Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.T.Ramanujacharyulu and OThe Vs. Special Tahsildar (La), Nello
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL A.S.No.2789 of 2000 04-12-2013 P.T.Ramanujacharyulu and others....appellants. Special Tahsildar (LA).Nellore....Respondent. Counsel for appellants:Sr.P.Kamalakar Counsel for Respondent:Learned Advocate General HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred (2011) 6 SCC47THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL A.S.No.2789 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) For the purpose of establishing an Industrial Development Area near Nellore Town, the Government acquired about 150 acres of land of Kakutur Revenue Village, Venkatachalam Mandal. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') was published, on 15.12.1990. An extent of Acs.30.92 cents of land, owned by the appellants herein, was also notified. In the award enquiry before the respondent, the appellant claimed compensation @ Rs.100/-, per square yard. However, a...
T.Sharath and AnoThe Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep., by Secretary, In
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.28392 OF201303-12-2013 T.Sharath and another ....Petitioners The Govt. of A.P. Rep., by Secretary, Industries & Commerce Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and five others.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri M. Ravindranath Reddy Counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents: Learned Additional Advocate-General Counsel for the 3rd respondent : Sri N. Vinesh Raj, Counsel for the 4th respondent : Sri N. Krishna Rao Counsel for the 5th respondent : Sri T.S. Anand Counsel for the 6th respondent : Sri T.S. Praveen Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations:1. AIR1964Mysore 159 (DB) 2) 2009(6) ALT1(DB3 AIR1965S.C. 491 4) (2011) 4 SCC15) (2001) 7 SCC2316) (2010) 9 SCC6557) (2006) 11 SCC7318) (2002) 6 SCC2699) 2005 (5) ALT71410) (2003) 4 SCC71211) (2013) 1 SCC50112) JT2009(7) SC60113) AIR1973SC113814) AIR1954Bom. 41 15) (1993) 2 SCC70316) AIR1960AP25017) 1973 (1) S.L.R. 1042 18) (2001) 4 SCC734 19) (1976) 1 SCC67120) AIR1961AP250(APHC DB...
B.Pullaiah, S/O.B.Seshan Vs. J.Mala Pullamma, W/O.Pullanna and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY SECOND APPEAL No.49 of 2005 03-12-2013 B.Pullaiah, S/o.B.Seshanna... Appellant/Appellant/Defendant J.Mala Pullamma, W/o.Pullanna And others... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs Counsel for the appellant:Sri P. Kamalakar Counsel for the respondents: Sri Murali Lincoln HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED:1. AIR1960SC3352. AIR1961SC8083. (2013) 3 SCC1824. (2011) 9 SCC1265. AIR1975Gau 12 6. AIR1991 Kar 273 7. 2007 (2) ALD3138. 2006 (1) ALD1169. AIR2000SC109910. 2003 (5) ALT56011. 2002 (3) ALT77812. 1999 (5)ALT494THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY SECOND APPEAL No.49 of 2005 December 03, 2013 JUDGMENT: This second appeal is preferred by the defendant challenging the decree and judgment dated 20.12.2004 in A.S.No.109 of 2002 on the file of I Additional District Judge Court, Kurnool, confirming in appeal the decree and judgment dated 28.11.2002 in O.S.No.105 of 2000 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge Court, Kurnool. The parties are hereinafter r...
Smt. Vodnala Raju Vs. the Life Insurance Corporation of India Near Rtc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. She has filed the appeal challenging the reasonableness of the order passed by the District Forum in C.C.No.70 of 2008. VERSION OF THE APPELLANT 2. The appellants son, Vodnala Srinivas during her life time obtained life insurance policy bearing No. 684571942 from the respondent-insurance corporation for sum assured of Rs.5,00,000/- for a period of 14 years with the commencement of the policy on 28.03.2007 and the maturity date 28.03.2022.The terms of the insurance policy provide for payment of sum assured and bonus etc., The appellants son died on 15.07.2007 leaving behind him the appellant who is also the nominee for the purpose of the sum assured under the insurance policy. After the death of her son, the appellant submitted claim and as the respondent-corporation has not settled the claim, the appellant got issued notice on 7.04.2004 which also failed to draw response from the...
V.SussaIn S Vs. Vadlapula Rangaiah and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL,J A.S.Nos.2487 of 1999 AND BATCH0312-2013 V.Sussain Saheb..APPELLANT VadlaPula Rangaiah and others...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant:Sr.J.Janaki Rami Reddy Counsel for Respondents :Sr.C.Prakash Reddy : ?.Cases Referred: COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) These two appeals arise out of the common judgment, dated 26.07.1999, rendered by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Atmakur in O.P.No.51 of 1991 and O.S.No.20 of 1995. The appellant figured as claimant No.4 in the O.P.and defendant No.1 in the suit. However, the array of the parties in the appeals is identical. The suit was filed by respondent Nos.1 to 10 (for short 'the respondents') against the appellant and three others for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of two items of land, namely Acs.21.18 cents in Survey No.270 and Acs.8.32 cents in Survey No.218/A of Gunthakandla Village, Kurnool District. Acs.2...
United India Insurance Company Limi Vs. Ajjuguttu Ramanjaneya Reddy an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-03-2013
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.194 OF201103-12-2013. United India Insurance Company Limited ..APPELLANT Ajjuguttu Ramanjaneya Reddy and others ..RESPONDENTs Counsel for the petitioner:Sri A. Ramalingeswara Rao Counsel for the respondents :Sri K.Venugopal Reddy : ?.CITATIONS: HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.194 of 2011 JUDGMENT : The appellant is no other than the 2nd respondent (Insurer) to the claim petition filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein as claimants against said Insurer as well as owner of the crime lorry bearing No.AP-16-U-7997. The Tribunal under the impugned award granted against the claim petition respondents compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- with interest at 9% per annum to the claimants with the findings that their deceased daughter, by name, Vinitha, a student, aged about 8 years as on the accident, dated 05.12.2002 due to rash and negligent driving of the lorry driver, was ran over and succumbed.2. The grounds of appeal impugnin...
National Insurance Co. Ltd.,rep. by Its Vs. Saheb @ Gadivan Saheb and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.177 of 2009 02-12-2013 National Insurance Co. Ltd.,Rep. by its Br. Manager..... Appellant Saheb @ Gadivan Saheb and another..... Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sri Kota Subba Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri L. Dayakar Reddy : ?.Cases referred:1. 2009 (1) ALD21SC2 2012 (1) ALT8123) 2013 ACJ1935(SC) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.177 OF2009JUDGMENT: Challenging the compensation awarded in O.P.No.1730 of 2002 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad (for short, 'the Tribunal') as excessive, the National Insurance Company Limited filed the instant M.A.C.M.A.2. The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The 1st respondent in this appeal is the claimant before the Tribunal. On 23-12-2001 at about 6.30 p.m. while he was travelling in an auto bearing No.AP25T475along with some others from Nizamabad to Arsapally and when their auto reached Omkar Rice Mill at about...
M. Harinath and Anoth Vs. the Joint Collector, Nellore,s.P.S.R. Ne
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY Writ Petition No.34404 of 2013 02-12-2013 M. Harinath and another..Petitioner The Joint Collector, Nellore,S.P.S.R.Nellore District and others...Respondents Counsel for Petitioner:Sr.V. Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for Respondents- : G.P.for Civil Supplies HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. 2013 (4) ALD241HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.34404 of 2013 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus seeking to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in seizing 272 bags of raw rice each weighing 50 kgs, belong to the 1st petitioner and the lorry bearing No.AP05X3049belong to the 2nd petitioner through proceedings dated 11.11.2013 as illegal and for a consequential direction to the respondents not to take any action in pursuance of the illegal seizure. It is stated that the 1st petitioner is having agricultural lands at Vatambedu Village and his father is also an agriculturist. As the paddy yielded from the 1st petitioner's l...
M/S. Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd., Rep. by Itâs Branch Commercial ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The District Forum allowed the complaint filed by the respondent directing the appellant to rectify the defects pointed out by the respondent within 15 days from the date of the order and in case the appellant failed to comply the order within the stipulated period of 15 days, the appellant was to replace the machine with new machine and pay costs of Rs.10,000/-. 2. The respondent filed application under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act stating that the appellant had not complied with the order of the District Forum. 3. The appellant filed its written version contending that it attended to the repairs within 15 days and requested the respondent to grant some time as some parts were to be imported and after importing them it attempted to replace the parts of the copier machine for which the personnel of the respondent did not permit the appellant company. 4. The appellant has submitted that the respondent demanded for...
M/S. Balaji Cotton Traders Vs. the Chairman and Managing Director, M/S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-02-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Incharge President) This is a petition filed by the petitioner/complainant U/s,.27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to punish the respondents for non compliance of the order of this Commission. This Commission partly allowed the complaint vide orders dated 23-3-2007 directing the O.P.s to pay Rs.20,98,952/- with interest @ 6% pa. from the date of repudiation i.e.25/7/2003 till the date of realization together with costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paid within a period of six weeks failing which the said sum shall carry interest at 9% p.a. thereafter. Aggrieved by the orders of this Commission, Ops filed FA 389/2007 and complainant filed FA 520/2007 before the Honble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and National Commission by order dated 08-4-2013 dismissed the appeal filed by opposite parties and partly modified the order of this Commission in FA 520/2007 directing the opposite parties to pay Rs.23,70,611/- with interest @ 9% p.a. from the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »