Andhra Pradesh Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cherukuri Srinivas Rao,s/O C.Rosaia Vs. The State of a.P., Reptd by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34825 of 2014 20-11-2014 Cherukuri Srinivas Rao,S/o C.Rosaiah...Petitioner The State of A.P., reptd by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Hyderabad and four others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.T.Niranjan Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh) ?.Cases Referred: NIL The Court made the following: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34825 of 2014 ORDER: The petitioner, who is the permanent fair price shop dealer of Shop No.6 of Kallampalli Village and Post, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District, filed this Writ Petition with the grievance that respondent Nos.2 to 4 have not been permitting him to function as fair price shop dealer by allowing his purported resignation to be withdrawn. In his affidavit, the petitioner has stated that he is 37 years of age and having been appointed as fair price shop dealer, he is functioning as such without any complain...
Ch.Vijaya Venkata Subba Raju and Anot Vs. the a.P. Co-Operative Tribun ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.24598 of 2014 19-11-2014 Ch.Vijaya Venkata Subba Raju and another.Petitioners The A.P.Co-operative Tribunal, Hyderabad and others.Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sr.C.V.Mohan Reddy, Senior Counsel for Sr.P. Balaji Varma Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3 : Sr.Gurram Ramachandra Rao ?. CASES REFRRED: 1. AIR1971S.C.742 2. 2010(8) SCC6853. AIR1982S.C.948 4. AIR1983S.C.355 5. AIR2003S.C.3044 6. AIR2003S.C.4244 7. AIR2009S.C.(Supp.) 886 8. AIR2011S.C.1353 9. AIR2013S.C.1172 10. 2007(6) ALD22HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.24598 of 2014 Date : 19-11-2014 The Court made the following : JUDGMENT: The legal representatives of Smt. Ch. Buchi Venkayamma- respondent No.5 in C.T.A.No.81 of 2011, on the file of the A.P.Co.operative Tribunal, at Hyderabad, (for short the Tribunal) filed this Writ Petition feeling aggrieved by the purported common order in I.A.Nos.283/2012, 282/2012 and 237/2011 in C.T.A.No.81 of 2011. The brief facts lea...
B. Ravikiran S Vs. the State of Telangana, Rep., by Itspri
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.249 OF201419-11-2014 B. Ravi Kiran Swamy..Petitioner The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary(Medical & Family Welfare), Secretary, Hyderabad & others...Respondents Counsel for Petitioner :Sri Chandra Sekhar Ilapakurti Counsel for respondents 1-8:The Advocate General (TG) Counsel for respondent No.9:Sri L. Ravichander, Senior Counsel for Sri N. Ashwani Kumar ?. Cases referred 1. AIR1996SC2426THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.249 OF2014Dated:19. 11-2014 ORDER: (Per the Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) A practicing advocate of this Court, being the petitioner herein, approaches this Court with the above writ petition asking for a declaration that the action of the 9th respondent, being the association formed by junior doctors, in not attendi...
Nadella Estate Pvt. Ltd. Hyder Vs. Prema Ravindranath and 297 Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CIRIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2548 of 2014 and batch 19-11-2014 Nadella Estate Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad.Petitioner Prema Ravindranath and 297 others . Respondents #Nadella Estate Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad.Petitioner $Prema Ravindranath and 297 others.Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri P.Venkat Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri D.Srinivas Prasad : ?. Cases referred:1. Laws (All) 1975(2) page 10 2. AIR1981AP4063. 2008(2) ALD709(AP) 4. (2004)1 SCC7025. 1995(1) ALT3056. (2003)6 SCC680HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2548 & 2551 of 2014 COMMON ORDER : Both these revision petitions are filed by M/s.Nadella Estates Private Limited represented by its Managing Director who is no other than plaintiff in O.S. No.209 of 2005 and O.S. No.177 of 2007 respectively pending on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy. Pending the suits for perpetual injunction i.e., O.S. No.209 of 2005 in respect of Ac.16-06 gts in S.No....
Kilaru Ramakrish Vs. Palla Prabhudas and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.R.P.NO.1466 OF201419-11-2014 KILARU RAMAKRISHNA..PETITIONER. PALLA PRABHUDAS AND ANOTHER RESPONDENTS COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: MR.C.RAGHU COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: MR.V.HARI HARAN GIST HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: 1. AIR1985ALLAHABAD262. AIR1996SUPREME COURT13513. 2000(6) ALT580HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.R.P.No.1466 OF2014ORDER: The judgment debtor in E.P.No.26 of 2013 in O.S.No.116 of 2011 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, is the revision petitioner. Through the impugned order, the executing Court ordered for arrest and detention of the revision petitioner in civil prison for a period of two months for violation of the perpetual injunction decree and judgment in O.S.No.116 of 2011. The execution petition is taken out under Order XXI Rule 32 of CPC. The respondents filed O.S.No.116 of 2011 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Khammam for the relief of perpetual injunction against the revision petitioner herein. ...
The Southcentral Railway, Rep., by Its Vs. the Specialdeputy Collector ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT APPEAL No.1331 OF200918-11-2014 The South Central Railway, rep., by its General Manager, Secunderabad & otheRs.Appellants The Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General).Hyderabad, & others.Respondents Counsel for appellants :Sr.Gourishankar Shanghi for Sr.N. Sasikala. Counsel for respondent No.1:Government Pleader for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent No.2:Sr.M. Sudheer Kumar Counsel for respondent No.3:Sr.Suresh Kumar Potturi > HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1. AIR1965SC1740THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT APPEAL No.1331 of 2009 Date: 18.11.2014 This Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble the Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal has been preferred by the South Central Railway, its officials and also the Union of India against the judgment and order of the learned Single...
Vijay Kumar Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Bhel Hou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.507 of 2006 18-11-2014 Vijay Kumar D...APPELLANT Chairman & Managing Director, BHEL House....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT :- Sr.Emani Srinivas COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :- Sr.E.Kalyan Ram ?. Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.507 of 2006 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.No.11263 of 1994 is the appellant. He filed the writ petition challenging the order, dated 15.02.1991, passed by the respondent dismissing him from service from the post of Engineer. The writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on 04.02.2004. Briefly stated, the facts are that the appellant was appointed as a Trainee Engineer in the respondent-organisation on 05.10.1981 after selection. His services were regularized on 22.11.1982. However, he wa...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatn Vs. Peters and Prasad Associat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.248 of 2003 18-11-2014 Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam..APPELLANT Peters & Prasad Association ...RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT:- Sr.S.R.Ashok COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :- Sr.Siva Kartikeya ?.Cases Referred: 1.145 ITR673THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.248 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The order, dated 05.03.2003, passed by the Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.114/Vizag/1997, is challenged in this appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (for short the Act) by the Revenue. The facts in brief are that the respondent is an agency undertaking the activity of conducting service for the benefit of foreign companies or agencies. After conducting survey on the assigned subject, the reports are submitted to the foreign agencies. Section 80-O o...
J.Srinivas Vs. Uco Bank, Hyderabad and An
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SHANKAR RAOB.SIVA Writ Appeal No.1860 of 2013 17-11-2014 J.Srinivas Rao. Appellant. UCO Bank, Hyderabad and anotherRespondents Counsel for appellant: Sr.K.Suresh Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sr.E.Sambhasiva Pratap ?. Cases referred 2008 (6) ALD1992 2014 (1) ALD244(DB) 3 AIR1999SC224 AIR1999SC37345 (1996) 3 SCC3646 (1998) 7 SCC847 (1995) 6 SCC1578. (1993) 4 SCC727THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SHANKAR RAO Writ Appeal No.1860 of 2013 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This is second round of litigation in relation to the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the appellant. The appellant was initially appointed as a Clerk in the 1st respondent Bank, in the year 1978. He earned promotions as J.M.G.Grade-I and II, in 1986 and 2000, respectively. During the year 2002, he worked as Assistant Manager in the Branch of the 1st respondent at Rajahmund...
The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Shaik Jeelani Basha and An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.2077 of 2009 17-11-2014 The New India Assurance Company Limited Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Kadapa....Appellant Shaik Jeelani Basha and another....Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.T. Ramulu Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sr.V. Eswaraiah Chowdary : ?. Cases referred: 1) 2005 (3) ALD172) 2003 ACJ1(SC) 3) AIR2004SC1340= 2004 ACJ428(SC) 4) 2000 ACJ1(SC) THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.2077 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the award dated 29.09.2008 in M.V.O.P.No.313 of 2008 passed by the Chairman, MACT-cum-Principal District Judge, Kadapa (for short the Tribunal).the 2nd respondent in the O.P/The New India Assurance Company Limited preferred the instant appeal. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The case of the claimant is that on 17.05.2003 at about 12:10am, he was going to Rayachoty in the lorry bearing No.AP04U1819as lorry mechanic and when he reached near Tolla Ganganna Palli on Cuddapah K...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »