Andhra Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kukatlapalli Meri Ra Vs. Kukatlapalli Paul Prak
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL FCA No.222 of 2011 28-01-2014 Kukatlapalli Meri Rani... Appellant Kukatlapalli Paul Prakash...Respondent Counsel for petitioner: Sri B. Devanand. Counsel for respondents: Sri Srinivas Rao Ravulapati HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED :1. (2014) 1 SCC2252. AIR1990Ker.262 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL FCA. No.222 of 2011 And FCA. No.47 of 2013 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) These two appeals are filed against a common order dt. 07.07.2011 passed by the Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge, Guntur in DOP Nos. 66 & 98 of 2009.2. The relevant facts are as under: The appellant is the wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 12.09.1995 at Brodipet, Guntur, according to the Christian customs and rites. The respondent filed DOP No.66 of 2009 under Sec.10(1)(vii)(ix) and 19(3) of Divorce Act (for short 'the A...
Madanam Seetha Ramul Vs. Madanam Vima
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2285 of 2003 28-01-2014 Madanam Seetha Ramulu .Appellant Madanam Vimala .Respondent Counsel for appellant : Sr.K. Venu Madhav Counsel for respondent : Sr.K.M.Mahender Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : 1) 2011 (6) SCC139THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2285 of 2003 JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.The petitioner in O.P.No.5 of 2000 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nizamabad, is the appellant. He filed the OP against his wife, the respondent, for divorce, under Section 13(1) (ia) (ib) and (ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').He pleaded that the marriage between himself and the respondent took place in or around the year 1995, according to Hindu customs and rites. It was stated that four children were born out of their wedlock, and that after the birth of the fourth child, the respondent got herself converted into Christi...
Mirza Khusru Ali Baig,s/O Mirza Asif Ali Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.582 of 2014 28-01-2014 Mirza KhuSr.Ali Baig,S/o Mirza Asif Ali Baig....Petitioner The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board,Reptd by its Chief Executive Officer, Hyderabad and two others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.V.Venkataramana Senior Counsel For M/s Bharadwaj Associates Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.M.A.K.Mukheed Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3: Sr.M.S.Prasad Senior counsel For Sr.B.Nalin Kumar : ?. CASES REFERRED: 1. AIR2003S.C.3290 2. AIR2003S.C.3290 3. (2003) 6 SCC6594. 2000(1) ALD298(DB) 5. 2010(5) ALD373(FB) 6. 2013(1) SCC1777. 1999(6) ALD270(DB) 8. 1997(10) SCC6499. AIR1999S.C.1867 10. 1999(6) SCC459HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.582 of 2014 Date:28.01.2014 The Court made the following: ORDER: This is a Writ of Prohibition for restraining the Labour Court-II, Hyderabad, Full Additional Charge of Single Member of the Wakf Tribunal, Hyderabad, from adjudicating O.A.No.64 of 201...
The Registrar, Alliance University, Chikkahagde, Chadapura Vs. Japa Na ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party against the order in C.C.No.02/2012 dated 28-12-2012 on the file of District Forum, Karimnagar. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: The brief facts of the complaint are as under: The complainant joined the business school of the opposite party for the course of MBA on 08-7-2011 and paid Rs.50,000/- towards registration on 17-3-2011, 1st instalment of tuition fee of Rs.3,50,000/- on 09-4-2011, hostel deposit fee of Rs.15,000/- on 09-4-20-11 and Rs.57,000/- towards hostel fee. He was granted an educational loan from State Bank of Hyderabad, Karimnagar and it also released first instalment and thus he paid Rs.4,72,000/- and joined the hostel on 09-7-2011 and attended the classes from the said date. Due to poor food, he suffered ill health and was not in a position to continue the course and he approached the opposite party and expressed his desire to cancel the admi...
United India Insurance Co. Vs. Shyam Rao Metre and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.2420 of 2012 28-01-2014 United India Insurance Co. Ltd..Appellant Shyam Rao Metre and others. Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri E.Venugopal Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Smt.A.Chaya Devi : : ?. Cases referred:1. 2001(1)ALT495DB2 1996 ACJ-1178 3) (2007)7 SCC4454) 1965(1) All. E.R-563 5) 1963(2) All.E.R-432 6) 1969(1)All.E.R5557) 1995 ACJ366SC) 8) 2013(2) ALD6549) 1997(3) CTC-346 10) FAO-79/1996, dated 01.06.2000 (Delhi) 11) 2013(1) ALD-628 12) 2012(5)ALD(SC)-35 13) 2012 ACJ-99=2012(3) ALD22614) 2009 ACJ281815) 1985 ACJ212(AP) 16) 1998 ACJ615(AP) 17) 1977 ACJ253(Gujarat) 18) 1987 ACJ561(SC) 19) 1988 ACJ667(All.) 20) 2007 ACJ-1279 (SC) 21) AIR1995AP6522) 2005 ACJ1618(Guj-DB) 23) 2009 ACJ1298 24) 2013 ACJ-1253 (3 Judge bench) 25) 2013 ACJ1403(4)ALT-35(SC). 26) 2005 ACJ26327) 2007 ACJ174(Madhyapradesh-Indore bench) 28) 2008(1) ILR-Ker-662 29) (2001) 8 SCC197AIR2001(SC) 3218 HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C....
Byri Narayana Vs. Byri Sitharama Murthy and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2260 of 2003 28.01.2014 Byri Narayanamma.Appellant Byri Sitharama Murthy and another.Respondents Counsel for appellant: Sr.E. Srinivas Counsel for Respondents : Sr.M. Subbaiah Sastry HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2260 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The marriage between the appellant and the 1st respondent (for short 'the respondent') took place, on 31.10.1992. The respondent is said to be assisting his father in 'Pourohityam', and thereafter, he started doing the same. Out of the wed-lock between the appellant and the respondent, a baby child was born, in the year 1993. They lived together for quite a considerable length of time amicably. The respondent got issued a notice, dated 16.01.2000, marked as Ex.A.1, through an advocate narrating the factum of marriage and the birth ...
Pasuleti Konda Babu S/O Late K Vs. the District Collector, Visakhapatn ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-28-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.1489 of 2007 28-01-2014 Pasuleti Konda Babu s/o Late Konda.Petitioner The District Collector, Visakhapatnam and another. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.K.Subramanyam Counsel for Respondents: Government Pleader for Land Acquisition : : ?.Cases referred: 1 AIR1995SC22592 AIR2006SC17163 2012 (1) ALD574THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.1489 of 2007 Dated 28th January, 2014 THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.1489 of 2007 ORDER: This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed, seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 2. The facts, which are essential for adjudication of the issue involved in the present writ petition, are as follows: 3. A notification under sub-Section (1) of Section 4 of the Act was issued on 28.02.1984 proposing to acquire a total extent 4. The grievance of the petitioners precisely in the present writ petition is that having recei...
M/S.Amrutlal and Company,merchants and Vs. M/S.Rankids Impex Private L ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.6150 of 2004 27-01-2014 M/s.Amrutlal and Company, Merchants and Commission Agents, Nizamabad....Petitioner. M/s.Rankids Impex Private Limited,New Delhi.....Respondents. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the petitioner:Sri Pratap N.Sanghi Counsel for the respondent: Sri V.R.N. Prashant, for M/s.Indus Law Firm ?.Cases referred 1 (2005) 2 SCC2562 1996 (1) ALD6163 2005 (3) ALD5114 2011 (6) ALD1055 (2013) 4 S.C.C. 333 6 AIR1972Calcutta 128 7 (1996) 4 S.C.C. 748 8 (2004) 6 S.C.C. 756 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.6150 of 2004 ORDER: This Revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioner challenging the order dt.14-07-2004 of the District Judge, Nizamabad in I.A.No.23 of 2003 in O.S.No.7 of 2002.2. The respondent is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It engages in the business of exporting turmeric besides other items to its foreign buyer/importers. It's registered office is at New D...
Tirupati Transport Workers Union(Apsrtc Vs. Government of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.7916 OF200327-01-2014 Tirupati Transport Workers Union (APSRTC).Tirupati and others....PETITIONERS Government of Andhra Pradesh, Transport, Road and Buildings Department and others....RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioner: Sr.G. Vidya Sagar Counsel for Respondent No.1 : GP for Transprt (R&B) Counsel for respondent No.2 : GP for Revenue (Endowments) Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sr.K.V.Subba Reddy, SC for APSRTC) Counsel for respondent No.4 : Sr.P. Harinath Gupta HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.7916 of 2003 ORDER: This old Writ Petition is instituted by Tirupati Transport Workers Union (APSRTC) (Ex. T.T.D.).a registered Trade Union acting through its General Secretary. Petitioners 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are individuals. It is stated that they are all working as conductORS.who were originally appointed in the Transport Wing of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (henceforth referred to ...
M/S. Vivek Constructions Corporation, Represented by Sri Balmukund Gup ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-27-2014
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) This appeal is directed against the order dt.08.05.2012 of the District Forum-II, Hyderabad made in C.C.No.760/2011. The appellants are the opp.parties and the respondent is the complainant in C.C.No.760/2011. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. The brief case of the complainant as set out in the complaint is as follows: The complainant purchased the flat no.4-1-826/34 from the opp. parties and the son of the opp.party no.2, admeasuring 1210 sq.ft. in the III floor of Victoria Chambers, situated at J.N.Road, Abids, Hyderabad together with 44 sq. yards of open area adjacent to the flat, the undivided share of 34 sq.yards in the land proportionate undivided share in the common areas and amenities, under the sale deed dt.24.01.1990 registered as the document no.376/1990 in the office of the Registrar, Hyderabad. At the time of executing the said sale deed, the opposite parties and the son of the opposite...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »