Andhra Pradesh Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt.Sita Ba Vs. the South Indian Bank Ltd.,incorporated
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.C.C.A.No.157 OF1997dated:18-06-2013 Smt.Sita Bai..Appellant The South Indian Bank Ltd.,Incorporated and constituted underThe Companies act, having its regd., Office at Trichur, Kerala State and one of Its branch office at Tilak Road, Hyd.,9 others...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant :Sr.K.Gopala Krishna Murthy Counsel for the Respondent No.1:Sr.A.Krishna Murthy ^Counsel for Respondents 2 to 10: - : : ?.Citations: C.C.C.A.No.157 OF1997ORDER:(per LNR, J.Defendant No.10 in O.S.No.269 of 1986, on the file of V-Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is the appellant. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff filed the suit against defendants 1 to 10 for recovery of a sum of Rs.5,34,877-74 Ps with future interest at 17.5% per annum. The plaintiff is a bank. It was alleged that the plaintiff created the facility of overdraft limit of Rs.20,000/-, bills purc...
Talari Mutyalappa,s/O Chinnappa Vs. the District Collector,anantapur D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.12295 of 2013 Dated:17-06-2013 Talari Mutyalappa,S/o Chinnappa....Petitioner The District Collector,Anantapur District and two others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.N.Aswartha Narayana Counsel for the Respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies : ?.CITATIONS: The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.2 in appointing the petitioner as the fair price shop dealer of Madhapuram Village, Ramagiri Mandal, Anantapur District, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner has pleaded that respondent No.2 has initiated the process for selection and appointment of permanent fair price shop dealer for Madhapuram Village as far back as 2009 and that he was selected for appointment by respondent No.2 following the selection process. His grievance is that since the year 2009, no appointment order is issued to him. Learned Assistant Govern...
Dubba Jaya Rami Re Vs. K.Jaithun Bee and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.R.P.No.5083 of 2011 Dated.17-07-2013 Dubba Jaya Rami Reddy...Petitioner K.Jaithun Bee and others ..Respondents ^Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.E.V.V.S.Ravi Kumar !Counsel for the respondents: Sr.S.Venkata Subba Rao Head note: ?.Cases referred: (1) 1984 AWR134(DB) THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 07.09.2011, in C.M.A.No.1 of 2010, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur. The petitioner secured a decree in O.S.No.140 of 2001 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Atmakur. During the pendency of the suit, the property belonging to the respondents was attached. Following the decree, the petitioner filed E.P.No.85 of 2003 in which the attached property was brought to sale. The petitioner filed an application for recording delivery of the property. Accordingly, the executing Court after recording delivery of possession of th...
Mohd Liyaqath a Vs. the Registrar, Administration, High Cour
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-14-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.11476 OF2013dated:14-06-2013 Mohd Liyaqath Ali....Appellant The Registrar, Administration, High Court of A.P, Hyd & ors.... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala Counsel for the respondent No.1 & 2 :Sri Y Rama Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : Sri G.Vidyasagar : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1991SC2010(1) 2. 1991 Supp (2) SCC199WRIT PETITION No.11476 OF2013ORDER: (Per Sri Justice P.Naveen Rao) Aggrieved by the decision of the Principal District Judge, Warangal (second respondent herein) reverting the petitioner from the post of Administrative Officer to the post of Superintendent, this writ petition is instituted.2. The facts giving rise to institution of this writ petition are as under.3. The disciplinary action initiated vide charge memo dated 26.06.2006, against the third respondent herein resulted in punishment of withholding of promotion for four years vi...
Transport Corporation of Ind Vs. National Insurance Company Ltd., and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-14-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.72 of 1999 Dated:14-06-2013 Transport Corporation of India....Petitioner National Insurance Company Ltd., and another... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri C.Trivikrama Rao Counsel for Respondents: Sri N.V.Jagannath : : ?.Cases referred:1. C.C.C.Appeal No.18 of 1996 dated 17.02.2012 2. 2002(1) L.S. 128(D.B.) HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.72 OF1999JUDGMENT: The defendant in O.S.No.288 of 1990 on the file of the Court of III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, is the appellant herein. The suit was filed for recovery of Rs.1,09,401-65 Ps., 2. According to the case of the plaintiffs, a consignment of 1800 trays of ".Great Shake". Soya milk was entrusted by the second plaintiff to the defendant at Mandideep for safe carriage to Bangalore and for delivery to their distributors. One carton tray of Soya milk contained 27 packs at the rate of 200 C.C. The...
Mohd Liyaqath Al Vs. the Registrar, Administration, High Cour
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-14-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.11476 OF2013Dated:14-06-2013 Mohd Liyaqath Ali ....Appellant The Registrar, Administration, High Court of A.P, Hyd & ors... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant :Sri Ashok Reddy Kanathala Counsel for the respondent No.1 & 2 :Sri Y Rama Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : Sri G.Vidyasagar : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1991SC2010(1) 2. 1991 Supp (2) SCC199ORDER: (Per Sri Justice P.Naveen Rao) Aggrieved by the decision of the Principal District Judge, Warangal (second respondent herein) reverting the petitioner from the post of Administrative Officer to the post of Superintendent, this writ petition is instituted.2. The facts giving rise to institution of this writ petition are as under.3. The disciplinary action initiated vide charge memo dated 26.06.2006, against the third respondent herein resulted in punishment of withholding of promotion for four years vide proceedings dated 30.01.2009. Aggrieved by the same, the third respon...
The Commissioner and Special Officer,mch, Vs. C.Sreeramulu and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-14-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.C.C.A..No.43 of 2006 and batch dated:14-07-2013 The Commissioner & Special Officer,MCH, Hyderabad....APPELLANT C.Sreeramulu and others....RESPONDENTS COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT :- Smt. A.Deepthi COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS:- Sr.P.Satyarajababu : ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.C.C.A.No.43 of 2006 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) Defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.403 of 1997 on the file of the III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad are the appellants. The deceased 1st respondent (sole plaintiff) filed the suit claiming a sum of Rs.6,24,277/- as compensation for the land admeasuring 162.15 square yards, situated at Lalapet, Secunderabad with the boundaries mentioned therein and for a sum of Rs.45,000/- towards damages. A further prayer was made to declare that the document, dated 26.02.1996, insofar as it recor...
M/S. Harsha Royal Minerals,represented B Vs. the A.P. Mineral Developm ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.9020 of 2013 dated:13-6-2013 M/S.Harsha Royal Minerals,Represented by its ProprietorR. Sukumar, Rly. Kodur,Kadapa District.Petitioner The A.P.Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.,Rep. by its Vice-Chairman & ManagingDirector, Khairtabad, Hyderabad .Respondent Counsel for petitioner : Sr.M.S.P.Kamaraju Counsel for respondent : Sr.V. Subrahmanyam, Standing Counsel HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in not supplying 3450 M.Ts. of C+D+W grade Barytes @ Rs.840/- per M.T.in pursuance of confirmation order dated 5-10-2012, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner approached the respondent for supply of C+D+W grade Barytes. The respondent agreed to supply the quantity of 3450 M.T.of Barytes required by the petitioner @ Rs.840/- per M.T.The petitioner has accordingly paid a sum of Rs.33,19,862/- @ Rs.840/- per M.T.on 5-10-2012. On receipt of the said amount, the ...
Rodda Narsaia Vs. Adla Raju @rajaia
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4684 OF2011Dated:13-06-2013 Rodda Narsaiah ....Petitioner Adla Raju @Rajaiah ....Respondent Cousel for the Petitioner:Sri.Y.Ashok Raj Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.K.Buchi Babu : ?.Citations: ORDER : This revision petition is filed by the defendant questioning the impugned order passed by the lower Court permitting the plaintiff/respondent to amend cause of action para in the plaint. The suit is based on the suit pro-note under which the defendant is stated to have borrowed money from the plaintiff on interest after executing the suit pro- note. The suit was filed in the year 2009. The written statement of the defendant was also filed, issues were framed, trial had commenced and the plaintiff's evidence was completed by examining PWs.1 to 3. PW1 is the plaintiff and PWs.2 and 3 are stated to be attesters in the suit pro-note. At that point of time, the plaintiff filed the present petition in the lower Court u...
M/S. Sai Ram Heavy Motor Driving School, Vs. the Government of Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.9544 of 2013 and batch Dated 13-06-2013 M/S.Sai Ram Heavy Motor Driving School,Represented by its Licence Holder, A. Lakshminarayana, Door No.4-9-195/1,Hayatnagar, Ranga Reddy District and others..Petitioners The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary,TR & B, Secretariat,Hyd., and others.Respondents Counsel for PetitioneRs.Mr.B.Chandra Sekhar Counsel for Respondents : Government Pleader for Transport HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: WRIT PETITION Nos.9544, 10347, 10836, 11752, 12164, 13123 and 13765 of 2013 The Court made the following: Common Order: The petitioners are licensed driving schools, which impart training to the persons learning driving of heavy motor vehicles. The State Government has issued Memo No.6131/Tr.I(1)2012-2, Transport, Roads & Buildings (Tr.I).dated 01.02.2013, which has published the resolution of the State Transport Authority, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, in the Andhra Pradesh Ga...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »