Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Eda Sujatha Vs. V. Raja Mallaiah and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) The complainant is the appellant. The complaint is filed to declare the action of respondent No.7 in unilaterally cancelling the agreement of sale dt.18-2-2006 as illegal, violative of terms of agreement and direct the respondents to complete the pending works and register the house in plot admeasuring 188.67 sq. yds. in plot 4(Part) 170 sq. yds. and part of plot No.5 admeasuring 18.67 sq. yds. together with structures thereon situated at Sy Nos. 9 to 14 of Madinaguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in favour of the complainant by collecting the balance sale consideration as per agreement of sale dated 18-2-2006 together with compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-. The appellant submitted that the respondents 1 to 6 are owners of land admeasuring 33.4 guntas in Sy No.9 to 13 and 562 sq. yds. in Sy.No.14 situated at Madinaguda Village of Serilingampally Mandal and got approval from HUDA for construction of houses and entered into...
P.Utheja Vs. S.Sriniva
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4286 OF201323-12-2013 P.Utheja .....Petitioner S.Srinivas ....Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.D.Pramada Counsel for the respondent:Sr.Eranki Phani Kumar : Cases referred : 1 (2007) 4 SCC3432 (2003) 1 SCC5573 2006 (1) ALD44THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4286 OF2013Dated: 23.12.2013 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 19.7.2013 in I.A.No.269 of 2013 in FCo.No.248 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Family Judge, Secunderabad. The revision petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the respondent. She filed O.P.No.248 of 2012 against the respondent seeking a decree for annulment of the marriage on the ground of non-consummation of marriage as well as a decree for divorce on the ground of cruelty. The respondent herein filed I.A.No.269 of 2013 under Order 7 Rule 10 of C.P.C.with a prayer to return O.P.No.248 of 2012 for want of territorial jurisdiction. Th...
indus Towerlimited, Plot No.1130/A,3rd Vs. State of Andhrapradesh, Thr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.27616 OF201323-12-2013 Indus Tower Limited, Plot No.1130/A,3rd Floor, Usha Jubilee Town, Road No.36,Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-33 & others......Petitioner State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, State of Andhra Pradesh & Others....Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Avinash Desai Counsel for the respondent No.1 : G.P.for Finance & Planning Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 to 6: Sr.P.Balaji Varma : Cases referred : 1 21 APSTJ982 62 VST185(AP) 3 196 ITR354(AP) 4 (2010) 9 SCC496THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.27616 OF2013AND WRIT PETITION No.27406 OF2013Dated: .12.2013 Common Order: (Per G. Rohini,J.The petitioner in these two writ petitions is a registered dealer under the A.P.Value Added Tax Act, 2005 as well as the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner was assessed under th...
Kovvuri Kanaka Reddy S/O Venkata Red Vs. Nadella Yedukondalu and Anoth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Civil Revision Petition No.2191 of 2012 23-12-2013 Kovvuri Kanaka Reddy S/o Venkata Reddy... Petitioner Nadella Yedukondalu and another ... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri S.Sridhar Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 : Sri N.V.Anantha Krishna : ?.Cases referred:1990. 1) APLJ4342011(4) ALD61(DB) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Civil Revision Petition No.2191 of 2012 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the unsuccessful respondent/plaintiff (`the plaintiff', for short) is directed against the orders dated 11-04-2012 of the learned III Additional District Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District made in I.A.No.3247 of 2011 in O.S.No.7 of 2008 filed under Order III Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 119 of the Code of Civil Procedure (`the Code', for short) allowing the request of the petitioners/ defendants to accord permission to cross examine the proposed witness, a handw...
State Bank OfIndia, Suryapet Branch,nal Vs. 1.The Deputycommercial Tax ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.8690 OF200823-12-2013 State Bank of India, Suryapet Branch,Nalgonda District......Petitioner 1.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,Suryapet, Nalgonda District, and 3 others....RespondentS Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.A.Satyanarayana Counsel for the respondent No.1 & 2 : Sr.P.Balaji Varma (Special Standing counsel for Commercial Taxes) Counsel for the respondent No.3: None appeared Counsel for the respondent No.4: Sr.P.R.Prasad : Cases referred : 1 2010 (51) APSTJ1172 (2002) 10 SCC4413 (1995) 2 SCC194 (2009) 4 SCC945 AIR1963SC1246 2005 (1) ALT293THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.8690 OF2008Dated: 23.12.2013 ORDER: (Per G. Rohini,J.The petitioner is a Nationalized Bank. The 3rd respondent herein availed a loan from the petitioner Bank by mortgaging certain immovable properties for securing repayment. Since the 3rd respondent commit...
T.V.G.Chandrasek Vs. the State OfA.P., Represented by Its Pr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.33917 of 2013 23-12-2013 T.V.G.Chandrasekhar.Petitioner The State of A.P., Represented by its Principal Secretary,Home Department, Secretariat,Hyderabad and others.Respondents Counsel for petitioner: Sr.P.S.P.Suresh Kumar Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Home : ?.CASES REFERRED: 1.1992 Supp. (1) SCC3352.Writ Petition (Criminal) No.68/2008, dt. 12-11-2013 3.2010(3) ALT (Crl) 93 (AP ) HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.33917 of 2013 Date : 23-12-2013 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: The word 'incorrigible' is perhaps an inadequate expression to describe the conduct of the Station House Officers of the Police Stations in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The officer in-charge of L. Kota Police Station, Vizianagaram District, is no exception in this regard, for, despite the law declared by the Apex Court in unequivocal terms as far back as the year 1992 in State of Haryana versus Bhajan Lal1 and being reit...
Mohd.AfzaluddIn Ahmed, Andanoth Vs. thetrustees Board Mahdavia Club Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI C.R.P.No.3798 OF201323-12-2013 Mohd. Afzaluddin Ahmed, and another....Petitioners The Trustees Board Mahdavia Club Rep. by its Hony. Secretary Syed Shakeel Ahmed, and two others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Smt. K.Sesharajyam Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sr.Mohd. Adnan : : ?.Cases referred: 1. AIR1973SC3132. AIR1967SC14703. 2011 (4) ALD6144. 1997 (1) SCC502THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3798 OF2013Date: 23.12.2013 ORDER: The revision petitioners are the defendants 1 and 2 in O.S.No.2160/2011 on the file of the Court of X Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. This revision petition is preferred aggrieved by the dismissal of I.A.No.499/2013 filed by the revision petitioners / defendants 1 and 2 with a prayer to conduct denovo trial in the main suit. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties. As could be seen from the material available on record, the 1st respondent herein is the ...
T.Ramana Redd Vs. Government Ofandhrapradesh, Rep. by It
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.6681 OF200123-12-2013 T.Ramana Reddy .. Petitioner Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home (Police-B) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner :Sri K. Muralidhar Reddy Counsel for the respondents: G.P. for Services - I HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED:1. 2009 (2) ALD402(DB) 2. (W.P. No.26654 of 2005, dated 09-08-2006) 3. O.A. No.715 of 2004, dated 23-03-2004 of A.P. State Administrative Tribunal. HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.6681 OF2001ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice A. Shankar Narayana) This Writ Petition is directed against the order in O.A. No.1885 of 2001, dated 22-03-2001, passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article - 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue Writ of Manda...
Bevara Sriramulu....Petitione Vs. Gorthi Ramakrishna Rao and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3454 OF201223-12-2013 Bevara Sriramulu....petitione Gorthi Ramakrishna Rao and others.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri T.Rajasekhar Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K.S.Gopala Krishna : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1982SC832. (2005) 12 SCC5033. 1996(1) ALT5584. 1996(2) ALT4895. (2009) 17 SCC7596. 2003 (5) ALD2227. (2005) 12 SCC5058. 1999 (6) ALD7149. 1978(2) ALT10210. 2001 (8) SCC9711. 2002 (1) SCC31912. 2003 (6) SCC675THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3454 OF2012ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed assailing the order dated 13.04.2012 passed by the Rent Controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam, dismissing I.A.No.24 of 2012 in R.C.C.No.1 of 2011, filed by the petitioner herein under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'C.P.C.'), seeking stay of all further proceedings in the said R....
Smt K.Lak Vs. the A.P.S.R.T.C and Two Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-23-2013
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.21160 OF200923-12-2013. Smt K.LAKSHMI..PETITIONER The A.P.S.R.T.C and two others ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri.T.G. Prasad Reddy Counsel for the respondents : Smt K. Sarala Reddy. : ?. CITATIONS: (1)2008(3) ALD511(2)(1994) 4 SCC138(3)1996(1) ALD304(DB) HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION No.21160 of 2009 ORAL ORDER: The petitioners husband, who was working in the respondent Corporation (APSRTC) went missing and was deemed to have been dead. Taking his continuous absence as unauthorised, and thereby as a major misconduct, the Corporation removed him from service on the conclusion of ex parte disciplinary proceedings. Under those circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioners husband, namely Mr.K.Ramesh, was working in the respondent Corporation as a driver with batch No.E.505379. On 03.04.1992, when he was off duty, the petitioners husband went out, but never c...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »