Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Sai Chaitanya Housing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mopuri Obanna
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondent purchased plot bearing number 31 At site C in Flight City floated by the appellant company at Maheshwaram village and Mandal in Ranga Reddi district for consideration of Rs.10,44,700/- to the appellant and the appellant executed sale deed in favour of the respondent on 18.11.2006. The title over the property was conveyed in favour of the respondent. The respondent submitted that the sale consideration of the plot was mentioned in the sale deed as Rs.2,36,900/- as against the actual cost of the plot which is Rs.10,44,700/-. 2. The respondent submitted that the appellant had handed over the sale deed and failed to hand over copy of HUDA/DTCP approved lay out and he paid personal visits to the branch office of the appellant company and thereafter he addressed letters dated 15.11.2012 and 1.12.2012 and notice dated 26.12.2012 with a request to furnish copy of HUDA approved layou...
The Divisional Manger Divisional Office, Shriram Life Insurance Corpor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite party insurance company is the appellant. The respondents son Srinivasa Rao during his life time obtained life insurance policy bearing No.MP100600082004 from Gudivada Branch of Shriram Life Insurance Corporation and the policy bearing no.L4100800122551 from Cherlapalli branch of Shriram Life Insurance Corporation and he appointed the respondent no.1 and the respondent no.2 respectively as his nominees for the purpose of sum insured therein. 2. The insured died on 4.2.2009. The respondents submitted claim and as the claim was not settled the respondents got issued notice on 24.1.2011 and filed the complaint later. 3. The appellant resisted the claim contending that the insured obtained life insurance policy which is a unit linked policy commencing from 19.8.2008 with annual premium of Rs.10,000/- for an assured sum of Rs.1,50,000/- and he suppressed his health condition in the proposal form. The first respondent ...
Vysyaraju Chandramouli Raju Vs. Durgavajjala Sravanth
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President The opposite party is the appellant. The complaint is filed for a direction to the appellant to execute and register sale deed in favour of the respondent in respect of site in Kanakamahalakshmi Real Estate and Constructions, Srikakulam and pay Rs.30,000/- towards mental agony and costs of Rs.2,000/-. The respondent a minor represented by his father intended to purchase a plot in Kanakamahalakshmi Real Estate and Constructions, Srikakulam and the appellant executed agreement in favour of the respondent for allotment of plot to an extent of 36 x 60 in the layout at the rate of Rs.350/-per instalment and collected the instalments from the parents of the respondent. The respondent submitted that the appellant executed an agreement on 01-7-1994 in favour of the respondent and thereafter the parents of the respondent requested the appellant to execute a registered sale deed in favour of the respondent. The respondent submitted that the appellant i...
Arvapalli Venkata Sitha Ramanjaneyulu Vs. the Senior Branch Manager, N ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The complainant is the appellant. The appellant purchased the vehicle AP07 TL T/R 4010 and insured the vehicle with the respondent. The respondent issued policy bearing No.71077769 and it was valid from 04.03.2010 to 03.03.2011. The appellant on 04.06.2010 entrusted the vehicle to his friend Duggireddy Srinivasa Reddy to go on pilgrimage along with his family members. One Vankayala Murali Mohan Rao was driver of the vehicle. While returning on 07.10.2010 at about 3.15 a.m. in between Ganganapalem-Kovvuru on Chilakaluripet-Narasaraopet road Volvo bus bearing No.AP27W 9009 hit the car belonging to the appellant as a result of which Duggireddy Srinivasa Reddy, Vankayala Murali Mohan Rao and Duggireddy Gayathri were died. In the collision the car got totally damaged. The accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the Volvo bus driver. The insurance policy was in force at the time of accident. The appellant got estimat...
The Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Nirmala Branch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The respondents husband, Rajeshwer during his life time obtained life insurance policy bearing number 685202523 from the appellant-insurance corporation for sum assured of Rs.3,00,000/-, for a period of 16 years with the commencement of the policy on 28.03.2009 and the maturity date 28.03.2025. The terms of the insurance policy provide for payment of sum assured and bonus etc. The respondents husband died on 12.08.2009 - leaving behind him the respondent as legal heir and she is also the nominee of the insured for the purpose of the sum assured under the insurance policy. After the death of their husband , the respondent submitted claim and the appellant-corporation has repudiated the claim on 18.11.2009. The respondent claimed repudiation of her claim arbitrary and unjustifiable. 2. The appellant insurance corporation resisted the claim contending that as per the death certificate, the date of death of the life assured was 1...
Dr.G. Ramesh Dnb Mrcs, Anu Hospitals and Another Vs. V. Venkata Ratnam
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President The opposite parties are the appellants. The complaint is filed by the respondent for a direction to the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- towards the medical expenses incurred by the complainant and to pay Rs.13,50,000/- towards negligence, damages and costs. The case of the respondent is that she visited the 2nd appellant hospital on 11-11-2010 as she was running fever with chills, vomiting and headache. The first appellant examined the respondent and advised her to admit in the second appellant hospital. The appellant hospital technicians collected blood sample for CBP, Widal and MP Strip test and as per the reports, typhoid and malaria were found negative. The first appellant administered Falcigo Inj. Mgnex Inj. Amikacin Inj, Quinine Inj. Pantacid Inj. Zofer Inj. And Calpol tablets, the temperature came down. The respondent had sudden loss of vision and there was no improvement. The respondent submitted that the first appella...
Gatla Maruthi Vs. M/S Synergy Shopping Pvt Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The complainant being dissatisfied with award for refund of the amount with interest from the date of the order, filed the appeal contending that the District Forum found that there is deficiency in service on the part of the respondents as the respondents failed to supply the products to the appellant, the District Forum ought to have allowed the complaint as prayed for and that the District Forum ought to have awarded the double the deposited amount as per ExA3 and A4. 2. The appellant paid an amount of Rs.34,500/- and Rs.1,65,000/- and through demand drafts dated 7.5.2007 and 12.06.2007 respectively to the respondents for the purpose of supply of the products that the respondents offered through brochures. The respondents received the amount and failed to supply the products to the appellant and the appellant got issued notice through his advocate on 14.08.2010 and as the notice failed to draw any response from the respond...
Devireddy Madhusudhan Reddy and Another Vs. M/S. Chalapathi Estates Pv ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Thotta Ashok Kumar, Honble Member 1. Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.215/2009 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad, the complainant, viz. G.R. Subba Reddy, shown as such in the complaint preferred this appeal. 2. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the sales executive of the opposite party approached the complainant, Viz. G. R. Subba Reddy and canvassed about the project Chalapathi Fortune City near Shamsabad showed the layout plan and induced the complainant to make investment. Accordingly, the complainant induced by the same booked 7 plots in the name of his family members and pass book Nos. 438 to 441 and 1509 to 1511 were issued and he and paid a sum of Rs.25,000/- each for the said plots through cheque Nos.862182 dated 29-9-2005 for Rs.1,02,000/- and cheque Nos.981 796 and 981797 dated 14-11-2005 for balance amounts and plots Nos.850, 842 and 852 of 400 sq. yds. and 533 sq. yds. were allotted respectively. 3. The complainant submitted that he could not mak...
T. Rajesh Reddy and Another Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The complainant no.1 in C.C.No.6 of 2013 is the son of the complainant who filed the CC NO.7 of 2013. In view of memo filed by the counsel for the complainant that the father and son made common correspondence with the opposite party-insurance company and they had been jointly doing cultivation and both the cases be clubbed to lead common evidence, both the cases are clubbed and disposed of by a common order. C.C.No.6 of 2013 is taken as lead case. 2. This is a complaint filed u/s 17(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act for a direction to the Opposite Party to pay Rs.98,43,000/- towards the claim of the complainant with interest and costs. 3. The case of the complainant in brief is that he introduced Green House Farming for which he has availed loan from Canara Bank Hi-tech Agri Finance Branch. As per the terms of finance the entire Green House and the entire machinery was insured with the Opposite Party from 1.11.2011 to 31....
Authorised Signatory Reliance Infocomm Services a Division of Reliance ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President The opposite parties 2 and 3 are the appellants. The complaint is filed for direction to the opposite parties 1 to 4 to restore the mobile connection of the respondent without collecting any charges, to pay a sum of Rs.45,000/- towards actual loss sustained by the complainant, to pay Rs.10,000/- towards compensation, a sum of Rs.500/- towards notice charges and Rs.2,000/- towards costs. The case of the respondent is that being a technician, he purchased a Reliance Cellular phone Model No.LG-RD2030 in the month of August, 2003 under postpaid connecting by paying an amount of Rs.10,500/- and the appellants allotted mobile connection number 08671-310935 and the postpaid connection was converted to prepaid category with lifetime validity and he was allotted number 93478000095. The respondent submitted that on 28-5-2011, the appellants without prior intimation, disconnected the cellular phone connection and he incurred loss in his business and los...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »