Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Sontiramanamma, W/O. Narayana Redd Vs. Hussainibegum, W/O.Mohd. M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.17 of 2000 06-12-2013 Smt. Sonti Ramanamma, W/o. Narayana Reddy, Hindu, Aged:46. years, D.No.32-26- 74,Machavaram, Vijayawada,Krishna District and another...Appellan Hussaini Begum, W/o.Mohd. Maqbool Hussain, Muslim, Aged:57. years, House Hold,R/o. Machavaram,Vijayawada and others...Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Sri T.S. ANANAD Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 10 to 13: SRI KANAKA MEDALA RAVINDRA KUMAR. : : ?.Cases referred: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.17 of 2000 JUDGMENT: - (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This Letters Patent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.1999 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in A.S.No.1439 of 1980. The said appeal, in turn, arose out of the judgment and...
M/S.Dhanalakshmi Ironindustrieslimited Vs. A.P. Electricity Regulatory ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-06-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOs 4330 OF2012and batch 06-12-2013 M/s.Dhanalakshmi Iron Industries Limited,Bonthapally Village, Jinnaram Mandal,Medak District, represented by its Director, Rajesh Gupta...Petitioner A.P.Electricity Regulatory Commission,represented by its Secretary,A.P.Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills,Hyderabad, and others....Respondents HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioneRs.Sr.Duba Nagarjuna Babu Counsel for respondents: Sr.O.Manohar Reddy Smt. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni Sr.Putluri Srinivasa Rao ?.CASES REFERRED: 1. (2011) 12 SCC4002. (2010) 4 SCC6033. (1973) 1 SCC2614. (1979) 3 SCC4315. 2000 (6) ALD217(DB) 6. (1997) 5 SCC2897. (2003) 1 SCC5068. (2003) 9 SCC7319. (2012) 3 SCC117HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.4330, 4340, 4926, 6736, 6837, 6848, 7165, 7184, 7185, 7201, 7443, 7458, 9379, 9465, 9490, 10807, 12575, 17859, 17893, 18270, 19662, 19663, 19678, 19705, 19799, 19855, 19856, 19857, 19858, 19871, 20387, 20403, 20405, 20410, 20968, 20969, 20...
Sri Sai Balajihealth Care India Private Vs. the Government Ofandhra Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13459 of 2011 05-12-2013 Sr.Sai Balaji Health Care India Private Ltd., Hyderabad...Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and another ..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner:Sr.D.Prakash Reddy, senior counsel for Ms.V.Uma Devi Counsel for respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13459 of 2011 05.12.2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing notices dated 08.04.2011 and 27.04.2011 under the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Summonses Act, 1869 (for short 'the 1869 Act') as arbitrary and without jurisdiction. The petitioner purchased property bearing Nos.3-4-3, 3-4-3/1 and 3-4-3/2 (corresponding to old premises No.1579 known as Ashokvihar) situated at Station Road, Kachiguda, Hyderabad, together wi...
The Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd. and Another Vs. P. Ashok Kumar
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. The averments of the complaint are that the respondent is the owner of the vehicle bearing registration NO.AP 01W 7614 which was insured with the appellant no.1 under policy NO.411300/31/2009/2671 valid from 27.06.2008 to 26.06.2009. On 18.02.2009 the vehicle of the respondent met with an accident and the same was informed to the appellants. The appellants deputed spot surveyor and surveyor after inspection assessed the damage and submitted his report to the appellants. The respondent had spent Rs.3,49,640/- for the repairs of the vehicle. The respondent submitted claim form along with all necessary documents to the appellants. The appellants neither settled nor repudiated the claim. The respondent got issued notice on 3.10.2009 and filed the complaint before the District Forum. 2. The appellants remained exparte. 3. The respondent filed his affidavit and the documents, Exs.A1 to A27. ...
Appikatla Sisir Kumar and Another Vs. M/S. Mahavir Auto, the Authorize ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Incharge President Both the complaints bear similar facts and as such they are being disposed of by a common order. C.C.No.29 of 2013 is taken as lead case. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite parties to replace the defective car with a new defect free one by meeting the registration and the insurance amount OR in the alternative refund the cost price of Rs.29,33,699/- along with registration charges of Rs.2,64,290/- and the insurance amount of Rs.2,13,529/- with 12% interest p.a. from 25-10-2009 till the date of realization; together with compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- and costs of Rs.50,000/-. The averments of the complaint are that the complainant and his professional partner, Sri Korada Ravi Kumar purchased two Mercedes cars in a gap of one and half months. The complainant purchased Mercedes Benz car bearing model No.C200K, Chassis No.WDD2040416L0222421, engine No.27195031184132 on 25-10-2009 vide Invoice No.ADO10910RIN00104 for a conside...
M/S. Sansai Motors Private Limited, Addanki By-pass Road of Nalgonda T ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The appellant running the business of selling different makes of cars. On 8.12.2011 the respondent in order to purchase i-10 car made a deposit of Rs.5,000/- with the appellant. Thereafter the respondent had been making enquiries to purchase the booked vehicle under the offers announced by the appellant by remitting the remaining balance and the appellant did not respondent. The appellant failed to arrange the car and also did not give any information regarding the details of the offer . The respondent got issued notice to the appellant demanding refund of the amount of Rs.5,000/- with interest. 2. The appellant resisted the case contending that respondent made deposit of Rs.5,000/- on 08-12-2011 and booked i-10 car. The respondent did not show any interest to purchase the car. At no point of time, the respondent exhibited interest to purchase the car. The appellant furnished all the infor...
Matapu Venkat Reddy and Anoth Vs. the State of A.P., Through Circle In ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-05-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS CRIMINAL APPEAL No.759 of 2009 05-12-2013 Matapu Venkat Reddy and another... APPELLANTS/ACCUSED Nos.1 and 2 The State of A.P., through Circle Inspector of Police, Adilabad Rural Police Station, Adilabad district, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad .. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for Appellant: Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1. AIR1981Supreme Court 82 2. (1983) 3 Supreme Court cases 327 3. AIR1976Supreme Court 294 4. 2010 (6) SCC15. AIR1999S.C. 1083 6. AIR1955S.C. 216 7. (1972) 1 Supreme Court cases 136 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANIS CRIMINAL APPEAL No.759 of 2009 JUDGMENT:- (per Hon'ble Sri Justice K.C. Bhanu) This Criminal Appeal, under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ".Cr.P.C.".), is directed against the judgment, dated 03-07-2009, in Sessions Case No.54 of 200...
Kuppala Sivasank Vs. Kuppala Venkatamma and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Appeal Suit No.2502 of 2000 04-12-2013 Kuppala Sivasankar ...appellant. Kuppala Venkatamma and others....Respondents Counsel for appellant: Sr.S.Srinivas Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sr.M.V.Suresh HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. (1977) 3 SCC992. (2006) 8 SCC75THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Appeal Suit No.2502 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) Claimant No.1 in O.P.No.35 of 1995 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kadiri, filed this appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act').An extent of Ac.1.00 of land in survey No.1356/2 of Kamathampalli Village, Kadiri Mandal, was acquired by the Government for providing house sites to the weaker sections. The declaration under Section 6 of the Act was published, on 21.04.1994. In the award enquiry, the appellant submitted a claim stating that an...
Life Insurance Corporation of India Rep. by Its Divisional Manager, Di ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-04-2013
(R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) The opposite party is the appellant. The complaint is filed claiming a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards accident benefit payable under the policy No.687091169 and Rs.20,000/- towards accident benefit payable under policy No.681478344 together with compensation of Rs.25,000/-, interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of death of life assured and costs. The respondent is the nominee of the life assured who during his life time had obtained two LIC Policies i.e Jeevan Anand (Double Accident benefit) for Rs.2,00,000/- bearing No.687091169 commenced from 28-3-2005 and another policy i.e. Janaraksha (Double Accident Policy) for Rs.20,000/- bearing 681478344 commenced from 28-3-1998. The respondent submitted that the life assured was murdered on 22-12-2005 by some unknown persons near Ursu hillock and the death was reported to the Police who lodged FIR and filed charge sheet. The respondent submitted the claim form to the appellant for settlement of the clai...
B.S.Neelakanta and Ano Vs. the Stateof A.P. Rep.by Public Prosecut
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1788 OF201104-12-2013. B.S.Neelakanta and another..PETITIONERs The State of A.P. Rep.by Public Prosecutor and another ..RESPONDENT Counsel for the petitioner: Sri T.Niranjan Reddy Senior Counsel Counsel for the respondent No.1 : Additional Public Prosecutor Counsel for the respondent No.2: Sri B.Sudhakar Reddy : ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1788 OF2011ORDER: This criminal revision case is filed against the order dated 26.08.2011 in Crl.M.P.No.4681 of 2011 in C.C.No.1037 of 2008 on the file of the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.2. I have heard Sri T.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners/A1 & A2 and Sri B.Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the de facto complainant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.3. The petitioners are A1 and A2 in C.C.No.1037 of 2008 on the file of the III A...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »