Andhra Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
ing Vysya Bank Ltd., Himayathnagar Branch Hyderabad Rep. by Its Region ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The appeal is filed challenging the order of the District Forum whereby the appellant was directed to adjust five EMIs in respect of one loan account of the respondent to his other loan account and to issue no objection certificate to the respondent and to pay balance amount with interest as also to pay a sum of `20,000/- towards damages and `2,000/- towards costs. 2. The case of the respondent as seen from the averments of the complaint is that the respondent is a proprietary firm engaged in construction work applied for sanction of loan to purchase two tippers and the appellant bank sanctioned a sum of `48,40,000/-. The respondent paid part of sale consideration of `2,69,080/- while the appellant-bank paid the balance sale consideration of `48,40,000/- through cheques dated 19.02.2008 and 23.02.2008 to the dealer, M/s Sehgal Motors Ltd. The dealer delivered one truck on 10.05.2008 and promise...
Yarlagadda Suguna Mani, Rep. by Her Power of Attorney Holder Y. Krishn ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The brief facts as seen from the complaint are that on 25.10.2005 the complainant had availed home loan of `24,85,000/- along with her husband and daughter from the opposite party. The amount is repayable in 120 equal monthly instalments at the rate of `33,532/- and the interest chargeable was 10.5% p.a. After paying 43 instalments, the complainant approached the opposite parties and requested to reschedule the loan. The 1st opposite party promised to reschedule the loan payment schedule and requested her to pay some lump sum amount. Accordingly the complainant paid money. The 1st opposite party failed to reschedule the loan. The complainant could not pay instalments. She addressed letter to the 1st opposite party to furnish detailed account copy to enable her to discharge her loan at the agreed rate of interest. There was no response from the 1st opposite party. The opposite parti...
The Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank and Another Vs. G. Chandrasekhar Ra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
(Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Incharge President) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties along with a petition to condone the delay of 5 days in preferring the appeal. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellants and having perused the record, we are of the opinion that the matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant availed a housing loan from opposite party No.1 and as against the security of the loan amount, he deposited his original title deeds i.e. Regd.Sale Deeds bearing Doc.No.2426/1996 dated 12-6-1996 2) Doc.No.6217/1998 dated 14-11-1998 and created equitable mortgage against his house property. Subsequently the complainant repaid the entire loan amount to opposite party No.1 and his loan account was closed on 31-8-2004. Thereafter the complainant approached opposite party no.1 several times for return of his tile deeds and also gave a written representation on 26-4-2010 and go...
Addala Subrahmanyam Vs. State: Rep.by Inspector of Police, Acb,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1857 o19. 02.2013 Addala Subrahmanyam State: rep.by Inspector of Police, ACB, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Appellant: Sri C.Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent: Sri Ghaniamusa, Special PP for CBI : : Cases referred:1. (2002)9 SUPREME COURT CASES 53 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the sole accused in C.C.No.13 of 1999 against the judgment dated 28.11.2005 passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge - cum - Special Judge for A.C.B.Cases, Visakhapatnam, whereby and where under the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to undergo SI for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default, SI for one month for the charge under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and also sentenced to undergo SI for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- in default, SI for one month for the charge under Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of...
Sri S.M. Anjineyulu. Vs. Sri K. Satya Prakash and Another.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P. No.4801 o19. 02-2013 Sri S.M. Anjineyulu. Sri K. Satya Prakash and another. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Bethi Venkateshwarlu Counsel for the Respondents : HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: Till the year 1980, the adjudicatory process in India has been purely conventional. The only alternative to adjudication through Courts was arbitration. In the year 1980, a Committee for Implementing Legal Aid Schemes was appointed and through the auspices of the same, an informal adjudication, by conducting what are known as Lok Adalats, was evolved. The Parliament enacted the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (for short 'the Act') with a view to provide statutory backing to the administration of justice through Lok Adalats. Further improvements thereto were made through Act 37/2002. One of the salient features was the addition of Chapter-VI-A, which provided for the mechanism of Pre-Litigation Conciliation and Settlement. Section 22-C of t...
G. Chandra Mouli Vs. Dtdc Courier and Cargo Limited Eluru Branch, Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The appeal arises from the order of the District Forum whereby the District Forum dismissed the complaint on the premise that the appellant failed to furnish correct address of the consignee and there was no deficiency in service on the part of the respondents. 2. The appellant had sent an envelope on 11.11.2008 through the respondents to JVK Appala Raju at Vishakapatnam. After two and half months the envelope was returned though the first respondent promised the appellant that the envelope would be delivered within 24 hours from the date of booking the consignment. The appellant got issued notice to the respondents demanding the amount paid towards the charges and compensation to the tune of `10,000/-. The appellant suffered mental tension and financial loss as the respondents rendered deficient service. Hence, the complaint is filed before the District Forum. 3. The respondents resisted the claim on the premise that the first re...
The Branch Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co., Ltd. Vs. Venna ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-19-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party no.2 is the appellant. 2. The averments of the complaint are that the complainants son is savings bank account holder with A/c bearing No.29001000056586 and the opposite party no.1 obtained personal accident insurance coverage to its account holder including the complainants son from the opposite party no.2. The sum assured is `5 lakh and the complainant is the nominee for the sum insured. The complainants son died on 9.11.2007 while he drowned in Godavari river while taking bath at Gudem village. The police Dandepally registered a case in Cr.No.118 of 2008. Postmortem examination was conducted over the dead body of complainants son. The postmortem examination report was issued showing the cause of death of the complainants son as due to drowning. 3. The complainant informed the opposite party no.2 orally and thereafter addressed a letter on 23.11.2007 about the death of his son. The complainant lodged claim and...
M/S.Krishnam Raju Financial Consultancy Vs. S.P.Builders, Rep.by Its A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARARAO C.C.C.A No.128 o18. 02-2013 M/s.Krishnam Raju Financial Consultancy Services,rep.by its alleged Proprietor Ch.Krishnam Raju,Hyderabad and another S.P.Builders, rep.by its alleged Managing Partner S.Haneef, Hyderabad Counsel for the Appellants: Sri HARI SREEDHAR Counsel for the respondent: Sri RUPENDRA MAHENDERA Md.YASEEN ALI : : ?Cases Referred: JUDGMENT: The defendants in O.S.No.631 of 1992 on the file of VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad are the appellants herein.2. The suit was filed for recovery of Rs.1,07,200/- alleging that the defendant No.2 is the proprietor of defendant No.1 consultancy, and there was an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants that the defendants will arrange bank loans and deposits and the defendants obtained a sum of Rs.80,000/- from the plaintiff by way of a cheque dated 15.11.1990 and it was encashed. But subsequently, the defendants did not render any services and consequently the sui...
K. Vishnu Vs. K. Janardhan and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2078 OF 201.18-02-2013 K. Vishnu K. Janardhan and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri D. Hanumanth Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V. Sudhakar Reddy : ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S No.63 of 2008 in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi, against the residents for the relief of partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties. It appears that written statement was filed by some of the defendants and the others have adopted the same. The respondents 1 and 2 i.e. the defendants 1 and 2 filed an application under Order - VI Rule - 17 CPC with a prayer to permit them to amend the written statement. The application was ordered. Though time was granted to the petitioner to file rejoinder, he did not avail that opportunity. Thereafter, issues were framed and the evidence on behalf of the petitioners was closed. When the evidence of D.W-1 was in progress, the petitioner filed...
Abdullah, Represented by His G.P.A.Gulam Vs. Mohd. Abdul Raheem,hussai ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-18-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY C.C.No.1776 o18. 2-2013 Abdullah, Represented by his G.P.A.Gulam Sajjad, Kotla Alijah, Jafrigalli, Hyderabad Mohd. Abdul Raheem,Hussaini Kothi, Kotla Alijah,Hyderabad HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : Sri M.A.K. Mukheed Counsel for respondent : -- ?CASES REFERRED:1. (1985) 4 SCC 24.2. (2004) 1 SCC 360=AIR 200.S.C. 942 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 17-2-2012 in C.R.P.No.761/2012, whereby this Court, inter alia, directed the respondent-Contemnor to vacate the schedule premises within a period of four months, later extended till 31-7-2012 by order dated 29-6-2012 in CRPMP No.3490/2012 in the said revision petition. The petitioner is the owner of premises bearing mulgi No.23-1-432/2, Hussaini Koti, Kotla Ali Jah, Hyderabad. The contemnor is the tenant of the said premises. The petitioner filed R.C.No.462/2007 in the Court of the learned I Additional Rent Controller...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »