Andhra Pradesh Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shaik Shaheena and Another Vs. andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Cor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.335 of 2009 17-12-2014 Shaik Shaheena and another....Appellants Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Rep. by its Managing Director/ Vice Chairman, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for Appellants : Sr.G. Sudheer Counsel for Respondent : Sr.K.V.Subba Reddy < Gist: > Head Note: ?. Cases referred: 1) 2014 (1) ALT5122) 2009 ACJ1298(SC) 3) 2007 ACJ1477(Raj) 4) 2013 ACJ1253(SC) THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.335 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 18.09.2008 in M.V.O.P.No.323 of 2007 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-III Additional District Judge, Tirupati (for short Tribunal).the claimants preferred the instant MACMA. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The fiRs.claimant is the mother and second claimant is the younger brother of the deceasedShaik Abdul Nabi. On 02.09.2006 at about 11:30am, when the deceased started his auto bearing No.AP03U8670at Rompicherla along wit...
The Commissioner of Income Tax, andhra P Vs. M/S. Shanker Constructi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.135 of 2004 16-12-2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh V, Hyderabad.Appellant. M/S.Shanker Constructions.Respondent. Counsel for Appellant: Ms.Kiranmayee for Sr.J.V.Prasad Counsel for Respondent : Sr.A.V.Shiva Kartikeya ?. Cases referred: [1962].046 ITR0144[1964].053 ITR0114[1925].1 ITC363 371 THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.135 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).is preferred by the Revenue, feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 03.03.2003, passed by the Hyderabad Bench A of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal).in I.T.A.No.40/Hyd/2000. The facts that gave rise to filing of the appeal are as under: The respondent is a Civil Contractor. It was awarded a contract by the Hyderabad Municipal...
Dr.T.Suryanarayana Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.129 of 2004 16-12-2014 Dr.T.Suryanarayana Rao..Appellant Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax..Respondent Counsel for the appellant:Sr.Pushyam Kiran Counsel for respondent: Ms.Kiranmayee ?.Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.129 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The appellant is a Lecturer in English, and an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).A search was conducted in his premises on 04.11.1993 and he was issued a notice, dated 04.04.1995 under Section 148 of the Act. In response to the same, he submitted block returns showing income of Rs.45,455/-. An order of assessment was passed on 31.03.1997 to the effect that the appellant has unexplained income of Rs.7,60,515/- and the same was brought under tax. The appeal preferred by the appellant herein before the Commissioner (Appeals) was allowed and...
M/S. Dasapallaproperties, Suryabagh, V Vs. Dcit, Circle ? I,visakhapat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.139 of 2004 16-12-2014 M/S.Dasapalla Properties, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam.Appellant DCIT, Circle I, Visakhapatnam.Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.A.V.KRISHNA KAUNDINYA Counsel for Respondent: Sr.VIVEK CHANDRA SHEKAR, representing Sr.S.R.ASHOK, learned Senior Standing Counsel : ?. Cases referred: 1. (1962) 46 ITR1442. (1964) 51 ITR3533. (1988) 169 ITR5974. (1993) 201 ITR2085. (2014) 367 ITR298(T&AP) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.139 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This is an appeal preferred by the assessee feeling aggrieved by the order dated 20.02.2004 passed by the Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal).in I.T.A.No.569/V/98. The appellant is a partnership firm, involved in the business of acquiring properties, raising constructions and d...
M/S. Dasapallaproperties, Suryabagh, V Vs. Dcit, Circle ? I,visakhapat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.139 of 2004 16-12-2014 M/S.Dasapalla Properties, Suryabagh, Visakhapatnam.Appellant DCIT, Circle I, Visakhapatnam.Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.A.V.KRISHNA KAUNDINYA Counsel for Respondent: Sr.VIVEK CHANDRA SHEKAR, representing Sr.S.R.ASHOK, learned Senior Standing Counsel : ?. Cases referred: 1. (1962) 46 ITR1442. (1964) 51 ITR3533. (1988) 169 ITR5974. (1993) 201 ITR2085. (2014) 367 ITR298(T&AP) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.139 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This is an appeal preferred by the assessee feeling aggrieved by the order dated 20.02.2004 passed by the Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal).in I.T.A.No.569/V/98. The appellant is a partnership firm, involved in the business of acquiring properties, raising constructions and d...
The Commissioner of Income Tax, andhra P Vs. M/S. Shanker Constructi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.135 of 2004 16-12-2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh V, Hyderabad.Appellant. M/S.Shanker Constructions.Respondent. Counsel for Appellant: Ms.Kiranmayee for Sr.J.V.Prasad Counsel for Respondent : Sr.A.V.Shiva Kartikeya ?. Cases referred: [1962].046 ITR0144[1964].053 ITR0114[1925].1 ITC363 371 THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.135 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).is preferred by the Revenue, feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 03.03.2003, passed by the Hyderabad Bench A of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal).in I.T.A.No.40/Hyd/2000. The facts that gave rise to filing of the appeal are as under: The respondent is a Civil Contractor. It was awarded a contract by the Hyderabad Municipal...
S. Gangaiah and Othe Vs. State of Telangana, Rep. by Its Principa
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION Nos.31174 of 2014 and batch 15-12-2014 S. Gangaiah and others....PETITIONERS State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.... RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioners: MR. S. SATYAM REDDY For MR. V. RAVINDER RAO MR. MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI SMT. K.V. RAJASREE MR. K. GANI REDDY MR. Y. NAGI REDDY Counsel for Respondents:GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (TG) & (AP) MR. K. RAMAKANTH REDDY ...
Lachalla Kist Vs. Rekha Ramesh and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1383 of 2014 15-12-2014 Lachalla Kistaiah.Petitioner Rekha Ramesh and another....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sr.K.Govind Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.V.V.N.Narayana Rao : ?. Cases referred: 1. (2014).SCC9022. (2010) 1 SCC6893. AIR1994AP334. 2011(1) ALD795. 2005(1) ALD2686. (2002).SCC333HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1383 of 2014 ORDER : 1) This revision petition is filed by the petitioner/Respondent under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 02.04.2014 in C.M.A.No.5 of 2013 on the file of VI Additional District Judge at Siddipet, Medak District under which the order and decree dated 30.01.2013 in I.A.No.942 of 2012 in O.S.No.279 of 2012 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Siddipet was set aside. 2) Brief facts are that the petitioner herein filed the suit for perpetual injunction in respect of the petition schedule property...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs. V.Jayanarayana Reddy and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A Nos.1016 of 2010 and batch 11-12-2014 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Ananthapur.Appellant V.Jayanarayana Reddy and others.Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.Bathula Venkateswara Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.A.V.S.Satish Babu ?. Cases referred: 1)(2013) 8 Supreme Court Cases 389 2)2014 (3) ALD263)AIR1976SC222= 1976 ACJ141HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.Nos.1016 and 1019 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 04.07.2006 in O.P.No.319 of 2004 passed by the Chairman, MACTcumII Additional District Judge, Madanapalle (for short the Tribunal).both Oriental Insurance Company Limited and claimant preferred M.A.C.M.A No.1016 and 1019 of 2010 respectively. 2) The facts in brief are that: a) The case of the claimant is that on 14.10.2002 at about 10:00am, when he was proceeding from Madanapalle to Galivedu of Kadapa District on his Hero Honda motorcycle bearing No.TN20H...
The Elegant Chemicals Enterprises Privat Vs. The Assistant Commissione ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.95 of 2004 11-12-2014 The Elegant Chemicals Enterprises Private Limited, Hyderabad...Appellant The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 1 (3),Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.S. RAVI Counsel for Respondent: Ms.KIRANMAYEE : ?. Cases referred: 1. [2007].291 ITR500(SC) 2. [1987].168 ITR1643. [1959].35 ITR148THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.95 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) An important question, which of course, was dealt with by the Courts on earlier occasions, arises for consideration in this appeal. The appellant is a manufacturer of pharmaceutical formulations and most of its business is to undertake custom manufacturing of the products, as regards which, orders are placed by the reputed companies. One of its main customers is M/s.Procter & Gamble (I) Limited (for sh...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »