said CCs whereby the opposite parties/appellants herein were directed to complete the construction and hand over possession of houses as early as possible and to pay rents till the date of delivery together with compensation @ Rs. 5,000/- each and costs. 2) The facts in CC 51/2013 are taken as representative case. 3) The complainants submit that attracted by the advertisement issued by the Opposite Parties they parted with their money on various dates i.e., almost entire sale consideration (except registration charges) for construction of independent houses allotted to them under Anamitra project. They also entered into agreements of sale in the year 2009 and 2010 with a stipulation that the opposite parties shall complete the construction and hand over possession of the...
E. Chandrasekhar Choudary Vs. Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-10-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) The complainant in CC No. 147/2011 is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the orderdt.26.9.2012 before the Dist. Forum, Kurnool, whereby the complaint of the appellant was dismissed. 2) The brief facts that led to filing of the present appeal are as under: The complainant is the owner of tractor bearing No. AP-21-X-7188 and the said vehicle was hired by M/s. Sree Rayalseema Alkalis and Allied Ltd., Gondiparla. The said vehicle was also insured with the respondent insurance company for a period of one year i.e., from 8.3.2009 to 7.3.2010, and the policy No. is 1808782343002479. It appears that on 2.10.2009 the driver of the complainant took the vehicle to the hirer i.e., Alkalis Factory but in the evening because of severe floods, the vehicle could not be returned. As neither the vehicle nor the driver were returned, the owner of the vehicle i.e., the appellant made an attempt to give a report to the police on 10.10.2009 but because of h...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »