Andhra Pradesh Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Patnalavenkata Ramakrishna and OThe Vs. M/S. Midwest(India) Indust ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL O.S.A.Nos.19 of 2012 AND BATCH0411-2013 Sr.Patnala Venkata Ramakrishna and others....appellants. M/S.Midwest (India) Industries Limited, Hyderabad and others...Respondents Counsel for appellants:Sr.P.Venu Gopal Counsel for Respondents :Sr.M.Anil Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL O.S.A.Nos.19 and 20 of 2012 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) These two OSAs arise out of a common order, dated 21.08.2012, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Company Application Nos.1598, 1599, 1600 & 1601 of 2011 in Company Petition No.39 of 2000. Hence, they are disposed of, through a common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in O.S.A.No.19 of 2012. M/S.Midwest (India) Industries Limited, the 1st respondent herein, was undertaking the activity, inter alia,...
Smt T. Rekha and Another Vs. the Managing Director Bhoomatha Real Esta ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-04-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. Appellants in both appeals the complainants. The opposite parties are the same parties in both the appeals. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred as they arrayed in the complaints. The facts and circumstances of both the appeals being same, they are disposed of by common order. F.A.No.181 of 2013 is taken as lead case. 2. The case of the appellant as seen from the averments of the complaint is that the appellant paid a sum of Rs.7 lakhs on 23.8.2005 and Rs.70,000/- 8.9.2005 to the respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 issued receipts dated 23.8.2005 and 8.9.2005 and the receipts were signed by the managing partner of the respondent no.1 company. The appellant requested the respondents to execute sale deed in his favour and as there was no response thereto, the appellant addressed letter dated 20.8.2006 to the respondent no.1 with a request to issue allotment letter with plot number and extent of the land. The respondent had...
Sk. Nazir, S/O Sk Khaja, Aged 40 Years, Vs. Northern Power Distributio ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR W.P.No.22939 of 2007 04-11-2013 Sk. Nazir, S/o Sk Khaja, aged 40 yeaRs.R/o 7-5-103, Sukravarampet, Khammam, Khammam District.....petitioner Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P.Limited represented by its Chairman and Managing Director, Corporate Office, Warangal, Warangal District and two others..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.M. Surender Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.P. Laxma Reddy, S.C for AP TRANSCO : : ?.Cases referred: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.22939 OF2007ORDER: The petitioner was an Assistant Lineman. Alleging that he was involved in theft of material of the employer and also alleging that he resorted to misappropriation, the petitioner was placed under suspension. After due enquiry, the petitioner was terminated from service. Questioning the same, the present Writ Petition is laid. The petitioner joined the service as an Assistant Junior Lineman on compassionate grounds through orders dated 21....
S. Ravindra S/O Gopal Rao, Aged About 42 Vs. the State of A.P Rep by I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.27696 of 2011 and batch Dated:04-11-2013 W.P.No.27696 of 2013 S. Ravindra S/o Gopal Rao, aged about 42 yeaRs.M/s Ravindra Mechanical Works, R/o D.No.12-12-72, Paadi Street, Vijayawada-520 001....Petitioner The State of A.P rep by its Commissioner Endowments Department, Hyderabad and 3 others ....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : M/s G. Ramachandra Reddy Counsel for the respondents : GP for Endowments W.P.No.27415 of 2013 HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.27696, 27415, 27862, 27904, 27909, 27910, 28380, 32137 and 32139 of 2011 Common Order: All these cases arise out of common set of facts and law. Hence they are disposed of by this common order. Common contentions are canvassed by the learned counsel. Hence, for convenience's sake, facts as are set up in W.P.No.27696 of 2011 are set out in detail. This writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari calling ...
Bhupathiraju Satyanarayana Raju and 2 Ot Vs. Sanku China Pulla Rao and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5256 of 2006 dated:04-11-2013 Bhupathiraju Satyanarayana Raju and 2 others.... Petitioners Sanku China Pulla Rao and 2 others.... Respondents Counsel for petitioners: Sri A. Ramalingeswara Rao Counsel for respondent: Sri P. Vinayaka Swamy : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR (36) 1949 Allahabad 464 2) AIR1927Calcutta 474 3) 2011 (6) ALD7364) AIR (36) 1949 Nagpur 39 5) AIR1960Punjab 604 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.5256 of 2006 Date:04. 11-2013 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the decree and judgment dated 05-07-2006 in A.S.No.45 of 2004 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, whereby and whereunder the appeal filed under Section 75 (1) of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920-the Provincial Insolvency (Andhra Pradesh Extension and Amendment) Act, 1965 (for short ".the Act".) by the revision petitioners, was dismissed.2. The revisi...
M. Laxmikantha Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,represe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.20676 of 2012 and batch :dated:4-11-2013 W.P.No.20676 of 2012 M. Laxmikanthaiah.. Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by its Principal Secretary,Revenue (Assn.V) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others.. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri C.V. Mohan Reddy, Senior Counsel for Sri S.V.S. Chowdhary Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignments) Counsel for respondent No.5 : Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana for Sri R.N. Hemendranath Reddy HEAD NOTE: W.P.No.20676/2012: ?.CASES REFERRED:1. 2009(1) ALT4242. 2010(4) ALD6553. 2011(5) ALT4204. 2004(1) SCC2875. 2003(7) SCC3506. AIR1966S.C. 828 7. AIR2000S.C. 2783 8. 2010(4) ALT6299. 2001(5) SCC589The Court made the following : COMMON JUDGMENT: As the subject matter of both these Writ Petitions is common, they are heard and being disposed of together by this Common Judgment. The background facts: The property in dispute i...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›