Andhra Pradesh Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.V.Appar Vs. Syndicate Bank, Rep.by Its Chairman and Ma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16240 of 1999 Dated:11-06-2013 M.V.Apparao....Petitioner Syndicate Bank, rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director, Manipal South Camara District, Karnataka and two others.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Krovvidi Narasimham and Sri Hari Sreedhar Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1998Supreme Court 1661 2) AIR1980Supreme Court 1894 3) (1980) 4 Supreme Court Cases 266 4) (1992) 2 Supreme Court Cases 299 5) (1992) 2 Supreme Court Cases 317 6) AIR1995Supreme Court 1745 Writ Petition No.16240 of 1999 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed for a direction that the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years by setting aside the Order dated 09.04.1999 vide reference No.1400/ZOH/PSOW/IF11007 dated 23.04.1999.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner had joined in the service at the Syndicate Bank on 11.07.1971 as...
The State of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by Its Vs. Mohd. MuntazuddIn Khan, Di ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT A.S.No.3720 of 1992 dated:11-06-2013 The State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad..Appellant Mohd. Muntazuddin Khan, died per LRs...Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Advocate-General Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.A. Ravinder Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT A.S No.3720 of 1992 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The sole defendant in O.S.No.35 of 1984, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Medak, filed by the sole plaintiff, the deceased 1st respondent herein; approached this Court, feeling aggrieved by the decree dated 18-04-1991 passed in the said suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to, as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff filed the suit for the relief of recovery of possession of an extent of 1649 acres of land in diffe...
Palteru Venkata Malleswara Rao Vs. Bank of Baroda Rep. by Its Chief Ma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-10-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in CC 81/2011 on the file of Dist. Forum-I,Visakapatnam, the complainant preferred this appeal. 2) The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant opened an NRI on line account bearing No. 12700100009015 to enable his family members to draw the amounts through cheques from the complainant account at Visakapatnam. He was assured by the opposite party bank that the on-line banking system introduced with modern technology which requires pass word for login purpose and therefore is a safe proposition. The complainant furnished his wifes mobile number at Visakapatnam for receiving SMS from the opposite party bank and gave necessary instructions to the bank for allowing third party transactions in two spells up to a maximum of Rs. 1 lakh in a day. The complainant retained the login and transaction password with him for entering into on line account details and to create third party transactions. The opposi...
Rastriya Paroyojana Nirman Limited and a Vs. M/S.P.L.Raju Construction ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-10-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY ANDTHE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT crp.1229 of 2007 dated:10-06-2013 Rastriya Paroyojana Nirman Limited and another....Petitioner M/s.P.L.Raju Constructions Limited and others ...Respondents !COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS ;Advocated Genral COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT :-J.Prabhakar cOUNDEL FOR THE2D Respondent ;-Sr.M.Ratna Reddy d: ?.Citations: CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1229 of 2007 ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The 1st petitioner is a Government of India Undertaking, involved in the activity of construction and the 2nd petitioner is one of its branches. For the sake of convenience, both of them are commonly referred to as the petitioner. The petitioner undertakes the construction of various projects all over the country, particularly those taken up by the Government Departments or State- owned Corporations. In the year 1984, the Food Corporation of India, the 2nd respondent herein, intended to construct godowns at three p...
Rashtriya Pariyojana Nirman Nigam Limite Vs. M/S.P.L.Raju Construction ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-10-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1229 of 2007 Dated:10-06-2013 RASHTRIYA pARIYOJANA nIRMAN nIGAM lIMITED AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS m/S.P.L.Raju Constructions Limited and others ...Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS:Advocate General COUNSEL FOR THE1T RESPONDENT:-J.PRABHAKAR cOUNSEL FOR THE2D RESPONDENT:Sr.M.Ratna Reddy : ?.Citations: ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The 1st petitioner is a Government of India Undertaking, involved in the activity of construction and the 2nd petitioner is one of its branches. For the sake of convenience, both of them are commonly referred to as the petitioner. The petitioner undertakes the construction of various projects all over the country, particularly those taken up by the Government Departments or State- owned Corporations. In the year 1984, the Food Corporation of India, the 2nd respondent herein, intended to construct godowns at three places in the State of Andhra Pradesh, namely Cher...
The State, Rep. by Inspector of Police,c Vs. Bhyravarapu Sri Kris
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-10-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRL.P.NO.3253 OF2013DATE:10-06-2013 The State, Rep. by Inspector of Police,Central Bureau of Investigation,Visakhapatnam...Petitioner Bhyravarapu Sr.Krishna...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.P.Kesava Rao, Standing counsel for CBI Counsel for respondents: Sr.P.Kasinageshwara Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: CRL.P.NO.3253 OF2013ORDER : Heard Sr.P.Kesava Rao, Standing counsel for CBI and Sr.P.Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The respondent/accused is facing trial before the I Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Visakhapatnam for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The case was registered basing on the report of PW.1, a cell phone shop owner alleging that the respondent demanded bribe of Rs.5,000/- for not conducing raid on his cell phone shop. According to the prosecution, after registering the case in a trap laid by the CBI, the respon...
Ganti SrIn Vs. Mrs. G.Vasa
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-10-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L .NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE F.C.A.No.142 of 2012 AND BATCH1006-2013 Ganti Srinivas..appellant MRS.G.Vasantha..Respondent Counsel for the appellant:Sr.D.V.Reddy Counsel for the Respondent:Sr.R. Satyanarayana Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT F.C.A.No.142 of 2012 & F.C.A.Sr.240 of 2013 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice S.V.Bhatt) These two appeals under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, arise out of a common order dated 10-12-2011 passed by the Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, in O.P.Nos.386 and 1375 of 2008. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 04-08-1993, and they were also blessed with two children in the years 1994 and 1997. Differences have arisen thereafter. The appellant filed O.P.No.386 of 2008 under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act') against the resp...
Feroz Khan Vs. Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant purchased a Volvo bus on 20.10.2004 to eke out his livelihood and was ferrying the passengers from Hyderabad to several places with concerned permit from Road Transport Authorities. The complainant got the vehicle insured with the opposite party forRs. 26, 64,025/- covering the period from 18.3.2010 to 17.3.2011 and was earning Rs. 7,500/- per day. While so, on 21.2.2011 at about 01.25 a.m. the vehicle which was kept in the yard at Omer Travels garage suddenly caught fire and was totally burnt. The complainant filed FIR and made a claim which was repudiated by the opposite party on the ground that the loss is due to electrical breakdown and the root cause of fire due to electrical accessories fitted in the vehicle and which were not covered under the policy. The complainant got issued legal notice on 21.7.2011 and again on 22.11.2011 but there was no response. The complainant s...
Tummidi Brothers, Rep. by Its Managing Partner and Another Vs. Smt. Ch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in C.C. No. 413/2010 on the file of Dist. Forum-I, Visakapatnam, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. 2) The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants approached the Ops for purchase of gold ornament weighing 47.770 Gms and purchased the same for Rs. 92,289.80 ps. on 1.8.2010. the complainants submit that in spite of using it with proper care and caution, the gold chain got cut and fell down. The complainant approached Op2 to replace the same with the same weight but in spite of several requests the Ops refused to replace the article and therefore the complainants approached the Police Station, Visakapatnam and gave a complaint for selling a defective gold ornament. Vexed with their attitude, the complainant approached the Dist. Forum seeking directions to Ops to replace the gold chain weighing 47.770 gms of the same model together with compensation and costs. 3) The appellants/opposite part...
Vurlagadda Nanjappa and Anoth Vs. B.V.Mallanaradhya and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU Second appeal No.562 of 1999 Dated:07.06.2013 Vurlagadda Nanjappa and another....Appellants B.V.Mallanaradhya and others...Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Sr.A.,Rangacharyulu Counsel for Respondents: Srinivas Emani and G.Prashanth Reddy : ?.Cases referred: 1.1971(2) AWR193JUDGMENT: Unsuccessful defendants 2 and 3 in both the courts below are the appellants herein. The plaintiffs-respondents filed the suit in the trial Court originally for permanent injunction, which relief was amended subsequently for declaration of title and possession. Originally the suit for permanent injunction was filed in respect of Ac.5.15 cents in S.No.264/4 of Bheemaganipalle village, Punganur Taluk, Chittoor District, which is the suit land. After the amendment, the declaration was sought in respect of Ac.1.90 cents out of the suit S.No.It is the plaintiffs' case that originally Gururajamma who is mother of the plaintiffs 1,2 and 4 and grand-mother of the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »