Andhra Pradesh Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.V.Deena Dayal and Other Vs. A.Bhagirathgi and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.C.C.A.No.71 of 2007 Dated 13-06-2013 G.V.Deena Dayal and others.....Appellants A.Bhagirathgi and others....Respondents Counsel for the appellants: Sr.P.V.Vidya Sagar Counsel for respondent No.1: Sr.I.V.Radhakrishna Murthy Counsel for respondent No.3: Sr.Anand Kumar Kapoor HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.C.C.A.No.71 of 2007 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The 1st defendant in O.S.No.67 of 2003 on the file of the learned I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, is the appellant. He feels aggrieved by the judgment and preliminary decree, dated 30.10.2006 passed by the trial Court. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff, by name Saraswathi, the mother of 3rd defendant by name Sulochana and the 1st defendant are the children of one late G.V.Varada Rajulu. In addition to the p...
B.Chitti B Vs. the Vice Chairman and Managing Director,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2013
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.16620 OF201313-06-2013 B.Chitti Babu.Petitioner The Vice Chairman and Managing Director,APSRTC Bus Bhavan, Hyderabad and others..Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sr.P.Venkateshwar Rao Counsel for respondent: Sr.Sunilkumar Reddy, Standing counsel for APSRTC : : ?.Citations: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.16620 of 2013 Date:13-06-2013 ORDER: This writ petition is filed by the petitioner to declare the action of the respondents in imposing the punishment withholding the annual increment for a period of two years without permanent effect by the 3rd respondent and which was modified into one year by the 1st respondent, as arbitrary and illegal by setting aside in so far the remaining punishment vide proceedings, dated 12-03-2012 of the 1st respondent and consequently direct the respondent not to effect the punishment imposed by the respondents. Heard both sides. The allegation against the petitioner is t...
K. Venkateswara Rao Vs. M/S. Sreemitra Developers (P) Ltd., Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in CC No.168/2011 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant joined as a member in the scheme floated by the opposite parties by paying an admission fee of Rs.150/- each for plots of 200 sq. yds. in the layout marked under the banner of Suchir India. The complainant joined the scheme on 02-1-2006 and bought two plots and paid monthly instalments at Rs.3,000/- for each plot for which O.P.2 issued two passbooks Nos. 534 and 535. O.P.2 allotted plot No.5 which is 596 sq. yds. consisting of 3 units and promised the complainant that he would bifurcate plot No.5 into 3 units and 2 units would be allotted to the complainant. The complainant paid 10 monthly instalments and intended to pay the balance amount in full and approached opposite party No.2 for registration. While so, the complainant submits that O.P.2 induced the comp...
Dr. Madala Rajasekhar Vs. Smt. Tamarapalli Savitri
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President This appeal has been preferred against PP 20/2011 in C.C 231/2010 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna at Vijayawada by the opposite party. The complainant filed the complaint against the opposite party doctor on the ground that she was suffering from knee pains and underwent treatment for 36 days under the opposite party and the opposite party treated her on Emitron machine table and pretended to diagnose the complainants back and neck pains because of which the complainant gained further weight and developed unbearable pain in the right leg and also sciatica because of the negligence and wrong treatment given by the opposite party. It is also the complainants case that she underwent surgery for total knee replacement because of the worsening of the pains on account of the treatment and medicines given by the opposite party. The District Forum passed an exparte order as the opposite party did not claim the notice, a publication was ordered but...
Karam Sreenivasu Dora Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CRIMINAL APPEAL No.722 OF2011AND dated:12-06-2013 Karam Sreenivasu Dora .... APPELLANT The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.....RESPONDENT Counsel for the appellant:Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy Counsel for the respondent: Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases referred:1. A.I.R.1952 SC3432. (1973) 2 SCC7933. AIR1984SC16224. (2009)13 Supreme Court Cases 534 5. (2012) 6 Supreme Court Cases 403 6. A.I.R.1971 SC18717. (2006) 13 SCC5168. A.I.R.1956 SC1169. A.I.R.1980 SC89810.(2002)4 SCC679HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM CRIMINAL APPEAL No.722 OF2011AND REFERRED TRIAL No.7 OF2012COMMON JUDGMENT:- (per Hon'ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu) Criminal Appeal No.722 of 2011, under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ".Cr.P.C.".), is directed against the judgment, dated 04.07.2011, in Sessions Case No.242 of ...
Tirumalasetty Santhamma and 5 Oth Vs. Yenuganti Venka
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.687 of 1999 Dated:12.04.2013 Tirumalasetty Santhamma and 5 others...PETITIONERS Yenuganti Venkaiah...RESPONDENT Counsel for Petitioner: Sr.M.S.N.PRASAD Counsel for Respondent: Sr.Nimmagadda Satyanarayana HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: 1. (2007)14 Supreme Court Cases 138 2. 2010 (2) ALD4803. AIR1972AP1784. 2002 (5) ALT628(D.B) JUDGMENT : Unsuccessful legal representatives of the defendant in both the Courts below are the appellants herein. The plaintiff/respondent herein filed the suit for specific performance of Ex.A-1 contract for sale dated 12.07.1983 said to have been executed by the defendant in his favour for the plaint schedule site of Ac.0-10 cents in S.No.14 of Muppavaram village, Prakasam District, after allegedly receiving total consideration of Rs.5,000/- thereunder from him at the rate of Rs.500/- per cent. The defendant resisted the plaintiff's claim on the ground that Ex.A-1 is a rank forgery and that the suit...
The Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.81/2010 on the file of District Forum, Khammam, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant obtained LICs Health Plus from opposite party No.1 on 21-2-2008 to 21-2-2024 and paid premium instalment @ Rs.15,000/- per annum for 16 years as per which the complainant is entitled to get surgical benefits upto Rs.4,00,000/- and his wife is entitled to get Rs.2,00,000/-. While so, the complainant met with a road accident on 29-1-2010 and sustained a communated fracture of the right elbow. He was treated as inpatient at Apollo Hospital from 29-1-2010 to 02-2-2010 and underwent surgery to his right elbow and screws were inserted for which he was charged Rs.85,000/- towards medical expenses. Thereafter he had to undergo another surgery for removal of screws for which Rs.50,000/- was spent towards medical expenses. The complainant submitted the claim enclosing all t...
P. Venkata Subrahmanyam Vs. Dr. Addepalli Srinivasa Rao (Ms. Ortho)
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.08/2011 on the file of District Forum-II, Vijayawada, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant sustained injuries in an accident on 25-8-2010 which was registered in Crime No.357/2010 dated 5-9-2010 and he approached the opposite party on 29-8-2010 for treatment of the injuries and the opposite party applied plaster of paris bandage to the injured right hand and advised him to report back on 02-9-2010 and 09-9-2010 and treated him on the respective dates and finally advised him to report on 13-10-2010 for removing the bandage. The complainant submitted that after applying the plaster of paris bandage, he complained of itching and irritation in the concerned area and the opposite party stated that such feeling is routine and need not be taken seriously. The complainant submitted that he approached the opposite party on 13-10-2010 for removing plaster o...
L. Jayarama Naidu and Another Vs. M/S. Guru Raghavendra Constructions ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complaint is filed claiming refund of Rs.26,69,000/- with interest @ 12% per annum and Rs.5 lakhs towards compensation, a sum of Rs.17,280/- per month towards delayed construction of the house. 2. The averments of the complaint are that the third and fourth opposite parties are the legal heirs of one T.K.Ramachandra Sharma who was assigned ten acres of land in Sy.No.332 at Nizampet Village, Qutbullapur Mandal, R.R.District, by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the opposite party 3 and 4 entered into development agreement with the opposite parties no.1 and 2 for development of the land and construction of 87 duplex houses in gated community known as Beverly Parlms. The complainants entered into agreement of sale with the opposite parties no.1 and 2 for purchase of duplex house on plot no.19 admeasuring 3456 sft, two car parking spaces for consideration of Rs.1,20,00,000/- at the time the house was in semi-finished condition. The co...
M/S Indian Rayon Corporation Ltd. and an Vs. M/S.N.N.Associates and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-11-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.C.C.A.No.7 of 1993 11-06-2013 M/s Indian Rayon Corporation LTD.and another...Appellant M/s.N.N.Associates and others ..Respondents Counsel for the Appellants:-Sr.V.Rajagopal Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: : ?.Cases Referred: JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The 1st respondent herein filed O.S.No.195 of 1989 in the Court of Chief Judge-cum-II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, against the appellants herein and certain otheRs.initially for the relief of perpetual injunction. Later on, it got the prayer amended for recovery of a sum of Rs.11,67,719/- with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The 1st appellant is a limited company, having its head office in the State of Gujarath and the 2nd appellant is its division operating in the State of Karnataka. They intended to establish a cement factory in Gulbarga District. Part of the construction work worth about a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- was assigned to the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »