Andhra Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Zaheerahmed Khan,s/O. Gulam Alikhan,r/ Vs. M.A. Gaffor, Chief Executiv ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.5057 of 2008 23-01-2014 Zaheer Ahmed Khan,S/o. Gulam Ali Khan,R/o. R.R. District...Petitioner/Appellant/Petitioner M.A. Gaffor, Chief Executive Officer, AP State Wakf Board,Haj House Building, Nampally, Hyderabad,and others...Respondents/Respondents/Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner/Appellant/Petitioner:Sri Gangaiah Naidu, Senior Counsel for Sri N. Bharat babu Counsel for the Respondents/Respondents/Respondents:Sri M. Mehdi Hussain Sri Mir Masood Khan Sri Syed Shareef Ahmed HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1972S.C. 2563 2. (2002) 1 S.C.C. 633 3. 2002 (4) ALD497(DB) 4. AIR1994A.P. 238 5. AIR1994S.C. 1074 5. (1991) 1 S.C.C. 588 6. (1979) 2 S.C.C. 468 7. AIR2006S.C. 3096 8. (1994) 2 S.C.C. 481 9. AIR1989S.C. 1972 10. 1998 (5) ALT761(DB) 11. AIR2005Madhya Pradesh 220 12. AIR1992Madras 298 13. (1971) 2 S.C.C. 102 14. (1990) 4 S.C.C. 594 The Court made the following : [order follows]. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C....
Metpalli Muthai Vs. Metpalli Lasum Bai and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.178 of 1995 23-01-2014 Metpalli Muthaiah....Appellant Metpalli Lasum Bai and others...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sr.M.V.S.Suresh Kumar Counsel for the Respondents:Sr.V.Manohar Rao, Sr.T.S.Anand, Sr.S.Chandrasekhar : : ?.Cases referred: HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.178 OF1995JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by defendant Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.2 of 1991 in the suit filed by the 1st respondent-plaintiff having been aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 15.11.1994 declaring the plaintiff as owner of the suit schedule properties and for perpetual injunction against the defendant Nos.1 and 2 and for costs. The plaint schedule consists of 3 items of immovable property including house of Adilabad District viz., 1) Land bearing S.No.28 of Ac.4-16 guntas (also known as S.No.28/1) of Dasnapur (vill. & Mandal) with southern boundary remaining land of Ac.2-00 guntas in S.No.28/1, (2) land bearing...
Smt.Basheerunnisa Begum and O Vs. Meer Fazeelath Hussaini and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1758 of 2008 23-01-2014 Smt.Basheerunnisa Begum and Ors....Petitioners Meer Fazeelath Hussaini & Ors....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri V.L.N.G.K. Murthy, learned Counsel for Sri D.Arun Kumar ^Counsel for the R-5 : Sri K.K.Waghray Counsel for the R-6 : Sri N.Ashok Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. (2006) 3 SCC6992. (2008) 8 SCC4633. AIR2011S.C. 3137 4. 2013 (4) ALD150(SC) 5. 2005 (3) ALD43(SC) 6. Mst. Kulsoom-Un-Nisa Vs. Noor Mohammed...AIR1936Allahabad 666; Kaura Mal Vs. Mathra Dassa....AIR1959Punjab 646; and Meghraj Vs. Jesraj Kasturjee....AIR1975Madras 137 7. 1999 (1) ALD3988. 1957 (2) An.W.R. 106 (D.B.) 9. 1996 (1) ALD118= 1995 (3) ALT685 10. AIR1983S.C. 1012 11. AIR1960AP105= 1960 (2) An.W.R. 11 12. AIR1964AP26113. (1998) 7 SCC12314. (2012) 11 SCC574THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1758 of 2008 ORDER: This Revision is filed under Section 115 CPC challenging ...
Smt.Apparaju Sobha Rani Vs. Midiyam Ramarao and Anothe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.382 of 2009 23-01-2014 Smt. Apparaju Sobha Rani....Appellant Midiyam Rama Rao and another...Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.K. Venkatesh Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.K. Satyanarayana Murthy Gist: Head Note: ?.Cases referred: 1) 2002 (8) Supreme 497 2) 2005(1) ALT6343) AIR2009Supreme Court 3104 HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.382 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Challenging the compensation granted in O.P.No.318 of 2000 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry (for short ".Tribunal".) as inadequate, the claimant preferred the instant M.A.C.M.A.2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) For the death of Ramakrishna Sastry in APSRTC bus accident, his wife filed O.P.No.318 of 2000 against the driver and APSRTC and claimed Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation under different heads. b) The respondent No.2 contested the O.P.c) The Tribunal in its award held th...
Sri Kolliboina Veerraju Andanoth Vs. the Special Grade Deputy Collecto ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.1452 OF200823-01-2014 Sr.Kolliboina Veerraju and another....Petitioners The Special Grade Deputy Collector And Land Acquisition Officer, APIIC, Visakhapatnam, Camp Office at Kakinada...Respondent Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.S. Subba Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Government Pleader for Land Acquisition : : ?.Cases referred: 1. (1995) 2 Supreme Court Cases 766 2. AIR2006Supreme Court 1716 3. (2009) 1 Supreme Court Cases 754 4. 2012(1) ALD574THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.1452 OF2008ORDER: This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed assailing the action of the respondents in not redetermining the compensation in the light of the decree in O.P.No.6 of 1992 and batch as modified by this Court in A.S.No.607 of 2000 and batch, which was confirmed by the Honourable Apex Court in Special leave Appeal (Civil) C.C.Nos.4196 and 4201 of 2003 and consequently for a direction to the responde...
The Govt.of A.P., and OThe Vs. Md. BurhanuddIn and Anothe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
HON'BLE SRI R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA W.P.No.29001 OF201023-01-2014 The Govt. of A.P., and others....Petitioners Md. Burhanuddin and another.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioners:G.P. Services I Counsel for the respondents:Sri J.Sudheer HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 2002 (1) ALD489(DB) 2 2004 (3) ALT6473 (1995) 4 SCC1724 (2006) 6 SCC5375 2009 (1) ALD470(DB) 6 2010 (4) ALD16(DB) 7 (2004) 3 SCC394HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA Writ Petition No.29001 of 2010 Order: (Per Justice R. Subhash Reddy) This Writ Petition is filed by the respondents in O.A.No.4356 of 2009 before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ".the Tribunal".) aggrieved by the order dated 08.07.2010. By the aforesaid order, the Tribunal allowed the application filed by the 1st respondent-applicant, wherein he had questioned proceedings Rc.No.36/ME- 3/2008, dated 19.04.2008, by setting aside the said proceedin...
Sri Maruthi Charitable Trust,rep. by It Vs. the Government of Andhra P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.1478 of 2014 AND BATCH2301-2014 Sr.Maruthi Charitable Trust, Rep. by its Secretary Sr.Kavuri Srinivasa Rao....Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others....Respondents #Devi Charitable Trust, Rep. by its Managing Trustee Sr.Dasari Srinivasa Rao....Petitioner $The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others....Respondents Counsel for PetitioneRs.Mr.U.Ramanjaneyulu Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 : AGP for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.1478 and 1479 of 2014 Dated: 23.01.2014 The Court made the following: Common Order: These two writ petitions have been filed by so-called charitable trusts for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in threatening to close down the alleged purified water plants purportedly being run by th...
Garikala Venkateshwarlu Andanoth Vs. Government of A.P. Rep. by Its Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1198 of 2014 23-01-2014 Garikala Venkateshwarlu and another....Petitioners Government of A.P.rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue).Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others...Respondents Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Mr.Kowturu Vinaya Kumar Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1198 of 2014 Dated: 23.01.201 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is field with the grievance that respondent No.3 has been unduly interfering with the petitioneRs.possession of the land admeasuring Ac.4-34 gts. in Sy.Nos.301/1 and 301/2 of Gopathi Village, Konijerla Mandal, Khammam District. At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana Area).on instructions, submitted that to the extent of the land admeasuring Ac.4-34 gts. in Sy.Nos.301/1 and 301/2 owned by the petitioneRs.respondent No.3 has not been causing an...
thechairman,board of Trustees Ofoal M Vs. the Andhrapradesh State Huma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.4709 of 2012 23-01-2014 The Chairman,Board of Trustees of Coal Mines Provident Fund Ltd.,New Delhi and another...Petitioners The Andhra Pradesh State Human Rights Commission, Ministry of Home AffaiRs.New Delhi and another...Respondents For the petitioneRs.Sr.P.A.V.V.S.Sarma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Sr.A.Samir Kumar Reddy Sr.Emani Srinivas : ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.4709 of 2012 Order: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This writ petition has been filed challenging the report dated 27.10.2011. Nay, it would be better to term it as judgment and order or direction. Of course, from the impugned document, we noticed that Human Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as ".the Commission".) has described it to be an order. Before consideri...
Smt.K.Swarnala Vs. P.Ravi Kanth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYV AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL, C.M.A.No.2096 of 2003 23-01-2014 Smt.K.Swarnalatha...Appellant P.Ravi Kanth Rao...Respondent' ! COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT:Sri.C.V.Bhaskar Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:-.. : ?.Cases Referred: 1.AIR1973Delhi 200 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The respondent in O.P.No.36 of 2002 on the file of Family Court, Secunderabad filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act feeling aggrieved by the order and decree, dated 22.04.2003, passed therein. Briefly stated the relevant facts are: the marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 28.05.1997. They lived together for some time. Within three months thereafter, differences are said to have arisen. The respondent filed O.P.No.238 of 1998 in the Family Court, Hyderabad against the appellant for divorce by pleading the grounds of cruelty and desertion under Section 13 (1) (ia) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »