Andhra Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jalagamkantha R Vs. Jalagam Umamahesw
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.615 of 2003 23-01-2014 Jalagam Kantha Rao ...appellant Jalagam Uma Maheswari...Respondent Counsel for appellant: Sr.K.Ananda Rao Counsel for Respondent: Sr.M.Venkata Narayana HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.615 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The unsuccessful petitioner in H.M.O.P.No.90 of 1998 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, filed this appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 17.01.1991. The respondent is none other than the daughter of the maternal uncle of the appellant. They were blessed with a female child, on 19.10.1992. The appellant filed O.P.No.90 of 1998, against the respondent, for divorce, on three grounds. The fiRs.is that the respondent...
K.Sree De Vs. K. Vidya Sa
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2116 of 2003 23-01-2014 K.Sree Devi... Appellant K. Vidya Sagar...Respondent Counsel for appellant: Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for respondents:None HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Dt. 23.01.2014 CMA. No.2116 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The appellant is the wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place way back on 4.11.1981 and they were blessed with three children. The respondent filed O.P.No.15 of 2001 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi against the appellant for divorce, under Sec.13(1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'). He pleaded that though they lived happily together till 1997, the appellant changed her attitude and behaviour from 1998 onwards and she left the house abruptly and without intimation. He further al...
M/S.National Insurance Company Ltd.,rep. Vs. Miss Asia and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.Nos.613 OF2011and batch 23-01-2014 M/s.National Insurance Company Ltd.,Rep., by its Branch Manager,Main Road, Patancheru Town,Medak District....Petitioner Miss Asia & Others.... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Nisaruddin Ahmed Jeddy Counsel for Respondents:Sri C. Pratap Reddy, for R.1 Sri N.S.Bhaskara Rao, for R.4 : : ?. Cases referred:1. 2006(6) ALT1472. 2004(4) ALD5973. 1996 ACJ11784. 2007 (7) SCC445ACJ-2129(SC) 5. AIR2009SC2086. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 7. (2006) 4 SCC2508. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 9. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 10. 2008 ACJ265411. 2008 (1) LS-SC-177 12. (1997) 7 SCC-558 13. (2007) 13 SCC24614. 2008 (1) Scale 531 -contd- 15. 2008 ACJ65416. 2007 ACJ72117. 2001 ACJ84318. 2008 (1) Scale 727 19. JT-2003 (2) SC5952003 ACJ61120. 2010 ACJ16521. 2012 ACJ128422. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 23. 2008 ACJ288524. 2000 ACJ31925. 1996 ACJ1046(SC) 26. 1987 ACJ411(SC) 27. 2008 ACJ149828. AIR2007SC197129. (2004...
The Andhra Bank Rep. by Its Branch Manager, Thirumalagiri Branch Anumu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party no.1 is the appellant. The first respondent filed complaint claiming a sum of Rs.54,400/- towards subsidy granted by the second respondent and interest @ 24% per annum thereon as also a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards compensation and costs. 2. The case of the first respondent as seen from the averments of the complaint is that he applied for crop loan under LOI Scheme for the purpose of raising sweet orange grove. The appellant bank is the financing bank and the respondent no.2 released a sum of Rs.54,400/- through cheque dated 10.2.2009 to the appellant bank. On representations made the first respondent, the appellant bank addressed letter dated 8.12.2010 to the respondent no.2 informing the respondent no.2 that it had not received subsidy amount relating to horticulture loan of the first respondent. 3. The first respondent submitted that the appellant bank addressed letter dated 8.5.2010 with a request to send the loan a...
Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd., Rep: by Its Chairman and Managing ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties against the order in C.C.No.159/2011 dated 19-6-2012 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna at Vijayawada. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: The brief facts of the complaint are as under: The complainant owned Ashok Leyland/Taurus 2516 vehicle bearing registration No. WB 37 A 1631 and obtained vehicle loan of Rs.6,05,808/- from the 2nd opposite party which is branch of the 1st opposite party on 31.8.2007. The loan was repayable in 36 monthly instalments from 5.10.2007 to 5.9.2010 @ Rs.23,349/- and the opposite party took blank cheques from the complainant as security and the vehicle was re-registered as AP 16 TX 3599. The complainant was paying monthly instalments regularly and in the year, 2009 there was non-receipt of bills from the contractor and due to that reason there was default and he could not pay instalments for three months to the opposite parti...
M/S. Kamma Sangham,hydera Vs. the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions),
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.ITTA No.613 OF201322-01-2014 M/S.Kamma Sangham,Hyderabad. Appellant The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions),Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sr.C.P.Ramaswami Counsel for the respondent: None appeared HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. (1985) 156 ITR3232. (1988) 170 ITR623. (2003) 262 ITR1944. (2000) 242 ITR457IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.613 OF2013DATE: 22.01.2014 This Court made the following: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.613 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is sought to be preferred and admitted against the judgment and order dated 23.11.2011 of the learned Tribunal in relation to the assessment year 2001-02 on the following suggested q...
Sheikh QutubuddIn S/O. Shaik Ahmed and a Vs. Goli Vishwanatham S/O. Ma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4744 of 2013 22-01-2014 Sheikh Qutubuddin s/o. Shaik Ahmed and another... Revision Petitioners Goli Vishwanatham s/o. Mallesham and others.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri C.Naresh Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri P.Raghavendra Reddy, counsel for respondents 2 to 4 : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1957AP602.AIR2001SC11583.AIR1972AP3734.1997 (5) ALT6285.2002 (5) ALD6606.2007(1) ALD28(SC) 7.2008) 4 SCC5308.(1995) 1 Mad.L.J.457 9.(1978) 3 Supreme Court Cases 236 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4744 OF2013DATE:22. -01-2014 ORDER: Revision petitioners are the defendant Nos.1 and 2 and respondents are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.10 of 2005 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Nirmal. Petitioners assailed the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Nirmal dated 24.10.2013 admitting document marked as Ex.A26, which is an agreement dated 14.01.2003.2. Suit is filed seeking declaration that the s...
Oletibhaskara Ramakri Vs. Oleti Ramakum
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.869 of 2003 22-01-2014 Oleti Bhaskara Ramakrishna..Appellant Oleti Rama Kumari.Respondent Counsel for appellant : Smt. Anjana Devi Counsel for respondent : None appeared. HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED : ---- THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.869 of 2003 JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.The appellant is the husband of the respondent and their marriage took place on 28.06.1986. He filed O.P.No.159 of 2000 in the Family Court, Visakhapatnam, against the respondent, for divorce, under Section 13(1)(ia)&(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').by pleading the grounds of cruelty and desertion. It was alleged that ever since the marriage, the respondent did not participate in family life, and that she used to insult him in several ways. It was also alleged that the respondent abruptly left the matrimonial house in the year 1997, and sh...
G.Nageswara Rao and Other Vs. the Land Acquisition Offic
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL A.S.535 OF2002AND BATCH2201-2014 G.Nageswara Rao and others ....APPELLANTS The Land Acquisition Officer ...RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS:Sr.Ganta Rama Rao COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:G.P.for Appeals : ?.Cases Referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL A.S.Nos.535, 558, 731 and 664 of 2002 COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) In this batch of appeals viz., A.S.Nos.535, 558, 731 and 664 of 2002, the orders passed by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla on different dates in L.A.O.P.Nos.76, 77, 79 and 80 of 1999 respectively are challenged. For the sake of convenience, the L.A.O.Ps. are referred to as 1st 2nd , 3rd , and 4th in the same order. The common feature that warrants the disposal of the appeals together is that all the L.A.O.Ps. arose out of a reference made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act (for shor...
Smt.S.Swarnalaxm Vs. the State of A.P., Rep.by Its Public Pro
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1404 of 2013 22-01-2014 Smt.S.Swarnalaxmi ....Petitioner/De facto complainant The State of A.P., Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.T.N.M.Ranga Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad Counsel for Respondent No.2: MRS.D.Sangeetha Reddy. : : ?.Cases referred: 1. 2010 Crl.L.J.4341 2. 2005 Law Suit (Mad) 1487. THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.1404 OF2013ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order passed by the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District dated 27- 06-2013 in Crl.M.P.No.62 of 2013 in S.C.No.110 of 2010. The respondent/accused is being tried by the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 493, 373 and 417 of I.P.C.In the said case, entire evidence was...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »