Andhra Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt.V.Lalitha and Others Vs. the Regional Joint Director,women Devel
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION Nos.21783 of 2013 and batch Dated: 02-08-2013 Smt. V.Lalitha & others......Petitioners The Regional Joint Director, Women Development & Child Welfare, Warangal & others.....Respondents For the petitioners:Sr.J.Sudhir, Sr.S.Lakshma Reddy, Ms.M.Vidyavathi, Sr.Prabhakar Bommagani, Sr.M.Vidyasagar & Sr.Rudresh Deshpande, Advocates. For the Respondents :Additional Advocate General. : ?.CITATIONS: 1. (1990) 2 SCC5022. (2010) 3 SCC3143. (2011) 3 SCC2384. (2013) 2 SCC7725. AIR1986SC10356. 2002 (3) ALT31(D.B) 7. (1997) 10 SCC4198. AIR1983SC8529. (2007) 11 SCC60510. (2011) 7 SCC39711. (2001) 9 SCC35612. (2001) 1 SCC72813. (2006) 9 SCC32114. (2012) 6 SCC31215. (2006) 4 SCC1C/15 HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION Nos.21783, 21802, 21844, 21923, 21924, 22028, 20733, 20805, 20888, 20929, 21058, 21018, 21038, 21061, 21073, 21103, 21124, 21150, 2114...
Kondapalakala Kiran Kishor Vs. the Nizam's Institute of Medical Scienc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.22202 of 2013 Dated 02-08-2012 Kondapalakala Kiran Kishore ....Petitioner The Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Rep. by its Director, Hyderabad.....Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.K. Venu Madhav Counsel for the respondent: Sr.G. Anandam HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.22202 OF2013ORDER: Heard Sr.K. Venu Madhav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sr.G. Anandam, learned Standing Counsel for Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences. The controveRs.in the Writ Petition relates to admission in Doctoral couRs.of Clinical Pharmacology, D.M.(Clinical Pharmacology) for the academic year 2013- 14 in Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad. The respondent institute has taken out a notification, pursuant to which a Common Entrance Test was conducted, the results of which have been published on 16.07.2013. A provisional admission list in D.M.Clinical Pharmacology has ...
Dandu Lakshmi Narayan Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Repres
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22949 of 2013 dated:02.08.2013 Dandu Lakshmi Narayana .Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others .Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy Counsel for respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22949 of 2013 ORDER: The son of the petitioner was assigned an extent of Acs.2.00 cents of land in survey No.12 of Patelguda Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak District, vide proceedings No.B/3767/1995 dated 22.11.1995 of the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Patancheru. The petitioner was at that time working as a Helper in Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL).On 11.11.2009, the assignee died leaving behind his wife. Sometime after his death, his wife got remarried and left the village. Thereafter, the petitioner has approached the then Mandal Revenue Officer,...
M.R. Srikanth Sharma and Another Vs. M/S Pooja Developers and Construc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainants are appellants. They filed complaint claiming possession of plot number 34 and part of 35 in Pooja Enclave in survey number 344 at Athevelly Mandal, Ranga Reddy district and for payment of interest @24% p.a on the amount of Rs.6,50,000/- as also for providing basic amenities such as water connection, drainage and electricity connections and formation of roads etc., and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation. 2. The appellants on being represented by the respondent-company that cost of land admeasuring 150 sq. yards is Rs.1,20,000/- and costs of construction is Rs.5,20,000/-, paid an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- to the respondent-company which got executed sale deed by the landlords in favour of the appellants on 15.12.2006 and the appellants entered into agreement for construction with the respondent-company for construction of the house over the plot for consideration of Rs.5,20,000/- and paid the amount of ...
Pradeep Kumar Mathur and Another Vs. Spicejet Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainants are the appellants. Being aggrieved by the order of the District Forum dismissing their complaint, the complainants have filed appeal contending that they refused the offer for a sum of Rs.3,000/- extended by the respondent as the bag which was lost contained articles worth Rs.1,35,190/- and claiming for the same amount they got issued notice dated 24.07.2010. 2. It is contended that the District Forum has not considered the order of the National Commission in F.A.No. 344 of 2006 which was upheld by the Honble Supreme Court in SLP No. 9033 of 2009 on 2.08.2010. Loss of baggage in transit was held to amount to deficiency in service on the part of Airliners which was made liable to pay compensation. It is contended that finding as to the failure of the appellants to prove contents of the baggage as not proved is incorrect and that the District Forum has been carried by the contention of the respondent that the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›