Andhra Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Ra Vs. L.Ramanamma @ Raj
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.M.A.No.1945 of 2004 dated:06-08-2013 S.Ramu ...APPELLANT L.Ramanamma @ Rajani...RESPONDENTS counsel for the appellant:-Sri.S.Satyanarayana COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT:Sri.C.Raghu ; HEAD NOTE ?.CITATION: 1 AIR2002Supreme Court 971 2 AIR2005Supreme Court 485 3 2002 (2) ALT65(D.B.) JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The petitioner in O.P.No.247 of 2002 on the file of the Family Court, Hyderabad filed this appeal, feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 27.05.2004. The appellant married the respondent on 05.04.2001 at Balaji Bhawan (Temple).Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. According to him, he became acquainted with the respondent in the couRs.of train journey and that acquaintance developed into a close relation and thereafter, to marriage. On 06.04.2001, the marriage was registered. The appellant filed the O.P.under Section 12 (i) (c) of the Hindu Marriage Act with a prayer to declare the marriag...
Employees Provident Fund Organisation Ministry of Labour, Govt. of Ind ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party no.1 is the appellant. The respondent no. 1 filed complaint claiming Rs.50,000/- towards EPF amount together with compensation of Rs.one lakh and costs. 2. The first respondents son was an employee of the second respondent and he died on 8.04.2007 in a motor vehicle accident. The first respondents son during the period of his employment with the second respondent, contributed provident fund managed by the appellant. After the death of his son, the first respondent had given the death intimation to the respondent and the second respond in turn informed the appellant about the death of the employee and requested the appellant through application dated 4.01.2008 to sanction pension and provident fund to the first respondent. 3. The appellant returned the application to the second respondent with an objection that relevant documents were not submitted and the second respond complied the objection and resubmitted the applica...
Branch Manager (Crm), Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
Oral Order : (T. Ashok Kumar , Member) 1.This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful opposite parties as against the orders dated 19.03.2012 in CC 15/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, West Godavari District at Eluru. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant is a senior citizen and Advocate profession obtained Life insurance Policy bearing No.S670435736 dt.15-9-1987 from 2nd opposite party under plan 5-19 for Rs.30,000/- under salary saving scheme from 21-6-1987 and all premiums were paid upto 21-5-2010. The opposite parties vide their letter dt.13-4-2010 and 13-11-2010 and 29-11-2010 certified that an outstanding amount of Rs.78,873/- ( Rs. 29,868/- + accrued bonus upto 21.06.2010 ) is lying in the Account of the complainant. From 21-6-2010 no bonus or profit or interest is crediting and hence the complainant requested the OP on 16-7-2010 to pay the maturity c...
State Bank of Hyderabad Siripuram Branch Vs. V. Rani
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party bank is the appellant. The respondent filed complaint claiming an amount of Rs.17,270/- towards refund of deposit with interest thereon and a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards damages as also costs of Rs.5,000/-. 2. The respondent stated to have deposited an amount of Rs.17,270/- with the appellant bank on 17.3.2007 and she addressed letter dated 11.3.2009 requesting the appellant bank that she deposited the amount of Rs.17,270/- for which the appellant had not issued receipt on the premise that its staff was busy and promised to issue the receipt later. 3. The respondent got issued notice on 29.8.2009 demanding for the amount of Rs.17,270/- with interest thereon and the appellant issued reply on 24.11.2009 that as per its record no transaction for issue of deposit receipt to V.Usha Rani for Rs.17,270/- was taken place on 17.3.2007. The respondent had submitted that the appellant bank had not taken note of her name Rani and re...
Durga Prasad Pukhraj Jewellers and Money Lenders (Municipal Shopping C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondents filed complaint claiming return of gold ornaments pledged by them after receiving the balance amount and to pay compensation and costs. 2. The respondents by pledging 330 gms of gold ornaments availed loan of Rs.95,000/- from the appellant on different dates. The respondents requested the appellant to return the gold ornaments on the premise that they are ready to pay the entire amount. The appellant postponed to return the gold ornaments despite repeated demands made by the respondents. The respondents got issued notice on 24.08.2010 to the appellant and the same was returned with an endorsement unclaimed. 3. The appellant was set exparte. 4. The respondent no.1 filed his affidavit and the documents Exs.A1 to A14. 5. The District Forum allowed the complaint directing the appellant to return the gold ornaments after receipt of Rs.1,01,925/- from the respondents. 6. Aggrieved by the ord...
M/S. Narne Constructions (P) Ltd. Vs. Dwaraka Prasad Choudary
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondent became member in the scheme floated by the appellant-company and entered into agreement for sale with the appellant-company on 7.9.1995 to purchase three plots, 253, 254 and 255 in Sy.No.218/4 and 218/5 in the extent of 1048 sq.yards in Central park Phase No.II of Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R .District under membership No.30337 for sale consideration of Rs.4,94,420/-. The respondent paid an amount of Rs.1,38,000/- on the same day towards initial payment and the remaining balance amount of Rs.2,96,920/- payable in 49 installments @ Rs.6,000/- per month and the last installment to paid is Rs.2,920/- commencing from October,1995 till November,1999. 2. The respondent submitted that he paid entire sale consideration by February, 2000 and the appellant-company in its correspondence admitted receipt of the amount from the respondent. The respondent requested the appellant to...
M/S Shankar Hills Plot Purchasers and an Vs. Ch. Anantha Reddy and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT A.S.No.338 of 2013 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) dated:05-08-2013 M/s Shankar Hills Plot Purchasers and another..Appellants Ch. Anantha Reddy and others..Respondents Counsel for the appellants: Sr.K.V.Satyanarayana Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.C. Hanumantha Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT A.S.No.338 of 2013 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The plaintiffs in O.S.No.907 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court).Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad, are the appellants. They filed the suit for the relief of perpetual injunction to restrain the respondents from interfering with the suit schedule property as well as to restrain them from alienating the same. The 1st appellant is an association registered under the A.P.Soc...
Dr.M.Divya Vs. the Medical Council of India and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-05-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.NO.6267 OF2013dated:08-02-2008 Dr.M.Divya....Petitioner. The Medical Council of India and others......RESPONDENTS For the Appellant : Party-in-person. For the Respondents : Mr.Challa Gunaranjan Mr.Sr.Charan Telaprolu Mr.A.Prabhakar Rao. : ?.CITATIONS: 1. (2005) 2 SCC65THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.6267 of 2013 ORDER: This writ petition is instituted seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in preventing the petitioner from applying for the final Post Graduate Degree Examinations in M.D.(General Medicine) CouRs.to be conducted in April 2013 by the 2nd respondent - Dr. N.T.R.University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada (henceforth referred to as 'the 2nd respondent University').as illegal and to direct respondents 1 and 2 to ensure that the petitioner is not subjected to any victimization at the hands of respondents 3 and 4. The petitioner was prosecuting the Post Graduate Degree CouRs.of M.D....
Smt. Sirasala Madhavi Vs. M/S Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-02-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is the appellant. He filed complaint claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards the sum assured under the insurance policy with interest thereon and an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- towards damages. 2. The appellants father during his lifetime obtained personal accident insurance policy bearing Certificate No.4018/IPA-386941000043/00/000 valid for the period from 02.11.2008 to 01.11.2009 and appointed the appellant as his nominee. The appellants father died on 12.01.2009 and the appellant had sent death intimation through letter dated 14.02..2009 and the respondent issued claim form to the appellant and appointed investigator who on 26.08.2009 sought for submission of documents which the appellant submitted to him on 3.12.2009. 3. The appellant submitted that his father sustained injuries in an accident on 12.01.2009 when he fell from bullock-cart and he was taken to Sri Mother Theresa First Aid Clinic for first aid and from there...
Kundrapu Sanyasi Naidu Vs. Vignan University, Rep.by Its Registrar, Va ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-02-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the dis-satisfied complainant as against the orders dated 26.07.2012 in CC 33/2012 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Guntur . For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that Complainants daughters viz., Anjali and Gitanjali after completion of their intermediate education (M.P.C) in the year 2010, appeared for EAMCET examination for admission into Engineering course. Before announcement of results of EAMCET examination complainant got admitted his daughters in CSC and ECE branches respectively in B.Tech Engineering course in opposite party university on 23-07-2010. The complainant paid Rs.5,000/- towards registration fee; Rs.7,500/- towards hostel registration; Rs.5,000/- towards hostel admission fee and Rs.35,000/- i.e. in all Rs.52,500/- towards advance tuition fee for each of his daughters on 23-07-10 and opposite part...