Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court October 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 03 2013

Mrf Mazdoor Sangh Vs. the Commissioner of Labour and Four Othe

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.18199 of 2013 Dated:03-10-2013 Mr.Mazdoor Sangh ...Petitioner The Commissioner of Labour and four others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.K.S.Murthy Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: G.P.for Labour Counsel for respondent No.4: Sr.M. Radha Krishna Murthy HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) (1975) 2 SCC1482) (1962) 3 SCR7863) AIR1958A.P.78 4) AIR1951All. 674 5) 1952 SCR5976) (2004) 1 SCC7127) AIR1962SC171= (1962) 3 SCR2698) AIR1971SC9669) AIR1989SC212610) AIR1956SC67611) (1978) 2 SCC1 12) AIR1951SC11813) (1969) 2 SCR39214) AIR1981SC87315) (1982) 2 SCC3316) (1979) 3 All ER2117) AIR1978SC59718) 2004 ILLJ274Madras 19) 1972 LIC79920) 1994 ILLJ22521) 1995 Suppl. (4) SCC54422) 2013 LLR823(All.H.C23 AIR2001SC724: (2001) 4 SCC13924) (1931 AC275(Privy Council) 25) AIR1962SC95526) 1957 SCR930: AIR1957SC62827) AIR1959SC100228) 1941 FCR12(AIR1941FC7229) AIR1963SC163830) (1985) 3 SCC54531) (2007) 7 SCC394: (2007) 3 SCC (Cri) 388 32) (2008)...


Oct 03 2013

S. Krishna Murthy, S/O. Late S. Kanchaia Vs. the Indian Overseas Bank, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-03-2013

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26784 of 2000 dated:03-10-2013 S. Krishna Murthy, S/o. late S. Kanchaiah...... PETITIONER The Indian Overseas Bank, represented by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Central Office, Chennai and others......RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Addepalli Surya Narayana Counsel for the respondents: Sri A. Krishnam Raju : ?.Cases referred:1. (1995) 6 SCC7492. (2010) 2 SCC7723. 1970(1) LLJ264. (1975) 4 SCC7315. LAWS(KER)-1988-11-9 6. AIR1999SC4011) 7. AIR1999SC16351) 8. (2008) 4 SCC4069. (1991) 2 SCC28310. AIR1983SC10911. 1995 (1) SLR14412. 2011(4) SCC58913. AIR1963SC77914. (2010) 5 SCC34915. (2012) 2 SCC64116. (1996) 3 SCC36417. 1999(4) SLR8SC18 AIR1977SC96519. (2003) 3 SCC46420. (2005) 6 SCC321The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26784 of 2000 ORDER: This writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ setting aside the order of the 4th...


Oct 01 2013

Gorrela Durga Rao...Party-in-person Vs. the Government of A.P. and Oth

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-2013

THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.14413 of 2008 Dated 01-10-2013 Gorrela Durga Rao...Party-in-person The Government of A.P.and others...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant:Gorrela Durga Rao, (Party - in - Person) Counsel for the Respondents:G.P.for Home C.Srinivasa Baba, Advocate C.Damodar, SC for GHMC : : ?.Cases Referred: 1. AIR2005SC5402. AIR1990SC20603. AIR2007SC7584. AIR1999SC114THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.14413 of 2008 ORDER:- The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) became a necessity and the need of the hour to take up the cause of those sections of the society who cannot knock the doors of the Court due to their poverty and ignorance. Some persons who felt it as a social obligation to take up the cause of suffering people took initiative and brought the grievances of the poor and the suffering people to the notice of the superior Court by way of PIL and the Courts have also entertained those PILs to mitigate the injustice done...


Oct 01 2013

Bynoboina Vali Raju and 3 OThe Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosec ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-2013

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE H0N'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.425 OF2009dated:01.10.2013 Bynoboina Vali Raju and 3 others....Appellants State of A.P. rep. By Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad.....Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Mr.B.Nalin Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : ?. Cases referred:1. (1994) 5 SCC1882.(2006) 9 SCC7313.1997 (2) ALT (CRI) 945 (A.P.) 4. (1983) 1 SCC3795. (2004) 9 SCC1936. (2003) 12 SCC6757.1997 SCC (Cri.) 1222 8. (2002) 10 SCC3249. 1997 SCC (CRI) 1148 10. (2004) 13 SCC14711. (2003) 10 SCC70012. (2001) 9 SCC63213. 2007 (1) ALD (Crl.) 255 14. (2009) 13 SCC3415. (2005) 13 SCC62416.(2006) 13 SCC30317. (1980) 1 SCC53018.(2004) 12 SCC311THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE H0N'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL APPEAL No.425 OF2009JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice K.C.Bhanu) 1. This Criminal Appeal, under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal ...


Oct 01 2013

V. Dasharatham and 5 Others. Vs. the Registrar, Central Administrative ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-2013

HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION Nos.5408 of 2001 and batch WRIT PETITION No.5408 of 2001 dated:01-10-2013 V. Dasharatham and 5 others.....Petitioners The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench and 2 others.....Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.S. Jagadish ^Counsel for respondent Nos.1 Sr.Ponnam Ashok Gound Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3 Sr.B. Narasimha Sarma WRIT PETITION No.6356 of 2001 01.10.2013 The Director, National Institute of Nutrition Jamai-Osmania P.O, Hyderabad....Petitioner S. Jalalappa and others......Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.B. Narasimha Sarmas Counsel for respondent No.1: Sr.T.P.Acharya Counsel for respondent No.2: Sr.Ponnam Ashok Goud Counsel for respondent No.3 to 7: Sr.S. Jagadish Counsel for respondent No.8: Sr.CMR Velu : ?.Cases referred: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION Nos.5408 & 6356...


Oct 01 2013

T.Ratnakar,s/O Jagan Mohan, Aged About Vs. State of Andhrapradesh Repr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-2013

HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.4855 of 2001 dated:01-10-2013 T.Ratnakar, S/o Jagan Mohan, aged about 50 yeaRs.Occ-Asst. Engineer, O/o Deputy Executive Engineer, R&B Sub Division, Parkal, R/o Parka, Warangal District...Petitioner State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Secretary to Government, Transport, Roads & Buildings Departments, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Abhinand Kumar Shavili Counsel for the respondents : Learned Government Pleader for Services-II : ?.Cases referred: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.4855 of 2001 ORDER:- (per Hon'ble Sr.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has questioned the order dated 16.01.2001, passed by the A.P.Administrative Tribunal (in short ".the Tribunal".).in O.A.No.7388 of 1996. The O.A.was filed challenging the G.O.Ms.No....


Oct 01 2013

Darji Krishna Murthy and 2 Oth Vs. 1.M.Shankar Reddy and 3 Oth

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-2013

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3046 of 2012 01-10-2013 Darji Krishna Murthy and 2 others...Petitioners 1.M.Shankar Reddy and 3 others...Respondents COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS: Sri M.S.R. Subrahmanyam COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: Sri Challa Gunaranjan : ?.CITATIONS:2011. (6) ALD3242011 (6) ALT176(2012) 1 SCC656(2008) 10 SCC7082009 (5) ALD4022010 (5) ALD24(SC) 2013 (3) ALD111(SC) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3046 of 2012 ORDER: This civil revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, calls in question the order dated 02.07.2012 passed by the Court of the Judge, Family Court - cum - VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Medak, at Sangareddy, dismissing I.A.No.26 of 2012 in O.S.No.120 of 2011 filed by the third parties/petitioners herein under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.2. The facts and circumstances leading to the filing of the present revision are as under:3. The 1st respondent herein ...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial