Andhra Pradesh Court January 2014 Judgments
thenational Insurance Companylimited R Vs. Habeeb Khan and Anothe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1761 of 2012 31-01-2014 The National Insurance Company Limited rep.by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Adilabad...Appellant Habeeb khan and another ....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Ramani Jonna Counsel for respondent No.1 : Sr.Bandi Prasad Rao Counsel for respondent No.2- : None appeared HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: --- HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1761 OF2012JUDGMENT: The National Insurance Company Limited (2nd respondent in the claim petition) filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Adilabad (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.628 of 2007 dated 05.10.2010 awarding compensation of Rs.60,000/-(Rupees one lakh only) out of Rs.1,00,000/- against the 2nd respondent and out of which Rs.6,000/- to the 1st respondent with interest at 6%p.a.and directing the 2nd respondent to pay entire compensatio...
Tag this Judgment!Canara Bank,khammam Branch, Rep.by Its Vs. Jetti Samba Sivarao and Oth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.312 of 2013 31-01-2014 Canara Bank, Khammam Branch, rep. by its Branch Manager......Appellant Jetti Samba Siva Rao & others......Respondents. For Appellant :M/s.Deepak Bhattacharjee, Advocate. For Respondents 1 to 3 :Sri N. Subba Rao, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 : Sri J.Prabhakar, Advocate. : ?. CITATIONS:1. (2004) 4 SCC311 2. (2010) 8 SCC110 3. AIR2003SC2508 4. AIR1999SC2867 5. (1996) 6 scc 433. HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.312 of 2013 JUDGMENT : (Per Justice R. Subhash Reddy) This civil miscellaneous appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of CPC by the 2nd defendant in the suit in O.S.No.169 of 2011 pending on the file of the learned III-Additional District Judge, Prakasam at Ongole, aggrieved by order dated 06.02.2013, passed in I.A.No.6 of 2013.2. Respondents 1 to 3 herein are plaintiffs in the afor...
Tag this Judgment!Pulugorugopal Reddy and 37others.... R Vs. Mandal Revenueofficer,tirup ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Review W.A.M.P.No.1983 of 2011 and batch 31-01-2014 Pulugoru Gopal Reddy and 37 others.... Review Petitioners/Respondents 4 to 34 Mandal Revenue Officer,Tirupathi (Urban) Mandal,Tirupathi, Chittoor District.and another.... Respondent/Appellant The Commissioner of Appeals,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad,and 2 others.. Respondent/Respondents 1 to 3 Counsel for the petitioners: Sri E. Manohar, senior counsel Counsel for the Respondents:Spl. Govt. Pleader : ?.Cases referred:1. (2006) 4 SCC782. (1995) 1 SCC1703. (1997) 8 SCC7154. (2006) 8 SCC6865. (2000) 6 SCC2246. (2005) 4 SCC417. (199) 4 SCC4788. 1997 AIHC911(Kant) 9. (2008) 3 ICC43510. 1971 (2) SCC20011. (1970) 3 SCC64312. (2008) 8 SCC61213. (2004) 4 SCC12214. (2005) 12 SCC14915. (2000) 6 SCC35916. AIR1963AP18HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Review W.A.M.P.No.1983 of 2011 in Writ Appeal No.1817 of 2005 Date:31. 01-2013 Order: (per Dr. K.G.S...
Tag this Judgment!D.Peddanarsa Vs. Hari Singhbadavathand Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.595 OF200731-01-2014 D.Pedda Narsaiah...Appellant Hari Singh Badavath and another....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V.Tulsi Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: None appeared Counsel for respondent No.2- New India Assurance Company Limited: Sri P.Harinath Gupta HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: --- HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.595 OF2007JUDGMENT: The injured-claimant filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- VIII Additional District Judge, Nizambad, (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.1099 of 2002 dt.004.10.2006, awarding compensation of Rs.5,500/- (Rupees five thousand and five hundred only) as against the claim of Rs.1,50,000/-(Rupees one lakh fifty thousand only), for enhancement of compensation as prayed for in the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act').2. Heard ...
Tag this Judgment!Jadavbhoja Vs. A.Bhooma Goud Andanoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.538 of 2007 31-01-2014 Jadav Bhojaram...Appellant A.Bhooma Goud and another....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: M/s K. Sarala Mahender Reddy zCounsel for respondent No.1:None appeared Counsel for respondent No.2- New India Assurance Company Limited : Sri Naresh Byrapaneni HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. 1965(1) All.E.R-563 2) 1963(2) All.E.R.432 3) 1969(1) All.E.R.555 4) 1995 ACJ366SC) HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.538 OF2007JUDGMENT: The injured-claimant filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- II Additional District Judge, Nizambad, (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.699 of 2001 dated 01.08.2006, awarding compensation of Rs.35,000/- (Rupees thirty five thousand only) as against the claim of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh only), for enhancement of compensation as prayed for in the claim petition under Section 166 ...
Tag this Judgment!Jagarlamudi Ba Vs. Jagarlamudi Ramadevi and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.2608 of 2012 31-01-2014 Jagarlamudi Bapuji..petitioner Jagarlamudi Ramadevi & others..Respondents Counsel for the appellant:Sr.D.V.Chalapathi Rao Counsel for the Respondents: -- HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1) AIR1967Kerala 159 2) AIR2006Karnataka 31 3) AIR1994Bombay 183 THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.2608 of 2012 JUDGMENT: The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.44 of 1991 against the 2nd respondent in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Ponnur, for recovery of certain amount. The suit was decreed, and after the decree became final, the 1st respondent filed E.P.No.15 of 1997 against the 2nd respondent for enforcement of the decree. Attachment before judgment was obtained in respect of an item of immovable property. Thereafter, the property was put to sale on 04-08-1999. The petitioner emerged as the highest bidder. The sale in favour of the petitioner was confirmed and a sale certificate was issued on 15-12-1999 on deposit ...
Tag this Judgment!The Agricultural Market Committee, Rep. Vs. Nettem Prasad and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.1585 of 2011 31-01-2014 The Agricultural Market Committee, Rep. by its Secretary, Guntur..appellant Nettem Prasad and others..Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Smt. Lalitha Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.V. Venugopala Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.1585 of 2011 JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal is filed by defendant No.2 in O.S.No.54 of 1999 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the Court of Principal District Judge, Guntur, in A.S.No.217 of 2000, which, in turn, arose out of the judgment and decree dated 07-11-2000, passed in the suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiffs own houses in Guntur town, abutting a 100 feet road. They filed O.S.No.54 of 1999 in the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur against the defendants, ...
Tag this Judgment!Lancohills Technology Park Pvt Ltd., Rep. by Its Director S. Venkata R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The averments of the complaint are that the respondent booked a flat No.6 LH 2704, Tower No. 6, floor 27 and flat 4 in Lanco Hills in Manikonda. The respondent paid a booking advance of Rs.5,00,000/- and the balance amount agreed to be paid in installments depending upon progress of the work. The appellant agreed to hand over the flat by July 2011. The respondent found that there was no progress of work of towers 6 and 7 in phase II and as such he stopped payment of the installments. The respondent requested the appellant to return the advance amount. 2. The appellant informed him that the company is not obliged to pay any amount, however as a special case it had agreed to refund the amount on sale of the flat. During May 2012 the respondent came to know that the flat was sold at higher rate. The respondent approached the appellant and requested them to return the amount, and the appellant did not pay...
Tag this Judgment!Nikode Parvathi @ Mangala and Another Vs. the Asst. Engineer, Apnpdcl ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
This is an appeal preferred by the complainants dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the District Forum, Adilabad vide order dated 13-3-2013 in CC.No.103/2011 and seeking enhancement of compensation. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complainant are referred to here under. The brief facts of the complaint are as under: On 14-7-2009 at 15 hours one Nikode Shankar, aged about 24 years who is the husband of the first complainant and father of the second complainant minor was going to his agricultural field located in the out skirts of Mogaddhagad village along with his bull worth of Rs 20,000/- on the way near the agricultural land of Nandu Gavari live electrical wire being maintained by the Department of the opposite parties snapped, he and his bull came in to contact with it. Consequently the said Shankar and his bull died on the spot due to electrocution and it so happened due to careless and negligent acts of the officials of the opposite parties 1...
Tag this Judgment!P.V.Manohar Panth Vs. the State Bank of Hyderabad, Hasanparthi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.28581 of 2007 31-01-2014 P.V.Manohar Panth....PETITIONER The State Bank of Hyderabad, Hasanparthi Branch, Warangal District, rep. by its Branch Manager.and others.....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Nandigam Krishna Rao Counsel for respondents: Sr.Ch.Mallareddy : ?.Cases referred: 1.2001 (2) ALT, 105 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION No.28581 of 2007 ORAL ORDER: The petitioner, an employee of the respondent bank, filed the present writ petition questioning the action of the second respondent in treating 103 days of sick leave as extraordinary leave as illegal and arbitrary. He has sought a consequential direction to the respondent bank to deduct 103 days of his absence from the pool of the sick leave rather than treating it as extraordinary leave. The petitioner, having been appointed a clerk-cum-typist on 02.05.1977 in the respondent bank, has been working since September 2001 in the fiRs.respondent branch a...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »