Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Routhu Likit Vs. L.Srinivasa Rao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO MACMA No.357 of 2009 20-12-2013 Routhu Likitha....Appellant L.Srinivasa Rao and another....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.Aravala Rama Rao Counsel for Respondents: Sr.S.Agastya Sarma : : ?.Cases referred: 1. 2007 (3) ALD449THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO MACMA.No.357 of 2009 Judgment: Aggrieved by the Award dated 18-11-2008 in MVOP No.374 of 2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Srikakulam (for short ".the Tribunal".) the claimant preferred the instant MACMA on the ground of inadequacy of compensation. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) Routhu Likitha the injured is the minor girl aged about 3 years and represented by her mother-R.Sudha Rani. The case of the claimant is that on 27- 01-2006 when the minor girl along with her parents was proceeding on a motor cycle bearing No.AP30B611from Narasannapeta to Srikakulam and when they reached near Komarthi junction at about 1...
1.Boya Pareshappa, S/O.Boya Chinna Yella Vs. 1.G.Raghavendra, S/O.G. V ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR SECOND APPEAL No.611 of 2013 20-12-2013 1.Boya Pareshappa, S/o.Boya Chinna Yellappa, aged 49 years, Occ: cultivation, r/o.Nemelikallu (v), Peda Kadaburu (M), Mekadona (Post), Kurnool District and another.....Appellants 1.G.Raghavendra, S/o.G. Venugopal, aged 22 years, r/o.Nemelikallu (v), Peda Kadaburu (M), Mekadona (Post), Kurnool District and nine others..... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner :Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar Counsel for the Respondents:Sri S.Lakshminarayana Reddy : : ?.Cases referred:1. (20009) 14 SCC2242. (2012) 8 SCC1483. 2006 (1) ALD1164. 1991 (3) SCC3315. 2011 (4) ALT4796. 2008 (3) ALD525This Court made the following:- HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR SECOND APPEAL No.611 of 2013 JUDGMENT: The appellants herein are defendant Nos.2 and 3 in O.S.No.104 of 2003 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Adoni, Kurnool District. The said suit was filed by respondent Nos.1 to 9 herein against respondent No.10 and t...
Mandala Yadagiri and Oth Vs. Mandala Madhava Rao and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.302 of 2001 and batch 20-12-2013 +L.P.A.No.302 of 2001 Mandala Yadagiri and others.Appellants Mandala Madhava Rao and others.Respondents Counsel for appellants : Sr.A. Narasimha Reddy Counsel for 1st respondent : Sr.Ashok Kumar Agarwal HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED : ----- ?.?. ?.?. ?.?. ?.?. COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.These two Letters Patent Appeals are filed against the judgment and decree, dated 31.03.2001, in C.C.C.A.No.2 of 1988 on the file of this Court. The said appeal, in turn, arose out of a preliminary decree, dated 06.07.1987, passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, in O.S.No.457 of 1983. While L.P.A.No.302 of 2001 is filed by the plaintiff in that suit, L.P.A.No.322 of 2001 is filed by the defendants 2 to 4. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the suit. The sole plaintiff, the 1st defendant and one Mandala ...
Shri M. Jaffersaheb (Decd.), Guntakal ( Vs. Commissioner Ofincome-tax, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.127 OF199719-12-2013 Shri M. Jaffer Saheb (Decd.).Guntakal (L/R M.Nurul Huda)..Applicant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Vijayawada ...Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.Y. Ratnakar Counsel for the respondent : Sr.J.V.Prasad, Learned Sr.Standing Counsel for Income Tax Head Note: ?. Cases referred: 1. 202 ITR P. 839 @ page 845 2. 157 ITR Page 711 @ 715(Ker) full bench 3. (1990) 181 ITR401(SC) 4. (1995) 212 ITR385(Orissa) 5. (2010) 328 ITR10(Ker) 6. (1976) 104 ITR695(Allahabad) 7. (1976) 105 ITR172(AP) 8. (1973) 90 ITR47(AP) 9. (1987) 1651 ITR231(SC) 10. (1973) 87 ITR22(Mad.) 11. (1972) 84 ITR625(P&H) 12. (1968) 69 ITR159(Kar) 13. (2010) 328 ITR10(Ker) 14. (1976) 104 ITR695HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.127 OF1997ORDER:- (per Hon'ble Sr.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) At the instance of the Assessee, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench &...
A.V.Vinod Kum Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Its Secretary, M
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.27054 of 2013 19-12-2013 A.V.Vinod Kumar ...Petitioner Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs & Public Distribution, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi-I & Others...Respondents Counsel for Petitioner: Sri Dr.A.Raghukumar Counsel for Respondents: Sri P.Ashok Goud, Asst. Sol.General & Sri G. Ramachandra Rao, learned Standing counsel for Central Warehousing Corporation. HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1. (2000) 10 SCC162THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.27054 OF2013THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.27054 OF2013ORDER:1. The petitioner is an Assistant General Manager (G) working in Central Warehousing Corporation, Regional Office, Hyderabad. He is aggrieved by the order dated 10-07-2013 passed by the 4th Respondent - Managing Director of the Corporation, suspending him from service on the ground of contemplation of disciplinary proceedings. The order reads as under : ...
M/S.A.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation Vs. Farzana and 4 Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1039 OF201119-12-2013 M/s.A.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation limited ....Appellant Farzana and 4 others.... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri A.Ravinder Reddy Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Sri S.Venkateswar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : Sri Mohd. Yousuf : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR2009SC2082. (2007) 10 SCC6503. (2006)4 SCC2504. 2009 SAR (civil) 679 (SC) 5. 2009 ACJ12986. 2013 (4) ALT35(SC) 7. 2011 (8) SCALE240HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1039 OF2011JUDGMENT: The appellant-A.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (1st respondent in the claim petition filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- XXII Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad, (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.785 of 2000, dated 27.01.2011, awarding compensation of Rs.5,94,125/- (Rupees Five lakhs Ninety four thousand one hundred a...
The NewIndia Assurance Co. Lt Vs. Basantha Mohanthy and 5 Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.867 OF201119-12-2013 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.....Appellant Basantha Mohanthy and 5 others.... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Naresh Byrapaneni Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Sri G.Sai Narayana Rao Counsel for Respondent No.6 : Sri P.N.A. Christian : : ?.Cases referred:1. (2004)3 SCC2972. 2003 ACJ6113. 2009 ACJ12984. 2013 ACJ14035. 2011(8) SCALE240HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.867 OF2011JUDGMENT: The 2nd respondent-New India Assurance Company Limited filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.758 of 2004, dated 11.03.2010, awarding compensation of Rs.7,90,000/-(Rupees Seven lakhs Ninety thousand only) with interest at 7.5% per annum as against the claim of the claimant of Rs.12,50,000/-(Rupees Twelve lakhs fifty tho...
thecommissioner of Wealth-tax Andhra Pr Vs. NitIn I.Patel, 4-1-833, Ab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.T.C.No.18 of 2000 19-12-2013 The Commissioner of Wealth-tax Andhra Pradesh-II, Hyderabad...Petitioner Nitin I. Patel, 4-1-833, Abids, Hyderabad...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.J.V.Prasad, Learned Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department Assisted by Smt.M.Kiranmayi. Counsel for the respondent: Sr.Khaja Mohinuddin : ?.Cases referred: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.T.C.No.18 of 2000 ORDER: (Per Sr.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) This reference application is made under Section 27(3) of the Wealth Tax Act (in short ".the Act".).by the Revenue seeking this Hon'ble Court to refer the following three questions of law said to be arising from the Order dated 25.09.1994 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ".A"., Hyderabad (in short ".the Tribunal".) in W.T.A.No.513 to 517/Hyd/1997, for the assessment years 1984-1985, ...
V.Kameswar R Vs. Smt. Umad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2488 of 2001 and batch 19-12-2013 V.Kameswar Rao .Appellant Smt. Umadevi.Respondent Counsel for appellant : Ms.G.Sudha Counsel for respondent : HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : 1) (2005) 7 SCC3532) (2006) 4 SCC558THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2488 of 2001 & Tr.A.S.No.120 of 2010 The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and the Transferred Appeal Suit are between the same parties. Hence, they are disposed of, through this common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the CMA. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 19.02.1984 at Yellendu, and it was also consummated. They lived together for a short period. The appellant filed O.P.No.224 of 1997 in the Family Court, Secunderabad, under Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act')....
Vallepu Ankam Vs. Pallapu Kondaiah and Others ...Respondne
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Second Appeal No.1620 of 2011 19-12-2013 Vallepu Ankamma....Appellant Pallapu Kondaiah and others ...Respondnets Counsel for Appellant: Sr.Charan Telaprolu Counsel for Respondents:Sr.V.Surya Kiran Kumar Gisdt: : ?.Citations:- JUDGMENT: The appellant herein filed O.S.No.72 of 2004 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Chilakaluripet, against the respondents, for the relief of specific performance of agreement of sale, dated 03.04.2001. It was pleaded that the respondents approached the appellant, with a proposal to sell an extent of Ac.1.00 of agricultural land, for a consideration of Rs.55,860/-, and on 03.04.2001, an agreement of sale (Ex.A.1) was executed, by advancing a sum of Rs.51,400/-. According to him, though the balance of consideration of Rs.4,400/- was to be paid by the end of April, 2001 and the sale deed was to be executed, the respondents did not evince any interest, inspite of repeated demands. It is stated that left w...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »