Andhra Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Beeram Sudhakar. Vs. the Govt. of A.P. and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.3727 o07. 02.2013 Beeram Sudhakar. The Govt. of A.P. and others. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K.Ram Reddy Counsel for respondents 1 to 3 : G.P. for Social Welfare Counsel for respondent No.4 : Sri K.Srinivasa Rao HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioner was appointed as a Conductor in the APSRTC against a vacancy reserved in favour of Schedule Tribes. When he was working in the Manuguru Depot of APSRTC, 4th respondent herein, a complaint was received to the effect that the caste certificate obtained by the petitioner is not genuine. Since the caste certificate was obtained from the Tahsildar, Manuguru, 3rd respondent herein, proceedings were initiated under Andhra Pradesh (SC, ST & BC) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 (for short 'the Act') by the District Collector, Khammam, 2nd respondent herein. The matter was entrusted to the District Level Committee (for short 'the Committee'), headed...
Maytas Properties Limited, Rep. by Its a Vs. A.P. State Consumer Dispu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.2521OF 201.and Batch 07.02.2013 Maytas Properties Limited, rep. by its Authorized Signatory C. Nagaiah, Maytas Hill County, Bachupally, Miyapur, Hyderabad-500 072. A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Anandnagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, and 2 others. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri D.Prakash Reddy and Sri S.Nirajan Reddy Counsel for respondents: Sri Prabhakar Sripada (GIST: (HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. (2012) 8 SCC 52.2. 2001 (6) ALD 3.= 2001 (5) ALT 61.3. (2005) 1 SCC 70.4. AIR 199.SC 142.5. AIR 200.SC 104.COMMON ORDER: (Per G.Rohini, J) The short question that requires consideration in these writ petitions is as to whether the penal proceedings under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for failure to comply with an order of the State Commission can be maintained while the appeal against the order of State Commission is pending before the National Commission? The p...
Smt. Naseem Sultana Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board Rep by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2013
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition Nos.3581 of 2013 and Batch 07.02.2013 Smt. Naseem Sultana Secunderabad Cantonment Board rep by its Chief Executive Officer, Court House Compound, S.P.Road, Secunderabad-500 003 and another Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Peri Prabhakar Counsel for the respondents : Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad Standing Counsel for Cantonment Board ?Cases referred: Common Order: These Writ Petitions raise common issues of fact and law. Hence, they are disposed of by common order. I have heard Sri Peri Prabhakar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for the Secunderabad Cantonment Board, representing the respondents. The petitioners are in occupation of small pieces of land with constructions thereon. Respondent No.2 has issued the impugned notices whereunder he has observed that it was brought to his notice that the petitioners have occupied the Government Property situated in GLR Sy.Nos.574/210 and 574/...
Burka Kannaiah Vs. the State of A.P., Rep., by the Public P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 108 o07. 02-2013 Burka Kannaiah The State of A.P., rep., by the Public Prosecutor, Andhra Pradesh High Court Counsel for Petitioner: Sri P. Nageshwara Rao Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1) 2006 (8) Scale 133 JUDGMENT: (per Sri N.V. Ramana, J) This appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C is directed against the conviction and sentence passed in S.C. No. 357 of 2008 by the VI Additional Sessions Judge (III Fast Track Court), Warangal at Mahabubabad dated 05-01-2009. According to the prosecution, PW 1 filed the complaint stating that he is the resident of Damaravancha and on 05-02-2008 while himself and PWs 2 and 3 were returning on his motor cycle from Mahabubabad after seeing one Gudimetla Laxmaiah who met with an accident and when they reached near Damaravancha cross roads at about 6.00 PM, the deceased came in the opposite direction with blood...
Sri Ravi Sreenivasa Rao Vs. M/S. Vasudeva Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-07-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant agreed to purchase the villa in plot No.19 admeasuring 300 sq. yds. with a constructed built up plinth area of 3,685 sq. ft. in the gated housing colony of opposite party named as LLAITHA BLOOMFIELDS at Khajaguda Village, Nanakramguda Road, serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District for a total sale consideration of Rs.50,00,000/- and that an amount of Rs.7,05,000/- would be towards the cost of the land and Rs.42,85,000/- would be towards the cost of construction of house building. The complainant submitted that out of the total sale consideration, he should make an initial payment of Rs.15,00,000/- towards booking advance and further payment of Rs.21,00,000/- for execution of Agreement of sale-cum-construction. It was also agreed that out of Rs.36,00,000/- an amount of Rs.7,05,000/- would be appropriated towards land component and Rs.28,95,000/- would be utilized for cost of construction and ...
Penmatsa Appala Narasimha Raju and Anoth Vs. District Collector,eluru, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.1616; 5119 o6. 2-2013 Penmatsa Appala Narasimha Raju and another District Collector,Eluru, West Godavari District and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioners in W.P.No.5119/2012: Sri C. Ramachandra Raju ^Counsel for petitioners in W.P.No.1616/2012 : Sri K.L.N. Swamy Counsel for respondents (in both the Writ Petitions): Government Pleader for Land Acquisition ?CASES REFERRED:1. 2011(5) AL2. AIR 199.S.C....
ircon International Limited Vs. State of A.P. and Another.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.24857 o06. 02.2013 IRCON International Limited State of A.P. and another. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S.Rajan Counsel for respondents: Additional Advocate General HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. AIR 197.SUPREME COURT 102 ORDER: The Government of Andhra Pradesh has undertaken the work of widening the road from Kadapa to Tadipatri. It appears to have been sponsored or funded by the World Bank. The petitioner, which is a Government of India undertaking, submitted its tender and became the successful bidder. The cost of the work is said to be about Rs.50 crores. In relation to the contract, the petitioner raised claims of different kinds. As many as three arbitrations ensued. The respective arbitrators awarded sums of Rs.1,55,49,724/-, 8,79,73,528/- and 32,31,897/-, with interest at the rate of 18% to 10% per annum. Proceedings were initiated before the respective Courts for enforcement of the awards or for setting aside the sam...
B.Kiran Kumar and Two Others. Vs. Lekkala Radhamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3964 o06. 02.2013 B.Kiran Kumar and two others. Lekkala Radhamma Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt B.Tara Sujatha Counsel for the Respondent: Ms B.Avani Reddy for Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar : ?CITATIONS: NIL The Court made the following: ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order, dated 21.06.2012, in I.A.No.536 of 2011 in O.S.No.79 of 2005 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Penukonda. I have heard Smt B.Tara Sujatha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms B.Avani Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent. Petitioner No.1 and his brother-B.Sairam filed the above-mentioned suit for declaration of title in respect of the suit schedule property against the respondent. Petitioner No.1 filed I.A.No.536 of 2011 for condonation of delay of 1216 days in filing the petition under Order 22 Rule 9 C.P.C. for bringing on record petitioner No.3 herei...
N.Venkata Rama Prasad Vs. K.Koteswara Rao and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR TRANSFER C.M.P.No.403 o06. 02.2013 N.Venkata Rama Prasad K.Koteswara Rao and others Counsel for the Petitioner: G. Jhansi Counsel for Respondent No.1: P. Prabhakara Rao ^Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 9: - HEAD NOTE: Cases referred ORDER: The petitioner, who is the first defendant in O.S.No.14 of 2012 on the file of VII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, filed this application seeking to withdraw the said suit and to transfer the same to any other Court having jurisdiction. The first respondent herein is the plaintiff in the said suit. He filed the suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.4,85,64,801/- and claimed interest. The petitioner herein filed a written statement denying the averments made by the first respondent-plaintiff. The first respondent filed I.A.No.24 of 2012 seeking ad-interim order of temporary injunction restraining the defendants in the suit from alienating the suit schedule property. The petitioner herein filed counter. Argumen...
D.Bapu Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-06-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.16 OF 200.06.02.2013 D.Bapu Rao..... APPELLANT AND State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Special Public Prosecutor for A.C.B......RESPONDENT Counsel for the appellant: Sri K.Surender Counsel for the respondent : Special Public Prosecutor for A.C.B. : ?Cases referred:1. (2001)10 Supreme Court Case2. (2006)1 Supreme Court Cases 401 JUDGMENT:- This appeal is filed by the sole accused in Calendar Case No.16 of 2001 on the file of the Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases-cum-IV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the judgment, dated 19.12.2005, whereby and whereunder the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three (3) months, and further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two (2...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »