Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Balamukund Rao Vs. M/S. National Insurance Company, Rep. by Its Bra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an application filed by the petitioner/appellant/complainant praying this Commission to pass orders on the representation dated 01.02.2013 along with letter of Bar Council Chairman dt. 31.01.2013 addressed to OP.1 Insurance Company which are enclosed with the application.2. In the affidavit annexed to the petition, the petitioner has contended that he filed FA 1005/2013 before this Commission questioning dismissal of CC 3/2013 by District Consumer Forum II, Hyderabad and that he filed representation before the first respondent/opposite party to consider his claim by applying Judgment of Honble National Commission passed in R P 3026/2011 dated 29.07.2011 along with letter of Chairman of Bar Council, State of A.P. dt. 31.01.2013 to consider his claim but the OP. 1 did not inform or give message to him till date regarding the same in spite of several demands and requests and hence this petition to direct the first respondent/OP to consider s...
M/S. Vahini Finance and Chit Fund Pvt Ltd. and Others Vs. P. Indrasena ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite party company are the appellants. All the complaints are of similar nature and sprouted from identical circumstances and they are being disposed of by a common order. F.A.No.365 of 2013 arising out of the order in P.P.No.9 of 2005 in C.D.No.75 of 2004 is taken as lead case. The parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the complaint. 2. The complainant filed complaint before the District Forum seeking for refund of the amount deposited with the opposite party company. Some of the depositors filed criminal complaints with various police stations against the opposite party company and the District Collector cum Competent Authority under the A.P. Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishment Act, Mahabubnagar issued proceedings on the basis of report of Inspector of Police, Rural PS Mahabubnagar and the Government vide G.O.Ms.No.172 dated 26.6.2003 attached the properties of the opposite party no.1 compan...
Gadekarla Ravi Kumar and Another Vs. M/S. Aditya Constructions Co. Ind ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President Both the appeals bear similar facts and as such they are being disposed of by a common order. F.A.No.963 of 2012 is taken as lead case. The complaint is filed by the appellant for a direction to the respondents to pay Rs.10,00,000/- either jointly or severally to the appellant towards penalty for delay in construction and delivery of possession of the flat, loss of rental income, mental agony and deficiency in service and continue to pay an amount of Rs.50,000/- per month towards loss of rental income from the date of filing of complaint i.e. February, 2010 till the respondents deliver the full constructed flat together with costs. The appellant submitted that he purchased flat no.205 from the respondents at Aditya Windsor and paid advance and later he paid entire sale consideration and obtained a registered sale deed dated 01-3-2008. The appellant submitted that at the time of booking the flat, the respondents promised that the apartment ...
Svs Projects (P) Limited Vs. Bharati Axa General Insurance Co.Ltd.
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, President) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appellant is a private limited company engaged in the business of industrial buildings construction such as cement power plants etc., which are of 150 mtrs in height and during the course of its business the appellant obtained group insurance policy covering risk of its labour working at Andhra Cements Limited, Durga Cement Works, Durgapuram, Dachepally, Guntur District and the insurance policy bearing No.LWC/10012269/51/05/C15116 for the period from 9.2.2009 to 8.5.2009 and since then the policy got renewed regularly on payment of premium payable on increase in number of labour with common source code no.51000078. 2. A labourer namely, Shanker Biswas working with the appellant company met with an accident on 27.4.2010 at 8.45 a.m. while carrying out civil construction work related activity of cement moli and subsequently he succumbed to the injuries. The police, Dachepally registered...
Care Hospital, Rep: by Its Managing Director and Another Vs. Consumer ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties 1 and 2 as against the order in C.C. No. 56/2010 on the file of Dist. Forum II, Krishna Vijayawada. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that complainant No. 1 a heart patient (hereinafter called as patient) has been referred to by Op1 to Op2 with a history of Pace Maker Syndrome (Syncope) as he had earlier undergone pacemaker implantation at Op1 hospital. On 12.8.2008 he was admitted to Op2 hospital. On 18.8.2008 after necessary investigations Op.3 performed operation to implant a new pacemaker by removing the existing pacemaker on the patient for which Op5 paid Rs. 80,000/-. The patient was kept in the same hospital as in-patient as advised by Op3 doctor for better management of the patient and to monitor post-operative complications if any. While the things thus stood, the patient had been experienc...
K. Dasharatham and Others Vs. Dr. Hema Raghu Chitneni, Md, Dgo Nitya S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1). This is a complaint filed u/s 17(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act for a direction to the Opposite Parties to pay compensation of Rs.50 lakhs towards inconvenience, hardship, mental agony and costs of Rs. 25,000/-. 2). The case of the complainants in brief is that complainant No. 1 is the husband and complainant Nos. 2 and 3 is children of deceased Smt. Sudhamala. When Smt. Sudhamala (hereinafter called the patient) was suffering from abdomen and back pain, menstrual disorder and bleeding she was taken to Tirumala Nursing Home, Metpally on 20.7.2008. CT scan of abdomen disclosed bulky uterus with right overran cyst. Subsequently, she also took treatment at Rainbow Hospital, Hyderabad 2.8.2008 for fibroid uterus. On 27.5.2009 she consulted Dr.Sujatha at Nirmal who advised her to undergo hysterectomy operation for removal of uterus. On 11.6.2009 the patient consulted Op1 at Op3 hospital. After conducting several investigations at 5.00 P.M. On 1...
M.Ali Baig, S/O.Mirjan Baig,r/O. Nannur Vs. Kottala Sanjeeva Reddy, S/ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-27-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CRP.No.1578 of 2009 and batch 27-12-2013 M.Ali Baig, S/o.Mirjan Baig,R/o. Nannur Village, Orvakal Mandal,Kurnool District and others....Petitioners Kottala Sanjeeva Reddy, S/o.Madduleti Reddy,R/o. Nannur Village, Orvakal Mandal,Kurnool District....Decree Holder/Petitioner/Respondent Mahaboob Baig and others...Respondents Counsel for appellants/defendants :Sri S.V. Sundararajan ^Counsel for plaintiff/L.Rs of plaintiffs/respondents : Sri K.V. Satyanarayana HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. AIR2009SC15272. AIR1974SC13203. AIR2000SC12384. AIR1999SC30295. AIR1981SC14006. AIR2001SC27837. AIR2008SC17868. AIR1993SC12029. 2008 (5) ALD71610. AIR1978Calcutta 559 11. AIR2008SC156812. AIR1970SC198613. (2009) 2 SCC67314. 2010 (8) SCC45215. 1989 (2) SCC63016. (2010) 7 SCC717THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO The Court made the following : [order follows]. THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO CRP.No.1578 of 2009 and A.S.No.2443 of 1999 COMMON...
Rohith P. Red Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Princip
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-27-2013
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.A.NO.1539 OF201327-12-2013 Rohith P. Reddy..Appellant State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary to the Govt., Higher Education Department, Hyderabad, and others....Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.K. Vivek Reddy Counsel for Respondents: GP for Higher Education Sr.A. Prabhakar Rao GP for Medical Health & Family Welfare Sr.N. Ashwani Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: 1. AIR2003SC1947= (2003) 5 SCC3502. (2004) 3 SCC753. 1992 (Supp) 3 SCC2154. (2005) 12 SCC454THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1539 OF2013DATED27h DECEMBER, 2013 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar) Article 371-D of the Constitution empowers the President of India to make special provisions for the State of Andhra Pradesh in the matters of public employment and education. In exercise thereof, the President promulga...
Dr.Srinivasa Rao Kothapalli and Other Vs. Dr.Appa Rao Mukkamala and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-27-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.5180 of 2013 27-12-2013 Dr.Srinivasa Rao Kothapalli and others.....Petitioners Dr.Appa Rao Mukkamala and others......Respondents Senior Counsel for the petitioners:Sri Vedula Venkataramana, for M/s.Bharadwaj Associates. ^Senior Counsel for RR1, 3 and 4 to 11: Sri D.V.Sitarama Murthy for Sri C.S.Surya Prakash Rao Senior Counsel for the R-2 : Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy for Sri K.Jyothi Prasad Counsel for the R-10 : Sri N.V.Ramanujam HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 AIR1968S.C. 1513 2 AIR1962S.C. 1172 3 Hyderabad Karnataka Education society v.Registrar of Societies .. 2000 (1) SCC566para 28 4 2011 (13) SCC774THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.5180 of 2013 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dt.10-12-2013 in I.A.No.2310 of 2013 in S.O.P.No.176 of 2006.2. M/s.N.R.I. Academy of Sciences (for short 'the Society') is a Society, registered under the provisio...
K.J. Deepak Reddy Vs. Smt. P. Vasantha and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-27-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against Opposite parties 1 to 3 to direct the said Ops jointly and severally to get occupancy certificate pertaining to subject Flat from GHMC and hand over the same to the complainant or to pay Rs.37,20,000/- which is at stake and uncertain because of non-regularization of the flat/apartment under BPS, Rs.10 lakhs compensation for mental agony on account of deficiency in service rendered by the opposite parties, so also, to pay costs of the complaint or any other order which is deemed fit in the circumstances of the case. 2. The brief facts of the complaint are as under : The first and second opposite parties are the wife and husband respectively and third opposite party is their relative and business associate in their real estate business. On seeing the classified advertisement published in daily newspaper for sale of flats in newly constructed apartment the complainant along with his father approac...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »