Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
icici Lombard Motor Insurance Company Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-27-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President The opposite party No.3 is the appellant. The complainant filed the complaint seeking direction to the opposite parties 1 to 5 to jointly and severally pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards damages together with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of complaint till the date of realization and also for a direction to the opposite parties 1 to 5 to deliver the car in road worthy condition and costs. The case of complaint is that her son by name Sivananda Reddy purchased the car bearing No. AP 03 AA 7450 from the first opposite party under financial arrangement with 2nd opposite party. The 2nd opposite party is under the control and management of 5th opposite party. The complainant submitted that her son was promptly paying the instalments and on 01”5-2008 the car met with an accident near Sattivaripalem cross on Piler-Tirupathi road and the vehicle was brought to second opposite party for effecting repairs and on 19-5-2008 the son of the com...
P.Dharma Reddy and Oth Vs. Anji Reddy and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL APPEAL SUIT Nos.2247 of 2000 AND BATCH2612-2013 P.Dharma Reddy and others.Appellants Anji Reddy and others.Respondents Counsel for the appellants: Sr.V.Ravi Kiran Rao Counsel for respondents : Sr.M.Rajamalla Reddy,K.Raja Reddy and Sr.Y.Ashok Raj : : ?.Citations: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL APPEAL SUIT Nos.2247 and 2248 of 2000 COMMON JUDGMENT:( Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) An extent of Ac.55.53 guntas of land in survey Nos.162, 107 and 130 of Bellapur village was acquired for the purpose of Singoor Project. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') was published on 27.12.1988. In the Award enquiry, the appellants on the one hand and the respondents 1 to 14 on the other hand presented their claims for compensation. While respondents claimed compensation exclusively for themselves, the appell...
Srikakulapu Suryanarayana Vs. Apsrtcrep by Its General Manager,mushee
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A Nos.141 of 2009 AND BATCH2612-2013 Srikakulapu Suryanarayana....Appellant APSRTC Rep by its General Manager,Musheerabad, Hyderabad. and another...Respondents Counsel for Appellant : Sr.N. Siva Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sr.C. Prakash Reddy : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2012 (2) ALD153(SC) 2) 2005 ACJ6443) 2010 (1) ALD659(DB) 4) 2008 ACJ13005) (2011) 1 SCC3436) (2009) 6 SCC1217) 2007 (2) LS33= AIR2007SC1243THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO MACMA.Nos.141 & 262 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 29-09-2008 in M.V.O.P No.1040 of 2005 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry (for short ".the Tribunal".) the claimant preferred MACMA No.141 of 2009 on the ground of inadequacy of compensation and Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation/1st respondent preferred MACMA No.262 of 2009 questioning the quantum of compensation. 2) The f...
Karimella Santhammaand Anoth Vs. More Venkanna and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-26-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO MACMA.No.662 of 2009 26-12-2013 Karimella Santhammaand another....Appellants More Venkanna and others...Respondents COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS:Mr.I.Gopal Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1:K.Ramesh Babu COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS2& 3 :b.dEVANAND : ?.cASES REFERRED: 1 2004 ACJ12 2009 ACJ1411(SC) 3 1996 ACJ253(SC) 4 2010 (4) ALD586(AP) 5 2008 (3)ALT26(SC) 6 2008 ACJ21617 2012 ACJ791(AP) Judgment: Challenge in this appeal is the award dated 02-06-2008 in O.P.No.327 of 2005 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru (for short ".the Tribunal) whereunder the Tribunal in respect of death of one Karimalla Narasimhacharyulu @ Narasimhamurthy (hereinafter ".the deceased".) in a motor vehicle accident has granted compensation of Rs.2,97,000/- against respondents 1 and 2 and dismissed the claim against the third respondent i.e.New India Assurance Company Limited. Hence, the instant M...
V. Krishna Prasad Managing Director Kiran Krishna Real Estate and Cons ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-26-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President The opposite parties are the appellants. The complaint is filed by the respondent seeking for direction to the appellants to register plot No.445 in his name and also to pay Rs.10,00,000/- towards compensation in lieu of cost of plot as the land value has increased and Rs.5,00,000/- towards damages. The case of the respondent is that the appellants started a venture called Cyber Valley Golden Circle in Sy No.225/226 of Vattinagulapalli of Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The respondent submitted that on payment of initial amount of Rs.25,000/- he was allotted plot No.445 and as per the scheme, the cost of the residential plot has to be paid forty instalments at the rate of Rs.1500/- per instalment and six special instalments of Rs.10,000/- each and initial payment of Rs.25,000/- which amounts to Rs.1,65,000/-. The respondent submitted that he paid Rs.1,65,000/- to the appellant towards the cost of the plot measuring 200 sq yds in 3...
M/S. Nugget Realty and Ventures Pvt Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Directo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-26-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite parties are the revision petitioners in both the Revision Petitions. The revisions are challenge to the order of the District Forum passed in I.A.No.123 and 124 of 2013 which were filed questioning maintainability of the complaint on the premise that general secretary of Human Rights and Consumer Protection Cell has no locus standi to file the complaint. R.P.No.89 of 2013 is taken as lead case. 2. The petitioners had filed I.A.No.123 of 2013 contending that the Human Rights and Consumer Protection Cell is not a society registered for advancing the cause of consumer and the membership of the society is limited to BHEL MIG residents only and the respondent/complainant is not a resident of BHEL-MIG and as such her cause cannot be espoused by BHEL MIG Residents Welfare Society and Thaku Rajkumar Singh. The appellants submitted that the Byelaws of the society do not permit establishment of Human Rights and Consumer Ce...
Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Sk. Anwar Bee and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-26-2013
(R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) The opposite party is the appellant. The complaint is filed by the respondents for a direction to the appellant to pay Rs.2,00,000/- i.e. Rs.1 lakh towards accidental benefit and Rs. 1 lakh towards compensation to the respondents together with interest @ 24% p.a. from the date of complaint till the date of realization together with costs. The case of the respondents is that Shaik Javeed, a driver during his life time insured his life for a sum of Rs.1 lakh with accident benefit. On 06-2-2010 when he was driving a tipper after unloading stones at MRF factory, Sadshivapet on the way he was hit by a container bearing NoN1-02/G-0112 and he sustained injuries and died. The police registered a case in Cr.No.09/2010 and the respondents lodged claim with the appellant and the appellant paid the basic sum assured and repudiated the claim with respect to accident benefit on the ground that the deceased was engaging himself in hazardous occupation. Th...
Ch.Venkata Rao and Other Vs. J.R. Rameshji,secunderab
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.112 of 2002 24-12-2013 Ch.Venkata Rao and others.....Appellants J.R.Rameshji,Secunderabad..Respondent Counsel for the appellants: Sr.G. Krishna Murthy Counsel for Respondent:Sr.S.Srinivasa Reddy : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.112 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The 1st appellant filed the Suit in O.S.No.62 of 1980 in the Court of the I Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the 2nd respondent for recovery of Rs.38,000/-. The Suit was decreed on 30.11.1981. By obtaining of precept, the 1st appellant filed E.P.No.5 of 1987 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Siddipet for recovery of a sum of Rs.53,067-50 ps. The E.P.Schedule property situated at Mulugu was attached on 26.4.1988. The 1st respondent filed a claim petition, being E.A.No.20 of 1988 under Rule 58 of Order 21...
Sri Bhatharaju Shankaraiah S/O. Bikshama Vs. the Union of India, Rep.b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.3087 of 2012 24-12-2013 Sri Bhatharaju Shankaraiah s/o. Bikshamaiah and others ... Petitioners The Union of India, rep.by its Secretary,Ministry of Road Trnsport & Highways,New Delhi and others. .... Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri P.Venugopal Counsel for the Respondents:1) Sri S.S.Varma for respondents 1 to 3 2)Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.4 3) Sri K.S.Gopala Krishnan for Respondent No.5 : : ?.Cases referred: (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 552 The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.3087 OF2012ORDER: Petitioners, who are ten in number, are the owners of agricultural lands in Sy.Nos.554 and 611 of Panthangi Village, Choutuppal Mandal, Nalgonda District. Petitioners own different extent of lands as mentioned in a table in para-3 of the affidavit. This writ petition is instituted challenging the notification dated 02.12.2011 issued under Section 3G of the ...
M/S. Coromandal International Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager, Mgc Sulthanab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-24-2013
T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the Ops. Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.130/2012 on the file of District Forum, Karimnagar, For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder: 2. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is a farmer cultivating Ac.300 of land in Sy No.215 of Kadambapur village by taking the land from original pattedars, on lease basis. The opposite parties propagated that if their seeds are planted, farmers will get more yield and therefore to raise cotton crop, he purchased one cotton seed bag i.e. NUZIVEEDU SUPERMAN on 02-7-2011 another i.e. NUZIVEEDU MALLIKA on 04-7-2011 from opposite party No.1 by paying Rs.930/- for each bag and that he also purchased cotton seed i.e. NUZIVEEDU MALLIKA AND NUZIVEEDU MANJET through his friend G. Rami Reddy worth Rs.2,790/- on 02-7-2011 and sowed the seeds in his land of Ac.3.00 and followed normal practices for growing crop by applying ferti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »