Andhra Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Madhav Vs. Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal-ii, rep. by
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.15689 of 2013 dated:13-08-2013 S.Madhav Rao...Petitioner Hon'ble Industrial Tribunal-II, rep. by its Chairman, Chandravihar Building, M.J.Road, Hyderabad-I & another...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.Vasudha Nagaraj Counsel for the respondent No.1: G.P. for Labour Counsel for the respondent No.2: Sri Vedula Srinivas HEAD NOTE: CASE REFERRED: (2010) 5 SCC349HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI Writ Petition No.15689 of 2013 ORDER:1. The petitioner is a workman, working as Electrician in the 2nd respondent-Jubilee Hills International Centre, Hyderabad. He was placed under suspension on certain allegations by an order dated 20-09-2009. It appears that similar action was taken against several other employees. The Employees Union raised an Industrial Dispute in I.D.No.7 of 2010 against the orders suspending its members on the ground that the President of the Organization has no such power. In the meanwhile, enquiry was held after a...
B.Neeraja, W/O B.Narasimha Reddy Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer,ra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23668 of 2013 dated:13-08-2013 B.Neeraja, W/o B.Narasimha Reddy....Petitioner The Revenue Divisional Officer,Ranga Reddy District and another......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.M.Damodar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue : ?.Cases Referred: NIL HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23668 of 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed feeling aggrieved by memo No.B/946/2012, dated 21.06.2013 of respondent No.2, whereby he has rejected the petitioner's application for mutation of her name and the names of her minor children in respect of half share of various extents of lands in Survey Nos.10, 25 to 34 and 140 of Ankushapur Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. I have heard Sr.M.Damodar Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana area).The petitioner is the wife of B.Narasimha Red...
V.Bheemay Vs. Y.Rami Reddy and 3 Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.2768 of 2009 dated:13-8-2013 V.Bheemayya... Petitioner Y.Rami Reddy and 3 others... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Ch.Srihari Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri B.Nagarjuna Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2: None Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri M.B.A.Khan Counsel for Respondent No.4: Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1961SC14571) 2. AIR1964SC10133. AIR1965SC11504. AIR1968SC11965. (1978) 3 SCC1196. AIR1968SC9857. 1997 CRI. L. J.3618 8. (1979) 3 SCC1359. AIR1971SC45810. 1992 CRI. L. J.2665 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.2768 of 2009 Order: The petitioner is accused in C.C.No.227 of 2008 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Prohibition and Excise Cases, Mahabubnagar. The de facto complainant, who is the 1st respondent herein, filed Crl.M.P.No.146 of 2008 before the trial court under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (the Act, for short)...
Kuppa Suseela and Others Vs. Smt. Muthyala Shakuntala and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.27/2009 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District, the complainant preferred FA 877/2012, opposite party No.5 preferred F.A.No.957/2012 and the opposite parties 1 to 4 preferred F.A.No.472/2013. Since all the appeals arise out of a common C.C. there are being disposed of by this common order. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant stated that opposite parties 1 to 4, who are land owners, have entered into development agreement with opposite party No.5 who is the builder herein and opposite party No.6 who is the husband of OP 5 is actively dealing with the affairs of OP 5. OP 5 obtained the sanction plan from LB Nagar Municipality on 28-8-2003 and started construction of flats in the name and style of Sri Datta Maruthi Saranava Bhava Enclave. The complainant entered into an agreement of sale with the opposite parties on 01-2-2007 for purchase of flat No.204 with 810 sq. ft. area and ...
M/S the New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager, Tp Clai ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
(Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.33/2012 on the file of District Forum-I, Visakhapatnam, the opposite party preferred F.A.No.913/2012 and the complainant preferred F.A.No.618/2013. Since both the appeals arise out of a common C.D. there are being disposed of by this common order. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of a lorry which was insured under Standard Commercial Vehicle Package policy from 30-9-2010 to 29-9-2011 and paid an amount of Rs.27,380/- to cover the risk of the said vehicle. On 17-5-2011 the insured lorry met with an accident resulting in damage to the lorry and death of one Mr.B.Suri Babu who was travelling in the lorry along with a load of coconuts and a FIR was registered in Crime No.42/2011 against the lorry driver. The complainant spent Rs.7,36,886/- towards repairs. The complainant submitted the entire bills, trip sheet/loan challan to the surveyor, one Mr.A.Chandrasekhar Rao but ...
Gumpenapalli Suloch Vs. the Tahsildar, Mandal Revenue Office, Bu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.8430 of 2013 Dated:12-08-2013 Gumpenapalli Sulochana...Petitioner The Tahsildar, Mandal Revenue Office, Burgampahad, Khammam District and others.Respondents ^Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.P.V.Ramana !Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 7: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 6 & 8: AGP for Home Counsel for respondent Nos.9 to 11: Sr.N.Subba Rao Head note: ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.8430 of 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings bearing Rc.No.B/542/2011, dated 05.05.2011, of respondent No.2 and proceedings bearing Rc.No.B/542/2011, dated 12.07.2011, of respondent No.1. By the fiRs.mentioned proceedings, respondent No.2 has requested respondent No.4 to take action in accordance with law while stating that respondent No.9 holds title in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.17.23 guntas in Su...
Konduri Yadagiri and Anot Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer,karimnaga
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.10057 of 2013 dated:12-8-2013 Konduri Yadagiri and another.Petitioners The Revenue Divisional officer,Karimnagar, Karimnagar District and others.Respondents Counsel for petitioner: Sr.Sriramakrishna Murthy for Sr.T. Koteshwara Prasad Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue HEAD NOTE : ?.CASES REFERRED: Nil The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed with the grievance that the proceedings initiated as far back as 21-6-2008 by respondent No.1 under Section 145 Cr.P.C.are kept pending even though five years had elapsed. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, stated that as many as two murders have taken place in connection with the dispute over the immovable property in question and therefore in view of the continuance of the grave situation, the proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C.are kept pending. Section 145 Cr.P.C.empowers the Ex...
M/S. Narne Constructions (P) Ltd. Vs. Dr. Devender Sharma and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District Forum whereby the appellant is directed to execute sale deed in respect of Plots bearing nos.184, 185, 189 and 190 and pay an amount of Rs.50,000/- as compensation and a sum of Rs.2000/- towards costs. 2. The respondent no.1 submitted that he and his family members, viz, the respondents no.2 to 4 joined the scheme Rolling Meadows launched by the appellant-company and they paid an amount of Rs.17,51,000/- with interest thereon Rs.34,345/- for late payment as consideration for their respective plots. The sale consideration included development charges. The appellant-company after receiving the entire sale consideration, addressed letter dated 14.10.2006 demanding the respondents no.2 to 5 to pay a sum of Rs.4,20,000/-, Rs.4,62,000/-, Rs.4,61,900/- and Rs.4,61,900/- towards additional amount on the premise that there was escalation in registration charges a...
Y. Venkata Krishna Reddy and Another Vs. United India Insurance Compan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
Oral Order: (M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in CC No. 117/2012 on the file of the Dist. Forum-I, Hyderabad the complainant preferred this appeal along with it the above application to condone the delay of 188 days in preferring the appeal on the ground that his complaint was dismissed for default on 30.7.2012. The petitioner/appellant/complainant submits that he suffered from viral hepatitis and also hypertension since 25.7.2012 and had undergone treatment and was totally bedridden up till 1.3.2013. In support of his claim, he filed the medical certificate issued by the Civil Assistant Surgeon, Govt. Urban Primary Health Centre, Hyderabad. He also submitted that he performed his 1st daughters marriage in the month of November, 2012 and therefore he could not file the appeal immediately and prayed that the delay may be condoned. 2) The respondent/opposite party filed counter resisting the application and contended that day to day delay has not been explained and that the...
M/S. Shriram Transport Co. Ltd. Vs. Prasanth Kumar and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1.This is an appeal preferred by the 1st opposite party as against the orders dated 05.09.2012 in CC 336/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum II, Krishna District at Vijayawada . For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the 1st complainant had purchased a Mahindra Champion vehicle bearing Registration No. AP 16 TU 8150 after taking loan of Rs.65,000/- under loan cum Hypothecation agreement dated 01.10.2006 repayable in 26 EMIs @ Rs.3,345/- per month and Rs.3,218/- for 27th instalment and he paid Rs.30,445/-. The 1st opposite party seized the vehicle along with the record but did not give seizure proceedings or endorsement. The 1st opposite party issued a press note on 01.05.2008 for sale of the vehicle and it was sold for a low price of Rs.15,000/- without following the procedure as contemplated under law and authority. An Arbitration case No. 296...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »