Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Sriganesh Vs. M/S. Sriram Nirman Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sri M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The complaint is filed claiming payment of compensation of Rs.20,80,000/- towards delay in construction, to pay Rs.31,20,000/- towards actual loss of rentals for 10 flats Rs.3,000/- per month for 104 months, to pay Rs.9,36,000/- towards loss of rents pertaining to commercial complex @ Rs.3000/- per shop for 3 shops from 2006 till date with interest @ 12% and to pay Rs.2 lakhs towards compensation for mental agony and hardship. 2. The averments of the complaints are that the complainant entered into a development agreement cum GPA dated 31.8.2004 with the opposite party no.2 representing the opposite party no.1 himself as Managing Partner of M/s Sriram Nirman to develop the property of the complainant into residential flats and commercial complex. As per the agreement the opposite parties have to complete the construction within two years failing which the opposite parties has to pay Rs.20,000/- per month to the complainant t...
The Good Health Plan Limited, Rep. by Its Authorized Signatory Vs. Mas ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, I/c. President) The opposite party is the appellant. The complaint was filed claiming compensation of an amount of Rs.50,000/- along with original claim amount of Rs.9,540/-. The respondent is a minor and he filed the complaint through his natural guardian i.e. his father who had taken three insurance policies. The respondent was admitted in Fernandez hospital with a complaint of difficulty in passing urine. The father of the respondent before admitting the respondent informed the appellant 48 hours in advance about his admission and claim No.30729 was provided to the respondent. The respondent submitted that the appellant assured to compensate the respondents as to the amount spent towards operation charges and directed the respondentsfather to submit the claim for releasing the amount along with original documents but failed to settle the claim. The appellant proceeded exparte. The respondent filed his affidavit and the documents Exs.A1 to A7. Th...
Kari Hari Bab Vs. Maddineni Narasimham and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.181 of 1999 02-12-2013 Kari Hari Babu ..Appellant Maddineni Narasimham and others.Respondents Counsel for appellant : Sr.M.V.Durga Prasad Counsel for respondents : Sr.S. Subba Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED : ------- ?.?. ?.?. ?.?. ?.?. THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.181 of 1999 2nd December, 2013 JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.This Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the judgment, dated 15.04.1998, rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in A.S.No.817 of 1981. The said appeal arose out of the judgment and decree, dated 11.07.1980, in O.S.No.176 of 1970 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Chirala. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the suit. The suit was filed by the sole plaintiff, the appellant herein, for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule prope...
Kanchamnallappa (Died) Per L.Rs.Kancha Vs. B.Sudhakar and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.73 OF201102-12-2013 Kancham Nallappa (Died) per L.Rs. Kancham Ramalinga and others .. Appellants B.Sudhakar and another .. Respondents Counsel for Appellants: Mr. K.Maheswar Rao Counsel for Respondents: Mr. K.Srinivas Mr. I.Mamu Vani : ?.Citations:1. 1965(1) A11. E.R-563 2 1963(2) All.E.R-432 3 1969(1)A11.E.R -555 4 1995 ACJ366SC) 5 2004 (3) SCC2972004-ACJ-1 6 2010 (5) ALT1057 2013 (7) SCC62HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.73 OF2011JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the claimants, having been aggrieved by the order of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapur, (for short, 'the Tribunal'), dated 16.09.2010, in O.P.No.377 of 2008, awarding compensation of Rs.80,000/- against tractor owner, as against the claim of Rs.4,00,000/- with joint liability of owner and insurer for enhancement of compensation and for joint liability on insurer als...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›