Andhra Pradesh Court November 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Akula Mallesham Vs. the General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Niga
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.32783 of 2010 08-11-2013 Akula Mallesham..... PETITIONER The General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Southern Telecom Region, 6- 1-85/10, Sai Nilayam, Saifabad, Hyderabad and others.....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.Sudha Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Sri B.Narasimha Sarma and Sri R.S.Murthy : ?.Cases referred:1. 2004-III-LLJ11412) (1963) 2 LLJ488AIR1964AP3633) (2005) 9 SCC3314) (2009) 2 SCC815) (SLP (C) No.6091/2010 6) AIR1955SC233THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.P.No.32783 of 2010 ORAL ORDER: The present writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 27.08.2010 in I.A.No.53 of 2009 in I.D.L.C.No.69 of 2006 whereby the 4th respondent, i.e., Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Hyderabad (for short 'the Tribunal'), dismissed the application filed by the petitioner seeking restoration of Industrial Dispute L.C.No.69 of 2006 to the file by setting aside the order dated 23.03....
N.Narsingrao and Anot Vs. the Stateof Andhra Pradesh,represented
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.17882 of 2008 8-11-2013 N.Narsing Rao and another.Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by its Secretary, Revenue (Assignment) Department,Secretariat Hyderabad and another..Respondents Counsel for petitioners :Sr.B.Vijaysen Reddy Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: 1. 1993(2) SCC5462. (2002) 1 SCC227HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.17882 & 19809 of 2008 The Court made the following: Common Order: These Writ Petitions relate to common subject matter. Therefore, they are heard and being disposed of together. The petitioners are the declarants under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short ".the Act".).Though their lands at the time of application of the Act were not included in the Master Plan, subsequently, the Master Plan was extended to other areas including the petitioneRs.lands on and with effect fr...
Mrs. Busi Jyothirmay and OThe Vs. the Govt. of A.P., Rep. by Its Prl. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Writ Petition Nos.29561 of 2013 and batch 07-11-2013 Mrs. Busi Jyothirmay and others... Petitioners The Govt. of A.P., Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, School Edn. Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad; and others... Respondents Counsel for petitioners in:Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy, Senior Counsel W.Ps.29561&29716/2013 Counsel for petitioners in: Sri V.Ravichandran W.P.No.30254 of 2013 Counsel for petitioners in: Sri M.Panduranga Rao W.P.No.30435 of 2013 Counsel for respondents: Addl. Advocate General : : ?.Cases referred:1. (2006) 4 SCC12. (1992) 4 SCC1183. (2004) 4 SCC714HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Writ Petition Nos.29561, 29716, 30254 and 30435 of 2013 Date:07. 11-2013 Common Order: These 4 writ petitions are disposed of through this common order as the cause of action as well as the questions of fact and law involved are similar if not identical in all the cases. For the purpose of brevity and clarity, I shall refer to Writ Petition Nos.29561, 29716, 30254 and 3...
G.Bala Subrahmanyam and Anoth Vs. Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.24758 of 2013 07-11-2013 G.Bala Subrahmanyam and another ...Petitioners Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary, High Court Premises, Hyderabad and others ..Respondents Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.M.Sudheer Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1: Sr.G.M.Mohiuddin Counsel for respondent No.3: Sr.V.R.Machavaram Head note: ?.Cases referred: 1. AIR (39) 1952 SC162. AIR1978SC851THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.24758 of 2013 Dated 07th November, 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings in Roc.No.534/2013, dated 20.08.2013, of respondent No.1. I have heard Sr.M.Sudheer Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.G.M.Mohiuddin, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1, and the learned counsel representing Sr.V.R.Machavaram, learned counsel for respondent No.3. The petitioners are the members of respondent No.3-Bar Associatio...
Sri Sanjaykumar Patengay S/O Satyanaray Vs. Srisatyanarayana Rao Patan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.160 OF200107-11-2013 Sri Sanjay Kumar Patengay S/o Satyanarayan Rao....Appellant Sri Satyanarayana Rao Patangay S/o Sri Ramji Patangay.... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Sunil B Ganu Counsel for the respondents : Sri K Ramakrishna Reddy : : ?.Cases referred:2004. (6) ALT182012 (5) ALT43(1987) 2 SCC547(1993) 2 SCC507(2005) 12 SCC503AIR1951SC280AIR1947PC140AIR2003Karnataka 407 AIR1954SC352HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL No.160 OF2001JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P. Naveen Rao) The unsuccessful Plaintiffs are the appellants herein. Original Suit No.1006 of 1994 is filed by the plaintiffs for partition of suit schedule property into four equal shares, allotment of their respective shares as between the plaintiffs and defendant No.1 and for delivery of possession of the respective share. Plaintiff Nos.1...
Shaik Subh Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,represe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.31193 of 2013 7-11-2013 Shaik Subhani.Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by its Principal Secretary,Minority Welfare Department, Hyderabad ..Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sr.M. Janardhan Rao Counsel for respondent No.1 : Assistant Government Pleader for Minority Welfare Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sr.Shafat Ahmed Khan, Standing Counsel HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : Nil The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2-Wakf Board in orally refusing to let the petitioner to function as its Member without any written order and preventing him from functioning as such contrary to the Judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in W.P.No.23603/2010, dated 23-11-2012, as illegal and arbitrary. While the petitioner was a Member of A.P.State Legislative Assembly (MLA).he was appointed as one of the Members of respondent No.2-Wakf Board. One person by na...
P.C. Aravinda Babu Vs. Country Club, Represented by Srikanth Sharma (A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.730/2011 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, the unsuccessful complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the appellant paid an amount of Rs.5000/- vide cash receipt No.029938 dated 02-12-99 and another amount of R.10,000/- vide cash receipt No.030449 dated 21-12-1999 totalling 15000/- including dependent charges of Rs.2500/- and became a permanent member of the country club. The country club issued a membership card bearing A-914 as token of identity for becoming a member of the club and also a permanent member. The appellant submitted that he was transferred from Hyderabad to Warangal, from there to Sangareddy and from there to Kakinada and lastly to Nalgonda by virtue of his job during which period he could not attend nor utilize the services of country club for some years. The appellant submitted that he was informed that his membership was...
Mettu Malyad Vs. Mettu Siv
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CRP No.2125 of 2013 07-11-2013 Mettu Malyadri ...Petitioner Mettu Sivaiah..Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.M. Venkata Narayana Counsel for the Respondent:Sr.P. Rajasekhar : : ?.Cases Referred: 1. (2012) 4 SCC3072. 2010(6) ALT92DB) 3. 2013(1) ALT532THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No.2125 of 2013 Order: This CRP is directed against the order and decretal order dated 15.03.2012 passed in I.A.No.24 of 2013 in O.S.No.36 of 2012 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kavali. The respondent herein filed the suit for injunction and I.A.No.103 of 2012 for grant of ad interim injunction. The lower Court granted injunction order dated 29.10.2012. Then the respondent herein filed I.A.No.24 of 2013 seeking police aid. By an order dated 15.03.2013 the lower Court allowed the said petition and ordered police aid to the respondent. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this petition. The main contention of Sr.M. Ven...
Jadhav Subhash Rao and Anoth Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.27535 of 2013 06-11-2013 Jadhav Subhash Rao and another....Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Commissioner and others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Smt.D.Padmavathi Counsel for Respondent No.1 : GP for Endowments Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sr.Ch. Satish Kuamar Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Sr.M.V.Pratap Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.27535 of 2013 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by two businessmen challenging the orders passed on 12-09-2013 by the Commissioner of Endowments, according permission to the Executive Officer of Sr.Gnana Saraswathi Devasthanam, Basara Village, Mudhol Mandal, Adilabad District, for extension of licence for maintenance of a hotel / canteen on the upstairs of the shopping complex building of the temple for a period of three yeaRs.commencing from 01-09-2013 in favour of the existing tenant, on an enhanced licence fee of 10...
D. Omprak Vs. 1. M/S. Sree Venkataraya Investment and Fi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-06-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4843 OF2012and batch 06-11-2013 D. Omprakash.Petitioner 1. M/S.Sree Venkataraya Investment & Finance Co.Ltd., Branch at Srinath Complex, 6th Floor, 602, S.D.Road, Secunderabad, Regd. Office at Tanuku,West Godavari District, rep. by B. Satyanarayana,General Manager and Company Secretary;and 3 others..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.K. Anoop Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1 : Sr.Challa Gunarajan Counsel for respondents 2 to 4 : -- HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases cited: 1 AIR1987SC13532 AIR2002SC12013 AIR2009SC13334 (2010) 5 SCC4595 (2010) 6 SCC7866 (2012) 3 SCC5637 AIR1994SC8538 (2012) 5 SCC1579 (2012) 12 SCC693THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G. ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4843 & 5064 OF2012AND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2809 OF2013Common Order: Since parties are common and common questions of fact and law arise for consideration, these three Revision Petitions are heard together and decided by this common order. The revis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »