Andhra Pradesh Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rama Devi and Others Vs. the Manager, Apsrtc Depot-ii Chittoor Town an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. She filed complaint claiming a sum of Rs.7,53,458/- along with interest thereon and an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards compensation and an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards costs. 2. The case of the appellants is that the first appellants husband and father of the appellants no.2 and 3 died on 11.08.2011. After his death, the appellants submitted claim for an amount of Rs.7,53,458/-. R.Venkatrama Naidu, K.Bhasker Naidu and M.Subramanycam filed suits, O.S.No. 573 of 2011, O.S.No. 456 of 2011 and O.S.No. 534 of 2011 respectively before the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chittoor against the appellants for recovery of the amounts under pronotes and filed the petition for attachment of salary of the first appellants husband. The respondent failed to release the amount due to the appellants. 3. The respondent resisted the claim on the premise that it had received order from the Court of ...
Bharaju Rambabu S/O Bhaskara Rao, Driver Vs. the State of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.7446 of 2013 and 20965 of 2013 Dated 06-11-2013 WP. No.7446 of 2013 Bharaju Rambabu S/o Bhaskara Rao, Driver of Ambulance Van Government Area Hospital, Gudivada R/o GVR Complex, Eluru Road, Gudivada, Krishna District and another ....Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Secretary Legislative Affairs & Justice Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva Counsel for the respondents :1. GP for Home 2. Sri K. Chidambaram WP. No.20965 of 2013 HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. 2009 (2) ALD (Cri) 300 2. 2008 (1) ALD (Crl.) 712 (A.P.) 3. 1988 (3) SCC1444. 2002 Crl.L.J.1694 5. 2001 Crl.L.J.912 6. 2004 (1) ALD (Crl.) 43 7. 2003 (7) SCC4038. AIR1959AP6599. 1986 (1) ALT14110. 1999 (2) ALD (Crl.) 621 (SC) 11. 2004 Crl.L.J.52 12. 2009 (12) SCC159 13. 2006 Crl.L.J425814. 1999 Supreme Court Cases (Crl) 1277 15. (2010) 6 SCC116. (2004) 4 SCC15817. AIR2004SC380018. ...
imran Ba Vs. M/S. United India Insurance Company Limi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.367 of 2001 05-11-2013 Imran Basha...appellant. M/S.United India Insurance Company Limited and another..Respondents Counsel for appellant: Sr.M.Mehdi Hussain Counsel for Respondent no.1 : Smt.A.Malathi HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.367 of 2001 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the judgment, dated 29.11.2000, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court, in A.A.O.No.1170 of 1996, preferred by the 1st respondent therein. The AAO was filed by the 1st respondent herein i.e.M/S.United India Insurance Company Limited, against the order, dated 20.02.1996 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- District Judge, Kurnool in M.V.O.P.No.182 of 1993. The order passed by the Tribunal, awarding compensation of Rs.1,25,000/- in favour of the appel...
M/S Universal Packers, Movers and Logistics Rep. by Its Branch Manager ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by Universal Packers, Movers and Logistics against the order of the District Forum along with it an application F.A.I.A.No.2509 of 2013 u/s 15 of C.P.Act (R/w Sec.5 of Limitation Act) to condone delay of 577 days on the ground that the authorized representative of the petitioner suffered with cardiac problem and was advised rest by the doctors and in the process a delay of 577 days ensued. 2. In the light of the fact that delay was 577 days without any material whatsoever to substantiate the delay, we do not intend to order any notice to the respondent as no improvement could be made by the petitioner/appellant. The procedure contemplated under Civil Procedure Code or provisions of Limitation Act do not apply to the proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act for ordering notice before resolving the issue. The matters have to be resolved by applying principles of natural justice, equity, etc. 3. The point t...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Another Vs. Mrs. G. Shantha ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner/Appellant/OP1 to condone the delay of 210 days in filing the appeal as against the orders dated 03.10.2012 in CC 418/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum I, Hyderabad. 2. In the affidavit annexed to the petitioner, Manager of the petitioner insurance company has contended that the copy of the order of the Forum was received by legal counsel of the company on 25.10.2012 and sent the same along with his opinion to the Divisional office on 09.11.2012 for appraisal thereafter it was sent to the Regional office, Hyderabad who in turn, returned the entire file to its divisional office for its necessary action on 3.12.2012 which was received by them on 4.12.2012 but the file was misplaced and could be located only on 24.4.2013 and then the file was sent to the regional office on 25.4.2013 with a request to take further action and it was under consideration of Review committee who recommended for pref...
The Oriental Insurance Companydivisional Vs. Smt. Aluru Rama Devi,and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.475 of 2005 05-11-2013 The Oriental Insurance CompanyDivisional Office, Ongole ...Appellant smt. Aluru Rama Devi,and others ....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Manne Haribabu Counsel for respondents: Sri B.Sudhakar Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. 2001(1) ALT495DB2 1992(2)ALT1553) 1965(1) All.E.R-563 4) 1963(2) All.E.R.432 5) 1969(1) All.E.R.555 6) 1995 ACJ366SC) 7) 2009 ACJ12988) 2013(4) ALT35SC) HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.475 OF2005JUDGMENT: The Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2nd respondent in the claim petition) filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Cuddaph,(for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.930 of 2001 dated 09.07.2004, awarding compensation of Rs.7,75,000/-(Rupees seven lakh seventy five thousand only) with 9%p.a. interest as against the claim of the responden...
S.Kumara Swamy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by the Spec
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.62 of 2006 dated:05.11.2013 S.Kumara Swamy..... Appellant State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by the Special Public ProsecutorFor A.C.B cases, High Court of A.P, Hyderabad.... Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sri J.Parthasarathy Counsel for Respondent :Sri R. Ramachandra Reddy, Special Public Prosecutor and Standing Counsel for A.C.B. : ?.Cases referred:1. 2001 (1) ALD Criminal 407 (SC) 2. AIR2003Cri.L.J.4776 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.62 of 2006 JUDGMENT: In this criminal appeal, the appellant assails the judgment dated 03.01.2006 passed by learned Special Judge for SPE and ACB cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad whereunder learned Judge convicted the A.O for the offences under Section 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ".P.C. Act".) and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- for the o...
Mohammed Abdul Jabb Vs. the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporat
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.5234 of 2013 Dated 05-11-2013 Mohammed Abdul Jabbar....Petitioner The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner and another....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.Mohd. Islamuddin Ansari Counsel for the Respondent : Dr.Y.Padmavathi HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.5234 OF2013ORDER: This Petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of the respondents in not mutating the petitioner's name in municipal records by considering the representation submitted by him on 04.01.2013 in respect of House No.8-3-237/7/5, Lakshmi Narasimha Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, 'the Act').Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr.Y.Padmavathi, learned Standing Counsel, who accepted notice on behalf of the respondents. It appeaRs.the petitione...
Kummati @ Pandrapalli Yerrappa and Oth Vs. Sangati Anjinappa (Died) an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.No.58 of 1997 and BATCH0511-2013 Kummati @ Pandrapalli Yerrappa and others.Appellants Sangati Anjinappa (died) and others..Respondents Counsel for appellants : Sr.N. Subba Reddy Counsel for respondents : None appeared. HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : ---- THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL L.P.A.Nos.58 of 1997 and 224 of 1998 COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,,J.These two LPAs arise out of a common judgment, dated 18.01.1996, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in A.S.Nos.516 of 1981 and 3018 of 1982. The two appeal suits, in turn, arose out of the decrees passed in O.S.Nos.22 and 24 of 1979 on the file of the District Judge, Anantapur, through a common judgment, dated 31.12.1980. It needs to be mentioned that except for the minor changes, the parties in both the suits are common. One Pandrapalli Bheemappa of the present Anantapur District of the St...
A.P.industrialdevelopment Corporation L Vs. the Official Liquidatorand ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL O.S.A.Nos.15 of 2013 AND BATCH0411-2013 A.P.Industrial Development Corporation Limited, Hyderabad....appellant. The Official Liquidator and others...Respondents Counsel for appellant: Sr.S.Sriram Reddy Counsel for Respondents :Sr.B.Chandra Sen Reddy & Sr.M.Anil Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL O.S.A.Nos.15 and 16 of 2013 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) These Original Side Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') are filed against a common order, dated 12.06.2012, passed in C.A.Nos.1007 of 2011 and 524 of 2008 in C.P.Nos.26 and 65 of 1987. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as arrayed in O.S.A.No.16 of 2013. M/S.Vidyut Steels Limited, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »