Andhra Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Citizen Cooperative Society Limited Rep. by Its Manager and Anothe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The appeals, F.A.No.910, 911 and 912 of 2012 are filed by the opposite party- society whereas the appeal F.A.Nos.288 of 2013, 296 of 2013 and 297 of 2013 are filed by the complainants. The matter involves same facts and similar circumstances and as such all the appeals are being disposed of by common order. F.A.No.911 of 2013 is taken as lead case.2. The respondents filed complaint claiming an amount of Rs.12,68,568/- towards maturity value of deposits and an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation and Rs.10,00,000/- towards costs. 3. The District Forum awarded a sum of Rs.12,68,568/- - towards maturity value with interest @6% and an amount of Rs.6,000/- towards costs. 4. The case of the respondents is that they deposited amounts with the appellant-society under Akshay Scheme?. An amount of Rs.6,30,288/- was deposited on 10.11.2005 in the name of the first respondent and the maturity value of the deposits after period of 57 mo...
Mrs. Veeramanemma and Others Vs. the Branch Manager State Bank of Indi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainants are the appellants. The first appellant is the wife and the appellants no.2 to 4 are the children of L.Nagishetty who during his life time availed loan of Rs.6,00,000/- from the respondent no.1-bank by mortgaging plot bearing number 64 situated at Sadashivpet town and thereafter constructed a house in the plot. 2. The appellants submitted that the 3rd appellant is the co-applicant for the loan transaction and as per the Group Insurance Scheme master policy was issued showing the appellant no.3 as the insured instead of his father due to lapse on the part of the respondent no.1-bank. The respondents have not adjusted the insured sum towards the outstanding due of the loan account and even after notice was issued therefor, the respondents instead of adjusting the sum assured under the insurance policy, they got issued reply to the notice of the appellants. 3. The respondent no.1-bank resisted the claim on the ...
Shareef Khan Vs. Dr. Parveen Kulsum
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
(T. Ashok Kumar, Member) This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 28-12-2012 in C.C.No.777/2011 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad wherein the complaint was dismissed holding that there is no deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. The brief facts of the complaint are as follows: The complainant was having cataract in his right eye and therefore on the advice of his friends, he approached the opposite party, who is an eye specialist at Majestic Hospital, Hyderabad. The opposite party conducted several tests including sugar test on the complainant and since the sugar levels were high, the complainant was advised to come to him after the sugar levels are normal. On 21-12-2009, the complainant approached the opposite party at the said hospital for treatment and paid Rs.7,500/- fee as demanded by the opposite party and later the opp...
Har Auto Pvt. Ltd., Har Avenue, Kannothumchal, Kannur, Represented Sen ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2014
Mrs. A. Radha : Member Aggrieved by the Order passed in C.C No.256/12 on the file of CDRF, Kasargod the opposite party preferred this appeal. The Forum Below allowed the complaint and directed the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- as compensation together with a cost of Rs.3,000/-. 2. The complainant purchased an Alto Car from the opposite party on 05/09/2012. The allegation of the complainant is that he was not provided with the basic accessories like mat, flap and centre lock. It is stated in the complaint that he was assured to provide the accessories on the next day itself. The complainant is a physically handicapped man and could not travel without the help of others. Though several times contacted the opposite party over phone the basic accessories were not given which caused mental agony and financial loss against which the complaint is filed for Rs.50,000/-. 3. Though the opposite party accepted the notice no one appeared or filed version to substantiate the case. Henc...
Tahmeena Kaleem and OThe Vs. State of A.P.Rep.by Public Prosecu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.157 OF201417-01-2014 Tahmeena Kaleem and others....Petitioners State of A.P.rep.by Public Prosecutor...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Nageshwara Rao Pappu Counsel for the Respondents:Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases Referred: 1.(2010) 7 SCC6672. AIR2000SC23241) 3. 2005(2) ALD (Crl.) 633(SC) 4. (2013) 5 SCC226HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.157 OF2014ORDER:- The petitioners A9 to A12 are seeking anticipatory bail for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act read with 34 IPC. The de facto complainant MRS.Syeda Saba was married to Mohammed Bin Issaq A1 on 05.09.2011. She alleges that at the time of her marriage, her father gave 40 tulas of gold and Rs.10.00 lakhs as dowry. After the marriage, her husband and in-laws treated her well for few days and thereafter started harassing her demanding to bring additional dowry. It is also her case that she ...
Brijgopalmaheshwari, S/O. Marikishan, Vs. the Districtconsumer Dispute ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF201309-01-2014 M/S.Patel Engineering Limited,12th Square Building, 3rd Floor,Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad,represented by its President .Appellant The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Hyderabad-II Commissionerate, Lal Bahadur Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad .Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sr.S.R.Ashok Counsel for Respondent : Sr.G. Sampath Kumar, Learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel : : ?.Citations: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF2013JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, 'the Act').The appellant is a company engaged in construction and execution of infrastructure projects and obtained service tax registration with the Commission...
M/S. Patelengineering Limited,12th Squa Vs. the Commissionerof Central ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF201309-01-2014 M/S.Patel Engineering Limited,12th Square Building, 3rd Floor,Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad,represented by its President .Appellant The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Hyderabad-II Commissionerate, Lal Bahadur Stadium Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad .Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sr.S.R.Ashok Counsel for Respondent : Sr.G. Sampath Kumar, Learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel : : ?.Citations: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.48 OF2013JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, 'the Act').The appellant is a company engaged in construction and execution of infrastructure projects and obtained service tax registration with the Commission...
Smt.Waheeda Begum and or Vs. Md.Yakub and and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4683 of 2013 03-01-2014 Smt.Waheeda Begum and Ors.....Petitioners Md.Yakub and and Ors....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners:Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for the Respondents:Sri Ashok Kumar Agarwal HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1957S.C. 357 2. (2008) 14 S.C.C. 632 3. (2004) 6 S.C.C.415 4. (2002)7 SCC559 5. (2008) 5 SCC1176. (2008) 14 SCC3647. (2006) 4 S.C.C. 385 8. AIR2009S.C. 1433 9. AIR2011S.C. 41 10. 2012 AIR SCW103511. AIR1957SC444(1) 12. 2012 (1) ALT64413. LAWS(MAD) -2011-7-260 14. LAWS(DLH) -2012-8-354 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.4683 of 2013 ORDER: This Revision petition is filed challenging the order dt.05-10-2013 in I.A.No.1009 of 2013 in O.S.No.450 of 2004 of the X Additional Chief Judge (F.T.C.), City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. The said suit was filed by petitioners herein for partition of the plaint schedule property into 14 equal shares and to allot 7 shares to them and for s...
R.Krishna Alias Kistaiah, S/O. Late R. a Vs. R. Bala Narasaiah (Died) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CRP.No.4674 of 2013 03-01-2014 R.Krishna alias Kistaiah, S/o. Late R. Agamallaiah,R/o.Neredmet, Secunderabad....Petitioner/Respondent/Plaintiff R. Bala Narasaiah (died) per LRs(petitioner Nos.5 to 10) and others....Respondents/Petitioners/Defendants Counsel for the Petitioner/ Respondent/Plaintiff:Sri Ch. Siddhartha Sarma Counsel for the Respondents/Petitioners/Defendants: Sri K. Goverdhan Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1987SC13532. (1998) 7 SCC1233. (2005) 3 SCC7524. 2013 (6) ALT237The Court made the following : [order follows]. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CRP.No.4674 of 2013 ORDER: This Revision is filed challenging the order dt.05.08.2013 in IA.No.826 of 2011 in OS.No.131 of 2006 of the Senior Civil Judge, Bhongir.2. The petitioners herein are defendants in the above suit. The suit was filed for specific performance of an agreement of sale dt.09.10.2005 allegedly executed by defendant Nos.1 to 3 in favor of the ...
Chilkurinarsimha and Others Vs. the District Collector, Rangareddy Dis ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.924 OF2007and batch 03-01-2014 Chilkuri Narsimha and others....Petitioners The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District and another....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.K.Ramakrishna Reddy, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sr.B. Mahender Reddy Counsel for respondents1 and 2: Govt. Pleader for Arbitration Counsel for respondent No.3: Sr.B. Venkat Rama Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) (1997) 7 SCC5562) (2011) 4 SCC3633) (2008) 17 SCC4484) AIR1962SC3615) IlR13Madras 269 6) (2012) 5 SCC1577) (2013) 4 SCC528) (2013) 4 SCC579) (1981) 1 SCC49510) (2000) 9 SCC9411) AIR1987SC135312) (1998) 7 SCC12313) (2010) 5 SCC45914) (2002) 3 SCC19515) (2010) 6 SCC78616) AIR1969SC57517) AIR1972SC74918) (2012) 12 SCC69319) (1996) 10 SCC63420) AIR1988SC89721) (2010) 5 SCC20322) (2003) 11 SCC72723).AIR2001SC2497THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.924, 925 OF2007 2954 OF2009 1595 & 1597 OF2012Com...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »