Andhra Pradesh Court December 2013 Judgments
Kesireddy Ramachandra Reddy and OThe Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Its U ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.9883 of 2005 31-12-2013 Kesireddy Ramachandra Reddy & others. ..Petitioners Union of India, rep. by its Under Secretary,Ministry of Home Affairs, Freedom Fighters Division,Loknayak Bhavan, Khan Market, New Delhi. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Mr.K.Ananda Rao Counsel for the Respondent: Smt.K.Mani Deepika HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. 1993 Supp (3) SCC1: AIR1993SC21272. (1997) 10 SCC1903. (1997) 10 SCC2894. (2007) 9 SCC5255. (2012) 11 SCC7546. (2001) 8 SCC87. 2013(5) ALD173THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.9883 of 2005 Date:31. 12.2013 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.9883 of 2005 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: ".To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in not granting pension to the petitioners from the date of receipt ...
Tag this Judgment!1.Rahmatullah Khan and One Oth Vs. 1.Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.38888 OF201331-12-2013 1.Rahmatullah Khan and one other....PETITIONERS1Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and two others....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the PetitioneRs.MRS.V.Dyumani Counsel for the respondents: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases Referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.38888 OF2013Dated 31st December 2013 The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.38888 OF2013ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings No.A12150/2013 dated 28.12.2013 of respondent No.3. At the hearing, Smt. V.Dyumani, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.has not disputed that her clients have filed an appeal under Section 10 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (".the Act' for short).against the impugned order. She further stated tha...
Tag this Judgment!Sri Agasteswara Swamy Temple, Vangipuram Vs. V.Siva Kameswara Rao and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1131 of 2012 31-12-2013 Sri Agasteswara Swamy Temple, Vangipuram Village....APPELLANT V.Siva Kameswara Rao and another...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant:Sri V.T.M.Prasad Learned counsel for 1st respondent:Smt.V.Dyumani HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. (2010) 10 S.C.C. 744 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1131 of 2012 Date :31. 12-2013 Between :- Sri Agasteswara Swamy Temple, Vangipuram Village. ..... Appellant. And 1. V.Siva Kameswara Rao and another .... Respondents. Learned Counsel for appellant : Sri V.T.M.Prasad Learned counsel for 1st respondent : Smt.V.Dyumani This Court delivered the following :- HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1131 of 2012 JUDGMENT: This Appeal is filed under Section 88 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1977 (for short ".the Act".) challenging the...
Tag this Judgment!State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Aut Vs. Nalamati Dorayya and Othe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.196 of 2004 31-12-2013 State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Authorized Officer, Land Reforms, Kakinada..... Petitioner. Nalamati Dorayya and others......Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner: Government Pleader for Ceiling Counsel for the respondents:Sri G.Krishna Murthy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 2007 (5) ALT4472 2013 (4) ALD725(D.B.) 3 AIR2000S.C. 3191 4 1978 (1) A.L.T. 43 (NRC) 5 1980 (1) A.P.L.J.324 6 1998 (1) ALD716(DB) 7 1999 (4) ALT3538 2003 (4) ALT9(SC) 9 1987 (2) APLJ92(AP) 10 1999 (4) ALT353THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.196 of 2004 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 21 of the AP Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (for brevity, 'the Act') challenging the order dt.29-07-2003 in L.R.A.No.13 of 2001 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge, East Godavari District at Kakinada.2. The 1st respondent herein Rimmalap...
Tag this Judgment!1.Kommagani Ilaiah and Anoth Vs. 1.Kommagani Bikshapathi and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.1037 of 2013 31-12-2013 1.Kommagani Ilaiah and another... Petitioners 1.Kommagani Bikshapathi and others...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners:Sri Avinash Desai Learned counsel for respondents :-- HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1963SC19172. AIR1988SC7033. (1972) 4 SCC5624. (2004) 10 SCC7795. (2007) 6 SCC100HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.1037 of 2013 Date :31. 12-2013 This Court delivered the following :- HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.1037 of 2013 JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dt.03-06- 2013 in A.S.No.12 of 2010 of the Senior Civil Judge at Bhongir (for short ".the lower appellate Court".), reversing the judgment and decree dt.04-06-2010 of the Principal Junior Judge, Bhongir in O.S.No.283 of 2003 (for short ".the trial Court".).2. The appellants are defendants in the above suit. The suit was filed by 1...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Ghulam Ghous Vs. Inudstrial Tribunal-ii, Chandravihar, M.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO W.P.Nos.23514 of 2000 31-12-2013 Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse ....petitioner Inudstrial Tribunal-II, Chandravihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad and another.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.S. Ravindranath Counsel for the Respondents: Government Pleader for Labour, Government Pleader for Finance &Planning, Ms.G.Sudha : : ?.Cases referred: 1. (2001) 2 SCC542. (2005) 2 SCC3633. (2006) 1 SCC4794. (2013) 10 SCC324HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.23514 of 2000 and 14579 of 2009 Common Order: WP.No.23514 of 2000: This writ petition was filed by the petitioner challenging that portion of the Award in I.D.No.93 of 1999 dated 10.03.2000 denying back wages. The allegation of the petitioner was that he was appointed as a Tongsman on 03.01.1980 on a monthly salary of Rs.300/- and his salary was increased to Rs.1,600/- at the time of termination. He played an active role in trade union activities of the 2nd respondent company and he was el...
Tag this Judgment!Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp Vs. Katta Kusuma and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.3668 of 2011 31-12-2013 Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation rep. by its Managing Director, Mushirabad, Hyderabad... Appellant Katta Kusuma and others.. Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Smt.D.Radhika. Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: M.Sudheer Kumar. GIST HEAD NOTE:1. 2013(1)ALD644(FB) 2 2001(1) ALT495DB) 3 1965(1) A11. E.R-563 4 1963(2) All.E.R-432 5 1969(1)A11.E.R -555 6 1995 ACJ366SC)-CA Nos.1799 &1800 of 1989 with SLP(Civil) 4586 of 1989 7 (2009) 6 SCC1218 2013(4)ALT35SC) 9 2011(8) SCALE24010 (2005) 6 SCC23611 2011(8) SCC14212(1988)3 SCC1THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.3668 of 2011 JUDGMENT The Managing Director of APSRTC-4th respondent to the claim petition in O.P.No.686 of 2008 filed this appeal; having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Karimnagar (for short, 'Tribunal') dated 06.09.2...
Tag this Judgment!P.Vijaya Jyothi, D/Odr.P.Muralinath Red Vs. 1.The State of Andhra Prad ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.23634 of 2009 31-12-2013 P.Vijaya Jyothi, D/o Dr.P.Muralinath Reddy....Petitioner. 1.The State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Principal Secretary,Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another......Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner: V.Jagapathi Counsel for the Official respondents:Government Pleader for Revenue GIST: HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. 2000(4) ALD5962. 1989 (1) ALT483. 1995 (2) A.P.L.J.325 4. 2006 (5) ALD132(DB) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.23634 of 2009 ORDER: This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed for the following relief: ". to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings initiated by the 2nd respondent against the dead person, Late Mallaiah, in File No.F1/3272/6(1)/06 dt.6.2.06 under the provisions of Sections 6 to 10 of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) ...
Tag this Judgment!D. Prabhu Kishore Vs. the Regional Manager, United India Insurance Co. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The complaint is filed u/s 17 (1)(a)(i) of C.P.Act claiming a sum of Rs.52,71,000/- towards damages and business loss from the date of expiry of agreement with APSRTC and interest thereon. 2. The averments of the complaint are that the complainant let on hire his bus bearing registration No. AP 26W 2449 to APSRTC and he obtained insurance policy from the opposite party insurance company vide policy bearing No.151204/31/04/06243 on 27.2.2005 and he got renewed the policy for the period from 27.2.2005 to 26.2.2006. The bus involved in an accident on 28.2.2005 causing death of two persons on account of which a petition seeking for compensation of Rs.7,50,000/- was filed before MACT which awarded a sum of Rs.3,90,000/- and Rs.3,87,000/- on 5.2.2008. 3. The complainant submitted that the opposite party has to pay compensation to the victims who filed the claim petition and it has attempted to shrug of its liability to pay the amou...
Tag this Judgment!Director General Esi Corporation and Another Vs. Parikae Nireekshana R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President 1. The complainant is an employee of M/s Vijaya Spinning Mills Ltd, a public limited company at ganguru near Vijayawada. On 29.09.21998 the complainant approached ESI hospital at Ganguru for treatment of fever and he was referred to ESI hospital, Gunadala, Vijayawada where he was treated as inpatient and later he was referred to Dr.P.Ramesh, cardiologist, Vijayawada and he advised the complainant to approach NIMS, Hyderabad. The labour welfare officer of M/s Vijaya Spinning Mills Ltd accompanied the complainant and the superintendent of ESI hospital, Vijayawada issued referral letter to NIMS. 2. The complainant was referred to Apollo Hospital on 7.10.1998 where he was treated by cardio-thoracic and vascular surgeon. The complainant was diagnosed with suffering from 1.post injection thrombo -embolism and gangrene of RD 3,4 and 5 and right thumb apart from 2.scrotal abscess and 3.Neurogenic bladder. After stabilization of gangrene,...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »