Andhra Pradesh Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Navayuga Engineering Co. L Vs. The Assistant Commissioner(Ct), Ltu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY W.P.Nos.7561 of 2014 and batch 03-12-2014 M/s.Navayuga Engineering Co.Ltd.Petitioner The Assistant Commissioner (CT).LTU, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District & Ors..Respondents Counsel for the petitioners:Sr.S.Ravi, Learned Senior Counsel for Sr.Ginjupalli Subba Rao Counsel for respondents:Sr.P. Balaji Varma, Learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes; ?. Citations: 1) (2005) 1 SCC6042) (1993) 88 STC2043) (2012) Vol.54 APSTJ14) (2004) 136 STC586(AP) 5) (2008) 47 APSTJ876) Judgment in W.P.No.8174 of 2009 dated 29.04.2009 7) Judgment in W.P.No.15069 of 2009 dated 08.10.2009 8) (2004) 5 SCC19) 1899 (22) ILR (Mad) 68 10) 1932 AIR(PC) 165 11) (1892) 1 QB431452) 12) AIR1961SC166913) (2013) 10 SCC35914) (1985) 1 SCC26015) (1972) 1 ALLER80116) (2011) Vol. 52 APSTJ48(APHC: DB) 17) (2006) 1 SCC27518) AIR1968SC64719) (1996 (6) SCC4420) (2012) 9 SCC68521) (2005) 6 SCC40422) (1955) 2 All ER330 332...
The Commissioner, Customs and Central Exci Vs. M/S. Kinners Steels L
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM C.E.A.No.52 of 2004 03-12-2014 The Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise.Appellant M/S.Kinners Steels Ltd.Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Sr.Gopala Krishna Gokhaley Counsel for respondent: Sr.Narasimham ?. CASES REFERRED: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM C.E.A.No.52 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The respondent is a manufacturer of mild steel bars and rods. Its annual capacity for the assessment year 1999-00 was determined under Rule 96ZP of the Central Excise Rules (for short the Rules) at 2,40,250/- metric tonnes. On 01.10.1999, the respondent filed an application stating that there is change of parameters in the factory and that the quantum of central excise duty determined against it needs to be revised. The application was considered by the concerned authority and through order, dated 13.12.1999, the annual capacity for the assessment year 1...
Chinnareddigari Sambasiva Reddy,s/O Rama Vs. The State of a.P., Reptd ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.36058 of 2014 03-12-2014 Chinnareddigari Sambasiva Reddy,S/o Ramaswamy....Petitioner The State of A.P., reptd by its Principal Civil Supplies Department, Hyderabad and four others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.S.V.Muni Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue (AP) ?. Cases Referred: NIL THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.36058 of 2014 Dated:03.12.2014 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside proceedings in Roc.No.296/2014, dated 08.11.2014, of respondent No.4, whereby he has temporarily appointed respondent No.5, who is a neighbouring fair price shop dealer, as the fair price shop dealer for distribution of essential commodities to the card holders attached to the petitioners fair price shop from the month of December, 2014. I have heard Sr.S.V.Muni Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Plead...
M/S.Melville Finvest Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Asst
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.47 of 2004 03-12-2014 M/s.Melville Finvest Ltd..Appellant Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assts.)..Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Sr.A.V.Krishna Kaundinya Counsel for respondent: Sr.J.V.Prasad < GIST: > HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.47 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.This appeal presents an occasion to address certain typical situations covered by Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).The appellant is a company, undertaking various activities including the trade in yarn, making investments, such as purchase and sale of shares of other companies. For the assessment year 1997-98, the appellant filed returns showing loss of Rs.29,71,990/-. The Assessing Officer gave an intimation making prima facie adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act. On the one hand, the loss of...
Tadikalapudi Sesha Rama Sankhar Kumar Vs. The State of a.P, Rep. by In ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Appeal No.1149 of 2010 02-12-2014 Tadikalapudi Sesha Rama Sankhar Kumar....Appellant The State of A.P, rep. by Inspector of Police, ACB,Eluru Range, Eluru,Rep. by Spl. Public Prosecutor,High Court, Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sr.U. Ramanjaneyulu Counsel for Respondent : Sr.M.B.Thimma Reddy Special Public Prosecutor for ACB ?. Cases referred: 1) 2007 CriLJ754(SC) 2) 2010 (1) ALD (Crl.) 924 (SC) 3) 1997 (2) ALD (Crl.) 743 (AP) 4) (2011) 2 Supreme Court Cases 36 5) MANU/SC/0505/2014 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1149 of 2010 Judgment: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the Accused Officer (AO) aggrieved by the judgment dated 24.09.2010 in C.C.No.7 of 2005 passed by learned Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada convicting him for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short P.C Act) and sentencing him to undergo R.I for a period of...
The Union of India Represented by Its Di Vs. S.Mohan R
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Writ Appeal No.839 of 2006 02-12-2014 The Union of India represented by its Director and others..Appellants. S.Mohan Reddy.Respondent. Counsel for appellants:Sr.R.S.Murthy Counsel for Respondent : Sr.Krishna Devan ?. Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Writ Appeal No.839 of 2006 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed by the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and its authorities at different levels, who figured as respondents in W.P.No.9250 of 2005, feeling aggrieved by the judgment rendered therein, by the learned Single Judge, on 20.04.2006. The sole respondent herein filed the writ petition, claiming conferment of Temporary Status of Group-D Employee, duly challenging the order, dated 21.12.2004, passed by the 1st appellant herein, in this behalf. The respondent was engaged as Daily Wage Worker initially, ...
The Commissioner of Income Vs. M/S. Godavari Drugs L
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.17 of 2004 02-12-2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax..Appellant M/S.Godavari Drugs Ltd.Respondent Counsel for the appellant : Sr.J.V.Prasad Counsel for respondent : Sr.Pushyam Kiran ?. CASES REFERRED: 1. (2014) 367 ITR575Guj) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.17 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.This is another case, in which we get an occasion to deal with certain facets of Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) The respondent is an exporter and is assessed to income tax. It has been submitting returns year after year, claiming benefits under the relevant provisions of law. For the assessment year 1994-95, it claimed deduction under various heads. An order of assessment was passed on 28.02.1997. The claims of the respondent, referable to Sections 80HH, 80HHC and 80I of the Act were not accepted by the Assessing ...
United India Insurance Company Limited R Vs. Thammineni Ramachandraiah ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.616 of 2009 01-12-2014 United India Insurance Company Limited Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Anantapur....Appellant Thammineni Ramachandraiah and otheRs.Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.E. Venugopal Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Sr.K. Maheswara Rao ?. Cases referred: THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.616 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Challenging the Award dated 09.02.2005 in O.P.No.40 of 2001 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-IV Additional District Judge, (FTC).Anantapur (for short the Tribunal).the appellant/ United India Insurance Company Limited preferred the instant MACMA. 2) On factual side, the case of the claimants is that on 26.10.2000, when the deceasedThammineni Mallikarjuna was travelling from Nizamabad to Kesepalli village along with paddy harvester in the Van bearing No.AP02T7110the driver drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner without observing the electric wires and one of the ...
Giddi Shophy Vs. The District Level Scrutiny Committee, E
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.31973 of 2014 01-12-2014 Giddi Shophyamma.Petitioner The District Level Scrutiny Committee, East Godavari, Kakinada. Rep. by its Chairman-cum-Joint Collector and otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.S.R.Sanku Counsel for Respondents: Government Pleader for Social Welfare (Andhra Pradesh) : ?.Cases referred: (1) 1996 (3) SCC545(2) AIR2012SC591(3) AIR1993SC43THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.31973 OF2014ORDER: The petitioner sought for a Writ of Prohibition declaring as redundant and unwarranted, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 15, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, the action of the 2nd respondent in directing the 1st respondent to enquire into the caste of the petitioner for purpose of disqualifying her to continue as the Sarpanch, Udimidi Village, P.Gannavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. The petitioner has contested the elections for the office of the Sarpanch, ...
Government of andhra Pradesh and Other Vs. V.Soma Sundaram and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.780 of 2006 01-12-2014 Government of Andhra Pradesh and others...APPELLANTS V.Soma Sundaram and others....RESPONDENTS COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS:- G.P.for School Education COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS12:- Smt.Anasuya ?. Cases Referred: (1).1997 (6) ALD331HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.780 of 2006 JUDGMENT:- (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) Respondent Nos.1 to 4 in W.P.No.4124 of 2000 filed this writ appeal feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 11.07.2005, passed by the learned Single Judge. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the writ petition. The petitioners were appointed as Teachers in respondent No.5-institution. The institution was admitted to grant-in-aid by the Government through its order in G.O.Ms.No.299, dated 01.09.1992. Consequent upon that, the services of the petitioner...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »