Andhra Pradesh Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Superbuild India Private Limited, H Vs. M/S. Niraj Cement Structu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-29-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.534 of 2012 29-11-2013 M/s. Superbuild India Private Limited, Hyderabad....APPELLANT M/s. Niraj Cement Structural Limited, Mumbai and others....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: MR.S.RAVI for MR. D. SESHASAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: MR. NAGESHWAR RAO PAPPU-R1 MR. SRINIVAS MANTHA - R2 MR. A. RAVI BABU - R3 HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred :1. (2007) 8 SCC1102. (1995) 4 SCC5153. (1997) 1 SCC5684. (2006) 13 SCC5995. (1994) 6 SCC597THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.534 of 2012 The Court made the following order: JUDGMENT: This is an appeal arising out of an injunction petition filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.367 of 2011 pending before the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. The suit was filed seeking relief of injunction against the defendants 1 and 2 from invoking or making any claim against the schedule mentioned bank guarantees aggregat...
K. Sudhakar Rao Vs. Smt C. Devayani and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. This is a revision preferred by the proposed opposite party no.3 against the order of the District Forum dismissing the petition holding that fact whether the petitioner purchased the Flat in the name of the first respondent can be decided only in civil court. 2. The case of the first respondent /complainant in brief is that she entered into Agreement of sale for purchase of Flat No.306 with the respondent no.2 who is the landlord of the property bearing door no.1-8-678/20 situate at Azamabad locality of Hyderabad city and the respondent no.2 entered into Development Agreement with the respondent no.3 for development of the property and construction of residential complex, Gharonda Chamundesari Complex therein. She submitted that she paid a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- out of total sale consideration of Rs.12,80,000/- to the second respondent and the third respondent abandoned construction of the Flat whereon she filed the complaint seeking dir...
The Chief Manager, State Bank of India Fathekhanpeta Vs. Vangal Thirum ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao,Incharge President) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondent is having savings bank account with the appellant as also he was provided with ATM card facility. On 31.10.2011 the respondent withdrew Rs.15,000/- from ATM and when the respondent again attempted to withdraw the amount of Rs.10,000/- from the ATM, it had shown that he had already crossed the limit and the transaction could not be processed. After repeated attempts he was successful in withdrawing Rs.5,000/-. The balance in his account was shown as Rs.39,925/- out of the total balance of Rs.64,925/-. The respondent made representation to the appellant. The appellant informed that somebody on his behalf might have withdrawn the amount of Rs.20,000/-. When the respondent insisted for showing the photograph image the appellant informed that the details of the transaction no.5075 was not available. The respondent addressed letter to the Banking Ombudsman and as he was unsuccessfu...
Smt. Yadav Sai Lakshmi Vs. M/S. Chebrole Constructions Rep. by Its Man ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The revision petitioner is 3rd party to the proceedings before the District Forum. The revision is challenge to the order of the District Forum dated 3.01.2013 restraining her from making payment of Rs.2,50,000/- to the first respondent/opposite party. 2. The second respondent filed compliant in C.C.No. 54 of 2011 against the respondent no.1 claiming refund of an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and the District Forum allowed the complaint on 25.08.2009 awarding refund of the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest @9% p.a. and a sum of Rs.25,000/-towards compensation. As the first respondent had not preferred appeal, the order of the District Forum became final. 3. The second respondent filed execution petition in E.A.No. 10 of 2012 on 25.04.2012 under the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act for prosecution of the first respondent on account of non-compliance of the order of the District Forum. The District Forum stated to had ...
Sri P.Anjaneyulu Gupta and Anoth Vs. Mohd Abdul Basith Khan and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.9245 of 2013 AND BATCH2811-2013 Sr.P.Anjaneyulu Gupta and another ...Petitioners Mohd Abdul Basith Khan and others ..Respondents ^Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.D.Raghavender Rao for Sr.D.Madhava Rao (W.P.No.9245 of 2013) !Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5: Sr.P.Raghavender Reddy Head note: ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition Nos.9245 and 8958 of 2013 Dated 28th November, 2013 The Court made the following: Common Order: These two writ petitions have been filed with identical grievance against the same proceeding of the Joint Collector (J).Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as 'the Joint Collector').There is a serious dispute among the petitioners in these writ petitions and the private respondents with respect to the land in Survey No.69 of Miyapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Based on the preliminary decree, dated 29.12.2000, in O.S.No.38 ...
M/S Deccan Cements Ltd., Hyderab Vs. Commissioner of Incometax, Ap-i, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM REVISION CASE No.78 of 1998 28-11-2013 M/s Deccan Cements Ltd., Hyderabad..Applicant Commissioner of Incometax, AP-I, Hyderabad..Respondent !Counsel for the Applicant :Sr.C.V.Narasimham Counsel for the respondent : Sr.S.R.Ashok, Standing Counsel for Department of Income Tax assisted by Sr.N.P.Sunil Reddy. : ?.Cases referred: 1) 174 ITR2002) 258 ITR7703) (1997) 223 ITR713HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.78 OF1998ORDER:- (per Hon'ble Sr.Justice G.Chandraiah) At the instance of the Revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-'A' (in short ".the Tribunal".) had referred the following questions of law as arising from the Tribunal's Order dated12.06.1996 made in I.T.A.No.460/H/92, for the assessment year 1989-1990: ".1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holdi...
Batta Yellaiah and Others Vs. B. Ramesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.370 of 2009 28-11-2013 Batta Yellaiah and others....Appellants B. Ramesh and another...Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.Jayanti S.C.Sekhar Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sr.N.V.Jagannath Gist: Head Note: ?. Cases referred: 1. 2013 ACJ1403(Supreme Court) HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.370 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Challenging the quantum of compensation awarded in O.P.No.661 of 2005 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, at Warangal (for short ".the Tribunal".) as inadequate, the claimants preferred the present M.A.C.M.A.2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The 1st and 2nd claimants are the parents and 3rd claimant is the minor sister of the deceased - Batta Nageshwar Rao of Malluru Village in Warangal District. Claimants' case is that the deceased was 18 years old and was working as Hamali in Sree Sai Rice Mill, Mallur on a monthly salary of Rs.3,000/-. Besid...
V.Alivelu Mangas Devi Vs. V,venkata Laskshmi Narasimha Palla Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL C.M.A.No.752 of 2013 28-11-2013 V.Alivelu Mangas Devi V,Venkata Laskshmi Narasimha Palla Rao !Counsel for the AppellantSr.Subba Rao Counsel for Respondent: Sr.A.K.Kishore Reddy : ?.Cases Referred; JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 16.04.1983 and they were also blessed with two children. The respondent was initially employed in Armed Forces and worked at various places. After retirement from the Army, he secured employment in Customs and Central Excise Department and was posted at Visakhapatnam. In the year 1997, the appellant is said to have left Visakhapatnam for Kakinada, where her parents were residing, on account of harassment and ill-treatment caused by the respondent. The respondent filed O.P.No.200 of 2011 in the Court of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada under Section 13 (1a) of the Hindu Marr...
Larsen and Toubro Limit Vs. the Commissioner of Labour,andhra Prades
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NOs.9111 of 2010 AND BATCH2811-2013 Larsen and Toubro Limited....petitioner The Commissioner of Labour,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and others ... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri C.R. Sridharan Counsel for the Respondents 1,2 & 4: G.P. for Labour Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Sri V.Ravinder Rao : : ?. Cases referred: (1990) 3 SCC682(2001) 7 SCC71(2002) 4 SCC297(2005) 2 SCC271(2008) 5 SCC176(1986) 3 SCC238AIR1967SC1364AIR1973SC365AIR2005SC286AIR1953SC83AIR1956Bombay 219 (Vol.43 C.81 April) 2010 LLR1842010 LLR752LAWS (JHAR)-2008-9-30=LLJ20091693 Date:28. 11.2013 This Court made the following :- HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NOs.9111, 10176, 12499, 12760, 12761, 12762, 12765, 12768, 12796, 17286, 17287, 17992, 18920, 20082, 21313, 23112, 24018, 24209, 24275, 24860, 29317, 30103, 31571 and 33586 of 2010 Common Order: These writ petitions raise common question of law, as such, they have been heard together an...
Neeraj Agrawal Vs. Chilakamarri Mukund Reddy and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-27-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complaint is filed under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, complaining deficiency in service against the opposite parties no.1 to 41 and claimed a sum of Rs.27,04,851/- towards the amount paid and interest thereon @ 24% p.a. from the date of filing of complaint till payment and a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards damages as also the costs of Rs.75,000/-. 2. The opposite party no.41 entered into development agreement under documents bearing nos.23198/2007, 23230/2006 both dated 7.10.2006 and document No.13321/2007 dated 23.6.2007 and development cum general power of attorney in favour of the first opposite party-company with the owners of land for development of their land measuring Ac.19.26 gts. in Sy.No.384, 385 and 426A at Tellapur village in Ramachandrapuram Mandal of Medak District and construction of building therein. In pursuance of the development agreement, the opposite parties had obtained permission for the constructi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »