Andhra Pradesh Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Sudhakar Naidu Vs. Smt. M. Padmavathamma and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.176 o28. 02-2013 V. Sudhakar Naidu Smt. M. Padmavathamma and another Counsel for the appellant: Sri N. Ashok Kumar Counsel for respondent: Sri P. Hemachandra for R-1 GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED: AIR 200.Kerala 155 JUDGMENT: The sole plaintiff in O.S.No.180 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati is the appellant. He entered into an agreement of sale dated 11-02-1999 with the respondents/defendants. He pleaded that the respondents, who are sister and brother got the suit schedule property in a family partition; evidenced by a registered partition deed dated 20-06-1992, and that they offered to sell the same for a sum of Rs.4,50,000/-. Advance of Rs.50,000/- is said to have been paid. It is stated that the suit schedule property is part of larger extent of Ac.2.24 cents in Sy.No.525/2B of Perur Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal and that the corresponding share being, 1/21 was agreed to be conveyed by ...
S. Venkatesh Vs. the Reserve Bank of India, Represented B
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.2542 o28. 2-2013 S. Venkatesh The Reserve Bank of India, Represented by its Regional Manager, Hyderabad and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : Sri Mohd. Yousuf Counsel for respondent No.1 : -- Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri K. Maheswara Rao ?CASES REFERRED:1. Civil Appeal No.9711/2011, dt. 14-11-2011 2. AIR 196.S.C....
The Manager Central Bank of India Golkonda Fort Branch Vs. Syed Gauhar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-28-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District Forum whereby it was directed to pay an amount of `1,05,000/- with interest and a sum of `2,00,000/-towards damages to the respondent. 2. The facts of the case as seen from the complaint are that the respondent is the account holder of the first appellant-bank with his account number 25 which was changed to 1455400232 in the year 2008 and new pass book and cheque book were issued to him. The balance amount to the credit of the respondents account as on 30.10.2010 was `2,41,150 and the respondent applied for new pass book by returning the existing pass book. The assistant branch manager of the first appellant bank informed him that the new pass book can be collected within two days and on 22.11.2010 he informed the respondent that he could collect the pass book at the counter. 3. The respondent having not found the pass book enquired of balanc...
Reddi Radhakrishna Vs. Reddy Lakshmi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR APPEAL SUIT No.1402 of 1996 and CROSS OBJECTIONS (SR) No.62620 o27. 02.2013 Reddi Radhakrishna Reddy Lakshmi and others Counsel for the Appellant: G. Krishna Murthy, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents: Sri M.R.S.Srinivas, Advocate : : ?Cases Referred:1. 2005 (4) ALD 29.2. (2003) 10 SCC 31.3. AIR 195.SC 397(1) 4. AIR 196.SC 33.5. AIR 196.SC 126.6. 2003 (1) ALD 50.7. 1956 Andhr8. AIR 199.SC 277.9. AIR 196.SC 107.10. AIR 192.Madra11. ILR 194.PC 44.12. AIR 200.Supreme Cour13. AIR 200.Supreme Cour14. AIR 200.SC 2380(1) 15. AIR 200.Supreme Court 3229(1) 16. AIR 198.Karnatak17. AIR 199.SC 35.18. AIR 195.AP 1.19. AIR 195.SC 17.20. 1993 (3) ALT 5.(DB) 21. 1996 (2) ALD 102.22. AIR 193.Privy Council 264 COMMON JUDGMENT:- This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 11.12.1995 passed in O.S.No.98 of 1989 by the Subordinate Judge, Ramachandrapuram, East Godavari District. The appellant herein is the second defendant and the first r...
Nakkawar Laxman Vs. M/S. Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complaint is filed U/s. 17(1)(a)(i) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay the sum assured an amount of `25 lakhs with interest @ 12% P.A., and to pay compensation of `1,00,000/- towards mental agony and costs of `20,000/-. 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that Mr. Nakkawar Ravi has obtained General Insurance Policy bearing No. 4111/PLB/56234780/00/000 for the period from 20.02.2009 to 19.02.2010 for `25 lakhs under the name and style of Personal Protect Plan 3 on payment of premium @ `4,129/- for which the complainant is appointed as nominee. The policy holder met with a Road Accident and died on 26.04.2009 due to head injuries and other crush injuries all over the body and died at the spot. The police instead of registering the death of the insured as an accident, registered it as murder case and the complainant was impleaded as accused no. 2 with ulterior motives U/s. 302...
Palle Pitchi Reddy Vs. the Special Deputy Collector, Somasila P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25561 OF 201.26-02-2013 Palle Pitchi Reddy The Special Deputy Collector, Somasila Project, Unit IV, Rajampet, Y.S.R. District and another Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Land Acquisition Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri K. Venugopal Reddy HEAD NOTE: CASES REFERRED: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare Award No.18/28(A)/2010- 2011, dated 23-01-2012, passed by respondent No.1, enhancing the compensation for the structures over an extent of Ac.0-10 cents out of Ac.0-41 cents in Survey No.41/1 of Thuduru Village, Atluru Mandal, YSR District, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential relief of setting aside the said Award. An extent of Ac.0-41 cents in Survey No.41/1 of Thudur Village, Atluru Mandal, YSR District, was acquired along with various other lands as they came under submergence of Somasila project. An award was p...
C.Mohan Reddy. Vs. Ottra Ramesh.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-26-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.468 o26. 02.2013 C.Mohan Reddy. Ottra Ramesh. Counsel for the appellant: Sri P.Govind Reddy Counsel for respondent: Sri A.Chandraiah Naidu HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. 2009(3) SCJ 4 JUDGMENT: This second appeal is filed against the concurrent judgments rendered by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati in O.S.No.393 of 2007 and the Court of VI Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Tirupati in A.S.No.92 of 2009. The respondent herein filed the suit against the appellant herein, for recovery of a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- on the basis of three separate promissory notes. He pleaded that the appellant approached him with a request to lend a sum of Rs.3,00,000/-, promising to repay the amount in instalments of Rs.1,00,000/- each and accordingly, the amount was lent under three promissory notes. He pleaded that in spite of repeated demands, the appellant did not pay the amount. In the written statement, the appellant denied th...
Syed Habibulla Shah and One Another Vs. the State of A.P,rep. by the P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No. 4234 OF 201.25.02.2013 Syed Habibulla Shah and one another The State of A.P,Rep. by the Principal Secretary,Social Welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the petitioners: Sri K.Venkata Rao, Counsel for the respondent No.1: AGP for Social Welfare. Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 4 : G.P for Land Acquisition. ?CASES REFERRED:1. AIR 199.S.C....
Marupaka Sudhakar and Another Vs. the Government of A.P.,rep. by Its P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.5501 o25. 02-2013 Marupaka Sudhakar and another The Government of A.P.,rep. By its Principal Secretary,Higher Education Department and others. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri S. Satyam Reddy, learned Sr.Counsel Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3 : learned Standing Counsel GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED : ORDER: The petitioners are the students of Intermediate Course. The admission into professional courses, like Engineering, Medicine, B.Pharmacy, is on the basis of Common Entrance Examination, conducted by the State. The Government in Higher Education Department issued G.O.Ms.No.73, Higher Education (EC.2) Department, dated 28-07-2011, prescribing the Rules to be followed in the matter of conducting the entrance examination, and matters relating thereto. The Rules inter alia stipulate the procedure for determining the merit list and assignment of ranks. Rule 4(7) stipulates the qualifying marks in the entrance examination, as 25%. Ru...
Regulavalasa Chiranjeevi Rao Vs. 1. State of A.P. Represented by the D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.347 o25. 02.2013 Regulavalasa Chiranjeevi Rao 1. State of A.P. represented by the District Collector, Vizianagaram and others Counsel for the appellant: Dr.Pundla Bhaskara Mohan Counsel for the Respondents: G.P.for Arbitration : : ?Cases referred:1. 2007(1)ALJ 1.(DB) 2. 1996(2) ALT862 (DB) JUDGMENT: Unsuccessful plaintiff in both the Courts below is the appellant in this second appeal. He filed the suit in the trial Court for declaration that he belongs to 'kondadora' caste which is a scheduled tribe under the constitution (Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 issued by the President of India and for consequential injunction restraining the defendants from making any enquiry into truth or otherwise of caste of the plaintiff in violation of caste certificate issued by the 3rd defendant. According to the plaintiff, he belongs to 'kondadora' caste which is a schedule tribe and after detailed enquiry, the Mandal Re...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »