Andhra Pradesh Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Naveen Kuma Vs. P.Satyanarayan
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.557 of 2008 dated:20-08-2013 M.Naveen Kumar.....petitioner P.Satyanarayana...Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.Damodar Mundra Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.M.Radha Krishna For Sr.K.Llakshman : : ?.Cases referred: 1) AIR1966Patna 8 (Vol.53, C.3) 2) 2007(2) ALD8083) 1998(1) ALD2244) 2010(1) ALD3665) 1995(2) ALT61HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.557 of 2008 ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed under Section 22 of the A.P.Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short 'the Act') challenging the judgment dated 03.12.2007 in R.A.No.259 of 2005 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, wherein the learned Chief Judge allowed the appeal by setting aside the eviction order dated 22.10.2005 in R.C.No.271 of 2003 on the file of the I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad. Facts, which are necessary for disposal of the revision petit...
B.Narayana S/O Sri Venkann Vs. Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.25777 of 2009 dated:20-08-2013 B.Narayana S/o Sr.Venkanna.....petitioner Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, Binola Village, Navipet Mandal , Nizamabad District and two others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.Nandigama Krishna Rao Counsel for the Respondents:C . Ramesh Sagar, G.P.for Cooperation Prosecutor : : ?.Cases referred: 1. AIR1990KARNATAKA1732. AIR1988KERALA75HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.25777 OF2009ORDER: Petitioner is a retired Secretary of Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited (fiRs.respondent).He seeks for a writ of mandamus to declare the inaction of the fiRs.respondent in not paying the retirement benefits to the petitioner as illegal and unjust and to pass consequential direction to the fiRs.respondent to pay arrears of salary and retirement benefits to the petitioner including provident fund, encashment of Earned Leave, and Gratuity etc., together with intere...
Ganthi Ramulu S/O Late Sri Veeraiah and Vs. the Govt of A.P., Reptd by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3750 of 2013 DATED:20-08-2013 Ganthi Ramulu S/o Late Sr.Veeraiah and 112 others.....Petitioners The Govt of A.P., Reptd by its PrincipalSecretary, Revenue (Urban Land Ceiling),Hyderabad and three others......Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.C.Raghu Counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) : ?.CITATIONS: The Court made the following: ORDER: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in not treating the property in occupation of the petitioners in Survey Nos.591, 595 and 596 of Eswarapuri Colony, Kapra Village, Ranga Reddy District, as private property consequent on the coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (for short 'the Repeal Act').as illegal and ar...
Golla Dharman Vs. Sakari Poshetty and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.3374 of 2013 dated:20-08-2013 Golla Dharmanna....Petitioner Sakari Poshetty and others.....Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner:Sri K.Ram Subba Rao Counsel for the respondents: -- HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 AIR2008SCW48292 (2003) 6 SCC6413 2004 (4) ALD824 (2001) 3 SCC15 (2003) 8 SCC7526 (2010) 8 SCC423THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.3374 of 2013 ORDER : This revision is filed challenging the Docket order dt.07.06.2013 in OS.No.41 of 2011 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Adilabad.2. The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit. The suit was filed by petitioner seeking a declaration of his title in respect of an extent of Acs.7.38 gts. in Sy.No.51/A at Buddikonda Shivar Mandal, Neredigonda District, Adilabad, for a perpetual injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with the alleged peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff in respect of the above land; for correction ...
Good Will Holidays, Rep.by Its Proprietor, Syed Hamid Abbas, Travel Ag ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. 2. The respondents filed complaint claiming each refund of Rs.2,000/- and a sum of Rs.10,000/- per each respondent towards compensation besides costs of Rs.20,000/-. 3. The respondents at the relevant time pursuing MBBS second year at RIMS Srikakulam entered into agreement with the second appellant for a trip of 17 days. The trip was for a period of 17 days and it comprised places in North India commencing from Agra to be visited on 19.09.2010 till 20.10.2010 with New Delhi as the last place of the trip. The respondents submitted that as per the agreement each of them has to pay a sum of Rs.10,200/- in five installments and the appellants promised them to provide with A/C buses and accommodation at some places, Hi-tech buses at some other places. The respondents paid an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as advance to the appellants for the appellants to reserve the rooms and buses . 4. The respondents submit...
Metta Krishna Rao Vs. M/S the Seven Hills Hospital Rep. by Its Managin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is the appellant. He filed complaint claiming an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-towards medical expenses and a sum of Rs.19,00,000.- towards compensation on the premise that the respondents rendered deficient medical service to him. 2. The respondent submitted that he an assistant lineman working with APEPEC experienced partial numbness of his both lower limbs in the year 2006 and the respondent no.2 after getting conducted relevant tests diagnosed him with cervical canal stenosis, cervical spondylosys with disc protruding for cure of which on the advice of the respondent no.2, the appellant had undergone surgery on 4.9.2006 and during the post-operative stage, the appellant developed complications which are diagnosed by the respondent no.2 as gas distention jejunely loops with step latter pattern for treatment of which the appellant had undergone surgery for second time. 3. The appellant submitted that both the lower limbs of the...
Sunkari Sambaiah and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh., Rep. by S.H. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL.No.878 of 2012 Dated 19-08-2013 Sunkari Sambaiah and others...Appellants State of Andhra Pradesh., Rep. by S.H.O.P.S., Kesamudram, Warangal District.Respondent Counsel for the Appellants: Sr.A.Ravinder Counsel for Respondent : Government Pleader for Home HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred (1) AIR1969Supreme Court 267 THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR W.A.No.878 of 2012 ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice N.V.Ramana) Writ petition filed by the writ petitioners seeking to quash the F.I.R.registered against them under Sections 34 (a) and 36 of A.P.Excise Act, 1968 (for short 'the Act').was dismissed by the learned single Judge, hence this appeal. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the writ petition. Petitioner No.1 claims that he is a license holder of retail shop under A.4 category, which was valid up to 30.06.2012. P...
Shaik @ Mohammed Gousinnisa Begum @ Gous Vs. Shaik Abdul Rasheed and A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO Crl.P. No.11774 of 2010 dated:19-08-2013 Shaik @ Mohammed Gousinnisa Begum @ Gousia Begum and others ....Petitioners Shaik Abdul Rasheed and another .... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri P.Gangarami Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri M.P.Chandramouli. ^ Counsel for Respondent No.2: Additional Public Prosecutor. : : ?.Cases referred: AIR1972SC928HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO Crl.P. No.11774 of 2010 ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in CC No.258 of 2010 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District.2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the 1st respondent-complainant and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.3. Brief facts relevant for considering the criminal petition are; that 1st respondent-complainant filed original suit, OS No.73 of 2002 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, for partiti...
S.C.R. Caterers, Dry Fruits, Fruit Juice Vs. Senior Divisional Commerc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.14577 of 2013 and batch 16-8-2013 S.C.R. Caterers, Dry Fruits, Fruit Juice Stalls Welfare Association,Warasiguda, Secunderabad,Represented by its Secretary Ritesh Kaushik.. Petitioner Senior Divisional Commercial Manager,Vijayawada Division, South Central Railways,Vijayawada, Krishna District and others.. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri C. Ramachandra Raju Counsel for respondents : Sri T.S. Venkataramana HEAD NOTE : ?CASES REFERRED : Nil W.P.14577, 14888, 15072 OF 201.The Court made the following : COMMON JUDGMENT: The parties as well as the subject matter of the dispute in these Writ Petitions are common. As such, they are heard and being disposed of together. INTRODUCTION: The petitioner in these Writ Petitions is the South Central Railway Caterers, Dry Fruits, Fruit Juice Stalls Welfare Association, Warasiguda, Secunderabad. W.P.No.14577/2013 is filed on behalf of the members of the petitioner-Association running canteens in ...
Shaik Abdul Azeez Vs. Srinivasa Nursing Home Rep. by Its Doctor Gv Kri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is appellant. He filed the complaint claiming compensation to the tune of Rs.19,10,000/- lakh, on the premise that his mother died due to deficiency in service rendered by the respondent during the course of medical treatment administered to her in the first respondent-hospital. 2. The case of the appellant is that his mother(hereinafter referred to as patient) suffered from abdominal pain was diagnosed by the doctor, Dr. Kavitha of Sri Janani Institute of Gastroenterology, on 19.05.2009 that she was having stone of 9mm size in Gallbladder. The patient had undergone ERCP on 11.05.2009 at Vijayawada and the test revealed stones in common bile duct of the patient for removal of which she had undergone surgery at Nagarjuna Hospital on the same day, i.e., 11.05.2009. The doctors fixed stent on the liver and pancreas guard of the patient and issued letter to the effect the surgeon conducting surgery should take precaution. 3. O...