Andhra Pradesh Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Gayatriprojects Limit Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by the
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4516 of 2011 and batch dated:19-06-2013 M/s.Gayatri Projects Limited....Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Secretary to Government I & CAD Department & 3 others.Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Sr.E.Manohar for Sr.S.Rambabu Counsel for the Respondent : party-in-person : : ?. Cases referred: 1) (2000).Supreme Court Cases 264 2) (2004).Supreme Court Cases 117 3) AIR (32) 1945 Madras 190 4) AIR1987(A.P) 254 CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4516, 4521 & 4522 of 2011 COMMON ORDER : Subject matter of these three revision petitions is condition imposed by the lower Court for payment of remuneration at the rate of Rs.80,000/- per month from 01.01.2007 till the date of discharge as an Advocate for the revision petitioner/plaintiff. The 4th respondent herein is one of the four advocates who appeared for the plaintiff in these three suits in the lower Court. The plaintiff filed petitions...
State Ofandhra Pradesh, Representedby M Vs. Mummareddykrishna Venamma ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3087 of 2004 Dated:19-06-2013 State of Andhra Pradesh, representedby Mandal Revenue Officer (Land Reforms)Nellore.Petitioner Mummareddy Krishna Venamma and two others.Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Government Pleader for Arbitration Counsel for 1st respondent : Sr.P. Sridhar Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : 1. 1996 (1) ALT4202. 1979 (2) APLJ50CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3087 of 2004 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the State, under Section 21 of the A.P.Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (for short 'the Act').against order, dated 20.06.2002, made in I.A.No.903 of 2001 in L.R.A.No.8 of 1994 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal-cum-I Addl. District & Sessions Court, Nellore (LRAT) wherein the LRAT allowed the review petition filed by the 1st respondent herein, under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'CPC').The brief facts t...
M/S Bulchandand Comp Vs. Khamrunissa Begum and Others..Responnde
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT, C.C.C.A.Nos.23 of 1997 and batch 19-06-2013 m/S Bulchand and Company...Appellant Khamrunissa Begum and others ..Responndents Counsel for the Appellant:-Sr.R.N.Hemendranath Reddy Counsel for the Respondent:-Sri.D.Prakash Reddy : ?.Citations: COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The sole defendant in O.S.No.901 of 1985 on the file of the V Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad filed these two appeals. The deceased 1st respondent filed the suit for eviction of the appellant from the premises in question. It was pleaded that the property bearing Nos.5-8-615 and 5-8-615/1 comprising of two mulgies at Abids, Hyderabad, was owned by Sr.A.K.Babu Khan and in a preliminary decree for partition passed in O.S.No.38 of 1964 on the file of the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the property fell to her share. It was stated that the appellant was the tenant of the pre...
M/S Bulchand and Company, Rep. by Partne Vs. Syed Yahya and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L .NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.Bhatt CCCA Nos.25 of 1997 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sr.Justice S.V.Bhatt) dated:19-06-2013 M/s Bulchand and Company, rep. by Partner Sr.Ramesh Govindaram Bulchand..appellant Syed Yahya and others ..Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Sr.R.N.Hemendranath Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT CCCA Nos.25 & 43 of 1997 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice S.V.Bhatt) These two appeals are directed against the decree and judgment dated 12- 12-1996, in O.S.No.1334 of 1989, on the file of the V additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to, as arrayed in O.S.No.1334 of 1989. O.S.No.1334 of 1989 was filed for the relief of specific performance of an oral agreement of sale, in respect of the suit schedule property. The trial Cou...
Mysagallabalamma and OThe Vs. Government of Andhra Pradeshrep. by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT,J WRIT PETITION No.12372 of 1996 Dated 19-06-2013 Mysagalla Balamma and others..Petitioners Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Secretary, Revenue,Secretariat, Hyderabad and others..Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.C.V.Mohan Reddy for Sr.C.Sumon Counsel for Respondents: G.P.for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: 2007 (4) ALT538THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.12372 of 1996 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This writ petition is filed challenging the order, dated 23.05.1996, passed by the 2nd respondent confirming the order, dated 26.12.1989, passed by the 3rd respondent. The facts that lead to filing of this writ petition, in brief, are as under: There exists about 350 acres of Government land in different sub-divisions of Survey number 63 of Boduppal village. The Government of A.P., the 1st respondent ...
S.A. Iqbal Vs. the Branch Manager, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
Oral Order: (M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in CC No. 24/2012 on the file of Dist. Forum, Kurnool, the complainant preferred this appeal. 2) The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant purchased a seized vehicle from the opposite party for Rs. 95,000/- and the opposite party also issued a receipt for the same but in spite of several requests the opposite party did not give him original record of the vehicle instead asked the complainant to produce the vehicle in a Criminal Case at Hyderabad and after two months the opposite party returned the vehicle to the complainant but did not transfer the vehicle in the complainants name. The complainant submits that he intended to sell the vehicle but he could not do so as he did not have the Registration Certificate in his name. Hence the complainant handed over the vehicle to the opposite party on 25.3.2010 and requested the opposite party for refund of Rs. 95,000/-. He also got issued legal notice on 29....
Movva Raja R Vs. State of A.P., Through Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.1966 of 2013 dated:18-06-2013 Movva Raja Ram....Petitioner State of A.P., through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad..... Respondent Counsel for the petitioner:Sri B.Kishenlal Counsel for the Respondent No.1:Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri C.Malla Reddy, senior counsel rep. Sri G.Anandam : : ?.Cases referred: (2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 757 2008 (1) ALD (Crl.) 221 (AP) Criminal Petition No.1966 of 2013 ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been taken out under Section 482 Cr.P.C., by the accused, Movva Raja Ram in Crime No.89 of 2013 of Madhapur P.S., Cyberabad to quash the proceedings therein.2. The 2nd respondent is the wife of the petitioner. She filed a report before the Inspector of Police, Madhapur P.S., Cyberabad on 07-02-2013 alleging inter alia that her husband retired in Central Government Service as Director General of Labour & Employment, Government of India and he fell i...
M/S. Centralroadlines Corporatio Vs. M/S.Steel Authority of Indialtd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY APPEAL SSUIT Nos.161 of 1995 and batch Dated:18-06-2013 M/S.Central Roadlines Corporation...Appellant M/s.Steel Authority of India LTD.and another..Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Smt N.Surya Kumari Counsel for Respondents: Sr.V.Ravinder Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: (2000) 4 Supreme Court Cases 91 (2000) 4 Supreme Court Cases 553 AIR1979Andhra Pradesh 41 APPEAL SUIT Nos.161 of 1995, 6 of 2011 & 1686, 1687 & 1717 of 2003 COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This batch of five appeals arises out of the same contract. Hence, they are disposed of through this common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in A.S.No.1717 of 2003. The facts that gave rise to the filing of these appeals are as under: The appellant, which is a Government of India undertaking, has steel factories at different parts of the country. For the purpose of expansion of its steel factory in Bhilai, it...
Telugu Chinna Thirpatha Vs. Boya Nadi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.R.P.No.4297 of 2011 DT.18-06-2013 Telugu Chinna Thirpathaiah...Petitioner Boya Nadipi..Respondent ^Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.J.Janaki Rami Reddy !Counsel for the respondent: Sr.G.Sravan Kumar Head note: ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4297 of 2011 The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against order, dated 06.09.2011, in I.A.No.838 of 2011 in O.S.No.685 of 2008, on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool. The petitioner filed the suit for mandatory injunction directing the respondent to remove the door and two windows erected by the latter in AF marked wall in the plaint plan. After completion of the evidence of PWs.1 to 4 and when the case was coming up for further evidence, the petitioner filed I.A.No.838 of 2011 under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. This application h...
M/S.Centralroadlines Corporatio Vs. M/S.Steel Authority of Indialtd. a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT APPEAL SSUIT Nos.161 of 1995 and batch Dated 18-06-2013 M/s.Central Roadlines Corporation...Appellant M/s.Steel Authority of India LTD.and another..Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Smt N.Surya Kumari Counsel for Respondents: Sr.V.Ravinder Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: (2000) 4 Supreme Court Cases 91 (2000) 4 Supreme Court Cases 553 AIR1979Andhra Pradesh 41 THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT APPEAL SUIT Nos.161 of 1995, 6 of 2011 & 1686, 1687 & 1717 of 2003 COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This batch of five appeals arises out of the same contract. Hence, they are disposed of through this common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in A.S.No.1717 of 2003. The facts that gave rise to the filing of these appeals are as under: The appellant, which is a Government of India undert...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »