Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
thevice-chairman and Managing Director Th Vs. M/S.Gmkminerals Private ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONOURABLE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Appeal No.1917 of 2013 12-12-2013 The Vice-Chairman & Managing Director The A.P. Mineral Development Corporation Ltd., 6-2-915, 3rd Floor, HMWSSB Premises Khairatabad Hyderabad and another... Appellants M/s.GMK Minerals Private Limited Rep. by its Director Smt. G. Vijayalakshmi R/o.B1, G-4, Lakeview Enclave Miyapur Hyderabad.. Respondent !COUNSEL FOR APPEALLANTS : Sri V. Subrahmanyam COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : Sri A. Samir Kumar Reddy appearing for Sri V.Surya Prakash HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1917 OF2013JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) By consent of the parties, we dispose of this appeal finally today at the stage of admission itself.2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the learned single Judge dt.23.10.2013 by...
Pochareddy Srihari Reddy, S/O. Ramana Re Vs. Veeriboina Harikrishna, S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6167 OF201012-12-2013 Pochareddy Srihari Reddy, S/o. Ramana Reddy....PETITIONER Veeriboina Harikrishna, S/o. Late Balaramaiah....RESPONDENT Counsel for Petitioner: Sr.K.S.GopalaKrishna Counsel for Respondent: Sr.Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6167 OF2010ORDER: This revision is directed against the order dated 18.11.2010 passed in I.A.No.410 of 2010 in O.S.No.648 of 2008 by the II Additional senior Civil Judge, Nellore. The petitioner herein is the defendant in the Original Suit. He filed written statement on 26.03.2009 and subsequently, he filed additional written statement on 28.08.2009. The trial commenced on 12.11.2009. P.W.1 was partly cross examined on 24.02.2010 and 08.03.2010. Subsequently, the petitioner herein filed I.A.No.140 of 2010 seeking permission to amend the additional written statement, inter alia, contending that there i...
Mandava Lakshminarayana and Anot Vs. K.V.S.S. Mallikarjuna Rao and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.264 of 2001 11-12-2013 Mandava Lakshminarayana and another...appellants. K.V.S.S.Mallikarjuna Rao and another....Respondents Counsel for appellants:Sr.K.Ananda Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sr.G.Subhash HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.264 of 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This is an unfortunate case, where a poor couple, who lost their only son, in an accident, have been accorded the treatment, which lacks grace, humanity, and their misery was made to remain for the past several decades. The son of the appellants, by name, Srinivasa Rao, was employed as a Cleaner on a Bus, bearing No.AIK5193 owned by the 1st respondent and insured with the 2nd respondent, on a monthly salary of Rs.800/-. He was just aged 23 yeaRs.On 08.06.1990, the bus started from Vijayawada with pilgrims for...
Ranjith Filling Station, Sy.No.475/U, N. Vs. the Indian Oil Corporatio ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.28062 of 2013 11-12-2013 Ranjith Filling Station, Sy.No.475/U, N.H.7, Reddypally Village, Chegunta Mandal, Medak District, rep.by its Partner T.Srinivas and another .. Petitioners The Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Divisional Office, 9-1-83 & 84, S.D.Road,Secunderabad, rep.by its Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager .... Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri E.Manohar Rao, Senior Counsel for Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee, counsel for respondent : : ?.Cases referred: This Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO.28062 OF2013ORDER: First petitioner is the partnership firm and second petitioner is one of the partners in the partnership firm. This writ petition is instituted by the petitioners assailing the Order, dated 16.09.2013 passed by the Executive Director (Retail Sales) of the Indian Oil Corporation Limited, terminating the dealershi...
B.Narsa Reddy and OThe Vs. Ramulu and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.258 of 2001 11-12-2013 B.NaRs.Reddy and Others....APPELLANTS Ramulu and other....RESPONDENTS COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS:Sri.Y.Srinivasa Murthy COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS:Sr.Janardhan Reddy : ?.cASES rEFERRED: JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) Defendant No.2 and the legal representatives of defendant No.3 in O.S.No.128 of 1982 on the file of the District Judge, Adilabad are the appellants. Respondents 1 to 3-plaintiffs filed the suit against their father, respondent No.4 (defendant No.1).and the appellants for the relief of partition and separate possession of plaint 'A' schedule, an extent of Acs.7.00 of Sonala Village, Adilabad District and immovable properties in schedule 'B'. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiffs, being minORS.were represented by their mother. It was pleaded in the plaint that the joint family, c...
United India Insurance Co. Lt Vs. Erikala Lokineni Sreenivasulu and An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.NO.100 OF201111-12-2013 United India Insurance Co. Ltd ....Appellant Erikala Lokineni Sreenivasulu and another .... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner:Sri K.Venkata Rao #Counsel for the Respondents:Sri O.Manohar Reddy : : ?.Cases referred:1. 2001 (1) ALT495(DB) 2 (4)2011 ACC826DB) 3 2004 ACJ1SC) 4 2013(6) ALT4715 1965(1) A11. E.R-563 6 1963(2) All.E.R-432 7 1969(1)A11.E.R -555 81995 ACJ366SC)-CA Nos.1799 &1800 of 1989 with SLP(Civil) 4586 of 1989 9 2013 ACJ1403(4)ALT-35(SC). 10 2009 ACJ1298 11 2003 ACJ12 12 2005(6) SCC236 13 2004(2) SCC297HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.NO.100 OF2011JUDGMENT: The insurer/2nd respondent to the claim petition preferred an appeal impugning the award of the Tribunal in the grounds of appeal not only on the quantum of compensation and rate of interest, but also on the ground that there is violation of the permit conditions committed by the 1st respondent-owner of the crime je...
Paladugu Ram Vs. Shaik Begum Bee Andothe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR Second Appeal No.691 of 2002 11-12-2013 Paladugu Ramesh . Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff Shaik Begum Bee and others .. Respondents/Appellants/Defendants Counsel for Appellant : Sri K.V. Satyanarayana Counsel for respondents:Sri V. Rama Krishna Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED :1. 1998(6) ALD2782. 2006(1) ALD669DB) 3. AIR1960AP3314. (2002) 3 SCC6765. 2011(5) ALD3176. 2011(3) ALD147SC) 7. AIR1966SC6058. (2009) 5 SCC2649. (2004) 5 SCC76210. (2007) 1 SCC54611. (2004) 10 SCC14612. (2006) 2 SCC49613. LAWS (SC)-2003-3-109 14. AIR2007AP22515. AIR1970SC54616. AIR1997Himachal Pradesh 12 17. AIR1986Karnataka 99 18. 2009(4) ALT51519. 2009 (4) ALT37920. AIR1940Madras 273 21. 1998(6) ALD278HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR SAMP Nos. 1160 of 2010 and 3369 of 2012 and Second Appeal No.691 of 2002 Common Judgment: This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 16.07.2002, passed in A.S. No.14 of 1999 by the Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, whe...
A.P.Stae Finance Corporation ...Appellla Vs. M/S Uniloids Limite
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL O.S.A.No.17 of 2012 10-12-2013 A.P.Stae Finance Corporation ...Appelllant M/S Uniloids Limited.,...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant:Sr.Vivek Counsel for Respondent: Sr.M.Anil Kumar : ?.Cases Referred: JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The respondent-company was referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR).After the effort of reconstruction of it failed, the BIFR directed its liquidation and accordingly, necessary orders were passed in R.C.C.No.2 of 1992 by this Court. The appellant advanced certain amounts to the respondent-company. To realize them, it has brought some assets of the respondent to sale, by remaining outside the liquidation. A sum of Rs.160.00 lakhs is said to have been realized. The Official Liquidator (O.L.) has initiated various steps under the Companies Act (for short 'the Act') and the Rules made thereunder vis--vis the respondent...
Smt. M. Yasodamm Vs. the Government of A.P., Consumer Affairs
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Writ Petition No.21579 of 2013 10-12-2013 Smt. M. Yasodamma.... Petitioner The Government of A.P., Consumer Affairs (Civil Supplies) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and 5 others.... Respondents Counsel for petitioner: Sri B.Sudhakar Reddy and Neeraja Reddy, Counsel for respondents: G.P. for Civil Supplies : ?.Cases referred:2007. (4) ALD388HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Writ Petition No.21579 of 2013 Date:10. 12-2013 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for declaring the orders of the 1st respondent passed in Government Memo No.813/CS-I.1/2013, dated 04-04-2013 whereby and whereunder the revision petition was allowed and granted stay of operation of the orders passed by the District Collector, Chittoor till disposal of the case, as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act and the A.P. State Public Distribution (Control) Order, 2008 and for setting aside the...
Jvs Shashank and Another Vs. Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Ltd ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-10-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. This revision is preferred by the complainant against the order of the Dist. Forum refusing to implead M/s Oriental insurance company as opposite partyno.3 in the complaint on the ground that the District Forum has no power to follow the procedure prescribed under 13(4) of C.P.Act or the provisions of O.1 R.10 CPC. 2. Aggrieved by the said order the complainant filed this revision contending that the District Forum did not appreciate that the complainant filed the complaint against the opposite parties no.1 and 2 claiming compensation and in their written version the opposite partis no.1 and 2 pleaded that the opposite partyno.1 obtained indemnity insurance policy from the proposed opposite partyno.3/the insurance company. Therefore they intended that the insurance company be impleaded as party. 3. The District Forum after considering the matter dismissed the application on the ground that it has no power to implead the insur...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »