Andhra Pradesh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Y. Raja Kumar Vs. M/S. Sunshine Internationals, Represented by Its Pro ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
Oral Order: (Per Sri S.Bhujanga Rao, Honble Member). This appeal is directed against the order dt.27.06.2013 of the District Forum-II, East Godavari, Rajahmundry made in C.C.No.56/2012 filed by the appellant/complainant, seeking direction to the opposite parties to take back the machine along with finished goods and pay a total amount of Rs.6,50,000/- under various heads and to pay costs of the complaint. The brief case of the complainant as set out in the complaint is that the complainant purchased Automatic Paper Plate Machine, from the opposite party no.1 proprietary concern represented by opposite party no.2 on 27.06.2012 with a buy back option, by paying initially an amount of Rs. 50,000/- by way of online transfer from SBI account. The machine has been delivered by transport i.e. Associated Road Carrier Ltd. i.e. the opposite party no.3 and the complainant received the same. Within few days thereafter, the complainant sent an amount of Rs.24,000/- by way of onlin...
Dr. K. Surya Kumar Vs. the Divisional Manager United India Insurance C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) The complainant is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the order dt. 10.4.2013 in CC No. 444/2012 on the file of Dist. Forum-I, Hyderabad whereby the Dist. Forum is pleased to award only an amount of Rs. 800/- towards compensation as against his claim of Rs. 25,000/-. 2) The brief facts are that the complainant a senior citizen obtained householders insurance policy from the opposite party insurance company valid from 22.12.2010 to 21.12.2011 covering the household articles like fans, TV etc. While so, during the last week of October, 2011 he lost four ceiling fans due to theft and the LG TV mother board was burnt due to electrical short-circuit. The complainant lodged a claim on 11.11.2011 on which the insurance company deputed a surveyor who inspected the premises, took photographs and submitted his report to the insurance company. Despite registered notice issued on 29.11.2011 the insurance company did not settle his claim. In those ...
Krishna Chaitanya Gondi Vs. M/S. Hill County Properties Ltd. and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) 1) This is a complaint filed u/s 17(1) of the Consumer Protection Act for a direction to the Opposite Parties (Ops) to refund Rs. 96,70,774/- with interest @ 24% p.a., from the date of complaint till the date of realization and refund insurance premium of Rs. 13,104/- with interest @ 24% p.a., together with compensation and costs of Rs. 50,000/- each. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that Op1 (hereinafter called the developer) floated a venture and agreed to sell apartments situated in Sy196/P etc., at Bachupally of Qutubullapur Mandal, in Ranga Reddy district in an extent of Ac. 85.36 Guntas of land. The developer represented that it had obtained layout permission from HUDA for constructing the independent houses and flats etc. Under the agreement of sale, consideration was agreed to be paid in instalments viz., 10% of the amount on the date of booking, and another 10% within 15 days from the date of booking and the remaining in phased m...
M/S. Sahitya Housing Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Director T.V. Chow ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada, President 1) This revision is directed against the order in IA No. 128/2013 in CC No. 1004/2010 dt. 1.11.2013 before the Dist. Forum-II, Hyderabad whereby the said petition filed u/s 13(4) of the Consumer Protection read with Section 151 C.P.C. for appointment of Mandal Surveyor for the purpose of locating the survey number and measuring the plot No. 234/1 and to demarcate the plot situated at Rangapur Village of Kothur Mandal in Mahaboobnagar District was allowed. 2) The brief facts are that the respondent/complainant purchased 400 sq.yds of plot from the Opposite Parties i.e., the petitioners herein for a valid consideration of Rs. 78,000/-. Thereafter she parted with the said money including the registration charges. Accordingly the said plot No. 234/1 was registered in favour of the respondent/complainant. Thereafter when she inspected the plot in question with the engineers it came to light that the extent of plot is not 400 sq.yds but only 260 sq.yd...
The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs. Karre Thirupathamma and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.1515 of 2006 12-02-2014 The New India Assurance Company Limited,rep.by its Divisional Manager, Secunderabad....Appellant Karre Thirupathamma and others.Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.C.V.Rajeeva Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: M/s.Hema Jaiswal : : ?.Cases referred: 1 (2003) 2 Supreme Court Cases 274 2 (2008) 3 Supreme Court Cases 379 3 (2011) 14 Supreme Court Cases 467 4 (2013) 10 Supreme Court Cases 695 5 (2013) 9 Supreme Court Cases 54 HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.1515 of 2006 JUDGMENT: The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has instructed them to withdraw the appeal. However, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that it is the duty of the Tribunal to award just and reasonable compensation even if the claimed amount is less. But, when the Tribunal comes to a conclusion that the claimants are entitled for more compensation than claimed, the Tribunal should award...
The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs. Karre Thirupathamma and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.1515 of 2006 12-02-2014 The New India Assurance Company Limited,rep.by its Divisional Manager, Secunderabad.Appellant Karre Thirupathamma and others....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.C.V.Rajeeva Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: M/s.Hema Jaiswal : : ?.Cases referred: 1 (2003) 2 Supreme Court Cases 274 2 (2008) 3 Supreme Court Cases 379 3 (2011) 14 Supreme Court Cases 467 4 (2013) 10 Supreme Court Cases 695 5 (2013) 9 Supreme Court Cases 54 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.1515 of 2006 JUDGMENT: The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has instructed them to withdraw the appeal. However, the l For the sake of convenience, parties will be referred to as they are arrayed in the Tribunal. The brief facts of the case are as follows: On 10.04.2003 at about 0.15 houRs.the deceased Shankar-husband of the 1st claimant and father of his minor daught The owner of the vehicle 1st respondent rem...
Gandla Rajender and Ot Vs. State of A.P., Rep.by Its Public Prosecu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE Criminal Appeal No.80 of 2012 12-02-2014 Gandla Rajender and others Appellants State of A.P., Rep.by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad...Respondent Counsel for appellants :A.Gayatri Reddy Counsel for respondent :Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.80 of 2012 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice MSK Jaiswal) Appellants No.1 and 2 are spouses and the 3rd appellant is said to be their friend. All the three were charge-sheeted by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kamareddy, for the offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 34 of I.P.C., and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989, in the Court of Special Judge for trial of cases under SCs/STs (PoA) Act, Nizamabad. Through Judgment, dated 30-12-2011, the trial Court found the accused guilty of the charges, convicted and sentenced them to u...
S.Venkatda Lakshmamm Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Sho Police
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.1160 of 2014 11-02-2014 S.Venkatda Lakshmamma ....Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh, SHO Police Station, Yellanuru, Anantapur Dist, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.G.Seena Kumar Counsel for Respondent : Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1160 OF2014ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. Earlier to the present report, the petitioner gave a report to the police which reads as follows:- The marriage of the petitioner's daughter was performed on 3- 11-2012. There is a custom in the village, according to which, the persons belonging to Madiga community used to beat the drums at the time of marriage on receiving some amount from the bride's parents. The petitioner purchased four drum...
Katta Penchalaswamy and OThe Vs. Mopuru Veera Raghava Redd
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No.4676 of 2011 11-02-2014 Katta Penchalaswamy and others ...Petitioners/Defendants Mopuru Veera Raghava Reddy...Respondent/Plaintiff Counsel for the Petitioners:Sr.P. Gangarami Reddy Counsel for the Respondent:Smt. Y.L.Siva Kalpana Reddy : : ?.Cases Referred: 1. AIR1974Orissa 173 2. 2008(4) ALT4953. 2005(6) ALD8054. 1998(1) ALT3715. (2002) 2 SCC6566. AIR1975SC17677. 2004(3) ALT63SC) 8. 2007(1) ALT5119. Laws (Mad)-2009-9-18 HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No.4676 of 2011 Order: This CRP is directed against the judgment and decree dated 22.09.2011 passed in O.S.No.171 of 2006 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District. The defendants in the said suit are the petitioners herein and the plaintiff in the said suit is the respondent herein. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the lower Court for the sake of convenience. The case of the pla...
Dr.M.Krishna Pras Vs. Amadalavalasa Municipal Corporation Rep
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-11-2014
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONOURABLE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.737 of 2011 11-02-2014 Dr.M.Krishna Prasad....Appellant Amadalavalasa Municipal Corporation represented by its Commissioner, Amadalavalasa ..Respondent COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT : Sr.Gangadhar Chamarthy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : Sr.S.Nageswara Reddy GIST HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATION: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.737 of 2011 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) This appeal is admitted for hearing. ControveRs.in this appeal is not serious one for which it needs elaborate hearing. After service of notice to the respondent, learned Counsel for the respondent is present. The writ petition was filed for setting aside the proceedings No.16/07 dated 5th October, 2007, whereby the respondent has called upon the petitioner to remove the constructions made by him in Survey No.129 of Krishnapuram village...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »