Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Vs. T.Latha and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.1093 of 2011 AND BATCH1912-2013 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited...Appellant T.Latha and others....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy ^Counsel for claimants:K.Harimohan Reddy (appellants in MACMA No.1093 of 2011) Counsel for the 6th respondent-owner Of crime vehicle in both the appeals: None appeared HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. 1965(1) All.E.R-563 2.1963(2) All.E.R.432 3.1969(1) All.E.R.555 4.1995 ACJ366SC) 5.AIR1936page 264 6. 2006 ACJ414SC7(2001) 8 SCC197AIR2001(SC) 3218 8. 2013(4)ALT35SC) 9.2009 ACJ129810. 2013(7) SCC47611. AIR2009SC20812. (2004) 3 SCC2972004-ACJ-1 13. (2006) 4 SCC25014. (2004) 13 SCC2242004-SAR(civil)-290 15. (2007) 10 SCC6502007(4) Scale 292 16. 2008 ACJ265417. 2008(1) LS-SC-177 18. (1997) 7 SCC55819. (2007) 13 SCC24620. 2008(1) Scale 531 21. 2008 ACJ65422. 2007 ACJ72123. 2001 ACJ84324. 2008(1) Scale 727 25. JT-2003(2) SC595= 2003 ACJ61126. 2010 ACJ16527. 2012 ACJ...
Rajulapati Komala D Vs. Kagitha Ram Babu and the State of Andhra
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1891 of 2006 19-12-2013 Rajulapati Komala Devi .Petitioner. Kagitha Ram Babu and The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. . Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.V. Subba Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, Counsel for Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor : : ?. Cases referred: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1891 of 2006 Date:19.12.2013 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1891 of 2006 JUDGMENT: This revision is preferred against the judgment dated 29-09-2006 in Criminal Appeal No.36 of 2004 on the file of I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Krishna District whereunder conviction passed by the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Gudivada in C.C.No.1292 of 2000 dated 24-02-2004 was confirmed but modified the sentence of simple imprison...
Gampala Anthaiah and OThe Vs. Kasarla Venkat Red
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CRP.No.4687 of 2013 18-12-2013 Gampala Anthaiah and others... Petitioners/ Kasarla Venkat Reddy ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri P.Venkanna Counsel for the Respondent:Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. 2010(2) ALD41(DB) 2. 2006(5) ALD953. (2007) 12 SCC2014. (2006) 4 SCC5015. AIR1982AP394(DB) 6. AIR2004Bombay 225 7. AIR2003Madras 219 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO CRP.No.4687 of 2013 ORDER : This Revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dt.21.08.2013 in I.A.No.129 of 2013 in OS.No.197 of 2011 of the Junior Civil Judge, Suryapet.2. The petitioners are defendants in the above suit. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his alleged peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.3. He also filed I.A.No.772 of 2011 in the suit seeking a temporary injunction restrain...
L.Nagar Vs. Syndicate Bank, Rep.by the General Manag
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTAAND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA1812-2013 L.Nagaraju.. Appellant Syndicate Bank, rep.by the General Manager, Syndicate Bank Zonal Office,Pioneer House, Somajiguda, Hyderabad and others.... Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sri G.S.K.V. Ramana Murthy Counsel for Respondents: Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee, SC HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred AIR2003SC858AIR2006SC2316AIR2001SC1748AIR2000SC21981978 (2) SLR425AIR1984SC541AIR2003SC534AIR1997SC1390AIR1999SC14161999 (2) ALD1541996 (2) ALT383HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY C.C.C.A.No.89 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy) The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S.No.576 of 2000 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, preferred this appeal against the impugned decree and judgment dated 11.11.2002.2. The appellant was the plaintiff and the respondents were the defendants in the suit ...
Yadlapati Nagamalleswara R Vs. the Deputy Transport Commissioner, (the
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.37084 of 2013 18-12-2013 Yadlapati Nagamalleswara Rao ...Petitioner The Deputy Transport Commissioner, (The Registering Authority).the Regional Transport Authority, Guntur and another..Respondents ^Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.B.Siva Rama Krishnaiah !Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Transport Head note: ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.37084 of 2013 Dated 18th December, 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1 in registering vehicle bearing temporary registration No.AP07 UJ TR3023as per the proceedings vide application No.AP007/155881/2013/R, dated 30.11.2013, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner, who is the owner of new vehicle of Hundai Verna make, appeared to have developed fancy for '0666' and approached respondent No.1 for allotment of the said number by paying a sum of Rs.30,000/- a...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Lt Vs. Botu Janardhana Rao and 3 O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.23 OF201218-12-2013 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.....Appellant Botu Janardhana Rao and 3 others.... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri A.Rama Krishna Reddy Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3 :Sri S.Kasi Viswanatham. : : ?.Cases referred:1. (2004) 3 SCC2972. AIR2009SC2083. (2006)4 SCC2504. (2004) 13 SCC2245. (2007) 10 SCC6506. 2008 (1) LS-SC1777. (2013) 7 SCC62HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.23 OF2012JUDGMENT: The 2nd respondent-insurance company filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.16 of 2008, dated 29.07.2011, awarding compensation of Rs.4,39,000/-(Rupees Four lakhs Thirty Nine thousand only) with interest at 7.5% per annum as prayed for in the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (for short, ...
Manigandla Radhakrishna Mur Vs. Dhavaleswarapu Janikam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.1294 of 2011 18-12-2013 Manigandla Radhakrishna Murthy...appellant Dhavaleswarapu Janikamma....Respondent Counsel for appellant: Sr.K.V.Subba Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Sr.Challa Srinivasa Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.1294 of 2011 JUDGMENT: This second appeal is filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.224 of 2000 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Macherla. The suit was filed against the respondent for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 07.02.1994. The trial Court decreed the suit, through judgment, dated 15.06.2005. Aggrieved by that, the respondent filed A.S.No.41 of 2005 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Gurajala. The lower Appellate Court allowed the appeal, through judgment, dated 10.08.2008. Hence, this second appeal. The case of the appellant was that the respondent agreed to sell the suit schedule property for a sum of Rs.80,...
thel.Rajagopaland AnoThe Vs. Union OfIndia, Ministry of Homeaffairs
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONOURABLE SANJAY KUMAR P.I.L.No.44 of 2014 18-12-2013 The L.Rajagopal and another.....Petitioners Union of India, Ministry of Home AffaiRs.represented by its Secretary, New Delhi,and another...Respondents COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS : Sr.A.Satya Prasad, learned Senior Counsel representing Sr.Pratyusha Appari COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: Sr.Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned Assistant Solicitor General GIST HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR P.I.L.No.44 of 2014 Date: 18.02.2014 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.44 of 2014 ORDER: (per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sr.Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) This Public Interest Litigation has been brought by one sitting Hon'ble Member of Parliament (Lok Sabha) and by a former one. By this petition, they prayed for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the approval/recommendation made by the Hon'ble President for introducing the Andhra Pradesh Sta...
Suresh Kumar S Vs. B.Rajesham,deputy Collector and Tahsildar,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.C.No.1564 of 2013 18-12-2013 Suresh Kumar Shaw.Petitioner B.Rajesham,Deputy Collector & Tahsildar,Serilingampally Mandal,Ranga Reddy District.Respondents Counsel for petitioner:Sr.G. Ram Gopal Counsel for respondent : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: Nil HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.C.No.1564 of 2013 Date : 18-12-2013 The Court made the following : ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 27-8-2013 in W.P.No.25046/2013. The petitioner also sought compensation of Rs.7 lakhs for the alleged illegal demolition of his structure. The brief facts leading to the filing of this Contempt Case are stated hereunder: The petitioner purchased premises bearing Door No.2-9/B, Gachibowli, admeasuring 174 sq. yards., under registered sale deed dated 19-8-1983 and he has been in possession and enjoyment of the same since then. On 26-4-2013, the respondent has issued a noti...
Nagabathula Hara Gopal(Died) Nagabathula Vs. Malluri Venkata Ramana an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.376 of 2009 17-12-2013 Nagabathula Hara Gopal(died) Nagabathula Sundararao and two others....Appellants Malluri Venkata Ramana and two others....Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.A. Gopala Krishnamacharyulu Counsel for Respondents No.1 & 2 : Sr.Sridhar Tummalapudi Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Sr.B. Devanand : ?. Cases referred: 1) 2003 (5) ALD1622) 2002 (4) ALD103(SC) THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.376 OF2009JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the award dated 28.08.2008 in M.V.O.P.No.297 of 2006 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, East Godavari District, Rajahmundry (for short ".the Tribunal".).the claimants preferred the instant M.A.C.M.A on the ground of inadequacy of compensation. 2) The claimant Nos.2 to 4 before the Tribunal are appellants herein and respondent Nos.1 to 3 before the Tribunal are respondents herein. 3) The factual matrix of the case is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »