Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tvs Rami Reddy Vs. Deepika, Deepika Steel Center Pranitha Residency
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The complainant is the appellant. He filed complaint claiming compensation to the extent of Rs.2,000/- and costs of the proceedings on the premise of the respondent supplying a defective water heater. The appellant submitted that he purchased a Lexi water heater from the respondent on 6.7.2011 and he used it as per the instructions and the heater got burnt which he had taken to the shop of the respondent and having found the shop closed, he approached the respondent few days later. The appellant submitted that the respondent refused to refund the cost of the water heater stating that the problem occurred due to defective electrical wiring in the house of the respondent and the respondents mother misbehaved with him compelling him to send notice on 6.07.2012 for which there was no reply from the respondent. 2. The respondent resisted the claim on the premise of the appellants refusal for replacement of water heater and that th...
Yeera Devaraju Vs. the Managing Director, S V and Rs Projects
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The complaint is filed by the appellant for a direction to the respondent to return the amounts paid by him amounting to Rs.5,00,000/- together with interest and compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- and costs. The appellant submitted that the respondent is doing business of selling garments and textiles and also business in real estate under the name and style of S.V.Group and R.S.Brothers Projects. The appellant submitted that he approached the respondent for purchase of north facing flat No.229 of Venkadri in II block and paid Rs.5,00,000/- towards sale consideration. The appellant submitted that the respondent has to complete the construction and hand over possession of the allotted flat No.229, which is east facing and as the flat is not having vastu norms, the appellant dropped the idea of purchasing the flat and requested the respondent to return the sale consideration of Rs.5,00,000/-. The appell...
Dlf Commercial Developers Vs. VipIn Kumar Mittal
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite party has filed the appeal challenging the order of the District Forum whereby it was directed to refund an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- with interest @18 % p.a. and compensation to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/- and costs. 2. The case of the respondent as seen from the complaint is that being attracted by the representations on internet, print media and personnel of the appellant-company, the respondent booked a flat admeasuring 1535 sq.sft at œThe Summit at Lake District, DLF Gachibowli Extension? for consideration of Rs.36,70,000/- of which the respondent paid an amount of Rs.3,50,000/- on 24.06.2010 towards booking amount for provisional allotment of flat. On being informed of scraping of the project due to some legal problems and launch of new project, New City Heights , and on being assured of allotment of flat of the same specifications in the new project, the respondent agreed for shifting to the new project...
V. Narayana R Vs. the Industrial Tribunal-ii and Two Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.26000 OF200731-12-2013. V. Narayana Reddy..PETITIONER The Industrial Tribunal-II and two others..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V. NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the respondent No.1 : Government Pleader for labour. Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Sri C. Sunil Kumar Reddy, Standing Counsel : ?. CITATIONS: (1)(2006) 5 SCC88(2)(2012) 5 SCC242(3) 2007(5) ALD416HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION No.26000 of 2007 ORAL ORDER:1. The present writ petition is filed assailing the Award dated 09.11.2005 in I.D.No.16 of 2005 passed by the first respondent-Industrial Tribunal-II, which confirmed the modified punishment earlier imposed by the revisional authority i.e., 3rd respondent.2. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner was initially appointed conductor on 25.06.1990 in the respondent Corporation, there afterwards on 15.02.1992 his services were regularized. While he was conducting the bus of the respondent C...
A.V.Santosh Ku Vs. Sajjid Hussain,partners of the Delta Cab
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.35368 of 2013 30-12-2013 A.V.Santosh Kumar.Petitioner Sajjid Hussain,Partners of the Delta Cabs PVT.Ltd.,Hyderabad and other....Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Smt. Dittakavi Satyavathi Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 7 : Assistant Government Pleader for Home ?.CASES REFERRED: 1. 1992 Supp. (1) SCC3352. 2010(3) ALT (Crl) 93 (AP ) 3. Writ Petition (Criminal) No.68/2008, dt. 12-11-2013 4. W.P.No.33917 of 2013, dt. 23-12-2013 HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.35368 of 2013 Date : 30-12-2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of the police in registering a F.I.R.on the report given by the petitioner on 16.11.2013, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. The petitioner averred that he joined as a shareholder in Delta Cabs Company, by depositing Rs.1,00,000/- vide State...
T.Ch.Venkateswar Vs. the Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, Food Co
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Writ Petition No.17728 of 2003 30-12-2013 T.Ch.Venkateswarlu... Petitioner The Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, Food Corporation of India, 2, Haddows Road, Chennai-600 006; and another... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Gangaiah Naidu, Senior Counsel Counsel for the Respondents: Sri B.Krishna Mohan : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1970SC898HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Writ Petition No.17728 of 2003 Date:30. 12-2013 Order: The petitioner seeks for a Writ of certiorari to cancel proceedings dated 06-8-2003 by the 2nd respondent ordering the terminating of the petitioner from service as illegal and for consequential reliefs.2. The petitioner belonged to Gundumeda Village in Guntur District. He belongs to Vaddera Community. He studied up to X Class. The school record and other certificates issued by the competent authorities showed the petitioner as belonging to the Scheduled Tribes being belonging to Vaddera Community. On 14-6-1976, the Deputy Tahsilda...
Arimanda Vijaya Bhaskara Re Vs. Manukonda Rami Reddy (Died) Per
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.95 of 2002 30-12-2013 Arimanda Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy ..appellant Manukonda Rami Reddy (died) Per LRs..Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Sr.K. Suresh Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.P. Vengala Reddy for R2 Sr.K. Panduranga Rao, for RRs 4 and 5 HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.95 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This Letters Patent Appeal is filed assailing the judgment rendered and decree passed on 26-09-2001 by a learned single Judge of this Court in A.S.No.2649 of 1985. That appeal, in turn, arose out of the judgment and decree dated 30-04- 1982, in O.S.No.145 of 1979 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tenali. The 2nd defendant in the suit is the appellant herein. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiff, who...
B.V.Ramakrishna R Vs. Mrs.B.Bharat
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2703 of 2003 30-12-2013 B.V.Ramakrishna Raju.Appellant Mrs.B.Bharathi .Respondent Counsel for appellant : Sr.E. Phani Kumar Counsel for respondent: Sr.K. Balakrishna HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : ------- THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.2703 of 2003 JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place in the year 1965. They were blessed with one son and two daughteRs.The marriage of the fiRs.daughter was performed on 21.05.1998. Shortly thereafter, the appellant filed O.P.No.370 of 1999 in the Family Court, Hyderabad, against the respondent, for divorce, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').He pleaded that after the marriage of their elder daughter, the respondent came under the influence of her brother and henchmen, and with that, she revolted against him without...
M.S.Rajasekh Vs. the Chairperson and M.D.,Indian Bank, Head
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Writ Petition No.20606 of 2003 30-12-2013 M.S.Rajasekhar... Petitioner The Chairperson & M.D.,Indian Bank, Head Office,31, Rajaji Salai,Chennai-600 001. and 2 others.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner:Sri T. Bal Reddy Counsel for the petitioner Counsel for the Respondents: Standing Counsel for the Respondent-Indian bank : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1986SC1571(1) 2. (1974) 3 All ER7573. (1973) 1 QB4004. (1974) 1 W.L.R. 1308 HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Writ Petition No.20606 of 2003 Date:30. 12-2013 Order: The petitioner seeks for a Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents-Bank in not refunding Rs.3,00,000/- as illegal and for consequential reliefs.2. The petitioner is an unfortunate employee of the Indian Bank. He joined the services of the Bank on 11-12-1995 as a Probationary Officer. In the appointment orders, para 6 provided that the petitioner shall serve the Bank for a period of 4 years from the date of joining and that if...
P. Ramakrishna Rao, Proproetor, Sri Ganesh Motors, Authorized Dealer f ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-30-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the first opposite party against the orders passed by the District Consumer Forum, Anantapur in CC.No.67/2011 dated 03.09.2012. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under: 2. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased a Sonalika Tractor and trailer from the first opposite party for a sum of Rs.5,54,956/-. The complainant paid a sum of Rs.64,000/- in cash and Rs.4,90,956/- by way of D.D dt.25.3.2010 and another D.D for a sum of Rs.1,30,500/- drawn in favour of third opposite party. The said D.Ds were handed over to the first opposite party and the same were encashed by them on 26.3.2011. After that the first opposite party delivered the Solanki Tractor to the complainant on 20.08.2010 but did not supply the trailer along with tractor. At the time of delivery of the tractor, the first opposite party did not issue the original notice to the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »